Manosphere Jordan Peterson - Internet Daddy Simulator, Post-modern Anti-postmodernist, Canadian Psychology Professor, Depressed, Got Hooked on Benzos

People with emotional problems stemming from brain damage tend to do that.
Everything about this family is over-the-top. His house is smothered in Soviet art and propaganda, which he hates, so he is always reminded of totalitarianism and evil. Then I saw clips of him pretending to know what Marxism is to Zizek for a couple hours.

His daughter is dating some guy with a demon inside him named Igor.
 
Man... when did he get so culture war-y? Always seemed like he atleast pretended to be a little above it [last time I looked literal years ago]... guess the payday was too sweet.

c87347e57f3ddaba9dae5b196b3c26cc31c1581032419e7ae3d24161126c1c20.jpg
 
Good God it was cringe to see this guy crying on the Rogan podcast (over how sublime the existence of music and dancing are).

Now he's posting shots looking like a 110lb Airsofter in a Navy Seal helmet? What a faggot.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Embaby Cumjar
Man... when did he get so culture war-y? Always seemed like he atleast pretended to be a little above it [last time I looked literal years ago]... guess the payday was too sweet.

View attachment 2969658
Peterson these days is a grifter so he goes where the marks are, which for him is on the right. Also he’s become such a target in the culture war, it’s not surprising he’s picked a “side” that is less likely to jump all over him for something. Now he has to start adopting that side’s talking points to stay in that crowd. It is what it is.
 
I've been lurking since roughly 2013, so I've borne witness to an innumerable amount of exceptionally bland, and unfathomably autistic threads here on the farms. But this one is among the strangest respecting its tonality and content. So much so that I have now descended from the abyssal plains of dissociated observation for the purposes of inter-penetrative inquiry.

These following questions may seem as though through them I am intending to run you into a rhetorical trap, or discourage your thoughts, or even tacitly insult you, but rest assured I seek only to know, and not to judge.

  1. What is the difference between merely sounding smart, and actually being smart? (this is one of the most common criticisms I have seen of Peterson here)


  2. Who do you consider an intellectual authority on the subject matter Peterson tends to discourse upon?


  3. Have you read Maps of Meaning, and can you describe what you think it's about?


  4. What makes Peterson a grifter?


  5. Would any of you describe yourself as communist, socialist, or anarchist?
 
I've been lurking since roughly 2013, so I've borne witness to an innumerable amount of exceptionally bland, and unfathomably autistic threads here on the farms. But this one is among the strangest respecting its tonality and content. So much so that I have now descended from the abyssal plains of dissociated observation for the purposes of inter-penetrative inquiry.

These following questions may seem as though through them I am intending to run you into a rhetorical trap, or discourage your thoughts, or even tacitly insult you, but rest assured I seek only to know, and not to judge.

  1. What is the difference between merely sounding smart, and actually being smart? (this is one of the most common criticisms I have seen of Peterson here)


  2. Who do you consider an intellectual authority on the subject matter Peterson tends to discourse upon?


  3. Have you read Maps of Meaning, and can you describe what you think it's about?


  4. What makes Peterson a grifter?


  5. Would any of you describe yourself as communist, socialist, or anarchist?
Go back to r/JordanPeterson and wash your penis nerd.
 
I've been lurking since roughly 2013, so I've borne witness to an innumerable amount of exceptionally bland, and unfathomably autistic threads here on the farms. But this one is among the strangest respecting its tonality and content. So much so that I have now descended from the abyssal plains of dissociated observation for the purposes of inter-penetrative inquiry.

These following questions may seem as though through them I am intending to run you into a rhetorical trap, or discourage your thoughts, or even tacitly insult you, but rest assured I seek only to know, and not to
I'll play and answer your questions if you answer these:

1. What exactly is strange about the tonality and content of this thread?
2. What threads are not strange by comparison?
 
  1. Would any of you describe yourself as communist, socialist, or anarchist?
I'm a Chaos Dragon Monarchist.

I'll play and answer your questions if you answer these:

1. What exactly is strange about the tonality and content of this thread?
2. What threads are not strange by comparison?
He's coming to the aid of his surrogate father just as any son would. Just nod politely.
 
I'll play and answer your questions if you answer these:

1. What exactly is strange about the tonality and content of this thread?
2. What threads are not strange by comparison?
A fair trade.

1.) The strangitude of which this thread is in possession is of the sort I often observe in communities wherein the collective object of attention is not simply misunderstood, but the perceptions thereof are actively distorted. In other words, very little of what's written here, in my opinion, is an accurate description of Peterson. As well, virtually none of the opinions in any of the posts of this thread regarding his scientific work, or his crowning text Maps of Meaning, come anywhere near close to hinting at a coherent comprehension of the subject matter in question.

2.) In almost all other cases, the object of hatred or ridicule is someone who is genuinely eccentric, insane, or literally incapable of self-reflection for one reason or another (80% of the time it's just a case of autism, or child abuse). Peterson's "antics" do not, in my opinion, qualify as anything other than natural given the context of his life, and both the unplanned and clearly unexpected ascent to fame he has experienced.

As far as I can personally ascertain, the person you're all attacking isn't Peterson. It's a sort of projection of an elaborately articulated boogeyman to which Peterson is merely the display board.
 
I've been lurking since roughly 2013, so I've borne witness to an innumerable amount of exceptionally bland, and unfathomably autistic threads here on the farms. But this one is among the strangest respecting its tonality and content. So much so that I have now descended from the abyssal plains of dissociated observation for the purposes of inter-penetrative inquiry.

These following questions may seem as though through them I am intending to run you into a rhetorical trap, or discourage your thoughts, or even tacitly insult you, but rest assured I seek only to know, and not to judge.

  1. What is the difference between merely sounding smart, and actually being smart? (this is one of the most common criticisms I have seen of Peterson here)


  2. Who do you consider an intellectual authority on the subject matter Peterson tends to discourse upon?


  3. Have you read Maps of Meaning, and can you describe what you think it's about?


  4. What makes Peterson a grifter?


  5. Would any of you describe yourself as communist, socialist, or anarchist?
I would like you to answer these questions before I answer any of yours:

1. What do you do with a drunken sailor?

2. Where did Robinson Crusoe go with Friday on Saturday night?

3. Do you eat beans?

4. Would you like to see a new movie with George Wendt?

5. How do you sleep at night?
 
He posted a picture of himself at a shooting range for some reason: https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/1491195256075079680/photo/1

I don't know if he's trying to look badass or what, but he looks like a complete mental case.
Holy hell, there's a Photoshop in there that made me lose my shit.
IMG_20220209_091309.jpg
You'll speak when spoken to.
Uh, you spoke first bucko? Anyway clean your room, wash your penis, and stay away from highly addictive pharmaceuticals. Learn from your idol.
 
I've been lurking since roughly 2013, so I've borne witness to an innumerable amount of exceptionally bland, and unfathomably autistic threads here on the farms. But this one is among the strangest respecting its tonality and content. So much so that I have now descended from the abyssal plains of dissociated observation for the purposes of inter-penetrative inquiry.

These following questions may seem as though through them I am intending to run you into a rhetorical trap, or discourage your thoughts, or even tacitly insult you, but rest assured I seek only to know, and not to judge.
I think you're running into a rather common issue, in that you're taking mockery and criticism as being absolute. Though as I said it before, and I'll say it again, I like a lot of what Peterson has done and I think he's helped a lot of people, but I'll also laugh at him when he's being a retarded and claiming he hasn't slept a single night in over a month or spergs out about Disney movies. Remember this for your next psychology 101 course, or whatever it may be, a person can both be legitimate and a grifter as well as being intelligent in some regards and retarded in another, and I'm here to laugh at the retarded bits.
 
Back