Time for me to be an anthropology sperg. In societies where virginity and the ownership of women is important, especially where arranged or promised marriages affect political power (this include the Yanomami, btw, who do practice arranged marriage), the time when women are considered adults and ready for sexual intercourse is usually menarche (the start of menstruation). HOWEVER, in societies that do no value female virginity as highly (and there have been and are many of these, including, off the top of my head, Aztec, Hawaiians***, Zulu (in fact the whole cluster of cultures who in Southern Africa who practiced Lobolo) the age of marriage tended/tends to be older, around 18 to early 20s. Make of that what you will, but it's not specifically modernity or even sedentary agriculture that necessarily creates the conditions for older/younger marriage.
Adult human lifespans do not actually vary that much historically. We have a much longer tail end to life now (going past 70ish was not common in H/G societies), but the biggest difference between early humans and modern humans is the death rate of children, which has a huge drag down effect on calculations of average lifespan. If you made it past 5, you were pretty good, and if you made it to 20, you were golden, with the same problems of the odd plague or accident being the things to take you out. So the idea that early humans needed to breed very early because lifespans blah blah blah, does not hold up to scrutiny.
*** See my
post below on Hawaiians for some clarification. Hawaiians are specifically an example of a society that really did not value virginity as a virtue. Their mores concerning marriage and sexuality were very, very different from most other human societies, including most other Polynesian societies.
So, just in looping back to what started this debate: when people were talking about the certain subset of gay men who are actively predatory on young gay guys, for more or less the same reasons a certain subset of straight men are, people were all in agreement that that was creepy and wrong. When the topic shifted to straight men doing it, first people denied that it was actually that big a problem, then equivocation and normalization started, even from men who don't personally engage in that behavior. You just watched a more or less carbon copy of how these conversations go in the gay community. Somebody, often a dude who was personally affected by it and didn't end up thinking of it as a positive experience, brings it up, and a whole ton of other dudes explain why he really is overreacting and that dudes just like youth, etc. This is what go Milo cancelled by his conservative audience, lol. So yeah, very interesting parallel to watch play out.
Anyway, back to trannies:
View attachment 2973946View attachment 2973947
Powerful.
View attachment 2973949View attachment 2973950
Somebody tell this dude he can wear makeup. No one cares. It doesn't make him a special gender fairy.
View attachment 2973956
I like that he drew the nipples on the obnoxious troon. Gotta draw those titties correctly! Always! Dude did retweet his comic though:
View attachment 2973957
Which makes me think he can't be all bad.
View attachment 2973958View attachment 2973959View attachment 2973960View attachment 2973961
An assortment of not even trying.
View attachment 2973963
Let's Zoom in on that picture:
View attachment 2973964
Lol, that bald dude in the dress. whoever drew this knew what they were doing.
Don't even know what that purple and green flag is supposed to represent. Add color theory to the list of things troons want to destroy.
