Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

LeChampion1992 said:
I mean to be honest western civilization is built on the idea of a strong nuclear family. It might be radically darwinistic but I think promoting alternative sexualities in the long term is harmful.
Nuclear family's tend to be more successful and stable on average. When you don't have that you tend to have alot of single mothers and young men often raised by single mothers have higher rates of mental illness, substance abuse issues and poverty. Promotion of long term immorality in society has it's consequences.
It's great you can be yourself but it comes with responsibility.
Click to expand...
The stereotypical nuclear family is a creation of the 1940's and 50's and the rise of suburbia. Before then people lived in multi-generation households and communities writ large had a much bigger role in raising children. In many parts of the world it is still like that. In a lot of Buddhist countries your son getting sent to a monastery for a year or something is normal practice, for example. You talk to a lot of hispanic people they will tell you that white family's tendency to shove grandma off into a nursing home is absolutely unthinkable to them, never mind kicking out the kid the moment he turns 18.

No developmental psychologist or teacher or anybody at all really is going to tell you children don't need structure and guidance from adults in their lives. But that has nothing to do with whether dad likes it in the butt or not. I mean Jesus, do you EVER spend more then one disgusted second thinking about what your parents do in the bedroom?

Anyway with single moms you're confusing the relationship status of the parent with the actual issue, which is vastly reduced income for the household and a parent with less time to spend with her child because she's got to work and shit. That has nothing to do with "immorality" and everything to do with modern society putting mothers in an unwinnable situation the moment the man leaves her. Never mind parents, just speaking as myself? I know almost nobody who lives by themselves. You just can't fucking afford that shit in most of America. You NEED multiple earners in a house or you're not paying rent.

Single parents end up working night shifts and crap like that for this reason. This country is unlivable for most working class people. That's not their fault for being "immoral", it's the economy's fault for not caring about people.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Sorrell, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Buck Breaker of BUcha and 15 others
LeChampion1992 said:
I mean to be honest western civilization is built on the idea of a strong nuclear family. It might be radically darwinistic but I think promoting alternative sexualities in the long term is harmful.
Nuclear family's tend to be more successful and stable on average. When you don't have that you tend to have alot of single mothers and young men often raised by single mothers have higher rates of mental illness, substance abuse issues and poverty. Promotion of long term immorality in society has it's consequences.
It's great you can be yourself but it comes with responsibility.
Click to expand...
What does single motherhood have to do with "promoting alternative sexualities"? Homosexuality isn't a choice and is fixed by the prenatal environment. Promoting alternative sexualities isn't creating more gay people and thus fewer families. It's creating this current generation of "queer"/"they/them" zoomers who will grow out of it and who are likely to date members of the opposite sex even if they don't lose the trendy identity.

Techpriest said:
The nuclear family isn’t even the traditional western family, the traditional western family ranges from polygamous households to multi generation ones depending on the time scale you’re looking at for traditional.
Click to expand...
Yup. Always hilarious to see conservatives upholding the nuclear family as being the based and redpilled traditionalist alternative to modern society. The nuclear family was part of the trend away from large families and strong community ties and towards atomization.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Sorrell, Super Kami Guru, snailslime and 3 others
Rich Evans Ayypologist said:
It isn't just that they brought firearms and gear to the capitol, either, to qualify for that sedition charge. See, they actually talked about performing the violent overthrow of the US government, many times, among each other.
Click to expand...

At the moment those are the charges against the Oathkeepers. The feds don't have a good track record on sedition. And its being levelled at 11 of the 2,500 people who were inside the capitol. What I'm wondering is, if the Oathkeepers had this big task force ready, and they supposedly already planned everything, how come they weren't at the same location Ashli Babbitt was when she was shot? Also if they had teams, why are only 11 people being charged?
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: SPhobos, big ups liquid richard, Hollywood Hulk Hogan and 6 others
b0x said:
At the moment those are the charges against the Oathkeepers. The feds don't have a good track record on sedition. And its being levelled at 11 of the 2,500 people who were inside the capitol. What I'm wondering is, if the Oathkeepers had this big task force ready, and they supposedly already planned everything, how come they weren't at the same location Ashli Babbitt was when she was shot? Also if they had teams, why are only 11 people being charged?
Click to expand...
Long as whoever was the jackass waving a Confederate battle flag...ya know, an enemy nation...gets the book thrown at him I won't be too mad at whatever happens.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: big ups liquid richard, snailslime and secret watcher
  • Dumb
  • Optimistic
Reactions: snailslime and secret watcher
b0x said:
At the moment those are the charges against the Oathkeepers. The feds don't have a good track record on sedition. And its being levelled at 11 of the 2,500 people who were inside the capitol. What I'm wondering is, if the Oathkeepers had this big task force ready, and they supposedly already planned everything, how come they weren't at the same location Ashli Babbitt was when she was shot? Also if they had teams, why are only 11 people being charged?
Click to expand...
I'm still waiting you for to answer my question
 
  • DRINK!
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, snailslime, Hollywood Hulk Hogan and 2 others
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: snailslime, Scribbler and secret watcher
b0x said:
At the moment those are the charges against the Oathkeepers.
Click to expand...
b0x said:
Even with the Feds going for a year through everything, they still haven't found anything supporting a coup.
Click to expand...
Huh, weird, I could've swore you said they didn't find anything supporting a coup and then I provided evidence that they were prosecuting the legal charge that would be associated with attempting a coup. Now the Oathkeepers don't count?
b0x said:
And its being levelled at 11 of the 2,500 people who were inside the capitol.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see, this is where you moved the goalpost. So absolutely everyone involved needs to have been part of it for it to be sedition, right.

Most of those people are guilty of being rioters and tresspassing, yes. In addition to that, there were people there who wanted to agitate a coup. Ah, right, sorry, but you can only pick the #ff0000 or the #0000ff, so either everyone is involved or no-one is.

It also doesn't avoid that the fundamental goal of everyone involved in that group was to disrupt the execution of the law in the United States. But you'll note in a lot of the sentencing, they're not pushing for insurrection or seditious conspiracy for most people. Almost like they actually are applying the law correctly, it just happens to really inconvenience a bunch of boomers who thought that breaking federal law wouldn't come back to bite them.
b0x said:
Also if they had teams, why are only 11 people being charged?
Click to expand...
They've got oodles and oodles of dialogue in that court document wherein the guys involved talk very specifically about what they intend to do. You tend to need things like that for a sedition charge.

But that isn't to say that everyone else got off. On the contrary, a look at the link I posted just above shows a lot of people were busted for weapons-related charges among others. If you don't have clear audio of someone saying that they actually want to overthrow the government and kill sitting members of congress, it's actually kindof hard to conjecture your way into a seditious conspiracy charge. But if they brought a gun with them into a federal building they were tresspassing on? You hit them for that.
b0x said:
they supposedly already planned everything, how come they weren't at the same location Ashli Babbitt was when she was shot?
Click to expand...
Good question - why weren't the guys who had come there intending to overthrow the government the ones running face-first into armed security alongside a crowd that could have had any number of concealed handguns that was also screaming about harming members of Congress? Oh yeah, they might have actually had the tactical sense not to run face-first into a nest of guns pointed straight at the one barricaded entrance point.

They quite evidently had more survival instinct than the oh-so-selfless mother, who was thinking very hard about her children when she proceeded to attempt to break into a barricaded chamber of the US government as armed officers with their weapons drawn told her to stop. Great martyr you guys picked, by the way. A perfect mirror of Floyd - Floyd was a piece of shit who got killed for something completely unwarranted, whereas this chick seems to have been your milquetoast soccer mom that absolutely fucked around and found out.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, snailslime, Scribbler and 2 others
Rich Evans Ayypologist said:
They quite evidently had more survival instinct than the oh-so-selfless mother, who was thinking very hard about her children when she proceeded to attempt to break into a barricaded chamber of the US government as armed officers with their weapons drawn told her to stop. Great martyr you guys picked, by the way. A perfect mirror of Floyd - Floyd was a piece of shit who got killed for something completely unwarranted, whereas this chick seems to have been your milquetoast soccer mom that absolutely fucked around and found out.
Click to expand...
The thing about Ashli Babbitt is that she had no kids yet they act like she did. She was a nutjob who believed in a lot of QAnon theories and PizzaGate, and she was nutty before that when she kept crashing her car into her ex's car.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Agent Abe Caprine, Batman VS Tony Danza and 4 others
Rich Evans Ayypologist said:
wait what really? lmao i've only seen the boomer memes, i genuinely thought she had children or something

oi fuck me
Click to expand...
Yep boomers act like she was some saintly normal woman who was passionately fighting for her country yet she was just a loony who had no self preservation
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, big ups liquid richard, snailslime and 1 other person
Imagine being so fucking autistic that your entire political idealogy is that you want the America you see in 1950's commercials; which wasn't even fucking real. Sorry but the american dream is for faggots

and then you're so autistic that you hero worship a total narc elite that only loves you for feeding his ego

and you're so autistic that you straight up storm the capitol of the government and get caught because you were too dumb to hide your face

this is every insurrectionist

the suburbs, their shitty car culture, and the awful boomers living there are destroying America.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Gold!, Buck Breaker of BUcha and 9 others
Frosty_Glass said:
Apparently, trump was trying to destroy some documents. Also, he hid documents at his home in Florida. He’s getting investigated for that as well.
Click to expand...
It's BASED when Trump does it, but when Hillary did it, she deserves to be thrown in jail with Chris Chan.

Just like how it's BASED when the anti-vax retards block roads in Canada, but when BLM and Antifa did it, they were frothing at the mouth in tardrage
 
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Gold!, The Last Stand and 10 others
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
It's BASED when Trump does it, but when Hillary did it, she deserves to be thrown in jail with Chris Chan.

Just like how it's BASED when the anti-vax retards block roads in Canada, but when BLM and Antifa did it, they were frothing at the mouth in tardrage
Click to expand...
People keep lying about the truckers. “They’re giving out food for the homeless UNLIKE BLM!!!” I haven’t seen anything proving that. Hell. Maybe blm did? Who knows. Th truckers are literal doing nothing but going broke. Smart move.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: The Last Stand, snailslime, Doctor of Autism and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back