Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution


"...what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission. So if you're going home to somebody who has not been vaccinated, somebody who can't get vaccinated... I would suggest you wear a mask in a public indoor setting,"

Vaccines don't prevent transmission, so if you're around someone unvaccinated you should wear a mask (which also doesn't work according to the CDC), even though you can get it from a vaccinated person too. The covidians are perpetually incoherent.
 

"...what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission. So if you're going home to somebody who has not been vaccinated, somebody who can't get vaccinated... I would suggest you wear a mask in a public indoor setting,"

Vaccines don't prevent transmission, so if you're around someone unvaccinated you should wear a mask (which also doesn't work according to the CDC), even though you can get it from a vaccinated person too. The covidians are perpetually incoherent.
I know you have crippling autism, so context is tough for you and your diseased brain cannot comprehend things that aren't 0% or 100%, but they do help prevent transmission. They just aren't 100% effective. I have no idea who you Republicans have such a hard time comprehending things can still be effective but not be 100% effective. Is it your lack of education?
 
I know you have crippling autism, so context is tough for you and your diseased brain cannot comprehend things that aren't 0% or 100%, but they do help prevent transmission. They just aren't 100% effective. I have no idea who you Republicans have such a hard time comprehending things can still be effective but not be 100% effective. Is it your lack of education?
"...what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission."
 
"...what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission."
That's because it's not 100% effective. He's saying "We cannot guarantee it will prevent transmission". Again, I know you have debilitating autism and your diseased brain cannot understand context, but you anti-vax simpletons have been posting that for a while and it's been explained many times what he meant.

It's really not a hard concept. If it prevents infection, it's going to prevent spreading it. If it lessens the timespan and severity (viral load), it will prevent transmission. I know you're an uneducated simpleton, but you can get this man.
 
That's because it's not 100% effective. He's saying "We cannot guarantee it will prevent transmission". Again, I know you have debilitating autism and your diseased brain cannot understand context, but you anti-vax simpletons have been posting that for a while and it's been explained many times what he meant.
Why did she only specify to be careful around unvaxxed, Hulk? She said nothing about being around vaxxed, even though there is a risk as you admit. Also it's a she, way to make sexist assumptions.
 
Why did she only specify to be careful around unvaxxed, Hulk? She said nothing about being around vaxxed, even though there is a risk as you admit.
It's really not a hard concept. If it prevents infection, it's going to prevent spreading it. If it lessens the timespan and severity (viral load), it will prevent transmission. I know you're an uneducated simpleton, but you can get this man.

Again, I know you are not only uneducated and a simpleton but you have autism as well, but you should talk to your case worker about this. It's been explained many times in this thread, but reading is too hard for you speds I guess
 
It's really not a hard concept. If it prevents infection, it's going to prevent spreading it. If it lessens the timespan and severity (viral load), it will prevent transmission. I know you're an uneducated simpleton, but you can get this man.

Again, I know you are not only uneducated and a simpleton but you have autism as well, but you should talk to your case worker about this. It's been explained many times in this thread, but reading is too hard for you speds I guess
But it can't prevent transmission. So there is a risk of being around vaccinated people, and she neglected to inform people of that risk. Stop repeating the same stale lines you've been saying for hundreds of pages and answer the question. Why did she not warn people of the risk?
 
But it can't prevent transmission. So there is a risk of being around vaccinated people, and she neglected to inform people of that risk. Stop repeating the same stale lines you've been saying for hundreds of pages and answer the question. Why did she not warn people of the risk?
Except it can prevent transmission. Again, I know you have autism and you spazes can't fathom things that aren't all or nothing, but they do prevent transmission. I have literally explained to you why they do, yet your simpleton brain couldn't handle a very simple concept. They just aren't 100% effective is what she is saying.
 
Except it can prevent transmission. Again, I know you have autism and you spazes can't fathom things that aren't all or nothing, but they do prevent transmission. I have literally explained to you why they do, yet your simpleton brain couldn't handle a very simple concept. They just aren't 100% effective is what she is saying.
Well, the CDC director says opposite and I trust experts, not desk jockeys. You still didn't answer why she neglected to inform people of the risk of being around the vaccinated. This is especially dangerous as we can see from the case data from countries with the highest vaccination rate that the protection from the vaccine is marginal at best. You can see it in the charts that I post that you never have a reply to. It's interesting that you are able to read the CDC director's mind and tell us what she really meant in regards to one half of her statement, but can't say anything about the other.
 
Except it can prevent transmission. Again, I know you have autism and you spazes can't fathom things that aren't all or nothing, but they do prevent transmission. I have literally explained to you why they do, yet your simpleton brain couldn't handle a very simple concept. They just aren't 100% effective is what she is saying.
Tell me what he really means, Hulk.


“Right now, most of our severe cases are vaccinated,” Giris told Channel 13 News. “They had at least three injections. Between seventy and eighty percent of the serious cases are vaccinated. So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just twenty to twenty-five percent of our patients are unvaccinated.”
 
Well, the CDC director says opposite and I trust experts, not desk jockeys. You still didn't answer why she neglected to inform people of the risk of being around the vaccinated. This is especially dangerous as we can see from the case data from countries with the highest vaccination rate that the protection from the vaccine is marginal at best. You can see it in the charts that I post that you never have a reply to. It's interesting that you are able to read the CDC director's mind and tell us what she really meant in regards to one half of her statement, but can't say anything about the other.
That's because, again, you didn't watch the whole thing and are taking what is posted on 4chan over what medical experts are saying. She literally just says that it's not 100% effective. Again, I know you have autism and you spergs suck at context, but it's important here.

What about the charts? You are inept at math so you don't understand statistics. I will explain it, although because you're a simpleton you won't be able to comprehend it and I am likely just wasting my time.

The vaccines are not 100% effective. Also, the vast majority of the population is vaccinated. Thus, the denominator is higher, which means that yes, there will be a lot of vaccinated people that get it. It's simple math. a large number times 30% or whatever is going to be a nonzero number.

Yeah, it's like 40% effective, or less. Nowhere in Science™ does it say that a vaccine has to actually work. I can't stand these alt-right Science™ denying heathen CHUDs.
I know you have autism but it's still cute how you spazes think 40% (although most estimates are higher than that) is 0%. And yeah, it does work. It prevents infection and makes the cases much less severe. But yes, an uneducated simpleton on Kiwi Farms knows more about this than 99% of medical doctors and scientists

Tell me what he really means, Hulk.


“Right now, most of our severe cases are vaccinated,” Giris told Channel 13 News. “They had at least three injections. Between seventy and eighty percent of the serious cases are vaccinated. So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just twenty to twenty-five percent of our patients are unvaccinated.”
That site isn't a real news site, you retard. It's a conspiracy site. You might as well link Alex Jones. Again, I know you autistic folks are more easily conned and you fit right in with the retards on this site, but have some dignity man.
 
If it prevents infection there wouldn't be cases, retard.

"Sure, he died of COVID even though was fully vaxxed and boosted. But it would've been worse if he wasn't." :story:
Again, I know you have autism so you can't comprehend things that aren't 0% or 100%, but something not being 100% effective can still be effective.

There's not too many people dying of covid that are vaccinated. Your fellow Republicans are the ones typically dying of it because they believe boomer Facebook memes over medical doctors and scientists. BTW, why do you have the politics of a 70 year old? You're in your 20s, right?
 
If it prevents infection there wouldn't be cases, retard.

"Sure, he died of COVID even though was fully vaxxed and boosted. But it would've been worse if he wasn't." :story:
So I guess seat belts don't prevent injuries because some people wear them and get killed anyway. Are you high on chromosomes?
 
Anyone who dies of covid absolutely should be dead anyways, so I really hope the people saying the vaccine doesn't work are right.

Nature's straight throwing us a bone here, we should be grateful for the opportunity to organically bump off the obese and genetically inadequate. Sure, it costs a lot making a token effort to save them in the short term, but just think of the long term savings. Plus we'll be glad all the weeds and kindling got burned away when a real disease arises; you'd think we'd learn our lesson from when we tried to completely prevent forest fires:

Controlled burns are lit for a number of reasons. By ridding a forest of dead leaves, tree limbs, and other debris, a prescribed burn can help prevent a destructive wildfire. Controlled burns can also reduce insect populations and destroy invasive plants. In addition, fire can be rejuvenating. It returns nutrients to the soil in the ashes of vegetation that could otherwise take years to decompose. And after a fire, the additional sunlight and open space in a forest can help young trees and other plants start to grow.

Controlled burns have become more important as fire suppression efforts have grown over the last century. Historically, smaller fires occurred in forests at regular intervals. When these fires are suppressed, flammable materials accumulate, insect infestations increase, forests become more crowded with trees and underbrush, and invasive plant species move in. Controlled burns seek to accomplish the benefits that regular fires historically provided to an environment while also preventing the fires from burning out of control and threatening life and property.
 

"...what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission. So if you're going home to somebody who has not been vaccinated, somebody who can't get vaccinated... I would suggest you wear a mask in a public indoor setting,"

Vaccines don't prevent transmission, so if you're around someone unvaccinated you should wear a mask (which also doesn't work according to the CDC), even though you can get it from a vaccinated person too. The covidians are perpetually incoherent.
Except vaccines can slow the transmission of Omicron, at least the mRNA ones can; I only posted this six pages ago:
So that means your vaccinated, I hope?

>inb4 vaccines don't prevent transmission.

They do, but it appears only the mRNA ones do any meaningful reduction in transmission:
 
Anyone who dies of covid absolutely should be dead anyways, so I really hope the people saying the vaccine doesn't work are right.

Nature's straight throwing us a bone here, we should be grateful for the opportunity to organically bump off the obese and genetically inadequate. Sure, it costs a lot making a token effort to save them in the short term, but just think of the long term savings. Plus we'll be glad all the weeds and kindling got burned away when a real disease arises; you'd think we'd learn our lesson from when we tried to completely prevent forest fires:

1644858847895.png
 
So I guess seat belts don't prevent injuries because some people wear them and get killed anyway. Are you high on chromosomes?
There's actual statistical evidence that seatbelts do increase your chances of surviving a car accident and reducing chances of severe injury. Your "vaccine" is a broken seatbelt that needs to be recalled.
 
Back