So we all know that Near is still alive, no matter what the Twittard are saying. And it's most likely, in the near future, he will be forced to admit the masquerade. My question is, how do you think it would happen?
I don't think he'll have to admit it. I think he's just changed usernames again and is still doing what he was doing before, and while we might get to a point where we're 99% sure some sped is secretly Near because the specific autisms match, he can probably stay quiet enough to give plausible deniability. It would take something really solid, or a proper mistake on his part, to be able to incontrovertibly not only say he's not dead, but to be able to point to a person online and say that this is him, which is what it would take.
I know I'm certain that he's not dead - or at least, if he has died it wasn't anything like the story Hector and the other guy concocted. I'm also certain that those few people who still give a shit rather than performatively propping up his body to attack the Farms - and now RetroArch, apparently - don't care that we have all sorts of evidence Hector is lying and none of that shit is true. After all, they all believe KiwiFarms is an evil place designed to harass people to suicide with information that's all lies, a combo that doesn't make sense but is a common cognitive dissonance among troons and SJWs.
So Hector will incompetently bullshit about why the March death list doesn't include Near, or even just ignore and block anyone who brings it up, and the usual sycophants won't care because they have their truth and it's more important than facts. Near will likely stay off the radar for some time, doing his usual autistic thing, and again through our own autism the Farms might become certain that some new username is Near but no one will care, because none of his supposed friends actually give a shit about him being alive except maybe the one or two who already know.
It's also another common trend in troons and SJWs that when they find out that something bad they thought happened didn't actually occur, they get angrier, because the bad thing happening confirmed their personal narrative. Like with hate crime hoaxes, they're never relieved that the world isn't as bad as they thought, and often they barely pay lip service to something like 'this makes it harder for real victims to come forward' - they often will convince themselves that the hoaxer was coerced into the admission, or that the authorities are engaged in a large-scale coverup, because that's more plausible than the idea that they're paranoid and have an unrealistic view of the world. So if Near ever did have to come out and publicly say he faked his death, I'd expect very little in the way of self-reflection and a great deal of distracting, diverting, and speculation about how he must have been getting blackmailed or so in fear for his life that he had to do it, so ignore all the lies told and the false accusations.
Tl;dr: basically what
@Chatspiracy Theorist said, but with even less self-reflection by the people involved, because they're already in a world where they can lie about the truth and get away with it, including to themselves.
www.twitlonger.com
www.instagram.com
