Disney is developing planned communities for fans who never want to leave its clutches


Disney is developing planned communities for fans who never want to leave its clutches​

49
Live, breathe (and die?) Disney
By James Vincent Feb 16, 2022, 11:20am EST
If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Share this story​

View attachment 37cabed38a7d45a84a409a8323b8503c83d118c0.webp
concept art for Disney’s first planned “Storyliving” community: Cotino, California. Image: Disney
Disney has launched a new business for fans who can’t bear to leave the pristine, family-friendly world the corporation has nurtured through its theme parks and media ventures.
“Storyliving by Disney” will operate as part of the company’s theme parks division, developing a series of master-planned communities for residential living, designed by Disney’s creative staff and offering the same pampered tranquility found in its resorts.
DISNEY’S NEW PLANNED COMMUNITIES WILL BE AS PAMPERED AND PRISTINE AS ITS RESORTS
“Picture an energetic community with the warmth and charm of a small town and the beauty of a resort,” said Disney Parks, Experiences and Products exec Helen Pak in a promotional video.
Only one location has been announced so far: a community of 1,900 housing units named Cotino that will be built in the city of Rancho Mirage in California’s Coachella Valley (a location where Walt Disney himself once lived).
Concept art for Cotino shows villas, condos, and housing complexes clustered around a 24-acre “grand oasis,” which Disney says will offer “clear turquoise waters” powered by the Crystal Lagoons technology deployed at its resorts. Amenities will include “shopping, dining, and entertainment,” as well as a beachfront hotel and clubhouse hosting “Disney programming, entertainment and activities throughout the year.”
Members of the public will be able to visit Cotino by purchasing day passes, while a section of the development will be set aside for residents aged 55 and up. Prices for accommodation and financing options have not been announced, and Disney has also yet to share when construction will begin or when residents might be able to move in.

As reported by USA Today, although Disney is branding and marketing these communities, it will not own, build, or sell the homes. Instead, it will be partnering with third-party developers to carry out this work.
Cotino, for example, is being built by DMB Development, a company that’s constructed a number of luxury communities in the US and abroad. These include Silverleaf, Arizona (“a private haven of rare grace and refinement”) and Kukuiʻula in Hawaii (“a place for discerning families who seek to balance luxury with the laid-back lifestyle and awe-inspiring beauty of our island home”).
It’s also not the first time Disney has explored residential developments like this. In 1996, it opened the gates of Celebration, Florida, a master-planned community near Walt Disney World Resort, and in 2011 opened its luxury Golden Oak resort in the same state, where prices for homes originally started at $1.6 million. And famously, Walt Disney himself wanted to develop a utopian “city of the future” named Epcot (standing for “Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow”).
GRID VIEW
41d47bc62f501ed1be5f6089dc850c133395e792.jpg

Not all of these communities have been successes, though. The hugely ambitious original plans for Epcot were never fulfilled (though the concept’s legacy lives on in various ways in Disney’s resorts and parks), while Celebration, Florida, suffers all sorts of mundane and un-magical problems like leaks and mold (Disney itself is not responsible for maintenance).
With this latest venture, Disney apparently wants to revisit its residential dreams while focusing on the vague and eternally sunny concept of “storytelling.” As the company’s chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Josh D’Amaro, puts it in a blog post, its new communities are all about “expanding storytelling to storyliving” (hence the name.)
What exactly that means in practice isn’t clear. Is “storytelling” just the company’s way of saying “you’ll have a really nice life if you pay us a lot of money,” or is it planning something nearer to the brand of lightweight immersive theater deployed in its parks and themed hotels? A report from USA Today hints at something more than just immaculate service:
“Every single element of these communities will be steeped in a story,” D’Amaro notes. The residents, he says, will be active participants in the stories.
Maybe, instead of being drawn into skits with hosts dressed up as Goofy or Elsa, Disney’s “Storyliving” residents will be able to take part in more grounded adventures, as staff who never break character help them navigate mid-life crises and suburban ennui. Why pay for therapy if you can turn your life into theater? A happy ending can be written for you.
 
Didn't they try this with Celebration, Florida? I'm pretty sure that ended up just being a moneysink for them, and Disney ended up divesting themselves of the town. What are they going to do different this time?
Not even Walt Disney himself could get this shit to work (even though he died before EPCOT had serious money put into it). It isn't going to work this time. Even the biggest Disney autists will end up tired of constant Disney if they are living that every fucking day of their life.
 
There's a few differences here from golden oaks and celebration so I'm going to break these down vs. quoting everyone spamming those as the same concept

Golden Oaks
- obscene Disney centered mansions on Disney property in Florida

- Carries an HOA fee of at least 5k a year.


Celebration
- Meant to be small town middle America in the 50s. Think pie eating contests.

- architecture is weird and it's a pretty expensive place to live because even post Disney it has a "charm" to the area


As far as the new development goes - if this was Elon Musk a lot of people would love to live in his "insert inventor name type iconic here" city. But Disney is no longer an individual but a brand . No one would want to live or vacation in "Time Warner" compound. And while Disney has a lot of crazy fans they are rapidly losing them by the minute
 
There's a few differences here from golden oaks and celebration so I'm going to break these down vs. quoting everyone spamming those as the same concept

Golden Oaks
- obscene Disney centered mansions on Disney property in Florida

- Carries an HOA fee of at least 5k a year.


Celebration
- Meant to be small town middle America in the 50s. Think pie eating contests.

- architecture is weird and it's a pretty expensive place to live because even post Disney it has a "charm" to the area


As far as the new development goes - if this was Elon Musk a lot of people would love to live in his "insert inventor name type iconic here" city. But Disney is no longer an individual but a brand . No one would want to live or vacation in "Time Warner" compound. And while Disney has a lot of crazy fans they are rapidly losing them by the minute
I have to disagree on your point about Celebration. I don't think anybody besides Disney fans were excited about it, especially after the disgustingly inflated housing prices. Nobody would have given a shit about Celebration if it didn't have that Disney brand attached to it.
There are definitely comparisons to be drawn, and I think this will be an even bigger disaster. There's no hope of relatively normal people ending up in Unpaidshilltown, USA, so there's no hope of the community coming together like in Celebration. Any attempt to band together will be quashed when the community restoration committee, now abandoned by Disney, finds out that Sandra over on Eisner street likes Cinderella more than Pocahontas or some shit.
 
As far as the new development goes - if this was Elon Musk a lot of people would love to live in his "insert inventor name type iconic here" city. But Disney is no longer an individual but a brand . No one would want to live or vacation in "Time Warner" compound. And while Disney has a lot of crazy fans they are rapidly losing them by the minute
Disney's always been a brand, but, the fatal mistake was deciding to switch from a "cartoons, movies and theme parks" brand to a "lifestyle" brand. The same mistake that has doomed countless other companies: trying to make the brand cover things it is poorly or not associated with, for no other reason than to fulfill an impossible and dystopic mandate from sheltered executives who are beholden to the "infinite growth" model and think that there's no market they can't tap. If they just use the right slick marketing buzzwords..... the people will come running and throw their money at us for it!

(Such people DO exist, but as I pointed out earlier, unless they resort to grand larceny, they're never going to be able to afford ALL the Disney stuff, meaning you'll be taking an absolute wash on a lot of it)

And, even as they ruin the market and consumer appetite through endless commercialization and woke virtue-signaling products , the only thing they'll learn is that maybe, maybe, theres's a market for Disney-brand cyanide capsules for disaffected worker drones - Visit the only Magic Kingdom that matters! Today!
 
Last edited:
Back