Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
1645136729852.png
 
Speaking of which, its weird because a lot of the slavery happened in Asia (like in Western Asia through the Ottoman Empire/Arab world), yet their history seems to get a pass by those types of people. Or I've seen them act all surprised that Pee-oh-see are capable of being just as cruel as any other human.
Ayyrabs learned from the jews and the gays that they could literally pay to rewrite history

Theres some interview of an arab professor saying they made up islamophobia after the gays made up homophobia and managed to silence all critics of their "lifestyle"
 
Oh man. The attempt at anime twintails on an otherwise balding and very methy looking individual sent me into a coughing fit.
It's just so fucking funny. Men with male pattern baldness used to cope with the classic combover (which didn't work either) and now they troon out instead. I'll never understand why men think they're fooling anyone with this shit.
 
Ayyrabs learned from the jews and the gays that they could literally pay to rewrite history

Theres some interview of an arab professor saying they made up islamophobia after the gays made up homophobia and managed to silence all critics of their "lifestyle"
people like you are part of the reason why trannies excist by the way
 
View attachment 2991989
Get me out of clown world please
I know this is pedantic bullshit, but fuck these people pretending they meant something else then the plain meaning inferred. "Oh I didn't mean that you aren't allowed to refuse to have sex with someone with a penis, I just meant that you have to abstractly accept the idea of trans people to be mature enough to date". Fuck stupid doublespeak. At least stick by what you mean.
 
It's just so fucking funny. Men with male pattern baldness used to cope with the classic combover (which didn't work either) and now they troon out instead. I'll never understand why men think they're fooling anyone with this shit.
That look on his face is priceless. He looks like he has the classic "blank" retard look. All he needs is a rubber sped helmet.
 
In Christian trinitarian theology Christ is God. There is one God in three parts, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. So any reference to God in the Old Testament could refer to one or any parts of God, from a Christian point of view. What you’re saying would make sense from an Islamic mindset however.

I hate how they retconned God in the Bible sequel.
 
@thegooddoctor Actually, you should look more closely at the evidence for these claims. Mainstream neurology doesn't maintain strong sex based differences in human brains, and when they do exist, they're broad generalities, no more profound than height distributions. The best (and I genuinely mean the best) evidence they've got only shows gay men's brains have some traits more like the average female brain. Transwomen do not score any more female in these metrics than other gay men do.

The scientific evidence for the pop culture concept of transgenderism is basically non-existent. It's like homeopathy tier science.

Edit: and there's no genetic differences in trans people
I was going to add: there are some structural differences, like white and gray matter and neuron numbers, as well as shape, between men and women, but what troons argue for in their trans brain hypothesis is innate gender. The brain is the only sexed organ for them; nothing else has any biological basis.

So while things like the SRY gene and other genes influence brain differences between the sexes, that is determined 7-8 weeks in utero. "Ladybrains" don't exist because there isn't a 'pink' or 'blue' brain. There are differences in function but the differences between the sexes is not as great as, say, between the races.

Having read the studies the TRAs keep parroting year after year, all the researchers found was some differences in gray and white matter. Atypical brains if you will. As all troons are chromosomally normal and not suffering from a DSD, their brains correspond to their birth sex.
There's a smile on her face but like any white shitlib she's dead inside.
View attachment 2990696

Why is this fat fuck Aydn not swimming with her fellow men? What about muh dysphoria?

How is this fat fuck winning races, as she is supposedly not on T?
I love how putting a TIF next to a TIM shows sexual dimorphism in action. Despite the 'lack of testosterone' Izak still has a woman's body: she has female fat deposits, female arms, female frame, female hips. Then you look at Thomas and you see how fucking huge he is.
I don't see that much in the gay male pornosphere. If there are trans people of either sex, they're usually just non-sexual cameos and not stars.
Gay men are much more gatekeeping of their spaces and identity than women are. When men say no, people listen. There's a reason lesbians get bullied relentlessly to accept 'girldick' while gay men tell Aidens that they're women with vaginas and they're not fooling anyone.
I should've fucking known.
I garantee you that the 7 year old girls having their metatarsals shattered hated it more than any rightfully disgusted white people observers. Troon apologists and liberal feminists really tip their hand when they identify with the perpetrators in these situations.
Waiting for the Twitter brain-trust to say that castrati was bad, because Italian opera is white, and therefore oppressive and colonialist. But the Ottomans castrating their slave-soldiers was good, cause the Ottomans were BIPOC.

Madame Swimcheat Teet-yeet has the over-developed traps that you see on FTMs on testosterone.
IIRC, men who abuse steroids end up getting bitch-tits because the production of estrogen increases due to all that excess testosterone. Could be wrong, though.
View attachment 2991989
Get me out of clown world please
This is what Superstraight highlighted in all the troon malding: these people keep insisting they are not forcing anyone to date trans people, but you are still bigoted if you don't date them.

No matter how often we say women don't have dicks, they are still steamrolling it ahead because eventually normie culture will break and soon everyone will agree that 'some women' have them.
 
A Canadian sport authority has authored a hit piece against Emma Hilton, calling her paper with Tommy Lunden (sic) pseudoscientific, transphobic nonsense.

Here is the PDF.

A letter supporting it.
TERF discusses it here.

In the appendix, Emma Hilton is written off as a crock of shit, and the authors argue that since she does not have a degree in sports science, she is not qualified to comment on transwomen in women's sports. Hilton notes how they did not go after Joanna Harper for doing the same thing.

This was the conclusion they reached.

FLuvLJzXwAA_99k.png


Here's another mealy-mouthed piece.

FL1rdYTWQAA_3qM.png


"We don't accept objective truth because it's transphobic."

In the letter supporting this report, Canadian sports teams will uphold their policies of allowing males in women's sports. Because there is 'no evidence' suggesting males have an advantage over women, women can continue to lose and be told to 'do better' against transwomen who 'just want to compete.'

Apparently, the authors and scientists behind this hit piece aren't named.

Edit: here's one author, a grad student, telling Hilton she used the scientific method and Hilton didn't.

grad student snitch.PNG
 
Last edited:
IIRC, men who abuse steroids end up getting bitch-tits because the production of estrogen increases due to all that excess testosterone. Could be wrong, though.
That's the explanation that I've always heard; that the male body overcompensates in the face of artificially high testosterone by producing extra estrogen, which leads to bitch tits.

It might be a folk explanation without much actual testing into it, but there's a reason for that: fucking with your body's hormones artificially is a bad idea and the scientific community has not felt the need to investigate the minutiae of why this is the case. It's common sense, don't do it.

It's like the joke "hey doc, my arm hurts when I bend it this way" "well damn, stop bending it that way!"

Maybe the science behind juicing safely might be useful to some people, but I guess not enough of those people are out there to sink a bunch of money into doing the studies.

Come to think of it, the concept that some ideas are so obvious on their face that no one bothers investigating is a theme when dealing with trannies. They like to find long held, common sense assumptions and then challenge them on the basis that there's no evidence behind them. I mean, challenging assumptions is good and it's good that science pursues such endeavors, but it's really fucking dumb to argue that men can become women just because we haven't run studies to prove otherwise.

Which comes to the next issue...
A Canadian sport authority has authored a hit piece against Emma Hilton, calling her paper with Tommy Lunden (sic) pseudoscientific, transphobic nonsense.

Here is the PDF.

A letter supporting it.
TERF discusses it here.

In the appendix, Emma Hilton is written off as a crock of shit, and the authors argue that since she does not have a degree in sports science, she is not qualified to comment on transwomen in women's sports. Hilton notes how they did not go after Joanna Harper for doing the same thing.

This was the conclusion they reached.

View attachment 2992214

Here's another mealy-mouthed piece.

View attachment 2992218

"We don't accept objective truth because it's transphobic."

In the letter supporting this report, Canadian sports teams will uphold their policies of allowing males in women's sports. Because there is 'no evidence' suggesting males have an advantage over women, women can continue to lose and be told to 'do better' against transwomen who 'just want to compete.'

Apparently, the authors and scientists behind this hit piece aren't named.

Edit: here's one author, a grad student, telling Hilton she used the scientific method and Hilton didn't.

View attachment 2992250
See, over and over, this paper just argues "there's no evidence that trannies are stronger than women!" Well no shit there isn't evidence for that. No one's bothered to look for such evidence because it's a straightforward conclusion. We already know men are stronger, on average, than women. We don't need evidence to separately conclude that men with dumb beliefs are also stronger than women. (albeit men who are alleged to have fucked their bodies up with hormones)

No, the burden of proof is on the troons to establish that fucking their bodies up sufficiently reduces them to women's levels. (Something I'd argue is borderline impossible to quantify, considering hormones aren't shaving their bones down or reducing their lung capacity.)

This is a dumb argument and no amount of shouting "NO EVIDENCE! NO EVIDENCE!" and "we fucking love science!" is going to persuade people. The neat thing about sports is that it's something that the common man is invested in and that they can have an opinion on based on their own two eyes. We're not talking about boring fractions of percents about crime in bathrooms (which is still a serious issue, but less immediately visible, I think)*.

We're talking parents spending weekends driving their daughters to track and field, or swimming or field hockey and then having to watch some hulking teenaged asshole steal their place on the podium.

Lol try telling those parents "well acktually there's no evidence that zhe has any advantage over your daugher", as the little shit is towering over said daughter.

* Though the Loudoun County incident did surprise me. Leave it to trannies to fuck up even the areas they have a relative advantage in, bathroom crime stats.
 
Back