Exulansic / TT Exulansic / Sierra Weir / Sierra Dullea Weir - TERF detransitioner/desister who has a crusade against the "I Am Jazz" phenomenon and also a massive collection of Party City wigs.

[LikeRivenIRL]

CAIS is only an XY condition, retard. Undermasculinized males are not women. Males who do not respond to the androgens their own bodies produce are not women. They are not entitled to speak for women nor impose themselves onto women's spaces.

And how the fuck would you know if a CAIS person was male? You gonna stick your hand up her fanny and see if you can catch a uterus lmao? I've seen literal beasts that are real women. You gonna check them out too?

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

And how the fuck would you know if a CAIS person was male? You gonna stick your hand up her fanny and see if you can catch a uterus lmao? I've seen literal beasts that are real women. You gonna check them out too?

The question of what they are is distinct from the question of what to do about them.

 

[FarmVille]

The question of what they are is distinct from the question of what to do about them.

"What they are" = very kind words, you do not sound unhinged

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

"What they are" = very kind words, you do not sound unhinged

yes, what, as in male or female.

CAIS males never have a uterus and only sometimes develop vaginas, which end in a blind pocket.

That is a question of what.
It is distinct from the question of their place in society.

 

[Gar For Archer]

your scenario is hypothetical. I agree it shouldn’t be best practice, but where the fuck is it actually happening and why the fuck does that justify removing TT’s platform just because she correctly observe they’re male? just because she’s sticking by scientific facts of determination and not humouring manipulative appeals to emotion regarding all the hypothetical super vulnerable 15 yos suddenly getting kicked out of bathrooms? that ain’t actually happening! girls getting sexually assaulted in bathrooms by LARPing males… IS.

She's the one that started the ridiculous hypothetical of CAIS individuals using their natural-born womanlike bodies to sneak into female bathrooms and assault young girls and impregnating them with their non-existent penises. Is there an epidemic of this that I haven't been made aware of? She's using that same "manipulative appeals to emotion" by invoking these hypothetical little girls in danger from assault from the 0.005% of men who suffer from a condition that makes them 100% physically indistinguishable from women until you cut them open.

Like, if she wants to die on the hill of this completely hypothetical edge case to her main thesis of "no trannies in women's bathrooms", she's free to do so. The rest of us are also free to opine that it's detrimental to her overall message because it reminds normal people what the "RF" in "TERF" stands for.

 

[FarmVille]

yes, what, as in male or female.

CAIS males never have a uterus and only sometimes develop vaginas, which end in a blind pocket.

That is a question of what.
It is distinct from the question of their place in society.

They have normal external genitalia and their place in society is the same as anyone else assigned female at birth and living in a phenotypical female body.

If anything this argument moves into the dehumanizing misogynist concept of women being equated with procreation and body parts.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

They have normal external genitalia and their place in society is the same as anyone else assigned female at birth and living in a phenotypical female body.

If anything this argument moves into the dehumanizing misogynist concept of women being equated with procreation and body parts.

You only say that to discredit my position by labeling it bigoted or whatever. My position is fine. They're malformed males, like the elephant man. That doesn't mean they can talk about women, because they're just males whose deformity makes them look like women.

no uterus and blind pocket vagina = male freak of nature

 

[Prince Vegeta]

I'm glad everyone agrees that women should be purity tested before going into a bathroom down to a genetic level. Maybe science can work towards portable instant result testing kits so the guards in front of all bathrooms can give these out before allowing access to the space. [Edit: crap spelling, still happy were in agreement. Fuck genetic mutants].

 

[FarmVille]

You only say that to discredit my position by labeling it bigoted or whatever. My position is fine. They're malformed males, like the elephant man. That doesn't mean they can talk about women, because they're just males whose deformity makes them look like women.

no uterus and blind pocket vagina = male freak of nature

How are you even going to know if they're talking about women? How do you know any woman that you are listening to is truly a woman unless you shove your hand up their vagina looking for a blind pocket?

How do you know TT is a woman?

 

[Gar For Archer]

no uterus and blind pocket vagina = male freak of nature

So, like, have we gone back to "uterus = woman"? Is a natal woman born without a uterus and a blind pocket vagina not a woman, but a female freak of nature?

 

[Prince Vegeta]

So, like, have we gone back to "uterus = woman"? Is a natal woman born without a uterus and a blind pocket vagina not a woman, but a female freak of nature?

That's what I'm saying. Instant portable genetic test kits. Can't be too careful. Wouldn't want to sit in a cubicle knowing that in the cubicle next to you could be someone who thinks they are a woman, looks like a woman, society believes is a woman, was raised as a woman..... but might not be.

Also it would cut the line for bathrooms from 30 minutes to like 5 minutes.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

How are you even going to know if they're talking about women? How do you know any woman that you are listening to is truly a woman unless you shove your hand up their vagina looking for a blind pocket?

The question of what they are is distinct from how we can tell them apart in social situations. You conflate the two and call people names for not answering your trick questions correctly.

How do you know TT is a woman?

You think CAIS males are women, so

So, like, have we gone back to "uterus = woman"?

We who? Who is the we here. This isn't some new frontier of science. You just don't know what you're talking about.

Is a natal woman born without a uterus and a blind pocket vagina not a woman, but a female freak of nature?

Female DSDs are distinct from male DSDs. So yes, there are male and female freaks of nature. And yes, the differences matter.

 

[Gar For Archer]

Female DSDs are distinct from male DSDs. So yes, there are male and female freaks of nature. And yes, the differences matter.

Kay, just wanted to clarify that you believe that women born without a uterus are not women. That's all I need to hear to know that there's no point further engaging in this discussion.

 

[FarmVille]

The question of what they are is distinct from how we can tell them apart in social situations. You conflate the two and call people names for not answering your trick questions correctly.

LOL "how can you tell when someone is female if you need to know their chromosomes" is not a trick question.

You compared it to the elephant man and IDK if you have ever seen a pic of the elephant man but you didn't need to shove your hand into any orifices to know he was a medical anomaly.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Kay, just wanted to clarify that you believe that women born without a uterus are not women. That's all I need to hear to know that there's no point further engaging in this discussion.

No, I said that XY males with testes who cannot respond to their own androgens, and who only sometimes develop a vagina, which can only end in a blind pocket, and who cannot have uteruses, aka CAIS males, are not women. They are males who malformed on their developmental pathway.

Not that you care about that distinction. The past, present and future of your replies was always bad faith invective.

 

[Marvin]

yes, what, as in male or female.

CAIS males never have a uterus and only sometimes develop vaginas, which end in a blind pocket.

That is a question of what.
It is distinct from the question of their place in society.

This perspective is deeply cruel to people you would consider female by your own definition, solely on a really arbitrary definition. A definition that really can only be discovered in mid adolescence.

 

[Gar For Archer]

No, I said that XY males with testes who cannot respond to their own androgens, and who only sometimes develop a vagina, which can only end in a blind pocket, and who cannot have uteruses, aka CAIS males, are not women. They are males who malformed on their developmental pathway.

Question:
"Is a natal woman born without a uterus and a blind pocket vagina not a woman, but a female freak of nature?"

Answer:
"Female DSDs are distinct from male DSDs. So yes, there are male and female freaks of nature. And yes, the differences matter."

Ergo:
"A natal woman born without a uterus and a blind pocket vagina is not a woman, but a female freak of nature."

Someone has a reading comprehension problem, and it ain't me.

Not that you care about that distinction. The past, present and future of your replies was always bad faith invective.

...do you think I'm on Kiwifarms to engage radfems in serious discussion on what womanhood means to them?

 

[The Emperor Skeksis]

Exulansic's fans show that they are normal and rational people and not Mad At (men on) The Internet at all: the video. They believe Boyce personally got Exulansic banned from Youtube somehow, so now they're dislike bombing his channel, apparently.

The video is just Boyce reading his comment section and it is comedy gold.
Highlights (so far):
'The world needs Exulansic'
'She was going to save people from countless surgeries. Now these people will have surgeries, all because of Ben. How can people not be angry about what he took away from the world?'
'He now has blood on his hands from blocking people from her knowledge'.
On how Boyce got Ex banned: 'He complained to Youtube, is my guess. I don't know exactly how it's done. From what I understand, it was collaboration with an undesirable.'

Archive:

Comments on THIS video: It's mEEEEEEEEEEEEEEn!

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

LOL "how can you tell when someone is female if you need to know their chromosomes" is not a trick question.

Conflating separate questions is trickery.

You compared it to the elephant man and IDK if you have ever seen a pic of the elephant man but you didn't need to shove your hand into any orifices to know he was a medical anomaly.

The comparison holds, because his body was malformed and he had to live with a disability.

This perspective is deeply cruel to people you would consider female by your own definition, solely on a really arbitrary definition. A definition that really can only be discovered in mid adolescence.

Knowing and stating facts isn't cruel. Nature is cruel. CAIS males can yell at their genetics if they're upset. I didn't deform them that way, I just read the science.

 

[Marvin]

Knowing and stating facts isn't cruel. Nature is cruel. CAIS males can yell at their genetics if they're upset. I didn't deform them that way, I just read the science.

There isn't any such thing as CAIS males. Look at the diagnostics. But again, even considering individuals that are female under exulansic's definition of female (which diverges significantly from actual clinical standards for female), it's seriously cruel.

Exulansic is a cruel, hateful person.

I think she's deeply hateful of her own appearance (but her appearance is very normal, but whatever), so she takes it out on weirdo pervert trannies, and more recently, people with DSDs.

The latter makes her an indefensible shithead.