Yes, I should follow the precise questioning of the master debater who asked this sage question:
Who cares what an uninformed moron who makes statements like that infers from my other statements. You self admittedly don't even know what exists and what doesn't, retard.
And beyond that, they might not even know.
So, I guess Exulansic's entire argument is completely baseless, then? After all, it's based on the completely ridiculous hypothetical of a CAIS individual sexually assaulting and impregating a girl in a bathroom stall, which is something that has almost certainly never happened. Who cares what an uninformed moron who entertains the edgiest of edge cases thinks on who is or isn't allowed to call themself a woman? She doesn't even know what exists and what doesn't... retard.
I fail to see how that is a rebuttal of my point. Nowhere do I claim such a disorder actually exists, in fact I clearly state it to be a hypothetical. Once again, it seems like someone has a reading comprehension problem. If Exulansic can base her entire argument off the existence of a hypothetical CAIS sexual predator that impregnates young girls using their nonexistent penises in women's restrooms, then I can challenge the validity of her definition with the existence of a hypothetical XX individual with a male phenotype.
Sorry. Double standards for she, but not for thee. You see.
have you ever heard of MRKH retard
That statement was in the context of CAIS, not every kind of DSD. I reiterated it here
and here
You presented it as a rule of thumb. Do you have a unique sex determination process for every DSD?
and yet you keep repeating that CAIS "only sometimes" develops a vagina/vulva, which is also not true. can you even bother to google what you are sperging about before you and your buds drop in to whiteknight a thread like cows? CAIS is the completely broken AR gene mutation end of the AIS spectrum. CAIS *always* develops with a vulva and normal female external phenotype. it is the more mild variant cases of PAIS, and always in cases of MAIS, that genital ambiguity begins to occur. but i wouldnt expect you to know that because exulansics retard patrol is now touting a study with a cohort of 40 or so patients with varying degrees of AIS and claiming that because 20% of the patients (who most of which will have milder versions of ais-- PAIS and MAIS) produce sperm so this must means that it's CAIS people producing sperm. because logic and understanding of Muh Biology.
But most of Exulansic's detractors aren't even arguing that XY aren't male, they're arguing against Exulansic's explicit desire to segregate these people and have them marked as freaks when they would otherwise never be perceived as anything other than female.
The video demonstrates that they have testes, not ovaries, can never have menarche, and do not develop fallopian tubes, *uterus, cervix or upper part of the vagina. Those structures disintegrate. CAIS is only a male condition.
That's fine but if their anatomy were not disordered from their birth defect, their testes would produce small mobile gametes. That's the definition of male. But the CAIS male did not develop correctly, and his testes are in his abdomen, he has no womb no capacity to bear, has no menses. I don't see any woman, just the appearance of a woman due to a birth defect.
