Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

Last time I saw two lefty acquaintances, they brought up that apparently by 2040 or 50 there's gonna be a huge mass extinction because of climate change. As soon as normies think we're back to normal from covid, they're going to get blindsided by the most panicked, alarmist climate shit imaginable. And that's ignoring any wars with Russia or China
there was so much "WE'RE ALL GONNA BE DEAD IN 10 YEARS IF WE DON'T DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!111" propaganda getting whipped around like a chain mace in 2019-early 2020
 
Nice writeup.
However, you didn't mention as an option the most plausible theory in my opinion:

End of Everything Bubble Theory (?)
  • Western economies are in debt beyond any reasonable levels due to excessive financialization and low interest rates (in Germany bonds had even negative rates for some time). The elites stole so much money with their fancy financial instruments, and they want to steal more. There is no way out of this mess apart from economic depression, and as they don't want to hang, they need an excuse why depression is happening. In my opinion both COVID-19 and now all these shenanigans in Ukraine serve as plausible explanation why there is rampant inflation, supply chain issues etc. Plus at least COVID measures makes the populace more docile and controllable.

My favorite theory the elites are senile and have no idea how to govern look at any decisions leading to the end of empires you will see completely senile elites AKA let them eat cake who think barbarian's aint shit and peasant rebellions ain't shit until their execution or banishment.
 
My favorite theory the elites are senile and have no idea how to govern look at any decisions leading to the end of empires you will see completely senile elites AKA let them eat cake who think barbarian's aint shit and peasant rebellions ain't shit until their execution or banishment.
They're so myopic, they literally can't see the guillotines until the blade is a few millimeters from their neck.
 
Here we go. Dr. Malone interviewed Andrew Huff, the EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower.


Here are the choice bits:


 
Here we go. Dr. Malone interviewed Andrew Huff, the EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower.


Here are the choice bits:

View attachment 3008662
View attachment 3008664
I think some people wish to ban Andrew Huff just like they tried with Joe Rogan.

Btw, any recent news about how Queen Elizabeth II feels now?
 
IMO the "mass depopulation" theory has two angles, one is exactly as you described, the other the same goal but takes longer, is more fallible, but is almost impossible to prove which gives nearly ironclad plausible deniability.
---
Specifically the idea of going all in on vaccine requirements to get as close as humanly possible to 100% vaccination, especially in major population centers, so as to push the virus' evolution of variants into a deadly track since basically all these fuckers are leaky vaccines, and look no further than Marek's disease to see why 100% leaky vaccination use in a large population does: specifically breed a virus so deadly that natal vaccination becomes a requirement. The result most closely mirrors the Ambrosia/Grey Death dichotomy if successful, and as such provides the most benefits to the average glowie filled illuminati-alike general goals of domination along the way given the things you need to do to force that evolution.

And at the end of it all, to mass depopulate all you need to do have a "manufacturing crisis" where magically only the chosen people get vaccines due to supply crunch and everyone else is fucked with fuck all they can do about it except hide and hope variants start to be less deadly as time goes on. Or you can not do that, and enjoy all the toys a garden variety Trudalitarian could ever want as a result of having the virus, the cure, and a population dependent on the cure.
---

I will point out that this plan was my favorite given that all the pieces fit without the vaccine itself being deadly necessarily. Once that final puzzle piece of "of the vaccine does not need to be deadly to pull this off" fell into place, the vaccine myopia from upon high made perfect sense, and also made clear that there actually wasn't a logical disconnect between what the climate fuckers want (mass depopulation) and what the COVID policies they push aim to achieve (at least on the surface, "saving lives").

I'm not so sure it's going to work this time because all it takes is entire countries saying "nah" to cause the plan to not work, and we have Scandinavia to thank for that, as well as every single person who got the distinct feeling something was very wrong, and didn't trust the vaccine. The WEF backed administrations all tried their damnedest though.
They picked the wrong kind of virus in that case. Marek's is a herpesvirus, a dna virus capable of immune evasion by insinuating itself into the nervous system. It doesn't suffer much in the way of antigenic drift either, so once a mutation gets in, it tends to stick around. In contrast to that, coronaviruses mutate about as fast as a neolib's principles and they always tend towards less lethality. You might get one year of relatively high mortality out of this scenario, but then another related virus will come along and challenge the immune system in novel ways, while the virus itself is mutating into a more benign form, and then the problem just sort of fixes itself.

The simplest explanation is that the coordinated political response was the scheme all along. You don't need to run mass depopulation conspiracies or start put impossible microchips in vaccines, you just need to maintain a coordinated front. All the WEF-connected politicians and public figures pushed the same response in order to try and bring about social and political changes favourable to the WEF's goals: the creation of a technocratic society, in which the people have no property and no rights, and are propagandised to have no empathy for their fellows. A world of human cattle. In such a society, you don't need nefarious schemes to start depopulating. You just cull the surplus population.

edit: To add, I don't think they can achieve this either. People aren't machines. We're too irrational to be treated like easily-regimented automatons, which such a society would require to function they way it's envisioned. If they try, it will fail sooner or later.
 
So has anybody here actually met anybody who has had a severe reaction to one of the coronavirus vaccines?
I was incapacitated for 2 days after my second shot. I was fucked up for about a week more. I have had severe post-exertion asthma attacks unlike any previous asthma since then but I don't know if that's related or coincidental.

Two of my close relatives have had similar reactions immediately after the second shot but do not seem to have any long term effects - they don't have asthma though.
 
Over the last decade and a bit Ireland has been bringing in the Public Services card. Back in 2009 it was sold as a way to combat welfare fraud, you have to have one if you want to claim the dole. Fair. In the mid 2010's they began to try expanding it to cover any government service including new passport and driving license applications, and eventually renewals. That would effectively make it mandatory if you want to do anything in the country that requires legal ID, like opening a bank account. At that point the Data Protection Commission started slapping the government down, saying there was no justification or legal basis to require the PSC for anything other than welfare. In December 2021, the government finally conceded and agreed that people can verify their identity in other ways.

That didn't last long. The social distancing measures brought in by the National Driver Licence Service have been made permanent as of a few days ago, so walk-ins for applications and renewals will no longer be allowed. All appointments now have to be booked online, and booking online requires a PSC and verified MyGovID account. Less than three months after the appeal was dropped, you can't get a driving licence without a totally-not-a-national-ID-card that the government has already admitted they can't legally require you to have.

Just another example of covid measures being used to sneak in things the government has always wanted but couldn't legally introduce.
 
Kelly Moore, a former Tennessee health official who now heads a CDC-funded vaccination advocacy organization named Immunize.org, recalled seeing data from a recent survey that hit her like a punch to the gut.

The results were presented at a CDC meeting of vaccine experts earlier this month. The January survey of about 1,000 adults asked unvaccinated participants what, if anything, would change their mind and persuade them to get a shot. Half said “nothing.”

“It was quite demoralizing to see those results, frankly,” Moore said.
 
>Posts peer reviewed journal article
>Believe what you want buddy! ur gonna die!


This is why it isn't worth your time giving people articles to back up your argument, unless they actually request them. Even then, they aren't going to read them, even if they do they probably don't understand anything about what's inside, and they will most likely respond back to you with some "news" website, like huffpo, deboonking it. Almost nobody spends multiple hours checking sources. I have sent people studies explaining why I decided to do certain things and they literally can't remember me sending them 5 months later. "Vitamin D is good? Oh yea, I never bothered to take any."

Not to disparage goldfish memory, but I feel like I am dealing with them sometimes. I have had such an easier time just appealing to these people's emotions if I need them to do anything. As for arguing on twitter, you're better off turning 360 degrees and walking away from your computer. I think even reading that stuff on twitter is mind-poison.

Ironically people tell me "there is so much misinformation out there man!" and they take most thing's at face value, never bothering to read up on the people pushing certain articles/positions. It's amusing when you deep dive into some random author from an article someone sends you, and you find out that they have financial ties that would give them incentive to push a certain narrative. I inform them of this funny coincidence, and the usual response is "oh yea? (blank response)." They aren't ever surprised, they don't reconsider the article, or it's legitimacy. If the person writing the article literally said in their bio "I shill for Pfizer" it has zero effect on how they perceive the information, this doesn't change what they think about the article. I can't do much else but laugh at that.

I am reminded of the "not everyone has an inner monologue" meme, and the "I can't visualize an apple in my mind meme" I spent an afternoon trying to find articles from pre 2010 talking about this subject but I couldn't find any. Reason I did this is because thinking about people as vacant automatons is pretty dehumanizing, and I don't want to think some of my acquaintances are NPCs. I wanted to know if there was good backing for this theory, or if it's just a way to fracture our society even more. Although dealing with what I described about above, really makes it hard to ignore.
 
>Posts peer reviewed journal article
>Believe what you want buddy! ur gonna die!


This is why it isn't worth your time giving people articles to back up your argument, unless they actually request them. Even then, they aren't going to read them, even if they do they probably don't understand anything about what's inside, and they will most likely respond back to you with some "news" website, like huffpo, deboonking it. Almost nobody spends multiple hours checking sources. I have sent people studies explaining why I decided to do certain things and they literally can't remember me sending them 5 months later. "Vitamin D is good? Oh yea, I never bothered to take any."

Not to disparage goldfish memory, but I feel like I am dealing with them sometimes. I have had such an easier time just appealing to these people's emotions if I need them to do anything. As for arguing on twitter, you're better off turning 360 degrees and walking away from your computer. I think even reading that stuff on twitter is mind-poison.

Ironically people tell me "there is so much misinformation out there man!" and they take most thing's at face value, never bothering to read up on the people pushing certain articles/positions. It's amusing when you deep dive into some random author from an article someone sends you, and you find out that they have financial ties that would give them incentive to push a certain narrative. I inform them of this funny coincidence, and the usual response is "oh yea? (blank response)." They aren't ever surprised, they don't reconsider the article, or it's legitimacy. If the person writing the article literally said in their bio "I shill for Pfizer" it has zero effect on how they perceive the information, this doesn't change what they think about the article. I can't do much else but laugh at that.

I am reminded of the "not everyone has an inner monologue" meme, and the "I can't visualize an apple in my mind meme" I spent an afternoon trying to find articles from pre 2010 talking about this subject but I couldn't find any. Reason I did this is because thinking about people as vacant automatons is pretty dehumanizing, and I don't want to think some of my acquaintances are NPCs. I wanted to know if there was good backing for this theory, or if it's just a way to fracture our society even more. Although dealing with what I described about above, really makes it hard to ignore.
The best thing to do is to ask "why" questions. Back them into a corner and force them to explain why they think certain things. It wont really get them to reconsider their opinions but it will totally demoralize them.

As far as the inner monologue stuff goes, I'm pretty sure it is related to how much one read as a child.
 
This is why it isn't worth your time giving people articles to back up your argument, unless they actually request them. Even then, they aren't going to read them, even if they do they probably don't understand anything about what's inside, and they will most likely respond back to you with some "news" website, like huffpo, deboonking it. [...] If the person writing the article literally said in their bio "I shill for Pfizer" it has zero effect on how they perceive the information, this doesn't change what they think about the article.
I say it's worth our time, because we have to keep in mind that 90% of internet arguments aren't happening for the sake of the people involved, but the audience.
If I'm arguing with someone who I know isn't going to change their mind, me being able to make my case better than the opposition can sway some opinions but more importantly - it can expose people already on my side to better information so that they can look good while defending their case to others.
 

More evidence Covid was tinkered with in a lab? Now scientists find virus contains tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna THREE YEARS before pandemic began​

  • Genetic match discovered in Covid's unique furin cleavage site on spike protein
  • Matched genetic sequence patented by Moderna for cancer research purposes
  • Researchers say one in 3trillion chance Covid developed the code naturally

Fresh suspicion that Covid may have been tinkered with in a lab emerged today after scientists found genetic material owned by Moderna in the virus's spike protein.

They identified a tiny snippet of code that is identical to part of a gene patented by the vaccine maker three years before the pandemic.

It was discovered in SARS-CoV-2's unique furin cleavage site, the part that makes it so good at infecting people and separates it from other coronaviruses.

The structure has been one of the focal points of debate about the virus's origin, with some scientists claiming it could not have been acquired naturally.

The international team of researchers suggest the virus may have mutated to have a furin cleavage site during experiments on human cells in a lab.

They claim there is a one-in-three-trillion chance Moderna's sequence randomly appeared through natural evolution.

But there is some debate about whether the match is as rare as the study claims, with other experts describing it as a 'quirky' coincidence rather than a 'smoking gun'.


1645649804189.png

SARS-CoV-2, which causes Covid, carries all the information needed for it to spread in around 30,000 letters of genetic code, known as RNA. The virus shares a sequence of 19 specific letters with a genetic section owned by Moderna. Twelve of the shared letters make up the structure of Covid's furin cleavage site, with the rest being a match with nucleotides on a nearby part of the genome

1645649827943.png

Moderna filed the patent in February 2016 as part of its cancer research division, records show. The patented sequence is part of a gene called MSH3 that is known to affect how damaged cells repair themselves in the body. It was approved on March 7 the following year

In the latest study, published in Frontiers in Virology, researchers compared Covid's makeup to millions of sequenced proteins on an online database.

The virus is made up of 30,000 letters of genetic code that carry the information it needs to spread, known as nucleotides.

It is the only coronavirus of its type to carry 12 unique letters that allow its spike protein to be activated by a common enzyme called furin, allowing it to spread between human cells with ease.

Analysis of the original Covid genome found the virus shares a sequence of 19 specific letters with a genetic section owned by Moderna, which has a total of 3,300 nucleotides.

The US-based pharmaceutical firm filed the patent in February 2016 as part of its cancer research division, records show.

The patented sequence is part of a gene called MSH3 that is known to affect how damaged cells repair themselves in the body.

Scientists have highlighted this pathway as a potential target for new cancer treatments.

Twelve of the shared letters make up the structure of Covid's furin cleavage site, with the rest being a match with nucleotides on a nearby part of the genome.

Writing in the paper, led by Dr Balamurali Ambati, from the University of Oregon, the researchers said the matching code may have originally been introduced to the Covid genome through infected human cells expressing the MSH3 gene.

Professor Lawrence Young, a virologist at Warwick University, admitted the latest finding was interesting but claimed it was not significant enough to suggest lab manipulation.

He told MailOnline: 'We're talking about a very, very, very small piece made up of 19 nucleotides.

'So it doesn't mean very much to be frank, if you do these types of searches you can always find matches.

'Sometimes these things happen fortuitously, sometimes it's the result of convergent evolution (when organisms evolve independently to have similar traits to adapt to their environment).

'It's a quirky observation but I wouldn't call it a smoking gun because it's too small.

He added: 'It doesn't get us any further with the debate about whether Covid was engineered.'

Dr Simon Clarke, a microbiologist at Reading University, questioned whether the find was as rare as the study claims.

He told MailOnline: 'There can only be a certain number of [genetic combinations within] furin cleavage sites.

'They function like a lock and key in the cell, and the two only fit together in a limited number of combinations.

'So it's an interesting coincidence but this is surely entirely coincidental.'

MailOnline has approached Moderna for comment.

Circumstantial evidence has long raised questions about the origin of Covid and its link to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The facility was known to be conducting experiments on bat coronavirus strains similar to the one responsible for the pandemic.

China insisted early and often that the virus did not leak from the lab, claiming that crossover to humans must have occurred at a 'wet market' in Wuhan that sold live animals.

Perhaps driven by animosity for then-US President Donald Trump, who embraced the lab leak theory early on, mainstream media and academics in the West heaped scorn on the possibility, calling it an unhinged conspiracy theory.

But leaked emails showed that top scientists advising the UK and US Governments expressed concerns about the official narrative privately.

1645649924522.png

A study earlier this month found traces of Covid samples that contained genetical material from humans, hamsters and monkeys and may have predated the official pandemic timeline.

Sir Jeremy Farrar, an eminent British expert who publicly denounced the theory as a 'conspiracy', admitted in a private email in February 2020 that a 'likely explanation' was that the virus was man-made.

The then-UK Government adviser said at the time he was '70:30 or 60:40' in favour of an accidental release versus natural origin.

In the email, sent to American health chiefs Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins, Sir Jeremy said it was possible Covid had been evolved from a Sars-like virus in the lab.

He went on that this seemingly benign process may have 'accidentally created a virus primed for rapid transmission between humans'.

But the British scientist was shut down by his counterparts in the US who warned further debate about the origins of the virus could damage 'international harmony'.

In the latest twist, a study earlier this month found traces of Covid samples that contained genetical material from humans, hamsters and monkeys and may have predated the official pandemic timeline.


China's official pandemic timeline of the coronavirus pandemic and the evidence that undermines it​

Official timeline
Dec 8, 2019
- Earliest date that China has acknowledged an infection
Dec 31 - China first reported 'pneumonia of unknown cause' to the World Health Organisation
Jan 1, 2020 - Wuhan seafood market closed for disinfection
Jan 7 - President Xi Jinping discusses coronavirus outbreak with his politburo
Jan 9 - China makes public the genome of the coronavirus
Jan 11 - China reported its first death
Jan 13 - First case outside China is confirmed
Jan 20 - China's National Health Commission confirms human-to-human transmission
Jan 23 - Wuhan locked down
Jan 31 - WHO declared 'outbreak of international concern' as China admitted having thousands of cases
Feb 23 - Italy reports cluster of cases in first major outbreak in the West
May 29 - China claims virus did not originate in wet markets but in Chinese bats before it jumped to humans via an 'intermediary animal'
July 31 - Chinese researcher admits some coronavirus experiments conducted in lower biosafety labs
Dec 16 - WHO announces it will travel to Wuhan to probe origins of virus in January
Jan 5, 2021 - China denies entry to WHO's investigatory team
Feb 9 - WHO dismisses theory virus leaked from lab - backs China's claim it was imported from frozen meat
Mar 28 - Former US national security officials says intel shows 'there was a direct order from Beijing to destroy all viral samples' at Wuhan lab

New evidence
2012
: Six miners struck down with with a mysterious flu-like illness in Mojiang cave in Yunnan.
They were found to have been infected with the closest known relative to Covid, sharing 97% of its genes.
Samples RATG13 are sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to be studied.
Sep 2019- Blood samples are taken in a lung cancer screening trial in Italy which later test positive for coronavirus
Oct - Whistleblower Wei Jingsheng claims China deliberately spread Covid at The World Military Games in Wuhan in October, two months before the rest of the world knew about the virus
Oct - Xi Jinping's authoritarian regime tried desperately to shut down whistle-blowers like Mr Jingsheng. Any references made in social media about a new SARS virus or 'outbreak' were censored
Oct-Dec - Rise in 'flu and pneumonia' cases in northern Italy which could be linked to coronavirus
Nov - Whistleblower Mr Jingsheng claims he took his concerns about the military games to senior figures within the Trump administration but was ignored
Nov - Intelligence report passed to agencies in Washington claims three members of staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sought hospital treatment in November 2019 after experiencing symptoms consistent with Covid
Nov - Sewage samples taken in Florianópolis, Brazil, suggest virus was present
Nov 10 - Milanese woman has a skin biopsy, producing a sample which later shows signs of the virus
Nov 17 - Leaked documents suggest case detected in China on this date
Dec - Doctors in China, including Li Wenliang, report existance of new type of respiratory infection. But Chinese police arrested him and eight of his colleagues for questioning - instead of publicising reports and warning public
Dec 1 - Chinese researchers report an infection on this date in a peer-reviewed study, but it has not been acknowledged by Beijing
Dec 18 - Sewage samples taken in Milan and Turin suggest virus was circulating in the cities
Dec 26 - Samples analysed suggested a new type of SARS was circulating as early as December 26, but Wuhan was not locked down until January 22
Jan 2020 - Sewage samples from Barcelona suggest virus was in the city
Jan 3 - Covid-19 infections begin sweeping across other nations including the U.S. as the WHO labelled the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern
May - Scientists at a government lab in California concluded that Covid-19 may have escaped from a facility in Wuhan
July - WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said China failed share vital raw data during their investigation in Wuhan. China rebuffed those claims
June 2021: Leading US virus expert Dr Anthony Fauci was warned Covid may have been engineered in a lab, emails publicly released reveal.
August: The world's first Covid-19 patient may have been infected by a bat while working for a Wuhan lab in China, WHO chief Dr Peter Embarek said
August: A damning report by Republicans in the US claims coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, shortly after the facility tried to improve air safety and waste treatment systems
The report also cited 'ample evidence' that lab scientists were working to modify coronaviruses to infect humans and such manipulation could be hidden.
October: US intelligence review into origins of pandemic does not reach a judgement on whether the virus emerged via animal-to-human transmission or a lab leak.
Chinese officials branded the report 'political and false'.
January 2022: Leaked emails from top UK scientist Sir Jeremy Farrar showed he admitted in February 2020 that it was a 'likely explanation' that the virus could be man-made. But he went on to brand the theory a 'conspiracy'.
February: Sir Farrar is called to be interviewed under oath at the US Congress. Officials want him to explain why he shifted away from the lab leak theory.
 
I wanna see.
You haven't seen the alien babies, yet?





 
You haven't seen the alien babies, yet?





Ooooh, the black-eyed children mark II. I getcha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brain Problems
You haven't seen the alien babies, yet?





Wtf. . . Talk about nightmare fuel.

Like, I've known newborns that were able to hold their heads up for short periods of time but never as long as the infants in those videos. They all look like movie props that are supposed to be something like chimeras or homunculi. Some kind of uncanny valley type shit right there.
 
Ooooh, the black-eyed children mark II. I getcha.
Wtf. . . Talk about nightmare fuel.

Like, I've known newborns that were able to hold their heads up for short periods of time but never as long as the infants in those videos. They all look like movie props that are supposed to be something like chimeras or homunculi. Some kind of uncanny valley type shit right there.

>use gene delivery to create perfect class of worker-drones
>full maturity at age 9
>ready to join the workforce by age 10 or 12
>accelerated aging continues through adulthood
>conveniently die of old age at 40 before benefits can kick in
>state saves a trillion dollars a year on social security that they can now spend on more Orwellian bullshit
 
>use gene delivery to create perfect class of worker-drones
>full maturity at age 9
>ready to join the workforce by age 10 or 12
>accelerated aging continues through adulthood
>conveniently die of old age at 40 before benefits can kick in
>state saves a trillion dollars a year on social security that they can now spend on more Orwellian bullshit
A workforce of progeria patients doesn't actually sound very productive or efficient...
 
>use gene delivery to create perfect class of worker-drones
>full maturity at age 9
>ready to join the workforce by age 10 or 12
>accelerated aging continues through adulthood
>conveniently die of old age at 40 before benefits can kick in
>state saves a trillion dollars a year on social security that they can now spend on more Orwellian bullshit
Puberty has been happening earlier and earlier. Male fertility has been decreasing. No one knows why but something in the food is only theory.
 
Back