Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[Alligator Alcatraz]

>I urge the entire IT inudstry to refuse to do business in the State of Texas
>says the tranny with 30 followers
I'm sure they'll take that into account when they decide if they should lose billions abandoning Texas

I dont think that troon realizes if they lockout Texas, that means no more Tesla, Samsung chips, and Texas Instrument chips. Many cellphones, laptop manufacturers, and Nintendo devices use Texas Instruments chips.

 

[Sourceress]

That's fucking dumb. They should reread the UN (or any major NGO) definition of genocide. It has to do with snuffing out a people, that is, an ethnic group. (when religion comes into it, it's religion in an ethnic context, like Muslim Chechens)

Troons, at least not officially, don't reproduce by sex. Thus there is nothing to genocide. You can't genocide troons any more than you can genocide family guy fans.

I actually don't agree - I don't think it has to be an ethnic group to constitute genocide, though it usually is. Homosexuals have been targeted for attempted genocide in the past, even though they are even less likely to have biological children than trans-identified people are (given that most trans-identified adults are AGP males who transition late in life after having had children). However, homosexuality is a biological trait and homosexual people constitute a coherent class that can be targeted, which is what I think really makes it "count". Additionally, gay and lesbian people who have been targeted in the past were actually targets of violence, not just mean thoughts or being told to stop poisoning children.

There is no trans "genocide" for a whole slew of reasons. First of all, trans people aren't being killed or even harmed - they are statistically the safest group in the West in terms of murder rates, having rates far lower than any other demographic group; Their suicide statistics are grossly inflated thanks to relying solely on one anonymous self-reporting survey that asked only if they had ever thought about suicide at all, so clearly they aren't being driven to suicide by societal prejudice either. But also, trans people aren't a coherent group - thirtysomething and fortysomething autogynephiles who transition due to porn addiction and narcissism have nothing in common with three year old children being "transitioned" because they touched a pink blanket have nothing in common with fourteen year old girls who transition because they hate the way their body is changing due to puberty. They don't even have "wanting to transition to superficially resemble the opposite sex" in common, because pediatric transitioners are too young to even know what that means let alone actively want to do it, and a huge number of teenage and young adult ROGD suffering girls never medically transition at all. You can't commit a genocide against a loosely-affiliated mass of people with little to nothing in common.

(And let's not get into the fact that not allowing parents to administer dangerous, off-label drugs to their children that have not been proven to help the condition they're allegedly prescribed for is not part of any part of genocide.)

Sorry to go on at length! I just love to ramble about stuff. But tl;dr I do think it is possible to engage in genocide against non-ethnic groups, but they have to have something in common that is being targeted, which trans people do not have. You also have to like.. be targeted for violence, which trans people statistically aren't.

 

[Marvin]

I actually don't agree - I don't think it has to be an ethnic group to constitute genocide, though it usually is. Homosexuals have been targeted for attempted genocide in the past, even though they are even less likely to have biological children than trans-identified people are (given that most trans-identified adults are AGP males who transition late in life after having had children). However, homosexuality is a biological trait and homosexual people constitute a coherent class that can be targeted, which is what I think really makes it "count". Additionally, gay and lesbian people who have been targeted in the past were actually targets of violence, not just mean thoughts or being told to stop poisoning children.

There is no trans "genocide" for a whole slew of reasons. First of all, trans people aren't being killed or even harmed - they are statistically the safest group in the West in terms of murder rates, having rates far lower than any other demographic group; Their suicide statistics are grossly inflated thanks to relying solely on one anonymous self-reporting survey that asked only if they had ever thought about suicide at all, so clearly they aren't being driven to suicide by societal prejudice either. But also, trans people aren't a coherent group - thirtysomething and fortysomething autogynephiles who transition due to porn addiction and narcissism have nothing in common with three year old children being "transitioned" because they touched a pink blanket have nothing in common with fourteen year old girls who transition because they hate the way their body is changing due to puberty. They don't even have "wanting to transition to superficially resemble the opposite sex" in common, because pediatric transitioners are too young to even know what that means let alone actively want to do it, and a huge number of teenage and young adult ROGD suffering girls never medically transition at all. You can't commit a genocide against a loosely-affiliated mass of people with little to nothing in common.

(And let's not get into the fact that not allowing parents to administer dangerous, off-label drugs to their children that have not been proven to help the condition they're allegedly prescribed for is not part of any part of genocide.)

Sorry to go on at length! I just love to ramble about stuff. But tl;dr I do think it is possible to engage in genocide against non-ethnic groups, but they have to have something in common that is being targeted, which trans people do not have. You also have to like.. be targeted for violence, which trans people statistically aren't.

I don't mean to suggest that there aren't groups that people want to eliminate out of some sense of hatred or intolerance. What makes it specifically genocide (compared to other types of societal "cleansing") is that it can be achieved through extermination or sterilization.

The combination of method and feasibility is what makes it genocide. There are other terms for targeting other groups.

But I also don't want to imply that genocide is worse than those other types of societal "cleansing". Genocide carries a lot more emotional weight, because of the events of the past 100 years or so, but I think that's more of a matter of history and culture, and not really an objective reason why it's uniquely horrible compared to other types.

So a government trying to exterminate all of a certain ethnic group, and the same government trying to exterminate all of a certain political sect... one would be a genocide, one might not be, although they would be equally horrible to me.* The difference is that ethnic groups reproduce genetically but ideas reproduce through speech. That's the main difference, I think.

But yeah, beyond semantics, no, troons aren't being repressed in the west, that's fucking dumb. They're either vulnerable weirdos (of both sexes) or privileged weirdos (usually males, occasionally females). But either way, they're no more uncomfortable in the west than your average trailer park resident, at absolute worst.

* Edit: and to address the religious issue, religion is kinda tricky. I think religion contributes to genocide if it's largely tied to the ethnic group. If a government wanted to exterminate all the scientologists (as awful as they are, they probably shouldn't be marched off to camps), I don't think that would be a genocide. But if there was some little commune of scientologists and that was 90% of the population of scientologists, then it might qualify.

 

[Sourceress]

I don't mean to suggest that there aren't groups that people want to eliminate out of some sense of hatred or intolerance. What makes it specifically genocide (compared to other types of societal "cleansing") is that it can be achieved through extermination or sterilization.

The combination of method and feasibility is what makes it genocide. There are other terms for targeting other groups.

But I also don't want to imply that genocide is worse than those other types of societal "cleansing". Genocide carries a lot more emotional weight, because of the events of the past 100 years or so, but I think that's more of a matter of history and culture, and not really an objective reason why it's uniquely horrible compared to other types.

So a government trying to exterminate all of a certain ethnic group, and the same government trying to exterminate all of a certain political sect... one would be a genocide, one might not be, although they would be equally horrible to me.* The difference is that ethnic groups reproduce genetically but ideas reproduce through speech. That's the main difference, I think.

But yeah, beyond semantics, no, troons aren't being repressed in the west, that's fucking dumb. They're either vulnerable weirdos (of both sexes) or privileged weirdos (usually males, occasionally females). But either way, they're no more uncomfortable in the west than your average trailer park resident, at absolute worst.

* Edit: and to address the religious issue, religion is kinda tricky. I think religion contributes to genocide if it's largely tied to the ethnic group. If a government wanted to exterminate all the scientologists (as awful as they are, they probably shouldn't be marched off to camps), I don't think that would be a genocide. But if there was some little commune of scientologists and that was 90% of the population of scientologists, then it might qualify.

I agree with you, tbh. And no matter what your definition of genocide is... the government prosecuting the poisoning of children who cannot possibly consent with drugs that will stunt their growth, turn their bones into powder, sterilize them and lower their IQ doesn't meet it.

Honestly, even "socially transitioning" is going to have massive negative effects on children's minds and psyches when they grow up to the point that I would say it constitutes child abuse. I don't have the energy to fully get into it but... it's serious. And just imagine how awful and ugly things are going to get when these kids grow up with all these issues and turn 18 to realize that Mummy got them to chop their dick or breasts off because they played with the "wrong toy" when they were four years old and it was all a big horrible mistake. Just.. goddamn. It's so much. It is child abuse. Not because it's wrong for a boy to wear a dress or for a girl to play with army men, but it's absolutely wrong to tell them these things make them the opposite "gender" ffs.

I keep saying this on here but man, I am just so tired lol. This shit is so infuriating and it just keeps happening. Here's hoping Texas is step one to people realizing how disgusting this whole "trans kid" business is, and putting a stop to it. Fingers crossed.

 

[Marvin]

Honestly, even "socially transitioning" is going to have massive negative effects on children's minds and psyches when they grow up to the point that I would say it constitutes child abuse. I don't have the energy to fully get into it but... it's serious.

Imagine being some dumb kid who trips and falls into tumblr nonsense and then troons out midway through school. Then later realizes it's a mistake when shit starts getting real and Dr Mengele strolls in with a needle full of rage juice.

I have to give credit to high school detransitioners, because it takes massive nuts to say "maybe I'm not trans, I'm just normal" in high school with all your friends watching.

I'm sure most of them just say fuck it and decide they're committed, too late to turn back now.

Anyway, to bring this back on track to Tony here: lol, he's signed himself up for a lifetime of stress. Imagine people correctly sexing you as male after you already got your dick chopped off. Even if it only happens a couple times a year, that's gotta seriously fuck with his head.

I think he lives in Montgomery County, MD, right? He's probably safe there, but if he goes too close to DC, I can absolutely see people misgendering him all the time. Black people there won't give a fuck.

 

[Positron]

His body's silhouette has fewer curves than a wooden board. There is not a thought behind those vapid autogynesmile eyes. Just coom.
View attachment 3011133
YWNBAW, just give up the charade, Anthony.

I'm sure many men are envious of his manly shoulders.

 

[rusty shackleford 1]

I really don't have too much to add except that this has to be the worst outfit Tony has ever worn. It is a self-own. This shirt just in itself is a crime against humanity and it doesn't fit, then you throw in the Jesus-y Birkenstocks and the skinny white belt that looks straight out of the early 2000s. His body's silhouette has fewer curves than a wooden board. There is not a thought behind those vapid autogynesmile eyes. Just coom.

YWNBAW, just give up the charade, Anthony.

Omg that belt is like the ones that used to come with them fancy Walmart sweaters for like 14.98 lol. Every girl I knew back in the day tossed those belts after wearing the top once. It’s hilarious he kept it for fashion recycling.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Tooth gap Tony thinks he's the troon Harriet Tubman.
View attachment 3009503

I know just the place in Colorado for these trans children to escape the trans genocide!

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-tenacious-unicorn-ranch-tenaciousranch-steampunk-penny-penellope-logue-phillip-matthew-logue.86681/

 

[Snarky Clark]

It's amazing how someone totally hip and glued to the politics of transness so they can clue the trans to the politics of transness doesn't have a clue that the political party supposedly going after the transness has played them like a free jukebox to make campaigning against woke identity politics a winning strategy.

It was a perfect "give them enough rope" gambit that's liklely to create a landslide this November. Of course without woke virtue junkies none of it would be possible.

 

[MetalParakeet]

It's hilarious how many people qre retweeting and screenshotting his take about that trans kid Bill.


People are actually praising this child abuser for his take on what he perceives as child abuse.

Just shows that no one ever looks into the people they grandstand. As long as they're trans, that's enough and makes them beyond reproach

 

[Freya Holmér]

He must be fucking fuming that everyone dropped the Texas tranny shit literally overnight to scream about Ukraine instead. There goes all the attention.

Yep

 

[XenomorphThot]

He must be fucking fuming that everyone dropped the Texas tranny shit literally overnight to scream about Ukraine instead. There goes all the attention.

Yep
View attachment 3012897

I wish they'd explain what is genocidal about that policy lol also fuck Ukraine, right, who cares about a LITERAL war and potential LITERAL genocide that might happen there, huh. Muh feels are the most important and muh feels are hurt by the transphobia of trying to protect children from making the same mistakes I made.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

He must be fucking fuming that everyone dropped the Texas tranny shit literally overnight to scream about Ukraine instead. There goes all the attention.

Yep
View attachment 3012897

Uh, wow. Millions upon millions of trans kids have been murdered in part of an ongoing genocide in Texas and MSNBC is covering some weird drama in like Africa or some shit? Like, I can't even right now. I don't have the spoons.

 

[Snarky Clark]

Twitter's he-she asspats for selfie addicts could stub their fucking toes and chair legs would be part of a vast conspiracy to amputate trans people.

 

[garbage cake]

Congrats to Erin on 33k Twitter followers from his raging yesterday. We know attention is what feeds the Twitter troon. He’s going to hate potential world war taking away from his attention pipeline.

what a warrior for the right of parents to put their minor children on Lupron & melt their bones

Our stunning & brave valiant warrior lies to a woman for some cheap thrills:

Fire that brow lady if those are “done”

 

[MetalParakeet]

I pointed out that Erin is an abusive POS on reddit. Didn't say anything about them being trans, even called him "her"

So naturally I'm being banned from a ton of subs, some of which I've never even posted in.

Really shows that they don't give a fuck about children, they just care about themselves. They'll defend someone who's admitted to being a piece of shit simply because they're trans.

What a neat get out of jail free card

 

[OttoWest]

Erin, that brow lady thinks you’re a fag who trooned out. She also wants to keep you as a customer. She knows you’re a man. Don’t mistake her small talk for sisterly camaraderie.

The lack of understanding re female socialization never ceases to astound me.

 

[A Real Autogynephile]

Congrats to Erin on 33k Twitter followers from his raging yesterday. We know attention is what feeds the Twitter troon. He’s going to hate potential world war taking away from his attention pipeline.
View attachment 3013168
what a warrior for the right of parents to put their minor children on Lupron & melt their bones
View attachment 3013169
Our stunning & brave valiant warrior lies to a woman for some cheap thrills:
View attachment 3013181
Fire that brow lady if those are “done”

Lol he pays someone to make them look like that?

 

[Ona Quest]

Dude looks unhealthy and Anorexic. Wonder if it's just recovery or weirdness from ffs

 

[Sourceress]

I pointed out that Erin is an abusive POS on reddit. Didn't say anything about them being trans, even called him "her"

So naturally I'm being banned from a ton of subs, some of which I've never even posted in.

Really shows that they don't give a fuck about children, they just care about themselves. They'll defend someone who's admitted to being a piece of shit simply because they're trans.

What a neat get out of jail free card

These are the same people who literally platformed a rapist who attempted to forcibly impregnate a young woman against her will as a speaker at a women's march (Cherno Biko). They regularly quote and promote rapists, wife beaters, homophobes, and all manner of filth.

You did right to comment on it and make sure people know that, but unfortunately it was never gonna make a difference. Trans-identified men can do whatever they want to whoever they want - it doesn't matter, their victims are probably lying and if they aren't then they probably did something to deserve it, right? (But they're not a men's rights movement! It's just a coincidence that their treatment of abusive, rapist, etc. men mirrors that of super conservative societies where women have no rights and men make all the rules!)

And yeah, it's not about the children. They only "care" about pushing the idea of "trans kids" being valid because it validates adult trans-identified men (specifically, because lbr trans activists don't give a shit about trans-identified women). If the only people transitioning were adult men with histories of porn addiction and abuse of female partners, it would become pretty clear pretty fast that they're just a bunch of nasty, woman-hating perverts (which they are) - but if they can claim "kids as young as three are trans" it bolsters their case when they claim they were "born this way, just like the (icky) gays!" They'd love it if all these kids in Texas killed themselves "due to transphobia" because it would make their cause stronger - they wouldn't waste a minute on weeping for the lost lives of children unless it was performative, on Twitter or on a television news interview. They don't give a shit about these kids, or anybody but themselves. (Because trans activism is a movement of narcissistic, porn-addicted, intensely misogynistic men and the women who love them.)

Our stunning & brave valiant warrior lies to a woman for some cheap thrills:
View attachment 3013181
Fire that brow lady if those are “done”

Anthony should get his money back, damn. Those rectangle brows are intensely masculine.

Or maybe that's just his face.

I'm still not over the fact that this dude has had FFS and stll looks Like That... lmfao. They wanna act like biology isn't real when this dude can have his whole face taken off and bones shaved down to try to look "female" and still can't even manage to look a little bit feminine... incredible, biology finds a way.

Erin, that brow lady thinks you’re a fag who trooned out. She also wants to keep you as a customer. She knows you’re a man. Don’t mistake her small talk for sisterly camaraderie.

The lack of understanding re female socialization never ceases to astound me.

As if it weren't obvious enough that these dudes are Men with a capital "m", their total obliviousness to the niceties of female socialization never fail to out them. At best, this poor woman recognized that Anthony is one of Those Men who would flip out and possibly physically harm her if she did or said anything to indicate that she knows he was born male (because he completely is). So she lied her ass off. There's absolutely no scenario in which this poor eyebrow lady didn't know she was humoring a man, and chances are she was laughing about it on the inside the whole time.