Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Currently the National Board of Health and Welfare believes that the risks of puberty blockers and exogenous sex hormones outweigh the benefits.
American TRAs and Lefties in general worship Scandinavian countries like Sweden when it comes to areas like immigration and general economic policies. Wonder their take is here?
 
It's because Jesse has a relatively moderate take […]
They're attacking Jesse as a warning to other journalists/people to not take up this position. They don't want more people to look into, to find exactly what Jesse found....the evidence is lacking or incomplete. […]

The best part is that his lesbian co-host, Katie, is basically a crypto-Terf and got cancelled for it already. She has a real lesbian wife and didn’t back down so now troons can only seethe and go after Jesse who does seem to try to maintain twitter respectability.
 
American TRAs and Lefties in general worship Scandinavian countries like Sweden when it comes to areas like immigration and general economic policies. Wonder their take is here?

Which is funny - in general, Scandinavia are market economies that sometimes even (especially in the last decade or so) rate higher on ease of doing business metrics than the US. Further, outside the recent refugee crisis, those countries have taken much less immigrants than the US on a percentage basis historically and have had fairly strict requirements on becoming a permanent resident. Lefties in the US are fairly unsophisticated and somehow have continued to assume that Social Democracy = Socialism, which is so far from the truth.
 
Now this is where semantics kicks in.

Older Futa works, the woman didn't have balls.

New Futa and Furry works, the women have MASSIVE HUGE BALLS.

In my opinion, this is where the line is drawn. Balls are purely mascaline features. To have balls is to be a man
You can condone women with penises but you draw the line at chicks with testicles? Because balls are purely masculine features but somehow dicks are not?

You message is legitimately unhinged, islamic and autistic, but i got a good belly laugh out of that part, so thank you, Hentai Scholar.
 
You can condone women with penises but you draw the line at chicks with testicles? Because balls are purely masculine features but somehow dicks are not?

You message is legitimately unhinged, islamic and autistic, but i got a good belly laugh out of that part, so thank you, Hentai Scholar.
Exactly. I make no excuses. I make no diversions. This is autistic. This is unhinged. No doubt about it.
This is fantasy, IMAGINARY porn. That is the only distinction I will make.

It's a situation that can only exist in fantasy OR if you're so inclined the Futanaria videos ( lesbians/pay to gay bisexual women acting out futanari porn scenes) that used to float around that user group. It's still a fantasy without an inkling of reality.

Ultimately the mental gymnastic that you need to understand /surrender your sanity to, while dicks are not natural - They belong to purely , biological women and function as magical dildoes. This is where the term Girldick originally came from , as far as I'm aware.

It always links back to porn and the inability; No. The complete abandonment of reality. I don't side with the anti-porn people but in this situation, the evolution of futanari from a random subset of japanese pornography to an entire degenerate lifestyle is something that needs documentation.

Like... How do you ignore the fact that these sexy cartoon women growing massive dicks and fucking each other were never men and at the end of the day, will always be women?
 
Exactly. I make no excuses. I make no diversions. This is autistic. This is unhinged. No doubt about it.
This is fantasy, IMAGINARY porn. That is the only distinction I will make.

It's a situation that can only exist in fantasy OR if you're so inclined the Futanaria videos ( lesbians/pay to gay bisexual women acting out futanari porn scenes) that used to float around that user group. It's still a fantasy without an inkling of reality.

Ultimately the mental gymnastic that you need to understand /surrender your sanity to, while dicks are not natural - They belong to purely , biological women and function as magical dildoes. This is where the term Girldick originally came from , as far as I'm aware.

It always links back to porn and the inability; No. The complete abandonment of reality. I don't side with the anti-porn people but in this situation, the evolution of futanari from a random subset of japanese pornography to an entire degenerate lifestyle is something that needs documentation.

Like... How do you ignore the fact that these sexy cartoon women growing massive dicks and fucking each other were never men and at the end of the day, will always be women?
Kinda off topic, but why you don't side with the anti-porn crowd? and how do you know so much about hentai?
 
Just to refer back up to the above:

This is a really good video, and it really delves into how the are hardcodes tendencies in what men and women find sexually stimulating. One of the biggest things to realize is that men can and do get erotically charged by a single sexual cue, so that a nice pair of boobs or a nice muscled chest (depending on if you are gay or straight) is enough to get people going. It is, and I've seen this confirmed in other stuff I've read, a tendency towards objectification in sexuality, a focus on very specific visual cues absent of context (like the rest of the person).

When you consider that paraphilic obsessions are usually centered around very specific visual, or sensory cues, then it makes perfect sense that men would be the sex to develop these obsessions. But I think the focus on futanari to explain AGP is wrong. There's a thematic link, but when you listen to AGPs, the specific visual focus that so so many of them obsess over is specifically the "smoothness" and "flatness" of the genital area. Hell, we had an AGP video in this thread where the dude talked about how his obsession started with aerobics videos, because of the women in leotards. It's a recurring theme, over and over, the specific absence of a genital bulge that gets these dudes off. Beyond just porn, I think media stimulus in general, especially sexually suggestive stimulus around the age of puberty, probably triggers this sort of obsession in a certain subset of straight men predisposed to more extreme paraphilic obsessions (since there does seem to be proof that paraphilias, or the tendency to develop them, is somewhat hereditary). This is where you see that some AGPs focus on swishy sundresses, on spinny skirts, etc. It's all the very specific, reoccurring visual images that you are repeatedly exposed to through media, that are visually linked to the opposite sex.

I've been wondering for some time if the ubiquity of just visual stimulus, the ability of screens to just stream information to a brain, might be the thing that fucks people up. It's very different from anything humans prior to even the 1950s experienced in terms of the sheer amount of visual stimulus we receive. There were those studies that showed that people who were exposed to grayscale media were much more likely to experience dreams in greyscale., so it seems plausible to me that the human brain just wasn't built to process visual stimulus out of context of the immediate environment. It may be that we are still not realizing the degree to which screen exposure of kids is messing them up.
 
Beyond just porn, I think media stimulus in general, especially sexually suggestive stimulus around the age of puberty, probably triggers this sort of obsession in a certain subset of straight men predisposed to more extreme paraphilic obsessions (since there does seem to be proof that paraphilias, or the tendency to develop them, is somewhat hereditary).
I remember reading a theory that sexual experiences at the beginning of puberty set a person's sexual interests for life. In other words, Lola Bunny created furries.
 
Just to refer back up to the above:


This is a really good video, and it really delves into how the are hardcodes tendencies in what men and women find sexually stimulating. One of the biggest things to realize is that men can and do get erotically charged by a single sexual cue, so that a nice pair of boobs or a nice muscled chest (depending on if you are gay or straight) is enough to get people going. It is, and I've seen this confirmed in other stuff I've read, a tendency towards objectification in sexuality, a focus on very specific visual cues absent of context (like the rest of the person).

When you consider that paraphilic obsessions are usually centered around very specific visual, or sensory cues, then it makes perfect sense that men would be the sex to develop these obsessions. But I think the focus on futanari to explain AGP is wrong. There's a thematic link, but when you listen to AGPs, the specific visual focus that so so many of them obsess over is specifically the "smoothness" and "flatness" of the genital area. Hell, we had an AGP video in this thread where the dude talked about how his obsession started with aerobics videos, because of the women in leotards. It's a recurring theme, over and over, the specific absence of a genital bulge that gets these dudes off. Beyond just porn, I think media stimulus in general, especially sexually suggestive stimulus around the age of puberty, probably triggers this sort of obsession in a certain subset of straight men predisposed to more extreme paraphilic obsessions (since there does seem to be proof that paraphilias, or the tendency to develop them, is somewhat hereditary). This is where you see that some AGPs focus on swishy sundresses, on spinny skirts, etc. It's all the very specific, reoccurring visual images that you are repeatedly exposed to through media, that are visually linked to the opposite sex.

I've been wondering for some time if the ubiquity of just visual stimulus, the ability of screens to just stream information to a brain, might be the thing that fucks people up. It's very different from anything humans prior to even the 1950s experienced in terms of the sheer amount of visual stimulus we receive. There were those studies that showed that people who were exposed to grayscale media were much more likely to experience dreams in greyscale., so it seems plausible to me that the human brain just wasn't built to process visual stimulus out of context of the immediate environment. It may be that we are still not realizing the degree to which screen exposure of kids is messing them up.
It's really a profound point. Sexual imprinting is subtle in male humans, I think, because we're sociable enough to police the obvious outliers, we ignore how huge an effect it has on our psychology. I think most guys can think back to formative times in their lives when they realized (not at the time, but later) that "yeah... *yawn* that's for me" and that was it.

Woe betide the poor fucks for which that wasn't tits or ass or even feet, but something degenerate and unacceptable; because those fellas were in for a rough life in some way or another.

Not to excuse perversion. Perverts should seek help. But we should keep in mind, imprinting is as powerful as any other kind of psychological influence. It may be lifelong, like an addiction.
 
In these scary uncertain times it's comforting to know we can all count on one thing, troon delusion

Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.47.54 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.48.12 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.49.47 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.49.55 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.50.05 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.49.04 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.50.34 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.50.45 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.51.04 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.51.22 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.51.33 PM.png


Screen Shot 2022-02-24 at 8.50.21 PM.png
 
It's not that they look like shit that bother me, it's that they look ridiculous, it's like they are taking the piss or something,
like they are not really serious about passing, like they are saying : 'I dare you to say something about it'.
 
I just learned that Lia Thomas was only ranked 462 as a man. So all these MTF athletes who dominate women's sports are only doing so because they could never win competing with their own sex. That episode of Futurama where Bender becomes a transgender athlete because he could never beat the male robots feels like a warning sign now.

I wonder why no one learned anything from troons like Fallon Fox. I'm sure it's already been posted here multiple times, but as a reminder, he personally enjoyed knocking out two women. Even fracturing one of their skulls.

I have a theory that some women blindly support or let these troons push them around because they know that they'll never win against them. They're still men who can beat them up. I don't think its as common to hear FTMs pushing around men and telling them how to behave or forcing themselves into men's spaces/fields. Maybe that's because there are presumably more MTFs than FTMs. But I also believe that many men aren't going to allow an FTM to push them around.
1645765248315.png
 
1645765261481.png
Orchi... as in orchioplasty? Mf is one foot in the grave and had his balls removed. Tsk. Coombrained until the very end.

Anyway,

If troons have one thing, it is the audacity:
1645766269619.png
Who gives af if some slav cissies got bombed WHAT ABOUT ME REEE

1645766295084.png
1645766431769.png

Snooping around Riley's braindead account then led me to this absolute gem of a human being:
1645766542658.png

Computer, enhance:
1645766588350.png

AGP SMIRK SPOTTED

He's very, very blatantly male, so it's funny. Couple pics hid behind a spoiler below if you're interested in seeing more of this dainty transbian.

Lesbians, how sexy is a 5 o'clock shadow?
1645766724581.png

Real hot girl shit is when woman clean bathroom:
1645766795337.png

CONGRATULASHUUUNNNNS! ✨✨
1645767017179.png
Most people are already afraid of visibly mentally ill towering ogres. Transpassing goals = met!
:semperfidelis:
 
omg did we just witness the birth of empathy
View attachment 3016031
Empathy that will be swiftly swept under the rug, in favor of focusing on the oh-so terrible crisis that transsexuals endure every day. Who cares that the Ukraine is being bombed? Who cares that violence is on the rise in your city? Who cares that you don't have a stable sense of morality or self? Best distract from that by focusing on your inability to get your genitals removed and your pronouns honored.
 
Back