RVNX
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't disagree with you there, but it's 70 billion versus 700 billion. If the US is spending 80% of that 700b on literally fucking nothing, they still have double the expenditure. It's not even close.Most of the money goes to absolute waste. We can’t just go by the numbers here. The F-35 is the worst example and is basically a useless plane.
hahaha, that “whew” at the end. i felt that. i was on the edge of my fucking seat watching this.View attachment 3017981
Artillery impacts in a populated area of Kharkiv
View attachment 3017995
tweet :
link
Okay, the convoy footage is definitely starting to form a pattern. Anyone willing to place bets that CIA or US military intelligence is slipping satellite recon to the Ukranians?
Gravel institute: all victims of war, no matter which one, deserve support and to get to a safe placeWar breaks out in Ukraine, Gravel Institute: "Let in all the arabs and niggers!"
View attachment 3017650
Can those 700b cover a nuclear holocaust's expenditure?I don't disagree with you there, but it's 70 billion versus 700 billion. If the US is spending 80% of that 700b on literally fucking nothing, they still have double the expenditure. It's not even close.
This goes without saying that if U.S. equipment is considered useless, all the soviet-era junkers Russia is still propping up are about as effective as cardboard boxes with "tank" written on the side.
They should. At least they don't have to answer to the whims of a fickle ally across the ocean.Wow, it's like it was a mistake to expand NATO after the Soviet Union, to former Soviet satalites/territiores, who have centuries long blood feuds with Russia itself.
I would not be surprised if those countries just pull out of NATO and form their own Slav Defense pact over the course of the next few weeks.
its a real book and not a meme fucks sake
I can tell you it’s definitely more than 80%.I don't disagree with you there, but it's 70 billion versus 700 billion. If the US is spending 80% of that 700b on literally fucking nothing, they still have double the expenditure. It's not even close.
This goes without saying that if U.S. equipment is considered useless, all the soviet-era junkers Russia is still propping up are about as effective as cardboard boxes with "tank" written on the side.
So the difference between the real Tsar and Putin is that at least the Tsar's half-savage attack dogs were the same religion as the populace?If by "Cossacks", you mean "Muzzies that will give your sporting event a pressure-cooker-n-shrapnel surprise, or enrich your neck with an axe", then yes.
Thats a legitimate concern. But again, a myriad of concessions were made to were Ukraine can remain independent and not be in NATO. Unfortunately Putin is a paranoid skitzo so now we're here.I hate to say anything that could remotely be interpreted as defending Putin, but is it possible (or even likely) that Russia in general and Putin specifically don't WANT the Ukraine, they just don't want a NATO enemy literally on their border?
Putin is smart enough to be hard to read and on top of that expert at that Russian thing of never just directly saying what your motives are, but seriously, if he wants something like "don't join NATO and plus we get to keep using the deep water ports in your country," what's the big deal?
I think of Biden more as being Cornelius Fudge.Putin is Voldermort
Trump is Lucius Malfoy
Biden is Dumbledore
Merkel is Hermione
Zalensky is Harry
Boris Johnson is Ron
Obvious glow op. Look at those shitty uniforms, they can't be Nazis.Donetsk People's Militia has captured a position in Mariupol from the veteran Ukrainian 53rd Brigade.
And, surprise. surprise, apparently they found a "Right Sector" (Ukrainian Far-Right group) hideout right under the Ukrainian positions in a literal basement. Apparently, the right sector guys just left their flags, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. -esque patches and literal membership cards lying around in there.
To me, this seems way too convenient to be anything but a Russian glowop to justify their narrative on the Ukranians.
View attachment 3018077
View attachment 3018084View attachment 3018086View attachment 3018085View attachment 3018101
Nobody wants Ukraine and Yes, you are 100% correct.I hate to say anything that could remotely be interpreted as defending Putin, but is it possible (or even likely) that Russia in general and Putin specifically don't WANT the Ukraine, they just don't want a NATO enemy literally on their border?
I'm gonna mash X and shower that one with rainbows. We've already established that Russia doesn't deploy conscripts in offensive operations, and I highly doubt things are going so poorly that Putin's already in more crosshairs than usual. I also highly doubt that his "Hitler rantings" are anything more than sales pitch. Kiev's going to be enough of a mess by itself without NATO turning this into Red Storm Rising.
Putin's the lesser of two evils. Bad as what the media says about him, and bad as what he actually does, a good majority of our major politicians are as bad if not worse than him.I hate to say anything that could remotely be interpreted as defending Putin, but is it possible (or even likely) that Russia in general and Putin specifically don't WANT the Ukraine, they just don't want a NATO enemy literally on their border?
Putin is smart enough to be hard to read and on top of that expert at that Russian thing of never just directly saying what your motives are, but seriously, if he wants something like "don't join NATO and plus we get to keep using the deep water ports in your country," what's the big deal?
I'm certain that is a driving factor in his invasion, but a victor can literally create reasons to justify their military incursions. War is mighty profitable to merchants and victors, between Russia owning Ukraine as a vassal state if they win and their semi-allied country of China, they'd have half of the worlds stock of grains, rice, and corn. It would constitute a massive economical advantage over anyone (globohomo) from trying to flex on those two.I hate to say anything that could remotely be interpreted as defending Putin, but is it possible (or even likely) that Russia in general and Putin specifically don't WANT the Ukraine, they just don't want a NATO enemy literally on their border?
Putin is smart enough to be hard to read and on top of that expert at that Russian thing of never just directly saying what your motives are, but seriously, if he wants something like "don't join NATO and plus we get to keep using the deep water ports in your country," what's the big deal?
I meant finlandPoland is literally one of the biggest NATO shills. how do you not know this?