Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

Retink said:
Ok, time to politi-sperg for me, it's not the people's house and the military, police, or whatever doesn't serve the people, they serve whoever is giving them orders. Not even out of malice, just because how the fuck do the people give them orders when they have a commander who is a member of the political party?
Click to expand...
glad you called it a sperg as they're unable to understand the purpose of rhetoric
 
  • Like
Reactions: Retink
ANDY FELTED
PPP FELTED
LMAOOOO.JPG
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: UnLimiTed-Lbs, Me262PrinceOfTurboJet, 6thRanger and 17 others
Retink said:
I think Nick wants to be a big boy serious politician and that's why he's trying to side with MTG and denounce Stew. There's two ways you can really take things, the goofy fuck it we'll take it to extreme levels but have deniability because it's just all in good fun or the running for office path. Personally I'd be more in favor of the former with Stew than the latter with MTG, and I don't think Nick can really take the latter path as he has already been blackballed, but he seems to be going that way.

I might also be biased because I'm on here, a place known for fuck it, let's say nigger to be edge lords.
Click to expand...
well, that cuts precisely to the heart of the problem here though. The ideologies and core messages of the various speakers, at least from what I have seen so far, are all over the place to the point of self-contradiction, at least from the perspective of an otherwise supposedly unified movement. At best, you can say Nick is taking a pragmatic approach and trying to build a big tent which we can already see collapsing, and at worst, it's just reaching out to a motley crew of vaguely-right-wing-enough-in-the-right-ways group of people because there isn't an actual ideology in place and nobody involved in organizing this or putting it together had ever thought this far ahead. On that note, I rescind my suspicions that america first is an operation of United States intelligence or some special interests donor class guy like peter theil because if it was, I would at least like to imagine that they could put together something more coherent than afpac 3.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Figger Naggot, Lobster Cult High Priest, MindYourSeabiscuits and 2 others
edit: Did he just say "alternative tax solutions" like gab.com and cozy.tv? He said alternative "tech" solutions. I haven't watched a replay, but I guess I misheard. Probably not a good idea to speak about something you're under investigation and subpeona for by the government (Jan 6th), especially using the word awesome to describe it. Unless Nick has some sort of super lawyer and he has crossed his t's and dotted his i's perfectly on everything since his grade school paperwork, the feds are going to fuck him over with taxes and criminal charges.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: StBonaventureFren, Lobster Cult High Priest, Retink and 1 other person
salubrious hog said:
well, that cuts precisely to the heart of the problem here though. The ideologies and core messages of the various speakers, at least from what I have seen so far, are all over the place to the point of self-contradiction, at least from the perspective of an otherwise supposedly unified movement. At best, you can say Nick is taking a pragmatic approach and trying to build a big tent which we can already see collapsing, and at worst, it's just reaching out to a motley crew of vaguely-right-wing-enough-in-the-right-ways group of people because there isn't an actual ideology in place and nobody involved in organizing this or putting it together had ever thought this far ahead. On that note, I rescind my suspicions that america first is an operation of United States intelligence or some special interests donor class guy like peter theil because if it was, I would at least like to imagine that they could put together something more coherent than afpac 3.
Click to expand...
Really if they wanted to cast a big tent, that covers very divergent groups, there's a way to do it and they failed at it hard. The problem is that the more moderate speakers are going to suffer as a result of this and gain little to nothing from it, if they wanted to attract them in the future, they could have very much played it as an extremist thing with the moderate guests being the outsiders and trying to convert them to the fold. Then the speakers could deny it by saying they were just trying to deradicalize people and the convention can have some fun at poking fun at them. As it is the whole thing just seems like trying to play both paths without really achieving either as they can be attacked from all angles now. King of optics my ass.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: not william stenchever, Figger Naggot, A-A-AAsssston! and 3 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: boongus, SNEED.EXE, Holiday of no return and 8 others
Retink said:
Really if they wanted to cast a big tent, that covers very divergent groups, there's a way to do it and they failed at it hard. The problem is that the more moderate speakers are going to suffer as a result of this and gain little to nothing from it, if they wanted to attract them in the future, they could have very much played it as an extremist thing with the moderate guests being the outsiders and trying to convert them to the fold. Then the speakers could deny it by saying they were just trying to deradicalize people and the convention can have some fun at poking fun at them. As it is the whole thing just seems like trying to play both paths without really achieving either as they can be attacked from all angles now. King of optics my ass.
Click to expand...
well, like I said, "big tent" is the best thing you could say about it, and it ignores any externalities, including the very real possibility that Nick is just doing this because he's a grifter who wants to fuel his own ego

AltisticRight said:
This isn't even true. Some of the founding fathers were deists, spiritual, or atheist.
Click to expand...
*most
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flim Flam, notafederalagent, Lobster Cult High Priest and 1 other person
salubrious hog said:
well, like I said, "big tent" is the best thing you could say about it, and it ignores any externalities, including the very real possibility that Nick is just doing this because he's a grifter who wants to fuel his own ego
Click to expand...
All politicians are grifters fueling their own ego, some are just better at it than others. I think the problem is they're just copying left wing tactics of groups like AntiFa, with the whole attempt to seem mild when in reality they are extremist, when they would probably just be better off being the goofy side that's clownish but actually building up a base.

AltisticRight said:
This isn't even true. Some of the founding fathers were deists, spiritual, or atheist.
Click to expand...
This is a big problem for groups like them, a lot of people aren't Christian, or even religious, who hold a lot of their views. I'm probably some level of agnostic, but I would vastly prefer a Christian nation over an Islam hellhole and don't care if the Church does its thing. Though the over emphasis of Christ is King gets old quick.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chris Chad, Flim Flam, notafederalagent and 2 others
nickcel said:
ANDY FELTED
PPP FELTED
View attachment 3019623
Click to expand...
Honest question, gayper fag. Your profile pic, you've used this art work across two accounts (That I've counted so far) as both the profile pic and background. The artist is William-Adolphe Bouguereau. Both accounts featured his depictions of pre-pubescent girls, your current profile pic. His art focuses heavily on bare-foot women, especially pre-pubescent women, a lot of the time it's basically soft core loli porn. And of course America first! is vocal about the lowering of age of consent laws.

So my question is, groyper fag. Are you a pedophile? Here to defend nick, but can't quite help broadcasting your love of little girls? Please, do answer. I'd like to understand why a nick fag defender has a specific fixation on a painted pic of a naked little girl.

Edit: Pic for those wondering https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.net/data/avatars/o/112/112846.jpg?1645517549
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Buck Breaker of BUcha, Holiday of no return, Me262PrinceOfTurboJet and 12 others
AFPAC review via Kino Casino:
Nick is a faggot fed. Green is a retard and/or playing the role of bate for left wingers. I'm 50-50 is Vince is an idiot grifter or a fed, at least he talked about the issues with Republicans and had fire, even though he looked fucking nuts. If Vince is for real, he should break away from AF. Peters is a fucking nobody but at least he called out Green and his crazy comments were fun even if he glows. Torba is fucking retarded beyond belief. Everyone else, who gives a shit. Nick and all other glowies should burn in hell.

Even NJP is better than this shit.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: z0mb0, StBonaventureFren, A-A-AAsssston! and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back