Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%

  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%

  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%

  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%
  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Agree
Reactions: Sig and Bananadana
дядя Боря said:
you laugh but that the scrap rate they had, that's practically a fortune.

Donbas ecenomy last 8 years largely depended on scrapping every little metal piece they could find.
Click to expand...
I don't blame them for taking advantage of the scrap just lying around. People gotta eat and the same things happened in World War 2. Its just an interesting sight to see on footage rather then just hear about it happening later.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: BBChannel, make_it_so, MrJokerRager and 2 others
Bananadana said:
I dont.
If these traitors want to have ALL of our governmental / civil institutions and weaponise them against dissident people like me at every step, including all mainstream media, the entire educational system and the entire banking system,
then i have little to loose by this system loosing a war.
I have no stake in "saving western civilisation" just so that some lunatic tranny can explain to me how evil i am for my white privilege while politicians i didnt vote for lock up my bank account.
I have no alliance or sympathy for the majority of my countrymen and will not die for them even if you payed me. Or guilt-trip me. Or appeal to my nationalist pride. Or otherwise try.
I for one welcome our new overlords whomever they may be if they just crush a single dangerhair or politician with said APCs.
Click to expand...
Lmao this retard is ready to sell is country cause he can't write nigger on twitter and most media acknowledge gay people exist, I really hope putin decide to do the right thing a nuke every single mutt
 
make_it_so said:
There sure are a lot of "saboteurs" that they've shot. Amazing how very few of them seem to be armed.

Impossible! Twitter told me he and the entire Chechen government and 200 tanks were wiped out by the 360 No-Scoper of Kyiv!


It applies because it's the same principal - actively bringing a country that is historically and geographically in another major power's sphere of influence into your fold and then trying to strategically militarize it (make it a nuclear tripwire - which is what NATO membership is and what the Soviets were doing by putting nukes in Cuba) is an extremely dangerous and destabilizing move and one that anyone with a wit of historical perspective ought to and would avoid. Because it will cause the other major power to panic. That happened in 1962, and it's happening now.
Click to expand...
This is Russia's bay of pigs only it looks like they'll pull it off.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox, Aidan, make_it_so and 2 others
naffatune said:
Here's some more footage taken from the TB2 Drone (link).

View attachment 3024832

By the way, here's a picture of a TB-2 UAV Drone. Never knew drones could look like this nowadays; I thought they were still the size of large dogs. These things look like fucking planes

View attachment 3024835
Click to expand...
Forgive me military buffs for asking but why in the fuck aren't these things shot down by choppers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CheepMeds and IAmNotAlpharius
thisighuf said:
View attachment 3024842

Also Amy on Ukraine
View attachment 3024843
View attachment 3024846
Click to expand...
1645992617728.png

1645992622800.png

1645992629233.png

1645992636232.png

It's all so tiresome.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: and 127 others, Chiri, StraightOuttaSomalia and 45 others
naffatune said:
Here's some more footage taken from the TB2 Drone (link).

View attachment 3024832

By the way, here's a picture of a TB-2 UAV Drone. Never knew drones could look like this nowadays; I thought they were still the size of large dogs. These things look like fucking planes

View attachment 3024835
Click to expand...
In general, armed drones will be significantly larger than surveillance-only drones, on account of having to haul around all that ordinance, go give the MQ-9 Reaper a look-up. The exception to this is your ISIS jury-rig commercial drone with a hand grenade strapped on (go give that a look-up, too: they're surprisingly effective if used properly.)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toolbox, DICTATOR and Bananadana
The Ugly One said:
But, even then, once Putin took charge, we should have done things like, oh, i don't know, not accuse Russia of stealing our 2016 election and installing a puppet government, daily beating the drums of war because some Washington faggots were mad that their turn at the trough got cut short.
Click to expand...
Oh it gets worse than that, before the whole "REEE RUSSIANS STOLE THE ELECTION" thing the Administrative State LOVED Putin.

Bush Jr said he looked in Putin's eyes and saw a good man
After the Invasion of Georgia Hillary Pressed the "Reset Button" on Russian and US Relations
aaaand Finally during The 2012 Election Obama told a Russian Diplomat "Don't worry after the election we will have more leeway"

This is shit that was completely known to everyone who was paying attention, and the Eurozone still didn't think to themselves "JESUS FUCK THE DEMOCRATS ARE ACTIVELY SIDING WITH RUSSIA WE SHOULD PREPARE TO GET PUTIN'S COCK UP OUR ASS" and when President Trump actively tried to reduce Putin's power in the world not a one of them stood up and said "This Cheeto Nigger isn't Russia's friend we should support him"
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBChannel, AnaphylacticShock, MrJokerRager and 2 others
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: BONE_Buddy, IAmNotAlpharius, MrJokerRager and 1 other person
Least Concern said:
I understand this. I actually do. Russia doesn't want "enemy" weapons on its border.

However, before this event, the situation between NATO and Russia is nowhere as tense as it was during the times of NATO and the Soviet Union. Maybe Russia thought its "interests" were at risk (even while Europe was hungrily sucking up its oil and natural gas), but they were not at the brink of war or invasion by NATO.

Furthermore, "but muh Cuban Missile Crisis/Monroe Doctrine interventionism" is whataboutism. If it was wrong for America to saber-rattle against the Soviet Union and support rebel groups and movements to overthrow pro-Soviet/Russian governments, why does that mean it's acceptable for Russia to launch an all-out war?

As for the whole "NATO supports (((((((globohomo))))) so Russia is based" edgelordery floating around this thread, as much as I might not enjoy a gay pride parade going down the main street of my city, I'd still rather have that than a parade of APVs from a belligerent foreign nation.
Click to expand...
Because the cuban missile crisis was a response to america giving a bunch of countries nukes and pointing them directly to moscow you dumb fuck
Kys
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Sammich, bread n circuses, Jarch6 and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back