Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, let's use a historical example.

Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.

Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'

Why are you using historical examples that aren't actually relevant here when you can just argue against what I actually said?

Can you explain why the US doesn't get sanctioned by every country in the world when they flatten every building in Iraq and kill 66,000 civilians for 23,000 enemy combatants, despite that being a sovereign nation that wasn't a threat to the US in any way?
 
Isn't he a monster? Never read a book of his but heard that he has a thing for prepubescent children.
1) you didn't miss a single thing, king cannot write and the decade of hype he enjoyed in the 80's came from Brian DePalma. I say this as a man who is bitter about wasting his edgy teen years reading the Dark Tower slogfest and all the other popular trash.

2) he wrote a several paragraphs-long sex scene between the children protagonists in It, taking place in the monster's lair to cement their bonds are forever friends or some such dumbshit excuse--the 11yo girl getting fucked even had the clarity of mind to mentally comment on the dick size of each lad, which is what normal little girls do when being fucked by their friends in a spider alien's lair. The man is a kid diddler and even the frauds at RLM called him out on it.
 
Okay, let's use a historical example.

Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.

Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'?

Oh, but I guess the US is lynching negros at this point in time. They automatically are bad, somehow. :(

Bad historical example, Imperialism was still in full swing during WW2.

For example, do you remember when the Burgers became the colonial masters of the Philipines by invading the country and killing tens of thousands in bloody insurrections?
 
Starlink satellite internet equipment has arrived in Ukraine
Starlink.jpg
 
If there's one thing that's more certain that ever: America's media class needs to be replaced by any means necessary.
Some of these niggas are "Uhh, like, so, maybe a nuclear war with Russia wouldn't be that bad?"-tier posting at this point.

I didn't think it was possible to despise these "people" even more after all the COVID and race retardation, but here we are.
 
Okay, let's use a historical example.

Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.

Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'?

Oh, but I guess the US is lynching negros at this point in time. They automatically are bad, somehow. :(
Lynching negroes is bad?
 
Why in God's name would the West want Ukraine in NATO other to take down Russia? They want to put nukes in the Ukraine so they can use it as leverage over Russia, you'd have to be a retard to not understand how this would be an existential threat to Russia which you are.
Leverage over Russia is an existential threat to Russia :story:

Jesus Russia really is a bunch of needle dicked little pansies
 
Can you explain why the US doesn't get sanctioned by every country in the world when they flatten every building in Iraq and kill 66,000 civilians for 23,000 enemy combatants, despite that being a sovereign nation that wasn't a threat to the US in any way?
Because the US Navy is the one that has taken the British Empire's role in securing global trade, finance, and various technological services. It isn't simply that the US has nukes, the US is actually a useful country to other nations. It's the same way with China. Why can China take Hong Kong or Taiwan and not get sanctioned? Uhhhhh I dunno, maybe because other countries like the fact it provides them with a useful service. It's almost as if having friends... will result in you... being supported... by those friends... Whoa, that's a big concept right there.

Again, Russia and anyone else can break off ties with the US at any time over the invasion of Iraq or whatever. And the end result of that will NOT be the US Navy suddenly turning around and sinking every merchant vessel in sight, or cutting countries off from the Internet or the ISS or whatever. In fact, the worst the US will do is pull off a 'freedom fries' tier rename of your country's products. That's because despite being full of niggers, the US doesn't actually act like one. Zionist globalist puppet, sure. But a nigger? No.

That'd be Russia - which thinks it is the defender of Eastern Europe, when in fact it invaded Poland and the Baltics alongside the Nazis, and when the truth of that came out in the late 80's none of Eastern Europe wanted anything to do with Russia anymore. Russia has never defended anyone from anything at any time. It is distrusted even in the best circumstances. Even China doesn't imagine Russia as its friend forever, it has claims on Siberia and will eventually demand those lands returned.
 
I would say that Russia has reached more than 2000+ casualties in this war so far and maybe 900+ dead.

What do you say, people?

Someone should count how many Russian dead are in the videos.
 
Why are you using historical examples that aren't actually relevant here when you can just argue against what I actually said?

Can you explain why the US doesn't get sanctioned by every country in the world when they flatten every building in Iraq and kill 66,000 civilians for 23,000 enemy combatants, despite that being a sovereign nation that wasn't a threat to the US in any way?
It is pretty relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man
Why in God's name would the West want Ukraine in NATO other to take down Russia? They want to put nukes in the Ukraine so they can use it as leverage over Russia, you'd have to be a retard to not understand how this would be an existential threat to Russia which you are.
Because some American general who still has memories of the 50s and 60s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back