mate
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2018
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, let's use a historical example.
Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.
Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'
1) you didn't miss a single thing, king cannot write and the decade of hype he enjoyed in the 80's came from Brian DePalma. I say this as a man who is bitter about wasting his edgy teen years reading the Dark Tower slogfest and all the other popular trash.Isn't he a monster? Never read a book of his but heard that he has a thing for prepubescent children.
Okay, let's use a historical example.
Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.
Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'?
Oh, but I guess the US is lynching negros at this point in time. They automatically are bad, somehow.![]()
New footage of dead soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces in the Bucha area of the Kiev region. Two more soldiers in Sumy were also taken prisoner.
View attachment 3028650
View attachment 3028651
What'd I miss??From all the CP I can tell that the (((LGBTQ))) folks are back.
I don't mean to be a dick (more than usual) but it reads like projection.From the official National Guard of Ukraine Twitter:
View attachment 3028661View attachment 3028663
Link
Lynching negroes is bad?Okay, let's use a historical example.
Japan is invading China. The US does not like this, because it makes its ally the UK very nervous. "I do not like this," says the US, "I am not going to sell you oil anymore. This will make you stop."
"WHAT?" Rees Japan. "I AM OWED THAT OIL! WITHOUT IT MY WAR EFFORT WILL COLLAPSE!"
"Not gonna sell you the oil." Said the US. "Its our oil, after all."
"I BOMB YOU" Said Japan, and promptly got nuked several years later.
Who was in the wrong here? The one who believed they were obligated another nation's resources and invaded others because of it, and who was the one who used words and the end of voluntary partnerships to try to get their way? Who believed in 'might makes right'?
Oh, but I guess the US is lynching negros at this point in time. They automatically are bad, somehow.![]()
Leverage over Russia is an existential threat to RussiaWhy in God's name would the West want Ukraine in NATO other to take down Russia? They want to put nukes in the Ukraine so they can use it as leverage over Russia, you'd have to be a retard to not understand how this would be an existential threat to Russia which you are.
Because the US Navy is the one that has taken the British Empire's role in securing global trade, finance, and various technological services. It isn't simply that the US has nukes, the US is actually a useful country to other nations. It's the same way with China. Why can China take Hong Kong or Taiwan and not get sanctioned? Uhhhhh I dunno, maybe because other countries like the fact it provides them with a useful service. It's almost as if having friends... will result in you... being supported... by those friends... Whoa, that's a big concept right there.Can you explain why the US doesn't get sanctioned by every country in the world when they flatten every building in Iraq and kill 66,000 civilians for 23,000 enemy combatants, despite that being a sovereign nation that wasn't a threat to the US in any way?
Whiter than the average Russian.Russian "saboteur" from Baku (Baku is the capital of Azerbaijan so presumably this guy is Azeri.)
View attachment 3028683
"Unprovoked war" meet "crocodile tears"
It is pretty relevant.Why are you using historical examples that aren't actually relevant here when you can just argue against what I actually said?
Can you explain why the US doesn't get sanctioned by every country in the world when they flatten every building in Iraq and kill 66,000 civilians for 23,000 enemy combatants, despite that being a sovereign nation that wasn't a threat to the US in any way?
Because some American general who still has memories of the 50s and 60s.Why in God's name would the West want Ukraine in NATO other to take down Russia? They want to put nukes in the Ukraine so they can use it as leverage over Russia, you'd have to be a retard to not understand how this would be an existential threat to Russia which you are.
Does Ukraine not have an emergency alert system for phones? Is that a rich-country-only thing? I can't imagine the US getting invaded and having the DHS tweet me warnings.From the official National Guard of Ukraine Twitter:
View attachment 3028661View attachment 3028663
Link