Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%

  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%

  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%

  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%

  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%
  • Total voters
    2,595
This made me laugh out loud:

1646096052032.png


The Defense isn't even trying to be diplomatic any more.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: snoot booper, DopeAddictKittenV2, Supreme Dingus and 25 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Fremantle decided to respond to Russ' MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support.

RESPONSE to 40 Motion for Leave to File Document by Defendants Fremantle Productions, Marathon Productions. Replies due by 3/7/2022.
Click to expand...
I wonder how many people are like me when I see these updates literally written out in plain fucking english, and all I hear in my head is sounds. I know I deserve trash can ratings for this but other than the really juicy tidbits, the plain English descriptions of legal goings-on are just like "yeah, yeah I know some of those words" :trump:

I wonder if that's part of the reason sometimes us fairweather watchers ask the same questions over and over again like "so uhh when does Russell/fremantle have to respond".

Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: NashiNashi, DopeAddictKittenV2, Cousin_Larry and 16 others
the khat quaffer said:
I wonder how many people are like me and they see these updates literally written out in plain fucking english, and all we hear in our head is sounds. I know I deserve trash can ratings for this but other than the really juicy tidbits, the plain English descriptions of legal goings-on are just like "yeah, yeah I know some of those words" :trump:

I wonder if that's part of the reason sometimes us fairweather watchers ask the same questions over and over again like "so uhh when does Russell/fremantle have to respond".

Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Click to expand...
If you have questions, feel free to DM me or just ask here.

For the record, the court can rule on this entire lawsuit before Russ next responds, but the next response date is due by 3/7/2022. At most 4 days after that, we should get Russ brief on the appellate level
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: DopeAddictKittenV2, Marvin, Ghjkl63 and 7 others
the khat quaffer said:
I wonder how many people are like me and they see these updates literally written out in plain fucking english, and all we hear in our head is sounds. I know I deserve trash can ratings for this but other than the really juicy tidbits, the plain English descriptions of legal goings-on are just like "yeah, yeah I know some of those words" :trump:

I wonder if that's part of the reason sometimes us fairweather watchers ask the same questions over and over again like "so uhh when does Russell/fremantle have to respond".

Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Click to expand...
Allow me to be the fool for you.


@Useful_Mistake sum up all the beat down Fremantle gave. I can't be bothered to read or try comprehending it by reading it 5 times to understand the lawyer speak
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: DopeAddictKittenV2, Phil Ken Sebben, the khat quaffer and 1 other person
My favorite part:
Screenshot_20220301-030251_Brave~2.jpg
Screenshot_20220301-030349_Brave~2.jpg

DSP's Tax Lawyer said:
@Useful_Mistake sum up all the beat down Fremantle gave. I can't be bothered to read or try comprehending it by reading it 5 times to understand the lawyer speak
Click to expand...
Of course.

Fremantle raises two points:
1. You can't file your Opposition, then do research after, and ask the court for permission to supplement your Opposition with the new research you made. Fremantle points out that Greer admits that he hasn't done his research properly (and he had 12 days left to file it that he could have used for research) and then attempts to game the deadlines by submitting a supplemental memorandum. You can't do that. Therefore his memorandum should not be considered

2. Even if the court decided it will consider it, all the issues Russ raised are issues that the court is not allowed to address, they must be adressed by an arbitrator.

Hope this helps.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: snoot booper, Red Velvet, Cilleystring and 38 others
Useful_Mistake said:
My favorite part:
View attachment 3029385
View attachment 3029387


Of course.

Fremantle raises two points:
1. You can't file your Opposition, then do research after, and ask the court for permission to supplement your Opposition with the new research you made. Fremantle points out that Greer admits that he hasn't done his research properly (and he had 12 days left to file it that he could have used for research) and then attempts to game the deadlines by submitting a supplemental memorandum. You can't do that. Therefore his memorandum should not be considered

2. Even if the court decided it will consider it, all the issues Russ raised are issues that the court is not allowed to address, they must be adressed by an arbitrator.

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Danke Schon
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Autistic
Reactions: Ghjkl63, the khat quaffer, SpiceyHuman and 5 others
Useful_Mistake said:
My favorite part:
View attachment 3029385
View attachment 3029387


Of course.

Fremantle raises two points:
1. You can't file your Opposition, then do research after, and ask the court for permission to supplement your Opposition with the new research you made. Fremantle points out that Greer admits that he hasn't done his research properly (and he had 12 days left to file it that he could have used for research) and then attempts to game the deadlines by submitting a supplemental memorandum. You can't do that. Therefore his memorandum should not be considered

2. Even if the court decided it will consider it, all the issues Russ raised are issues that the court is not allowed to address, they must be adressed by an arbitrator.

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Ahh yes. Okay, now I viddy. Makes sense. Nice and sparkling clear.

Now explain it as if I was 3. I mean for the slower lurkers *yawn*

(Just kidding)
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: NashiNashi, Ghjkl63, Bob Loblaw and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back