Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Because I ain't dying so a bunch of Jews can win at Risk IRL. The unspoken problem America has is more than half the country now agrees with this, which is going to be bad if an actual armed conflict ever comes into play.


Moot? Moot.... doesn't ring a bell. Must not have ended up being an important figure in history.

View attachment 3031705
Same thing he posted a bit ago. Wah wah think of the children, War is hard and it's Current year + 7, hard things aren't supposed to exist anymore.
The same idiots that don't bat an eye when niggers kill themselves in Africa. Or Muslims doing the same in the Middle East
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Generic Retard
His best case option is probably going to be ending up with western Ukraine independent, the Crimea going back to Russia, and those two bs "peoples republics" being enlarged into some sort of "east Ukraine" that would inevitably vote to join Russia as an autonomous region in a few years. Ending up like Finland is probably his best hope.
So, what Putin asked for
And maybe Zelenaki"s resignation.
 
reminder that sky news and Western media directly told Ukrainians to do this. The theory that the Ukrainian government is trying to generate civilian deaths is becoming discomfortingly plausible.
I don't think it's unrealistic that Ukrainian civilians would become armed and try to fight off invading forces in their homeland. If your family has lived somewhere for hundreds of years and the last time the Russians invaded you, your family was Holodomor'd, you'd probably try to fight too.
 
It is certainly fun watching all the boomer politicians impotently shake their fist at Russia while giving some platitudes about Ukraine.
When all the "hah-you got pwned tranny loving westerners" is all done:

Ukraine will be cowed and ruined. Congratulations, I guess.

Russia will be economically ruined and forced to live with the now undeniable fact that their army is (and always was) overrated at best and sub-par at worst. I think NATO would have air superiority over them in 6 hours. They will have also inherited a country they just ruined in their sphere. Will they rebuild Ukraine when their puppet regime is in place? That'll be fun to see.

NATO and the west, while having some disappointment at having lost a buffer state, will be economically fine. Other countries will start to pick up the slack and in the end they will be less reliant on Russian energy than ever.

Someone please explain how this is a "W" for Vlad again? He literally has economically set his country back, perhaps just temporarily, to 1992. At least Hitler's invasion of the USSR made sense. He needed the one thing they had in plenty - natural resources. Putin gains almost nothing from this. And he's probably stupid enough to try to invade the Baltic states and gain nothing again.
 
Lukashenko did a funny.

Capture d’écran 2022-03-01 à 20.59.49.png
FMxqpxqX0AkqZWJ.jpeg
 
lmao @ the cope in this thread about euromaidan

All political movements have economic interests backing them. The American and French revolutions were backed by the non-aristocratic middle-class. Solidarity in Poland was backed by the labor unions and the Catholic church. And yet you don't see faggy-ass American boomers claiming that their revolt was fake and gay because George Washington paid the bills.

It's not exactly a shocker than young Ukrainians would prefer to be rich and have codified political power instead of the alternative. Having money behind them doesn't really alter that fact.
 
I don't think it's unrealistic that Ukrainian civilians would become armed and try to fight off invading forces in their homeland. If your family has lived somewhere for hundreds of years and the last time the Russians invaded you, your family was Holodomor'd, you'd probably try to fight too.
There's a difference between that resistance movement and being told by the news that you should make molotovs to throw at tanks to disable then when that hasn't worked since ww2, leading naive ukranians to get blown up by russians when they try to pull it off
 
I don't think it's unrealistic that Ukrainian civilians would become armed and try to fight off invading forces in their homeland. If your family has lived somewhere for hundreds of years and the last time the Russians invaded you, your family was Holodomor'd, you'd probably try to fight too.
I really don't understand the posters who freak out over the whole 'arming civilians bad / stupid' thing. Obviously it's not ideal, but a lot of people value things like their country / people / honor a lot more than their own lives. Basically every war in history, when one side is on the edge of collapse has civilians step up and fight against the invaders, even if it seems stupid or ineffective.
 
View attachment 3031782

source

If true, this does give a sense that this is very far from any sort of stereotypical 'total war.' If Zelenskyy can be toppled or made to sign whatever Putin wants, I doubt the Russians want the bill for repairing infrastructure. If the war goes on for longer, this will surely change.
The Virgin Russians 'minimizing collateral damage and trying to keep civilian casualties to a minimum'

Vs

The Chad Ukrainian 'arm and throw as many civilians as possible at the enemy so I can get pity points'
 
McCain, Soros etc are certainly bottomfeeders - but I dont think that counts as "bottom up".
Every world leader is tainted. Putin got just as many ties to WEF and jewish bankers as every other head of state. But does support from Soros automatically taint an independent Ukraine? They only recieve support from Soros because they were pro EU which supports European federalists.
But does that make Putin right in invading? Considering Ukraine actually became a hotbed for reactionary politics in Europe I'm not entirely satisfied with the Russians moving in to "denazify" the country.
In fact the European federalists are not infallible, for every eastern european nation they've added to the union they've shifted European politics rightwards. Perhaps it would have been for the better to let things progress as they had instead of unleashing another brother war upon eastern europe just so Putin can slaughter more slavs while filling Moscow with muslim migrants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: afternoon_tea
Never even knew about the dam in Ukraine affecting Crimea until the few videos on this channel. Has anyone talked about this at all?
 
Slavs grew up on stories about irregulars hiding in the woods. The French would do the same in a similar situation because La Résistance. I unironically believe they would have a little more chance in the countryside against Russian soldiers without armor or air support if they would've built bunkers every fucking where back in the day. Like Enver Hoxha's little hellhole did.
worthless idea. bunkers (static defense fortification in general) are near useless in the modern era because they are just sitting ducks waiting to get popped by artillery shells and rockets from 20 miles away.
 
Never even knew about the dam in Ukraine affecting Crimea until the few videos on this channel. Has anyone talked about this at all?
Shush! The only thing you need to know and talk about now is that Putin is thirsting for the souls of diabetics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt Damon
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back