War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Israel's Holocaust museum condemns attack on memorial site

Holocaust memorial site, on March 1, 2022. (State Emergency Service of Ukraine)
Israeli and Jewish officials sharply denounced a Russian missile attack on a Ukrainian television transmitter in Kyiv that killed five people and also struck the city’s Babi Yar Holocaust memorial site on Tuesday.
“As we view images emerging from Ukraine showing innocent civilians fleeing from their endangered homes and pictures of the deadly Russian attack on the vicinity of the Babi Yar Holocaust memorial site, Yad Vashem voices its vehement condemnation,” the Israeli Holocaust museum said in a statement.
The Russian airstrike appeared to have targeted Kyiv’s main television tower, which is directly adjacent to the Babi Yar memorial. The Russian attack knocked out some state broadcasting, but left the tower intact.

At least five people were killed and five more were injured in the missile strike, the Ukrainian emergencies service said. Images from the scene showed charred bodies and cars damaged in the apparent Russian attack.
At least one missile struck a crop of buildings in a Jewish cemetery located in the Babi Yar complex. The missile strike sparked a fire in the building, which local firemen were called to extinguish. There did not appear to be any direct damage to the Babi Yar monument itself, a spokesperson for the site told The Times of Israel.

Photographs and video footage from the Babi Yar complex, which were shared by Ukrainian emergency services, showed the extensive damage to buildings and the surrounding area.

Holocaust memorial site, on March 1, 2022. (State Emergency Service of Ukraine)
Israeli and Jewish officials sharply denounced a Russian missile attack on a Ukrainian television transmitter in Kyiv that killed five people and also struck the city’s Babi Yar Holocaust memorial site on Tuesday.
“As we view images emerging from Ukraine showing innocent civilians fleeing from their endangered homes and pictures of the deadly Russian attack on the vicinity of the Babi Yar Holocaust memorial site, Yad Vashem voices its vehement condemnation,” the Israeli Holocaust museum said in a statement.
The Russian airstrike appeared to have targeted Kyiv’s main television tower, which is directly adjacent to the Babi Yar memorial. The Russian attack knocked out some state broadcasting, but left the tower intact.

At least five people were killed and five more were injured in the missile strike, the Ukrainian emergencies service said. Images from the scene showed charred bodies and cars damaged in the apparent Russian attack.
At least one missile struck a crop of buildings in a Jewish cemetery located in the Babi Yar complex. The missile strike sparked a fire in the building, which local firemen were called to extinguish. There did not appear to be any direct damage to the Babi Yar monument itself, a spokesperson for the site told The Times of Israel.
Get The Times of Israel's Daily Editionby email and never miss our top stories
Newsletter email addressGET IT
By signing up, you agree to the terms
Photographs and video footage from the Babi Yar complex, which were shared by Ukrainian emergency services, showed the extensive damage to buildings and the surrounding area.




The attack sparked a flurry of outrage and denunciations from Israel and international Jewish organizations.
Foreign Minister Yair Lapid said Israel would help fix whatever damage was caused to the site. In a statement, Lapid said Israel “denounced the damage” to the Babi Yar memorial and the Jewish cemetery, but pointedly refrained from identifying Russia as having caused it. “We call for the sacred site to be protected and honored,” Lapid said.
“At the instruction of Foreign Minister Lapid, the ambassador to Kyiv is in contact with the managers of the site and, when it is possible, we will help fix the damage,” the Foreign Ministry said.

Diaspora Affairs Minister Nachman Shai also refrained from blaming Russia for the attack, saying only that he was “saddened by this unnecessary war, by injury to innocent civilians, and damage to civilian installations, including Jewish sites such as the important Babi Yar Holocaust memorial center.”

Yad Vashem, which used notably softer language in its initial comments on the Russian invasion of Ukraine the day before, was far harsher and more pointed in its statement on Tuesday. It did explicitly blame Moscow for the strike, describing it as a “deadly Russian attack.”

“We continue to follow with grave concern the outrageous acts of aggression being perpetrated against civilian targets in Ukraine,” the museum said in a statement.

“We call on the international community to take concerted measures to safeguard civilian lives as well as these historical sites because of their irreplaceable value for research, education and commemoration of the Holocaust. Rather than being subjected to blatant violence, sacred sites like Babi Yar must be protected,” it said, adding: “Of course, the security and wellbeing of civilians must be universally and absolutely respected.”

The Babi Yar memorial sits atop a mass grave containing some 34,000 Jews who were slaughtered there over a two-day period in 1941.

“This was done as part of the ideology of genocide perpetrated by the German Nazis and their collaborators. History must be remembered accurately and its moral lessons must be implemented truthfully by all,” Yad Vashem said.

Natan Sharansky, the chairman of the Babi Yar Holocaust Memorial Center and former head of the Jewish Agency, said in a statement: “[Russian President Vladimir] Putin seeking to distort and manipulate the Holocaust to justify an illegal invasion of a sovereign democratic country is utterly abhorrent. It is symbolic that he starts attacking Kyiv by bombing the site of Babi Yar, the biggest of Nazi massacres.”

Sharansky was referring to claims by Putin ahead of the Russian invasion of Ukraine that he was doing so, in part, to “denazify” the country, which has a democratically elected Jewish president.

“We, at the Babi Yar Holocaust Memorial Center, built on Europe’s largest mass grave of the Holocaust, work to preserve historical memory following decades of Soviet suppression of historical truth, so that the evils of the past can never be repeated. We must not allow the truth to — once again — become the victim of war,” said Sharansky, who was born in Ukraine.

Earlier in the day, prior to the airstrike, the Babi Yar Holocaust Memorial Center also issued a statement, heavily criticizing Putin and the invasion and calling for him to be investigated by the International Criminal Court for war crimes.

The American National Jewish Women’s Council called the strike that hit Babi Yar “unconscionable” and said it “only underscores the false pretenses of ‘denazification’ to justify Russia’s attack on Ukraine.”

The organization added: “We condemn these Russian attacks in the strongest possible terms.”

The Jewish Federations of North America also denounced the Russian attack, noting that among the Ukrainian citizens affected by the invasion “are Holocaust survivors who have lived through the horror of war before.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is Jewish and had family members die in the Holocaust, also sharply criticized the damage to Babi Yar and tacitly compared the Russians to the Nazis.

“To the world: what is the point of saying ‘never again’ for 80 years, if the world stays silent when a bomb drops on the same site of Babyn Yar? At least 5 killed. History repeating,” he wrote in a tweet.

In a phone call with Zelensky, US President Joe Biden discussed Russia’s escalation of attacks, including the attack at Babi Yar, according to a White House readout. Biden offered the “United States’ continued backing for Ukraine as it defends itself against Russian aggression,” the readout said.

The strike followed the Russian defense ministry’s warning that Russian troops would carry out an attack on what they said was the infrastructure of Ukraine’s intelligence services in Kyiv and urged residents living nearby to leave.

“In order to suppress information attacks on Russia, the technological infrastructure of the SBU (Ukraine’s Security Service) and the 72nd main PSO (Psychological Operations Unit) center in Kyiv will be hit with high-precision weapons,” Russian defense ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said.

“We call on… Kyiv residents living near relay nodes to leave their homes,” Konashenkov added.

The statement came as Russian troops ramped up efforts to take Kyiv, with a 40-mile convoy of hundreds of Russian tanks and other vehicles advancing on the capital in what the West feared was a bid to topple Ukraine’s government and install a Kremlin-friendly regime.

Ukrainian authorities have accused the Russian army of carrying out strikes on residential areas in several cities, including the country’s second-biggest city of Kharkiv, where fierce fighting is taking place.

Ukraine says up to 350 civilians have been killed since Russia invaded.

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor said earlier this week that he plans to open an investigation into possible war crimes.

The first talks Monday between Ukraine and Russia yielded no stop in the fighting, though the two sides agreed to another meeting in the coming days.

 
*Downloads Duolingo*

It's already federalized through, but I can imagine a Russia that's more democratic will fall under the same issues that lead to Putin to rise. Primarily the Caucasus region igniting into ethnic turmoil. Putin put a lot of effort putting that region down and that's the most likely region to cause trouble.
Also, I'd imagine a pro-Western Russia would find itself being the target of Islamist extremism by Iran, which I don't think would be happy that its greatest ally sides with the Great Satan. Right now, I think Russia's more likely to be a Chinese vassal state like North Korea if the sanctions hit it hard enough.
Yeah. Somehow, that's better than Slav Iraq.
 

China signals willingness to mediate in Ukraine-Russia war​


China has signalled its willingness to play a mediator role in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine as the war entered its sixth day.

In his first phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, Dmytro Kuleba, since the outbreak of the war, China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, said on Tuesday that Beijing “laments” the outbreak of the conflict and is “extremely concerned” about the harm to civilians, according to a Chinese readout.


State-owned China Central Television said Kuleba asked China to use its influence to help mediate in its conflict with Russia. It added that Kuleba “asked for help in finding a diplomatic solution”.

The Chinese foreign ministry said the call was initiated by the Ukrainian side. The two foreign ministers also discussed evacuation of Chinese nationals from Ukraine, with 6,000 Chinese citizens living, working and studying there, according to official figures.

“Ukraine is willing to strengthen communications with China, and it looks forward to China playing a mediation role in achieving a ceasefire,” according to a Chinese readout, which cited Kuleba.

Wang’s call with Kuleba came amid escalation of the conflict. On Tuesday, Russian forces bombarded the regional government building in Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second city, killing at least 10 civilians, according to official accounts.

Meanwhile, a huge armoured column rolled towards the capital, Kyiv, raising fears Russia may resort to pulverising civilian areas. Kuleba tweeted a video of the huge explosion in Kharkiv’s Freedom Square, calling it a “barbaric missile strike” resulting from Vladimir Putin’s inability to “break Ukraine down”.

Western allies continue to show solidarity with Ukraine, piling pressure on Russia through sanctions and military assistance. China, however, said it “fiercely” opposes sanctions against Russia. It said dialogue “is the only way to stop the fighting”.

China has been watching the events closely. On Tuesday, Wang continued to take a balanced view on Russia’s action against its neighbour.

He said while China believed the security of one country “should not come at the expense of the security of other countries”, regional security “cannot be realised through the expansion of military blocs”.

Wang told Kuleba the pressing task for now was “to ease the situation as much as possible to prevent the conflict from escalating or even getting out of control”. He also urged Ukraine to “assume corresponding international responsibilities”.

“China is trying to juggle a balanced position to support Russia’s ‘reasonable concerns’ and at the same time not to burn all the bridges,” said Yun Sun, the director of the east Asia programme at the Stimson Centre in Washington.

“[Beijing] will not give the world the satisfaction of opposing Russia. Putin knew it. Whatever Russia does, the US still looms large as the biggest threat to China. For that alone, China will not oppose Russia.”

 
‘It might be the last chance to get out’: citizens flee Kyiv as assault intensifies

Thousands of people trying to escape Ukraine capital amid fears that large-scale attack is imminent

The piercing screams of children mingled with the barking of traumatised dogs and the shouts of soldiers desperately trying to maintain order, as the 14.07 to Ivano-Frankivsk pulled into Kyiv’s central station.

There was a crowd of thousands on platform one, surging towards the blue carriages and desperate to secure a prized place on a ride westwards out of the Ukrainian capital. Most people would not be able to board.

“Look at these faces around us, they are exactly the same as in the photographs from the second world war, and it’s just five days. Can you imagine what will happen in a month?” asked Tanya Novgorodskaya, 48, an art historian who arrived at the station on Tuesday afternoon with her 15-year-old daughter.

She had bought tickets for six different trains, but soon realised they counted for nothing. Instead, there was a boarding algorithm: first mothers with children, then women, then old people. Others were kept away by the police and soldiers standing guard.

Quickly, the train was crammed full. Families had to make split-second decisions, as mothers and children were allowed to board but grandparents told to wait behind.

This was the sixth day of Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine, and by now fear had taken over. In the first days, there was a sense of shock and disbelief. Then came pride and inspiration, at the surprisingly resilient Ukrainian response and the unity of Ukrainian society.

But the success at repelling the initial Russian assault comes with a terrifying caveat. With Putin’s plan A failing, will his plan B involve turning Kyiv into Aleppo or Grozny?

The missile strike on a residential block in Ukraine’s second-largest city of Kharkiv on Monday, followed by another strike that hit the city’s central square on Tuesday morning, led many in Kyiv to realise what the capital could be up against in just a few days.

On Tuesday there was another reminder of the sheer power that Ukraine is up against, when a missile strike hit Kyiv’s television tower, reportedly killing at least five people. The tower is close to the memorial site that commemorates the victims of Babyn Yar, the ravine where Nazi soldiers massacred up to 150,000 people during the second world war – including more than 30,000 Jews.

The Russian defence ministry warned residents of the capital to flee, promising airstrikes against an array of targets.

Like many, Novgorodskaya had underestimated the ferocity and barbarity of the oncoming invasion, and ignored those who told her she should leave. Even when the missiles started falling, she decided to stay and tough it out. On Tuesday, though, she changed her mind, having seen footage of the missile attacks on civilian areas of Kharkiv.

“We realised it might be the last chance to get out. Personally, I would stay and try to fight, but I think if you have children, you should leave,” she said.

She and her daughter had taken only a small grey hand luggage case between them, for a trip that could end up being indefinite. She hoped that, by evening, they might be able to force their way on to a train.

The crush to board the 14.07 was too intense for many to even attempt, and as pleading wails emanated from the scrums around each carriage door, a middle-aged couple stood some metres back, carrying a suitcase and a five-litre bottle of water, their brown boxer dog standing alongside them, panting nervously.

The man, Yuri, said his children lived in Munich and had been pleading with him for weeks to leave Ukraine, but like most people here, he had simply not believed Putin was capable of launching the kind of war that is now under way.

On the first night of the assault, he and his wife slept in the basement of their apartment block. It was icily cold, structurally insecure and there was no toilet. Since then, they had been sleeping in the bathroom of their ninth floor apartment and hoping for the best. When they saw images of the missile attacks on Kharkiv on Monday, they made the decision to flee.

“I am scared for what’s coming and I really want to get out of here,” he said.

But Yuri and his wife were far too low down the priority list, and far too polite, to have any chance of boarding the train. His wife tried to make the case that he had high blood pressure and had passed out the previous day, but he shushed her out of embarrassment, and nobody was listening anyway.

Finally, with a grinding of wheels and a hiss of smoke, the train pulled out of the station, a huddle of humans visible through the grimy windows and the faces of small children squashed against the glass.

On arrival in western Ukraine, many will have a further gruelling journey to get to the border with Poland, Slovakia or Hungary, where people have reported waiting times of several days this week.

Yuri and his wife were left behind on the platform along with thousands of others, hoping they might be luckier next time. An elderly man with an amputated leg stumbled on crutches, as his wife tried to rouse his spirits to wait another few hours and try for a spot on the next train west. A young couple hugged each other in support, both of them crying. A woman leaned against a pillar, dejected, tears falling on the cat she was cradling in her arms.

Adebayo Babatunde, a Nigerian management student who has been studying in Kyiv for the past six months, appeared to have little chance of being allowed to board, and no real idea of where he might go if he did. He was speaking to his sister, a British citizen who lives in London, via WhatsApp. He had applied for a UK visa in Ukraine weeks ago, she said, but had no response, and she could not get through to the Home Office or the British embassy.

“Please help my brother to get on a train,” implored the voice coming from the phone.

The train station is one of the few hubs of activity in Kyiv, which a week ago was a fully functioning, lively European capital city, but is now a ghost town. Khreshchatyk, the city’s broad central thoroughfare, was almost completely deserted on Tuesday. Most shops are closed, with the only signs of life the queues outside pharmacies.

On the edge of the city, more and more checkpoints spring up each day. On Tuesday, army cranes were lifting concrete blocks into the road to form barricades in several locations. The main checkpoints are manned by professional soldiers, while hundreds of minor posts are guarded by nervy volunteers, many of whom have never handled weapons before.

Digital billboards on the outskirts of town announce: “Putin has lost! The whole world is with Ukraine,” while the information tableaux at the side of the highway announce: “Air temperature +1, road temperature +2, Russians, fuck off!”

The threat from the Russian defence ministry appeared to justify the fears of Yuri, voiced on the platform earlier in the day as he explained his decision to leave.

“It was hard to believe Russia could strike Kharkiv, but now it’s clear what the plan is. They’re going to do here what they did in Chechnya.”
UNHCR have announced around 680,000 people have fled Ukraine since 24 February, and the number is rising rapidly
 
Biden speech preview: Putin’s war was premeditated and unprovoked.’

The White House has released some key lines from Joe Biden’s State of the Union address tonight, including the warning that dictators should “pay a price for their aggression” and the assertion that “American diplomacy matters.”

From Biden’s planned remarks:

"Throughout our history we’ve learned this lesson – when dictators do not pay a price for their aggression, they cause more chaos. They keep moving. And, the costs and threats to America and the world keep rising.

That’s why the NATO Alliance was created to secure peace and stability in Europe after World War 2. The United States is a member along with 29 other nations. It matters. American diplomacy matters

Putin’s war was premeditated and unprovoked. He rejected efforts at diplomacy. He thought the West and NATO wouldn’t respond. And, he thought he could divide us here at home. Putin was wrong. We were ready."
 

China signals willingness to mediate in Ukraine-Russia war​


China has signalled its willingness to play a mediator role in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine as the war entered its sixth day.

In his first phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, Dmytro Kuleba, since the outbreak of the war, China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi, said on Tuesday that Beijing “laments” the outbreak of the conflict and is “extremely concerned” about the harm to civilians, according to a Chinese readout.


State-owned China Central Television said Kuleba asked China to use its influence to help mediate in its conflict with Russia. It added that Kuleba “asked for help in finding a diplomatic solution”.

The Chinese foreign ministry said the call was initiated by the Ukrainian side. The two foreign ministers also discussed evacuation of Chinese nationals from Ukraine, with 6,000 Chinese citizens living, working and studying there, according to official figures.

“Ukraine is willing to strengthen communications with China, and it looks forward to China playing a mediation role in achieving a ceasefire,” according to a Chinese readout, which cited Kuleba.

Wang’s call with Kuleba came amid escalation of the conflict. On Tuesday, Russian forces bombarded the regional government building in Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second city, killing at least 10 civilians, according to official accounts.

Meanwhile, a huge armoured column rolled towards the capital, Kyiv, raising fears Russia may resort to pulverising civilian areas. Kuleba tweeted a video of the huge explosion in Kharkiv’s Freedom Square, calling it a “barbaric missile strike” resulting from Vladimir Putin’s inability to “break Ukraine down”.

Western allies continue to show solidarity with Ukraine, piling pressure on Russia through sanctions and military assistance. China, however, said it “fiercely” opposes sanctions against Russia. It said dialogue “is the only way to stop the fighting”.

China has been watching the events closely. On Tuesday, Wang continued to take a balanced view on Russia’s action against its neighbour.

He said while China believed the security of one country “should not come at the expense of the security of other countries”, regional security “cannot be realised through the expansion of military blocs”.

Wang told Kuleba the pressing task for now was “to ease the situation as much as possible to prevent the conflict from escalating or even getting out of control”. He also urged Ukraine to “assume corresponding international responsibilities”.

“China is trying to juggle a balanced position to support Russia’s ‘reasonable concerns’ and at the same time not to burn all the bridges,” said Yun Sun, the director of the east Asia programme at the Stimson Centre in Washington.

“[Beijing] will not give the world the satisfaction of opposing Russia. Putin knew it. Whatever Russia does, the US still looms large as the biggest threat to China. For that alone, China will not oppose Russia.”

So I can see China being in a hardspot because they can't burn their bridges with Russia, but also can't burn the bridges with the western countries either.
 
So I can see China being in a hardspot because they can't burn their bridges with Russia, but also can't burn the bridges with the western countries either.
Its worse then that.

Western Companies are trying to pull out of Russia.

Russia is telling them to go fuck themselves.

They are going to ask for a Premium out of china to ensure they don't go bug nuts
 
Really sad it's that high, don't these people know what it would mean if the US or Europe fight Russia over Ukraine or do they just have a death wish by nuclear warfare?
I agree. It's scary how many people in the US don't relaize that this isn't going to war in a Middle East shithole. But a war that could actually go nuclear
 
Sounds like they're Ukrainians who lived in Ireland but returned for the war. Flying back to your own country to participate is fine, but if you're just flying over from another country to fight in a war that has nothing to do with you is pretty dumb.
View attachment 3031397View attachment 3031398
I’ll give them credit for their willingness to fight and die. It takes guts to join a side that is the underdog. I personally am not a fan of Putin, NATO, or the EU, but I respect those willingly to fight for their people.
Support for US joining a potential war in Europe over Ukraine. By party: R - 49% D - 53% I - 44%

God damnit.

This seems too optimistic to be true. It is the NYP after all… funny thing is it’s not too different from more prestigious outlets out there.
Morale among Russian troops has dropped to the point that some units are “surrendering” to Ukrainian soldiers without a fight, a senior defense official said Tuesday.

The official did not say how many of the soldiers — who are apparently facing fueling and food shortages — have surrendered, but said they are noticing “certain risk-averse behavior by the Russian military.”
“The Russians have been surprised by some of the morale problems that they’re experiencing and I think they’re none too pleased about the logistics and sustainment challenges they’ve had,” the official said during a press briefing.

The official also described many of the Kremlin’s troops as “conscripts” and “very young men” who haven’t been well-trained and weren’t fully briefed on the scope of what they would be doing when invading.
The same feed claimed that the Chechen assassins were thwarted.

Chechen hit squad sent to kill Zelensky 'neutralized'​

Members of an elite Chechen death squad dispatched by Vladimir Putin to assassinate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky were killed or captured Tuesday, according to a senior Ukrainian official.
Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, said on Ukrainian TV Tuesday that two Chechen units that “came to kill our president” had been “eliminated,” according to a report in The Telegraph.
Danilov said one unit had been captured, and the other was engaged by Ukrainian forces.
It was not immediately clear how close the failed assassins were able to get to Zelensky.
And that Russian Marines are pussies.

Russian Marines reportedly rebelled and turned back warships to avoid assault on Ukraine beach​

By lee brown
Terrified Russian Marines defied orders to storm a mine-filled Ukrainian beach — and instead forced their fleet of warships to turn around and flee, according to local reports.
Members of the 810th brigade of Russia’s Marine force allegedly told Ukraine’s Dumskaya paper that they had been ordered Monday to carry out an underwater assault on Luzanovsky beach in Odessa.
But at the last minute, “a real rebellion took place” and the crews managed to turn around their ships and flee the bay, according to the report also shared by the Odessa Journal Tuesday.
The “large group” of Russian warships “suddenly withdrew” just as Ukraine’s military was about to “shoot back,” retired Ukrainian diplomat Olexander Scherba also tweeted.
I mean I can believe Russia is underperforming but this seems too optimistic for me to find credible. Or perhaps the landing site just didn’t have ideal weather. Or it was a feint.

Oil Reserves are being tapped into.
FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — The International Energy Agency’s 31 member countries agreed Tuesday to release 60 million barrels of oil from their strategic reserves — half of that from the United States — “to send a strong message to oil markets” that supplies won’t fall short after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The board of the Paris-based IEA made the decision at an extraordinary meeting of energy ministers chaired by U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm. She said in a statement that U.S. President Joe Biden approved a commitment of 30 million barrels and that the U.S. is ready to “take additional measures” if needed.
The group’s “decision reflects our common commitment to address significant market and supply disruptions related to President Putin’s war on Ukraine,” Granholm said.
Russia plays an outsized role in global energy markets as the third-largest oil producer. Its exports of 5 million barrels of crude per day amount to about 12% of the global oil trade. Some 60% goes to Europe and another 20% to China.

RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR

Russia-Ukraine War: What to know on Day 6 of Russian assault

'Undisguised terror': Russia's Kharkiv strike chills Ukraine



As non-Ukrainians also flee war, some report mistreatment

Russia eyes sanctions workarounds in energy, gold, crypto

So far, U.S. and European sanctions have not barred oil or gas exports and have included exceptions for transactions to pay for oil and gas. Western leaders are reluctant to restrict Russian oil exports at a time when global energy markets are tight and high prices are fueling inflation in developed economies.
But the invasion has still shaken markets worldwide. On Tuesday, oil prices soared, with U.S. benchmark crude surpassing $100 per barrel — the highest price since 2014.
“The situation in energy markets is very serious and demands our full attention,” IEA executive director Fatih Birol said. “Global energy security is under threat, putting the world economy at risk during a fragile stage of the recovery.”
Besides the United States, other members of the organization include Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Japan and Canada. IEA members hold emergency stockpiles of 1.5 billion barrels of oil. The release amounts to 4% of stockpiles, or roughly 2 million barrels per day for 30 days.
It’s only the fourth time in history that the IEA has done a coordinated drawdown since the reserves were established in the wake of the Arab oil embargo in 1974.
From the U.S. perspective, the price of crude oil determines a big portion of what drivers pay to fill up their cars with gasoline. The national average for a gallon of gas is $3.61, which is 26 cents more than a month ago and 90 cents more than a year ago, according to motor club federation AAA.
In November, Biden announced a release of 50 million barrels of oil in coordination with other energy-importing countries, but the measure had only a fleeting impact on oil prices, which have continued to rise.
Granholm stressed the need to invest in renewable energy as a way to reduce dependence on Russian oil and natural gas.
To that end, Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia called on Biden and the oil industry to take immediate action “up to and including banning crude oil imports from Russia.”
“If there was ever a time to be energy independent, it is now,” said Manchin, who supports fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas that are his crucial to his energy-producing state.
___
Associated Press writer Matthew Daly contributed from Washington.
 
Last edited:
Really sad it's that high, don't these people know what it would mean if the US or Europe fight Russia over Ukraine or do they just have a death wish by nuclear warfare?
I think A.) They are so far removed from the idea of a world conflict they are thinking it will be some kind of Iraq shit B)There is no real reasoning being invoked here beyond ‘war bad, stop war good’ and C)A lot of people don’t think Putin will actually do it or even if he did anyone would listen. Like you think Putin has the rabid loyalty of his generals and all the people way down to the final button pushers to end the world for his ego?
The thing is though if they are wrong, and GODDAMMIT WE RAISED A GENERATION OF PEOPLE TELLING THEM THEY ARE NEVER WRONG AND ALWAYS SPECIAL AND HERE HAVE ANOTHER PARTICIPATION AWARD well the elephant’s foot in chernobyl will become a goddamned common drop instead of rare.
 
I agree. It's scary how many people in the US don't relaize that this isn't going to war in a Middle East shithole. But a war that could actually go nuclear
There are people (I use that term in a very loose sense) on Twitter who will respond to somebody saying "that could very easily lead to nuclear war" with "SO WHAT???" Here's a good example of this. Lots of simpletons invoking Hitler as an example, as though that's a true comparison. No, if Hitler had an arsenal of thousands of nuclear missiles back in the 30's, we most assuredly should NOT have gone to war to stop the holocaust. We should have let him exterminate every last fucking untermenschen in Europe rather than court the utter annihilation of human civilization. These retards lack any sense of proportionality or appreciation for what they're proposing.
 
Its worse then that.

Western Companies are trying to pull out of Russia.

Russia is telling them to go fuck themselves.

They are going to ask for a Premium out of china to ensure they don't go bug nuts
And it's obvious that China doesn't want to ditch Russia. But at the same time they relaize they don't want to burn their bridges with all the eroupen countries as well. Hence why they want peace talks
 
Really sad it's that high, don't these people know what it would mean if the US or Europe fight Russia over Ukraine or do they just have a death wish by nuclear warfare?
There’s a psychological factor going on. Two years the world has been impotent towards getting fucked in the ass. This gives people something to rally behind, feel like they’re doing some just and proactive. He get our very own Hitler.
 
There are people (I use that term in a very loose sense) on Twitter who will respond to somebody saying "that could very easily lead to nuclear war" with "SO WHAT???" Here's a good example of this. Lots of simpletons invoking Hitler as an example, as though that's a true comparison. No, if Hitler had an arsenal of thousands of nuclear missiles back in the 30's, we most assuredly should NOT have gone to war to stop the holocaust. We should have let him exterminate every last fucking untermenschen in Europe rather than court the utter annihilation of human civilization. These retards lack any sense of proportionality or appreciation for what they're proposing.
Even through nukes didn't exist in the 1930s if they did I'm pretty sure actions would have been different and history would certainly have been different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back