Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m back. What happened in the last 10 hours?
Not much, more shelling and bombing of a hospital in Kiev. The Ukranians say they still have it, but it looks like it's half demolished so I can't imagine they'll be getting much use out of it. Russia probebly encircling kyiv, the 4gorrilion mile long convoy is still approaching Kyiv. Russian news are throwing a fit over wikipedia saying that ukraine has killed 5000 russian soldiers (I agree that the number is probably bullshit, but it's still a funny thing to get pissy about)
 
what the hell was that map lukashenko showed? I've been at work then asleep and I'm not sure why-his associates looked unnerved when that map popped up Lukashenko_1646189793256_1646189799044.jpg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: PhoBingas
Based Germany may be walked back if this is true

About fucking time they actually spent what they were supposed to. Hopefully they get their air force readiness rates above 15%.
 
what the hell was that map lukashenko showed? I've been at work then asleep and I'm not sure why-his associates looked unnerved when that map popped up
Because it appears to have been the actual invasion plans, I.E. the kind of shit that should be locked in a safe in a bunker, rather than broadcast on international TV. Be basically gave Ukraine the biggest intel coup of the war for free.
 
Unlikely, in my opinion. If you browse to CCTV (China's state media) english website, you will notice that they're barely mentioning the Russian-Ukraine war. Contrast that with a mention to to the Texan primary in the US, which by all accounts, shouldn't be much of a big news (no major surprises expected, even that one-eyed jew Crenshaw sailed by).
I've heard elsewhere that what they are reporting is favorable to Russia. Do you agree?
The CCP is watching the events unfold, but I don't think they committed to either side. And it is in their interest to not have to deal with a failed state right up on their borders.
They already have a a lot of influence in the west and now Russia's short term economic hopes lay with them. I don't think they need to "commit" so much as chose the right opportunities to squeeze everyone.
 
ore common than any of those rationales, I think: people who will cheer for absolutely anything hostile to globohomo, even if it's just another competing would-be globohomo on the other side of the planet. They may know Russia is corrupt, but may see them as a "lesser evil" compared to the admittedly evil thing that is western LiBeRaL DeMoCraCy in 2022.

If theres only one player on the field. They can exploit you as much as they want. Where are you gonna go?
 
I haven't been up this late for the night guys (I got in on this today at 0600 because, well, World War III.) I figured that Vlad would actually surround Kiev and move in by now.

God damn you glorious tards are autistic as fuck with your Destroyer ID game. Respec. Who knew this 'war' would go naval. Another front!
download.gif
 
lol

archive of their video

Transexual CIA hackers vs alcoholic FSB hackers. What a timeline.
 
They switched to the m855 to deal with the mostly non existent threat of soviet body armor. There's also some spergy shit with twist rates and bullet tumble.
Nobody asked but Soviet 6B-5 armor stops M855 from a 20in barrel at 12 feet
 
lol

Lol wtf would they expect. Literally any government that isn't a literal third world shithole has more resources for cyber warfare than some dipshit moral crusading script kiddies. Wonder if any of the "hackers" will end up having unfortunate accidents.
 
I've heard elsewhere that what they are reporting is favorable to Russia. Do you agree?
Their wording has been very careful, as far as I can tell. They're actually using the term "special military operations" to describe the war, which is also the same term Russia uses. You can draw your own conclusions from that.

By contrast, in SEA, you can see how Singaporean media reports it. Much more neutral.

EDIT: Screenshots, so that this post makes sense in the future.
CCTV:
Screenshot_811.png

Channel News Asia:
Screenshot_812.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back