Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
There is no reason for Russia to attack anywhere near the plant

There is no reason for Ukraine to position soldiers and guns in or right beside the plant

Fuck Putin fuck this kike
Like it or not, there is plenty of reason. A large part of Ukraine gets its electricity from this plant, if the Ukrainians just allowed Putin's boys to walk in they would probably have shut it down. Now it looks like it's going to get shut down in much more dramatic fashion.
1646353661641.png
 
Okay here's some actual video.
View attachment 3040190
Are these lil niggas suicidal?
I come back from the vet and check this thread to find the slav niggers set a nuclear reactor on fire by fighting the Russians yet again holy shit any sympathy I had for them evaporated in a flash, not a single atom remains.
 
I saw this story, fucking amazing.

Facebook is reversing a ban on users praising Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, previously included in the platform’s Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy, amidst Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Internal memos from the social media platform, which has routinely censored mainstream conservative content, reveal it will “allow praise of the Azov Battalion when explicitly and exclusively praising their role in defending Ukraine OR their role as part of the Ukraine’s National Guard.”

“Internally published examples of speech that Facebook now deems acceptable include “Azov movement volunteers are real heroes, they are a much needed support to our national guard”; “We are under attack. Azov has been courageously defending our town for the last 6 hours”; and “I think Azov is playing a patriotic role during this crisis,” added The Intercept, which first obtained the company memos.

“For the time being, we are making a narrow exception for praise of the Azov Regiment strictly in the context of defending Ukraine, or in their role as part of the Ukraine National Guard,” clarified a spokesperson from Facebook’s parent company Meta.

“But we are continuing to ban all hate speech, hate symbolism, praise of violence, generic praise, support, or representation of the Azov Regiment, and any other content that violates our community standards,” they added in a statement to Business Insider.
 
I saw this story, fucking amazing.

Facebook is reversing a ban on users praising Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, previously included in the platform’s Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy, amidst Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Internal memos from the social media platform, which has routinely censored mainstream conservative content, reveal it will “allow praise of the Azov Battalion when explicitly and exclusively praising their role in defending Ukraine OR their role as part of the Ukraine’s National Guard.”

“Internally published examples of speech that Facebook now deems acceptable include “Azov movement volunteers are real heroes, they are a much needed support to our national guard”; “We are under attack. Azov has been courageously defending our town for the last 6 hours”; and “I think Azov is playing a patriotic role during this crisis,” added The Intercept, which first obtained the company memos.

“For the time being, we are making a narrow exception for praise of the Azov Regiment strictly in the context of defending Ukraine, or in their role as part of the Ukraine National Guard,” clarified a spokesperson from Facebook’s parent company Meta.

“But we are continuing to ban all hate speech, hate symbolism, praise of violence, generic praise, support, or representation of the Azov Regiment, and any other content that violates our community standards,” they added in a statement to Business Insider.
The absolute cunts.
 
Like it or not, there is plenty of reason. A large part of Ukraine gets its electricity from its plant, if the Ukrainians just allowed Putin's boys to walk in they would probably have shut it down. Now it looks like it's going to get shut down in much more dramatic fashion.
View attachment 3040224
The power plants are a legitimate military target kinda runs thin when it's a nuclear power plant

If this goes up it will give NATO the excuse to say fuck you for real now Vlad, stop the war or we'll have to do something about it. And even China will keep its mouth shut, a nuclear disaster is so far over the line and everybody knows who would get blamed for it. Not the Ghost Kike of Keev
 
China and oil companies are going to be the biggest winners
America is going to make out pretty well too. Lots of new arms purchases, solidified the military bloc and the low-information voters think they're saving the world. The citizens will get screwed but two thirds of them will lap it up and ask for more because they're the Avengers.

Europe gets buttfucked by this. But no you try to tell that to most Europeans any time over the last couple years and you're just "a dumb American" or "you can't know anything about this because you don't live here." :story:
 
I mean, you're forced to. You can't just abandon a position just because staying there carries risks. If the Ukrainians allow the Russians to capture a vital position and piece of infrastructure without any opposition it's a major setback. They would be giving Russia the controls to the breaker box to all of Ukraine. If it's that hazardous the Russians can just as well go around. But I think we can all agree that you don't just ignore the largest power plant in a nation being invaded.
>I mean, you're forced to. You can't just abandon a position just because staying there carries risks
Yes, you fucking do. Just like rational armies don't set up fighting positions in schools and hospitals.
>They would be giving Russia the controls to the breaker box to all of Ukraine
They can just cut powerlines if they want to cut off power. Holding a mother fucking nuclear plant does absolutely nothing other than give you a position you think your enemy will have to handicap themselves in order to take.
 
Once you notice you can't un-notice.

Adolf Hitler stood 5 foot 9 inches in his socks and weighed about 155 pounds.
In 1802 Napoleon's doctor Jean-Nicolas Corvisart-Desmarets (1755–1821) said Napoleon was "5 foot 2 inches by the French measure," which equates to about 5 foot 6 in British measurements.
Standing at around 5ft 7ins tall, Churchill was smaller than Hitler, and was bullied at school, so he spent his adulthood proving his personal courage.”
While Joseph Stalin’s cult of personality, subsequent statues, and certain photos and paintings may have you thinking he was a giant of a man, in truth the former Soviet leader and glorious moustache owner was only around 5 feet 5 inches tall (165 cm), give or take an inch.

View attachment 3039103

Winston Churchill (5 ft 6 in.), Harry Truman (5 ft 8 in), Joseph Stalin (5 ft. 5 in.)

Most powerful Mob bosses were of short height!​


-Toto Riina (chief of the Sicilian Mafia) : 5'2
-Pasquale Condello ( chief of Ndragheta) : 5'3
-Meyer Lansky (Jewish mob boss) : 5'4
-Pablo Escobar (Colombian Drug Lord) : 5'5
-Semion Mogleivich (Chief of the Russian Mafia) : 5'5
-El Chapo Guzman (Mexican drug lord) : 5'5
-Carlo Gambino (Boss of Gambino family) :5'6

I'm starting to see a pattern.
Some say the world is being run by the Jews. Others the Illuminati. What they all failed to consider was right under their noses... The Manlet
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back