Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

Figured I'd pick out a few amusing tweets from her since this is honestly a goldmine of crazy. Also I dunno how delete-happy she is, so if anything does happen at least we'll have a small sample of her silliness.

9c72dfe850d88640ab5ce04aaad780b2.png


"White women though, yeah those bitches have all the choice in the world."

a7343bdd7c78123ff67b95b2d6418dcc.png


I've always wondered how these people reconcile the whole "men are kind of required for that whole reproduction" thing. Maybe they're just super optimistic about stem cell research or something. To her credit though, someone dying trying to gold-plate their balls is pretty funny.

58eda9736ed04cbf69440147b21c3e08.png


I think that's a stupid idea no matter who you are.

485a4cc0a4328f4f800b37ee9e0e5ee9.png


Also she's a huge GoT fan for some reason. I haven't read the books and I've only watched like the first 2 or 3 episodes, but even I can tell something about that doesn't exactly gel.
Thank you so much. I don't read her Twitter at all. I've just been watching her leave comments on YouTube and capping some of them. Here are the ones I posted in the SJWs thread. I had even thought about making a thread about her alone but wasn't sure if that would make for a viable thread or not so for now posting her bullshit here is fine.

IPtFmuL.png

n4OcoIn.png

EdYdUOk.png


This is an older one but still hilarious.

8MLRpYR.png


I have some more I'm gonna cap and post here soon.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-12-7_19-23-44.png
    upload_2015-12-7_19-23-44.png
    125 KB · Views: 443
Figured I'd pick out a few amusing tweets from her since this is honestly a goldmine of crazy. Also I dunno how delete-happy she is, so if anything does happen at least we'll have a small sample of her silliness.

9c72dfe850d88640ab5ce04aaad780b2.png


"White women though, yeah those bitches have all the choice in the world."

a7343bdd7c78123ff67b95b2d6418dcc.png


I've always wondered how these people reconcile the whole "men are kind of required for that whole reproduction" thing. Maybe they're just super optimistic about stem cell research or something. To her credit though, someone dying trying to gold-plate their balls is pretty funny.

58eda9736ed04cbf69440147b21c3e08.png


I think that's a stupid idea no matter who you are.

485a4cc0a4328f4f800b37ee9e0e5ee9.png


Also she's a huge GoT fan for some reason. I haven't read the books and I've only watched like the first 2 or 3 episodes, but even I can tell something about that doesn't exactly gel.

She always uses the word 'they' like it really means something. Who is she referring to?

If only all men would die? Yes, if only. If only the entire species was eradicated. If only.

How is car and license plate information a privilege? If it is, then it's an underwhelming one.

Oddly, most, if not all, of the characters on that show are white. Even more of them are men. Most of those men are in power. The women in power are often incompetent.

To be fair, most of GoT's characters are incompetent, but I'm just showcasing how inconsistent she is. How can she like a show that can be interpreted as celebrating patriarchy? She's a moron who doesn't even understand her own beliefs.
 
Thank you so much. I don't read her Twitter at all. I've just been watching her leave comments on YouTube and capping some of them. Here are the ones I posted in the SJWs thread. I had even thought about making a thread about her alone but wasn't sure if that would make for a viable thread or not so for now posting her bullshit here is fine.

IPtFmuL.png

n4OcoIn.png

EdYdUOk.png


This is an older one but still hilarious.

8MLRpYR.png


I have some more I'm gonna cap and post here soon.

What gets me about these people is the cut-and-dry air about them. They want gender and race gone. Okay, how? That is foolish. It's important to keep the words in order to discuss and debate. Once one loses words and concepts, then they can't be analyzed or critiqued. Whether or not gender and race are social constructs, destroying them in one fell swoop is not only impossible, but it's jumping the gun in my mind.

Not to mention the fact that they don't debate very well. A debate is supposed to be a calm and respectful exchange of opinion utilizing personal experience and established facts. It's not a match of who can make the edgiest insult. She's a tool.
 
:story:

Go to 6:07. The context is that Mancheeze has had some very deep jaw infection and had to be treated for it and then goes on this insane rant right there about replacing male firefighters with female ones.

 
:story:

Go to 6:07. The context is that Mancheeze has had some very deep jaw infection and had to be treated for it and then goes on this insane rant right there about replacing male firefighters with female ones.


I'm sure when she dies in a fire because the firefighter couldn't move a burning support beam, it'll be a huge comfort that the person failing to save her has no penis.
 
"Kirstin Rudolph is a former volunteer firefighter from Fort. St. James, B.C., who says her chief sexually assaulted her and two other women she worked with for six years.

'He would ask me to have sex with him in his office,' Rudolph says. 'He would say if I want a promotion why don't I put on my knee pads and blow him under his desk.'

In February of 2015, Rob Bennett, the former fire chief of Fort St. James, B.C. was convicted of three counts of sexual assault, which he is appealing.

In his trial, Bennett insisted his actions weren't sexual and that he was just being humorous with the women. The judge didn't buy it, blaming the chief for creating 'a toxic environment.'"

It seems to me that these issues aren't being tolerated by the law. Whether the fire departments in Canada are sexist, her solution is just ridiculous. Firing all men is sexist in and of itself. Not only this, but it's impractical. It would cause a lot of chaos and confusion and interrupt the process of fighting fires. You can't stop one extreme with another extreme. It's stupid.
 
Has she considered that her views are very much a minority? Most women don't hate men. They might be cautious around a man they don't know at first, but that's not hatred. She's a sexist (yes, you can be sexist against men) and as much as the MRAs toss around the term like it's going out of style, she really is a misandrist. Did she just jump on the "men are evil" radfem bandwagon, or did she suffer some trauma at the hands of men that soured her on half the human race? Anyone know?
 
"Kirstin Rudolph is a former volunteer firefighter from Fort. St. James, B.C., who says her chief sexually assaulted her and two other women she worked with for six years.

'He would ask me to have sex with him in his office,' Rudolph says. 'He would say if I want a promotion why don't I put on my knee pads and blow him under his desk.'

In February of 2015, Rob Bennett, the former fire chief of Fort St. James, B.C. was convicted of three counts of sexual assault, which he is appealing.

In his trial, Bennett insisted his actions weren't sexual and that he was just being humorous with the women. The judge didn't buy it, blaming the chief for creating 'a toxic environment.'"

It seems to me that these issues aren't being tolerated by the law. Whether the fire departments in Canada are sexist, her solution is just ridiculous. Firing all men is sexist in and of itself. Not only this, but it's impractical. It would cause a lot of chaos and confusion and interrupt the process of fighting fires. You can't stop one extreme with another extreme. It's stupid.
Her other points before that about women doing the job better than men can because when the women go through the firefighter training, they are put through a more rigorous examination than the men because men harass them and men make them do more and carry more just seems like she's pulling some assertion right out of her ass and doesn't make any sense. The whole video is just a mind numbing pain to sit through. She just goes on and on about YouTube feminists and drama in that community and how she's gotten wiser as she's now in her mid 40s compared to these young feminists, blah blah blah.
 
Has she considered that her views are very much a minority? Most women don't hate men. They might be cautious around a man they don't know at first, but that's not hatred. She's a sexist (yes, you can be sexist against men) and as much as the MRAs toss around the term like it's going out of style, she really is a misandrist. Did she just jump on the "men are evil" radfem bandwagon, or did she suffer some trauma at the hands of men that soured her on half the human race? Anyone know?

And I think a lot of that caution comes not because they're a man, but because they're a stranger. They're probably just cautious around folks they don't know, which is fine and relatable.

Anyone who speaks in complete absolutes is usually missing something.

Feminists like to throw the word strawman a lot. Funny that they usually utilize strawman despite their constant umbridge with our supposed use of it.

Her other points before that about women doing the job better than men can because when the women go through the firefighter training, they are put through a more rigorous examination than the men because men harass them and men make them do more and carry more just seems like she's pulling some assertion right out of her ass and doesn't make any sense. The whole video is just a mind numbing pain to sit through. She just goes on and on about YouTube feminists and drama in that community and how she's gotten wiser as she's now in her mid 40s compared to these young feminists, blah blah blah.

I wouldn't mind all that much if she provided concrete evidence of this. She doesn't. It's conjecture at best and pure lunacy at worst.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't mind all that much if she provided concrete evidence of this. She doesn't. It's conjecture at best and pure lunacy at worst.
Uh oh. I've seen enough of these kinds of clowns and asking them for evidence is the one way to really get them all pissed off. They've even called demands for evidence "pedantic." They are that confident in their own claims and theories a lot of the time.
 
Uh oh. I've seen enough of these kinds of clowns and asking them for evidence is the one way to really get them all pissed off. They've even called demands for evidence "pedantic." They are that confident in their own claims and theories a lot of the time.

Unfortunately, you're right. It's this kind of narcissism that really kills discussion before it even begins.

Pedantic? Ha. Proof isn't like nit-picking.

I bet if an MRA said that female maids in hotels rape male guests, these feminists would call bullshit and demand evidence.

To be fair, they'd probably just fail and say that male rape is impossible.
 
This is how Mancheeze usually argues. Lots of ad hominem attacks and then accusations that the opponent she's trying debate with is an MRA. She trolls in a lot of YouTube videos and leaves comments like this.

B0VHq2R.png
"don't you have a blog to bitch on, or a cat to feed, or some male pedestrians to glare at from your window as they walk down the street" Fucking brutal :story:
 
Back