War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Why be a Russian citizen when the West can promise gibs as a migrant?
It is a slight flaw in the Russian plan. Also I've seen some people try proposing doing this but for everyone on the Russian side. Like promising anyone that defects from the Russian army something like $100k. Which while expensive, would probably work pretty well. Because how many in the Russian army honestly give a shit about staying in Russia with how things are when they could get a big payday and live in a nicer country?
 
So when do the smart guns and cow-voiced mechs start showing up in this changed version of war?

Glad Im not the only one who thought of MGS. Information control, proxy wars and PMC's.

Kojima called this shit. Watch the crazy twist at the end being Putin was working for the US the whole time, and was secretly destroying Russia from within so America could take over. A true American patriot.


Love still blooms on the battlefield.
 
What I'm afraid of is Russia going scorching earth, carpet bombing and everything.
Right now they're still somewhat trying to avoid turning this into a straight up genocide, only because it would be terrible PR.
If Putin does that, he's officially gone insane:
1. It would forever destroy Russia's relationship with the rest of the world, making re-approachment of any kind after the war impossible.
2. It would almost certainly be considered a genocidal act that would engender an even stronger response from the west, up to and including possible intervention. Remember that the current world order was founded to stop a second Holocaust. Under the Genocide Convention, all signatories, including the western nations, are obligated to enforce the global prohibition against genocide, even if it violates national sovereignty. Committing overtly genocidal acts would only put even more pressure on western nations to respond, directly or indirectly.
3. Outwardly genocidal acts would destroy Ukraine so utterly as to make the entire war a pyrrhic victory, damage the global economy, and demoralize Russia's own forces, who would have to carry out the acts.

The rest of Europe don't operate these old fashioned Soviet fighters, so they can't bolster what Ukraine has as they are not going to be able to operate Rafaeles, Typhoons or Grippens quickly enough for them to get into the fight and make a difference. So Ukraine might increase its fighters by about 1/3rd, which will make a huge difference but wouldn't be enough for Putin to try and broaden a conflict he is already losing.
One way around this would be to hire western mercenaries to operate and maintain the fighters on their behalf. However, I think there is more than enough ex-Soviet equipment that sending western aircraft isn't necessary for now.
 
Last edited:
One way around this would be to hire western mercenaries to operate and maintain the fighters on their behalf. However, I think there is more than enough ex-Soviet equipment that sending western aircraft isn't necessary for now.
It's unfortunately a lot more complicated than this, even if you have the know how the infrastructure can be immense. There is a reason air forces are a lot smaller today than in the past, fighter jets have complex engines, avionics, and require incredibly high maintenance to operate.

You would need to install the right security systems, ensure they have the right munitions which are not always operable on different aircraft, ensure the computer systems they have communicate with the aircraft. Access to the right chemicals, fuels, and storage facilities for each.

If the war slowed down into a longer term conflict - sure you could do it, but at the moment it's not just difficult it's impossible for Ukraine. It's not like the US that could likely turn up and turn a patch of ground into a functional airfield in a few weeks.
 
Last edited:
Now I'm not lawyer regarding war crimes but...

If that is then killing enemy combatants, who are pretending to be non-combatants, then it isn't actually a war crime. Plus, according to this, they gave them ample and reasonable opportunities to identify themselves and were ignored. So it's not like this was indiscriminate fire, they gave them a chance to identify themselves.

Unintentionally killing innocent people, if there is a military necessity, and it is not overly reckless isn't a war crime. In this case, if the Tweets are true, they gave ample opportunity for these people to identify themselves. That's assuming they weren't saboteurs.
 

Horrific video shows Ukrainians hit by Russian missile​

Graphic video has surfaced that shows the moment a Russian military strike hit in Irpin, Ukraine, a town on the western outskirts of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv. CNN's Pamela Brown has more.

Archive link is broken, and that's the second time archive.md absolutely refused to archive this properly, so here's an archive by WaybackMachine:


U.S. gasoline prices soar to highest since 2008 on Russia conflict -AAA​


U.S. gasoline prices at the pump jumped 11% over the past week to the highest since late July 2008 as global sanctions cripple Russia's ability to export crude oil after its invasion of Ukraine, automobile club AAA said on Sunday.
AAA said average U.S. regular grade gasoline prices hit $4.009 per gallon on Sunday, up 11% from $3.604 a week ago and up 45% from $2.760 a year ago.
The automobile club, which has data going back to 2000, said U.S. retail gasoline prices hit a record $4.114 a gallon on July 17, 2008, which was around the same time U.S. crude futures soared to a record $147.27 a barrel.

The most expensive gas in the country is in California at $5.288 a gallon, followed by Hawaii ($4.695), Nevada ($4.526) and Oregon ($4.466), according to AAA.
U.S. gasoline futures , meanwhile, soared to a record $3.890 per gallon on Sunday.
Gasoline price provider GasBuddy said the average price of U.S. gasoline spiked nearly 41 cents per gallon, topping $4 for the first time in almost 14 years, and stands just 10 cents below the all-time record of $4.103 per gallon.

GasBuddy said that weekly increase was the second largest ever, following a jump of 49 cents per gallon during the week of Sept. 3, 2005, after Hurricane Katrina tore through the U.S. Gulf Coast.
"Increasing oil prices continue to play a leading role in pushing prices higher," AAA said in a release, noting "pump prices will likely continue to rise as crude prices continue to climb."
U.S. crude futures soared more than 12% to $130.50 per barrel late Sunday, their highest since July 2008, as the United States and its European allies consider banning imports of Russian oil.


China Says Russia Friendship "Rock Solid", Ready For Ukraine Mediation​

"The friendship between the two peoples is rock-solid, and both sides' future cooperation prospects are very vast," said China's Foreign Minister.​

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi Monday stressed that the friendship between Beijing and Moscow was still very strong, despite international condemnation of Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine, as he said China was open to helping mediate peace.

Beijing has walked a tight diplomatic tightrope throughout the crisis, refusing to condemn its close ally Moscow after only last month touting a "no limits" strategic partnership between the two countries.

"The friendship between the two peoples is rock-solid, and both sides' future cooperation prospects are very vast," said Wang at an annual press briefing.

But he said China was "willing to work with the international community to carry out necessary mediation, when necessary".

The European Union's foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said last week that China should mediate future peace talks between Russia and Ukraine as Western powers cannot fulfil the role, in an interview with Spanish daily El Mundo.

Beijing has repeatedly said it would play a "constructive role in calling for negotiations" to resolve the crisis, but has not previously committed to joining or hosting any peace talks.

Wang also said China would send humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

He also described the China-Russia relationship as "the world's most crucial bilateral relationship", which "is conducive to world peace, stability and development".

The foreign minister referred to last month's partnership commitment as "clearly and unmistakably showing the world" that both countries "jointly oppose the revival of the Cold War mentality and stoking ideological confrontations".

Wang also said the informal alliance would "not brook interference by third parties", in a warning to the United States and its Western allies who in recent days have lobbied China to play a more active role in mediating the conflict.


Because Russia is recruiting Syrians, I feel like update on them fits this thread:

Syria says two civilians killed in Israeli airstrikes near Damascus​

State media claims its air defenses shot down most missiles, but damage also caused to sites; reported attack marks first since Russia's invasion of Ukraine​


Israel struck several sites near Damascus early Monday, killing two civilians and causing material damage, Syrian state TV reported.

The 5 a.m. strike marked the first since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and came a day after Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett flew to Moscow for a surprise meeting he said was intended to help broker a ceasefire.

Russia is allied with Syria’s regime and allows Israel to carry out operations against targets in the country. Israel’s attempts at neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict have been described as necessary to safeguard its relatively unfettered access to Syria’s skies.

Monday’s report from Syria’s SANA news agency, citing a military official, said the Israeli jets launched their missiles from over neighboring Lebanon, near Beirut.

The official said most of the incoming missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defenses, an often-heard claim that can rarely be independently verified.

It added that two civilians were killed and that the strikes caused material damage to the sites near the capital. It did not say how the civilians were killed and gave no further details.

As a rule, Israel’s military does not comment on specific strikes in Syria, but has admitted to conducting hundreds of sorties against Iran-backed groups attempting to gain a foothold in the country.

Israel last struck in Syria on February 24, mere hours before Moscow launched its assault on Ukraine. Three Syrian soldiers were killed in that strike, Damascus said.

Bennett has refrained from antagonizing Russia by refusing to condemn Moscow by name and resisting Ukrainian pleas for arms or defensive equipment. Bennett has described the strategy as necessary to keep Israel as a neutral broker, while expressing sympathy for Ukraine and sending humanitarian aid. Other officials have noted that Israel’s national security depends on being able to continue hitting Iran-backed forces in Syria.

Israel has acknowledged that it targets the bases of Iranian forces and Iran-allied terror groups, particularly along the Golan border, such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah, which has fighters deployed in southern Syria. It says it also attacks arms shipments believed to be bound for those groups.

Last month Israel also allegedly fired surface-to-surface missiles at an observation post and “finance building” near the border town of Quneitra on the Syrian Golan Heights.


Russia obstructs Iran nuclear deal as the Kremlin frets over its oil income​

Moscow makes last-minute demands as Tehran promises to boost oil production and market shuns Russian crude

Moscow is throwing up last-minute demands that could scupper an international nuclear deal with Iran — and the timing is unlikely to be coincidental as the Kremlin frets about the growing threat to its critical oil revenue after its invasion of Ukraine.

Hopes had been high that international negotiators from the permanent five members of the U.N. Security Council, Germany and the EU would be able to secure a deal with Tehran on Saturday to put strict limits on Iran’s atomic work in exchange for sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.

Such a deal would bring significant volumes of Iranian crude oil back to global energy markets in the months ahead, and that could spell trouble for Russian President Vladimir Putin. The return of Iranian supplies would help offset market turmoil and price spikes if the West were to ramp up its sanctions against Moscow over the war in Ukraine and ban Russian crude sales.

Oil sales are critical to Russia’s budget. Although Western countries have not yet directly targeted oil and gas, they have said they are prepared to do so and many oil traders have already started imposing an effective embargo.
At the Iran talks, Russia is demanding guarantees from the U.S. that the sanctions targeting the Kremlin over its invasion of Ukraine would not hinder its trade with Iran.
This fresh demand, which one Western senior official called a potential “trap,” could up-end negotiations aimed at securing a return to a 2015 accord on Iran’s atomic work. It has created yet another twist in a long-running saga that has seen the nuclear talks nearly fall apart over and over.
Russia would play an important role in implementing a renewed Iran agreement, which negotiators say they are close to achieving after 11 months of talks. The plan would be for Moscow to ship excess enriched uranium out of Iran to Russia and support the conversion of Iran’s Fordow nuclear plant into a research facility, among other things.
But with the international community moving to economically sever ties with Russia following its assault on Ukraine, Moscow says it wants assurances that it will still be able to benefit from a revived Iran accord. “We have asked for a written guarantee … that the current process triggered by the United States does not in any way damage our right to free and full trade, economic and investment cooperation and military-technical cooperation with the Islamic Republic,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Saturday.

Key role​

The question is whether Moscow is actually demanding protection from sanctions in order to fulfill its key role in implementing a restored nuclear deal, or if it’s a ploy to demand broader sanctions relief, officials said. Western officials appeared to still be scrambling to understand which one of the two scenarios was at play.

“If they stretch the domain of sanctions exceptions, we will get a political and not a technical problem, and that could be lethal for the agreement,” the senior official said.
Another senior Western official said that if Russia’s demands went beyond sanctions waivers to fulfill the role in implementing a restored nuclear deal, they could potentially “take hostage the entire agreement and put at risk their relationship with China.” Beijing is already importing significant amounts of Iranian oil and will do even more so under a restored nuclear accord.
The U.S. State Department said sanctions over Ukraine are “unrelated” to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the Iran deal is formally known. “The new Russia-related sanctions are unrelated to the JCPOA and should not have any impact on its potential implementation,” a U.S. State Department spokesperson said. “We continue to engage with Russia on a return to full implementation of the JCPOA. Russia shares a common interest in ensuring Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. ”
The threat of additional Ukraine-related sanctions already is having an impact on Russian’s oil revenue. Almost three-quarters of Russian crude trade is frozen in the wake of the Ukraine invasion, Bloomberg reported, citing consultant Energy Aspects. Russia has been exporting about 5 million barrels a day, equal to about 5 percent of global consumption, it said. Iran, meanwhile, has ambitions of supplying well over 2 million barrels per day.
“It’s hard to say whether this is a technical hiccup or a political pivot,” said Ali Vaez, Iran Project Director at the International Crisis Group. “The JCPOA’s collapse is not in Russia’s medium to long-term interest, even if in the short-run it might help keep the global energy prices up as a means of imposing pressure on the West,” Vaez said.
“As soon as nuclear negotiations in Vienna are concluded, we can reach our maximum oil production capacity in less than one or two months,” Iran’s oil minister, Javad Owji, said on Thursday, according to a Reuters report citing SHANA, the official oil ministry news agency. Iran produced 2.4 million barrels per day on average in 2021, and plans to increase that to 3.8 million barrels if restrictions are lifted.

Europe and the U.S. were beginning to worry about soaring oil prices as a result of Russia’s incursion against Ukraine. Iran analyst Henry Rome at the Eurasia Group argues that “the war puts intense pressure on Western policymakers to secure a deal that brings more Iranian oil onto the market to temper high oil prices and potential further sanctions and disruptions.” The calculation is that a revived Iran deal could help to stabilize the energy market, analysts say.
In recent days, Western officials have said negotiators were within reach of an agreement, insisting only a few outstanding issues needed to be resolved. Among the outstanding issues are the scope of sanctions relief, including Iran’s demand that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps be taken off Washington’s terror sanctions list.
“We are very close to an agreement,” said British chief negotiator Stephanie Al-Qaq on Twitter before departing to London for what appeared to be final consultations. “Now we have to take a few final steps.”

Meeting postponed​

Negotiations had advanced to such a stage that preparations to close the deal were even visible outside Palais Coburg, the main venue of the talks in Vienna. Police have begun to erect additional barricades around the luxury hotel in preparation for a meeting of ministers from Russia, China, Iran, Britain, Germany and France. Invitations were even sent out more than a week ago in anticipation of a formal adoption of a restored deal at ministerial level; that meeting is now postponed.
Western negotiators have warned over the past few months that Iran was only weeks away from having enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon. They argued that time was running out for a successful conclusion of the talks as Iran’s nuclear advances were eroding the very basis of the JCPOA.
Underscoring this point, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in its latest confidential quarterly report circulated on March 3 to member states and seen by POLITICO, that Iran had doubled its amount of 60 percent enriched material. That’s “a hair’s breadth away” from weapons grade, Eurasia Group’s Rome wrote in a note.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine also loomed large over the final days of the negotiations with officials emphasizing the need to quickly seal the deal as they were beginning to scramble with the fallout of this aggression on European territory.
While diplomats were able to shield the sensitive talks from global developments during the past eleven months, the recent scale of the Russian aggression in Ukraine made close interaction between Russia’s chief negotiator Mikhail Ulyanov and U.S. Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley more difficult by the hour.
Meanwhile, Iran agreed to provide the IAEA with documents that will answer questions into its past nuclear weapons program, potentially removing a major hurdle for the restoration of the nuclear deal. That agreement was reached on Saturday during a visit by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi to Tehran.
In a joint statement, Grossi and Iran’s nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami said they agreed to “accelerate and strengthen their cooperation and dialogue aimed at the resolution of the issues” with the aim of concluding the probe by June, when Grossi will report to the IAEA Board of Governors.
Iran had demanded that the probe into the past nuclear weapons program be closed once and for all as a precondition for Tehran returning to the 2015 nuclear deal. The investigation by the UN nuclear watchdog looks into the origin of decades-old uranium traces found by IAEA inspectors inside Iran at several undeclared sites in 2019 and 2020.
Upon his return from Tehran on Saturday evening, Grossi told reporters at Vienna airport that “there is no artificial deadline, there is no pre-defined outcome,” highlighting that the IAEA would continue to press Iran on those questions also beyond the June deadline should Tehran’s answers be inconclusive.
The IAEA has thought for some time that the undeclared sites could have been active in the early 2000s and insisted that it needed credible answers from Iran on the origin of the traces. The traces were found by inspectors on the ground after the IAEA reviewed intelligence material stolen by Israeli Mossad agents in a high-risk operation inside Iran in 2018.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was originally agreed upon in Vienna in 2015 by the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council – the U.S., Britain, France, Russia and China – plus Germany. The European Union acted as mediator and coordinator of the talks.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the agreement in 2018 and re-imposed nuclear-related sanctions along with new ones related to terrorism and human-rights abuses. In response, Iran began to incrementally ramp up its nuclear program beyond the limits of the JCPOA. Iran insists that its nuclear program is entirely for peaceful purposes.


Iran criticises Russian 'interference' in nuclear talks -Tasnim agency​


Iranian officials criticised Russian "interference" in the final stages of talks aimed at reviving Tehran's nuclear deal with major powers, Iran's semi-official Tasnim news agency reported on Monday.
Talks to revive the 2015 pact have been mired in uncertainty following Russia's demands for a U.S. guarantee that the sanctions it faces over the Ukraine conflict would not hurt its trade with Iran.
Moscow raised the potential stumbling block on Saturday, just as months of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington in Vienna appeared to be headed for agreement.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia wanted a written U.S. guarantee that Russia's trade, investment and military-technical cooperation with Iran would not be hindered in any way by the sanctions.
Tasnim cited Iranian officials on Monday saying the Russian demands were aimed at securing its interests in other areas and were "not constructive".
By postponing the revival of the agreement and delaying Iran's return to the oil market, Russia was seeking to raise crude prices and increase its own energy revenue, the news agency said, without citing a source for that assessment.

Iran's top security official Ali Shamkhani said on Monday negotiators were evaluating new components that had affected the talks in Vienna. Shamkhani said on Twitter Iran was adapting initiatives to accelerate an agreement.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken sought to dispel talk of obstacles to the nuclear deal, saying on Sunday that the sanctions imposed on Russia over Ukraine had nothing to do with it.

The 2015 deal between Iran and the United States, France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China, eased sanctions on Tehran in return for limiting Iran's enrichment of uranium, making it harder for Tehran to develop material for nuclear weapons.
The accord fell apart after President Donald Trump withdrew the United States in 2018.
Russia's concerns about the impact of Western sanctions on its dealings with Iran follow a push by senior Iranian officials for deeper ties with Russia since the election of Iran's hardline president Ebrahim Raisi last year.
Iran's top authority, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, has been calling for closer ties with Russia due to his deep mistrust of the United States.


France warns Russia against blackmail over Iran nuclear talks​


France warned Russia not to resort to blackmail over efforts to revive a nuclear deal between Iran and world powers, after Moscow demanded a U.S. guarantee that sanctions it faces over Ukraine would not hurt its trade with Tehran.
Russia raised the potential stumbling block on Saturday, just as months of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington in Vienna over reviving the pact struck in 2015 appeared headed for agreement.

In Tehran, a foreign ministry spokesperson said Iran was awaiting an explanation of the Russian demand via "diplomatic channels", adding however that the talks should not be affected by sanctions imposed on Moscow, whose contribution to negotiations so far had been constructive. read more
On Saturday, a senior Iranian official speaking to Reuters had called Russia's move unconstructive.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday that Russia wanted a written U.S. guarantee that Moscow's trade, investment and military-technical cooperation with Iran would not be hindered by Western sanctions imposed since Russia invaded its neighbour.

A French presidency official told reporters late on Sunday that diplomats tended to treat each issue on its merits and not conflating them.
"Because otherwise, in reality, it's just blackmail and not diplomacy," he told reporters.
All parties involved in the talks say progress has been made toward the restoration of the pact to curb Tehran’s nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief, which the United States abandoned in 2018. But both Tehran and Washington have said there are still some significant differences to overcome.
Western officials say there is common interest in avoiding a non-proliferation crisis, and they are trying to ascertain if what Russia is demanding regards only its commitments to the Iran deal. That would be manageable, but anything beyond that would be problematic, they say.
However, diplomats told Reuters that at least two key issues remained unresolved between Tehran and Washington, including the extent to which sanctions would be rolled back.
Iran's top security official, Ali Shamkhani, called on Washington on Monday to make political decisions. read more
"Priority of Iranian negotiators is to resolve remaining issues that are considered (a)... red line. Rapid access to a strong deal requires new initiatives from all parties," Shamkhani tweeted on Monday.
'TRYING IT ON'
The French presidency official urged Russia to assess what was at stake in Vienna, "that is to say Iran's return to respecting its obligations under the JCPOA," referring to the 2015 deal by its formal name, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
A European diplomat added: "The Russians are really trying it on and the Iranians aren’t happy although of course not saying too much publicly. We’re trying to find a way through."
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken sought on Sunday to dispel talk of obstacles, saying the sanctions imposed on Russia over Ukraine had nothing to do with the nuclear deal.

"I believe it's not for communication with journalists at this stage, sorry to say," Russia's chief negotiator Mikhail Ulyanov said when asked to clarify Moscow’s position on Monday.
European negotiators have temporarily left the talks as they believe they have gone as far as they can and it is now up to the two main protagonists to agree, three diplomats said.
Russia's concerns about the impact of Western sanctions on its dealings with Iran follow a push by senior Iranian officials for deeper ties with Russia since the election of Iran's hardline president Ebrahim Raisi last year.
Iran's top authority, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, has been calling for closer ties with Russia due to his deep mistrust of the United States.


"BREAKING 🚨 Gold price nears $2,000"

 
Last edited:
Not a mod, but spoiler should be enough.
Yeah, I figured that too, but thought I'd ask just in case.

Russia Z symbol: The meaning behind the cult symbol that has swept across Putin's Russia​

RUSSIANS have been using the letter Z to show their support for President Vladimir Putin's actions in Ukraine - but what does it mean and why are they plastering it on tanks, cars and their homes?​


Images of Russian tanks have become commonplace following Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. And the eagle-eyed amongst us may have noticed a white Z painted on them. While it’s not clear why the tanks bear this letter, in particular, the tag has become widespread with ‘proud’ Russians also starting to use the moniker as a show of support for Mr Putin’s invasion.

Explaining the phenomenon on Twitter, Galina Starovoitova Fellow Kamil Galeev wrote: “Z is a letter that Russian Military are putting on their vehicles departing to Ukraine.

“Some interpret Z as Za pobedy (for victory). Others - as Zapad (West).
“Anyway, this symbol invented just a few days ago became a symbol of new Russian ideology and national identity.”

The symbol has been used far and wide across Russia, with cars, vans and properties sporting the bizarre tag.

Professor Michael Clarke, former director of the defence think tank Rusi, told Sky News: “Often these symbols will be location based – they will be communicating where a unit is heading.
"If they were only to mark the vehicles as being Russian, you could just use one symbol.

“The fact that they are different tells you more – they are probably signs which tell you which units are heading to the north-east or north-west of a district, for example.”

And it's not the only symbol being used to show support for the Russian invasion.


Other symbols include a triangle with two lines on either side, a circle with three dots inside and a large triangle with a smaller triangle inside.

Mr Galeev added: “Of course all of this is being done in the name of Russian Orthodox Church. Shelling of residential districts, carpet bombings, launching ballistic missiles upon Ukrainian cities. All in the name of Orthodoxy.

“Some argue that Russian people don't support this invasion and this is all Putin's responsibility. Yes, decision was taken by Putin and was a surprise even for his ministers. But once it was taken, it found huge popular support. People are cheering, they're proud and enthusiastic.

“Russian media and social media accounts that stand for the invasion often put Z in their names or logos. That's how you can detect them.”

Another hypothesis that’s been touted is that they serve to avoid 'friendly fire' between other Russian combat vehicles, as the Russian and Ukrainian tanks are of the same model.

What’s also interesting is that the letter “Z” doesn’t exist in the Russian alphabet creating further speculation around its use on military vehicles.


"JUST IN 🚨 New negotiations with Russia at 1400 GMT (9 am ET) Monday: Kyiv"


"Biden in 1997 saying that the only thing that could provoke a "vigorous and hostile" Russian response would be if NATO expanded as far as the Baltic states"

"Also an interesting side point, when told by the Russians that they may have to look to China as an alternative if NATO keeps expanding, Biden joked with them by saying "good luck". How things have changed.






Kremlin says Russian forces will 'stop in a moment' if its demands are met



As talks are set to get under way between Russian and Ukrainian negotiators, a Kremlin spokesperson has a warning for Ukraine.

They said they would continue with the "demilitarisation" of Ukraine - Russia's pretext for its invasion - unless Ukraine met certain demands.

These include Ukraine dropping its bid to join the NATO military alliance, and recognising Donetsk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine as independent states.

Russia has also said it wants Ukraine to stop fighting, or effectively surrender.
The Kremlin said the attacks would "stop in a moment" if these demands were met.

 
NAKED (Topless) FRENCH WOMEN PROTESTING PUTIN'S INVASION:



@L50LasPak is puting the vid under the spoiler enough, or should I do something more? Sorry, I usually post "safer for work" content.
Did they not learn from the last time Putin was confronted with topless protestors?

WZwwv3m.gif
 

Road out of Mariupol littered with mines, Red Cross says​

The port city of Mariupol has faced some of the heaviest bombardment from Russian forces.

It appears even trying to leave the city is now fraught with danger, as the Red Cross has said one of its teams attempting to lead civilians out of the area discovered the road they were planning to take out was mined.

Dominik Stillhart, a top official with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), said it was a "hugely dangerous situation".

He called for both sides to agree the details for civilians to be able to evacuate safely - although Russia has not kept its promises to allow humanitarian corridors.

ICRC has been working to help facilitate the evacuation of civilians from Mariupol after a second attempt failed yesterday to start evacuating an estimated 200,000 people out of the city.

Mariupol is a key target for Russian forces as it would create a land corridor between annexed Crimea and the partly separatist-controlled Donbas region.

Ukraine 'retakes town and airport'​

Ukrainian forces have retaken control of the town of Chuhuiv in northeastern Ukraine, according to presidential adviser Oleksiy Arestovych.

We don't have any more details at this stage.

The town is in the Kharkiv region, where fighting has been heavy since Russia launched its invasion 12 days ago.

Separately, Ukraine forces have retaken the regional airport in the Mykolayiv region, the local governor has said.

While analysists predicts Russia should have enough resources to take key parts of Ukraine, holding them could be trickier - with the potential for a drawn-out guerrilla struggle.

Advancing forces are also required to leave behind troops to hold the gained territory - so the force moving forward becomes thinner.

Meanwhile, further south, part of the Ukrainian port of Olvia has been hit by a military "strike", Ukraine's infrastructure ministry has said.

Nobody has been wounded in the attack at the Black Sea port, which is in the Mykolaiv region.

It comes after the country claimed an area in its key port city of Odesa was subjected to a missile strike in the early hours of this morning.


Swiss journalist 'fired at by Russian soldiers'​

Reports suggest Swiss journalist Guillaume Briquet is in hospital following an attack by Russian soldiers.

The troops fired on his car, which was marked as a press vehicle, and then confiscated his passport, cash and laptop, according to Ukraine-based news outlet Hromadske.

He is the latest journalist to be targeted by Russian forces, after a Sky News team was shot at just outside Kyiv last week.

The team had to escape their car while under fire, fleeing to a nearby warehouse.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Chi-com Soldier
The guys of American Thinker are on a roll about Ukraine and Putin.

March 7, 2022

The cautionary tale of the global de-platforming of Russia​

By Rajan Laad

Following Russia's military operations in Ukraine, countries such as the UK, the US, Canada, and the EU imposed sanctions on Russia.
Key Russian banks were blocked from the interbank transaction system, SWIFT. Both Putin and Russian oligarchs allegedly part of Putin's inner circle were sanctioned by the US, UK, and EU. Even historically neutral Switzerland froze assets belonging to Putin and top Russian officials.
Russian flights have been banned from EU and US airspace.
Big Tech is restricting the reach of Russian state-owned news outlets. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and Telegram have blocked or limited access and demonetized their accounts of such Russia Today or Sputnik. Twitter has started "fact-checking" and reducing its reach of Russia Today.
Reddit has "quarantined" its Russian content. Namecheap, a domain registrar, has blocked Russian customers. Online payment systems
Google Pay, Pay Pal, and Apple Pay have blocked their services, causing grave inconvenience. Netflix won't air Russian channels on its platform in Russia. Microsoft and Apple have halted sales of their services and products in Russia.
Sports federations have banned Russia’s teams and athletes.
FIFA, soccer’s global governing body, suspended all Russian teams. The International Chess Federation will not hold its annual congress or its Chess Olympiad in Moscow. The International Automobile Federation, which manages Formula One, canceled its Russian Grand Prix. The National Hockey League won’t host future events in Russia and is pausing relationships with Russian business partners. The International Paralympic Committee won’t hold events in Russia. Even differently-abled Russian athletes were (unfairly) banned from the 2022 Winter Paralympics.
Putin was suspended as honorary president and ambassador of the International Judo Federation. The federation canceled its events in Russia.
The organizers of the Cannes Film Festival said official Russian delegations and those linked to the Russian government “will not be welcomed.” Hollywood studios have paused their film releases in Russia. Russian opera singer Anna Netrebko was banned from the New York Metropolitan Opera.


March 7, 2022

Two videos give a military perspective on what’s happening in Ukraine​

By Andrea Widburg

If you’re like me, you know with certainty that, when it comes to events in Ukraine, the media are telling you deliberate lies and that these lies are intermixed with huge dollops of ignorance. I don’t say this to challenge the dominant media narrative that a malevolent Putin has mounted a baseless attack against Ukraine to expand Russia’s borders to match those during Imperial Russia or the Soviet Union. I simply state this as a fact: Our media are not informing us about the most important issue of the day. Thankfully, a friend pointed me to a couple of videos that rely on publicly available information (including Russian military communications) to give clear, military-based explanations about what’s happening in Ukraine.
Task & Purpose is a YouTube channel founded eight years ago as an information, entertainment, and advocacy site for “active-duty military, veterans, and their families.” If you go to their home page, you can see that they have videos about all things military: How military weapons, tactics, and technology have evolved; currently used weapons and equipment; military history; Medal of Honor heroes; and military humor. Chris Cappy, a former U.S. Army infantryman and Iraq veteran, is the main host.
Once Putin invaded Ukraine, Cappy started putting together videos about what’s happening on the ground from a military perspective. The videos are great: They’re filled with publicly available information (including communications between Russian forces on the ground in Ukraine) that journalists ignore. Cappy explains in clear language, with helpful graphics, what’s happening in terms of engagements won and lost, weapons in use, and strategy and tactics.
236400_5_.jpg

Image: Task and Purpose screen grab.
One of the main takeaways, which I’d actually figured out on my own because I know about the Siege of Leningrad during WWII, is that Russians are stingy with weapons and profligate with troops. During Leningrad, the rule was one weapon for three soldiers (none of whom were trained). The three would head into combat as a pack. If the guy holding the gun was killed, the other two were expected to grab it, until all had used that single gun and died in the effort.
While Americans believe in “Shock and Awe” approaches to the first battle with the enemy, that may not be what Putin is doing. Instead, consistent with Russian battle tactics, he may be sending in expendables to get a feel for the enemy. In this case, Putin’s enemy—Ukraine—is putting up a much stiffer resistance than Putin anticipated. Having acquired this information, Putin is likely to bring in the bigger guns and better fighters.
This doesn’t mean, of course, that Putin will win in the long run. Russia is a dying country with a population in steep demographic decline. (So is Ukraine.) Even with Americans and Europeans buying massive amounts of Russian oil, this war is proving to be very expensive for Russia. Finally, the Russians aren’t thrilled with Putin’s war, meaning that Putin, like all tyrants, is sitting on an unstable throne.
Having said all that, in the short term, Putin has the military advantage, and these two videos explain why.

 
  • Like
Reactions: PFM

Elon Musk Says Europe Should Restart Dormant Nuclear Power Stations​


Elon Musk has said he believes Europe should restart its dormant nuclear power stations and boost production in those that are operational as experts fear that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could create a shortage of gas across the continent.


Taking to Twitter on Sunday, the Tesla CEO said that “nuclear is vastly better” for global warming than burning hydrocarbons, also known as fossil fuels, for energy.


According to the U.S. Office of Nuclear Energy, nuclear is a zero-emission clean energy source and the second-largest source of low-carbon electricity in the world behind hydropower.


“Hopefully, it is now extremely obvious that Europe should restart dormant nuclear power stations and increase power output of existing ones. This is *critical* to national and international security,” Musk wrote, adding that fears of radiation from nuclear power stations are inflated.


“For those who (mistakenly) think this is a radiation risk, pick what you think is the worst location. I will travel there & eat locally grown food on TV. I did this in Japan many years ago, shortly after Fukushima. Radiation risk is much, much lower than most people believe,” Musk continued.



Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has led to oil prices soaring to new highs in the UK and the EU, threatening to further push up heating bills for millions of households.


According to the International Energy Agency, Europe and the United Kingdom have increased their reliance on Russian gas supplies over the last decade, with the country supplying roughly one-third of Europe’s gas demand.


Meanwhile, nuclear power plants across Europe have been steadily closing down, despite the fact that the EU depends on nuclear power for one-quarter of its electricity, according to the World Nuclear Association.


Bloomberg, citing a compilation of data from the International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, reported that Europe is on track to house over 100 shutdown nuclear reactors by the end of this year.


The declining number of power plants comes as European nations reevaluate their relationship with nuclear energy in the wake of the Fukushima meltdown and a move toward more environmentally-friendly energy sources.

In an effort to meet the growing demand for electricity and achieve its carbon reduction targets, Europe would need to invest 500 billion euros ($568 billion) in nuclear over the next 30 years, according to Thierry Breton, the EU’s internal market commissioner, while existing nuclear plants would need 50 billion euros of investment through 2030.


Breton also said that the inclusion of nuclear energy in the taxonomy is crucial for the sector to attract the necessary capital it needs.


His comments came as the larger EU in February released plans that would allow certain natural gas and nuclear energy projects to have a place in the EU Taxonomy, a classification system that labels certain investments as environmentally sustainable.


Musk’s latest comments come after he called on the United States to increase oil and gas output “immediately” amid Russia’s invasion of neighboring Ukraine in an effort to become less dependent on Russian oil.


“Hate to say it, but we need to increase oil & gas output immediately,” the businessman wrote. “Extraordinary times demand extraordinary measures. Obviously, this would negatively affect Tesla, but sustainable energy solutions cannot react instantaneously to make up for Russian oil & gas exports.”


Stakes Rise as Ukraine War Enters 12th Day With No End in Sight​


As the Russo–Ukraine war entered its 12th day, hopes dimmed for a near-term negotiated settlement to the hostilities as Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday doubled down on his campaign to “demilitarize” Ukraine, while Russia’s Defense Ministry warned neighboring countries to stay out or be considered parties to the war.


In separate phone calls on Sunday with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and French President Emmanuel Macron, Putin said Russia would only halt its military operation if Ukrainian forces stopped fighting and Moscow’s “well-known” demands were met, according to the Kremlin’s readout of the calls.


Russia is demanding that Ukraine halt military action, change its constitution to enshrine neutrality, acknowledge Crimea as Russian territory, and recognize the separatist republics of Donetsk and Lugansk as independent territories, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, according to Reuters. Peskov told the outlet that Russia had told Ukraine it was ready to stop its military action “in a moment” if Kyiv met its conditions.


Putin also warned in a Sunday televised meeting with flight attendants from Russian airline Aeroflot that Ukrainian statehood was in jeopardy and compared Western sanctions against Moscow as equivalent to “declaring war.”


In a further sign of rising tensions, Russia’s Defense Ministry on Sunday warned that any country that offers the use of its airfields to Ukraine’s military for attacks on Russian assets could be considered as having entered the conflict. It comes amid rumors that Poland might supply fighter jets to Ukrainian forces as part of military aid.



Ukraine has requested jet fighters from Bulgaria, Poland, and Slovakia.


U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Sunday that Poland has been given the “green light” from the United States to send the jets as part of military aid support to Ukraine.


Blinken said during a press conference with Moldovan President Maia Sandu on Sunday that Washington has been holding discussions with Warsaw regarding a proposed deal that would let Ukraine to obtain warplanes from Poland.


Under the proposed deal, Poland would provide Ukraine with its MiG-29 fighter jets in return for having its hangars refilled by the United States with American-made F-16s.

But Poland, a NATO ally, has denied plans to provide its airfields for use by Ukrainian forces or send its fighter jets into the combat zone, according to the prime minister’s office.


Marcin Wasik, Poland’s deputy head of internal affairs, told a Polish radio outlet in an interview Monday that “Poland’s stance remains unchanged” on the provision of fighter jets, saying “we have not sent any jets to Ukraine,” while adding that any decisions in this regard should be made jointly by NATO allies.


His remarks were echoed by Polish national security chief Pawel Soloch, who said on Monday that no decisions have been taken on providing warplanes to Ukraine.


“Our government has already stated that we have no plans to provide the jet fighters,” Soloch said, according to Polish state television TVP, adding that decisions in this regard would need to be taken by NATO as a whole.


Soloch added that, while Poland continues to support Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression by providing military aid, its main focus is on providing humanitarian relief.


Over 1 million people fleeing the war in Ukraine have entered Poland since Russian forces launched a multi-pronged attack on Feb. 24, according to the Polish prime minister’s office.


Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky has called for NATO to impose a no-fly zone over Ukraine, a proposal that has been dismissed by the NATO alliance as too provocative and carrying the risk of sparking World War Three.


Alberta Oil Can Be a Solution to US Energy Supply Crunch—Minister​


Alberta, Canada’s main oil-producing region, can help alleviate the global oil supply crunch caused by energy disruptions, Alberta energy minister, Sonya Savage, said on Sunday.


Alberta has some spare pipeline and rail capacity and can move more oil to the United States, Savage said in Houston ahead of the CERAWeek energy conference by S&P Global. Oil prices in Monday trading in Asia have soared to $128 per barrel, up from about $83 per barrel in January.


“We are the solution, not Venezuela and others,” Savage told Reuters, an apparent reference to U.S. sending a delegation to Caracas last week to discuss an easing of U.S. oil sanctions.

She also said it was “unconscionable” for any nation to be buying Russian crude oil or refined products in light of its invasion of Ukraine.


Oil buyers have been shunning oil cargoes from Russia, one of the world’s largest petroleum exporters. Russia exports 4–5 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil and 2–3 million bpd of refined products.



Savage said the United States should ban imports of Russian crude oil and refined products.


Canada last week banned Russian crude oil imports and agreed to supply anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to counter the Russian invasion.


Russia’s Aeroflot Suspends All International Flights Except to Belarus​


Russian airline Aeroflot said Monday that it will temporarily suspend all international flights starting March 8, following the onslaught of Western-imposed sanctions on Russia over its aggression against Ukraine.


Aeroflot said in a statement that the temporary suspension of international flights was brought about by “new additional circumstances impeding the operation of flights.”


The airline stated that all domestic routes, as well as flights to Belarus, a Russian ally that has played a supportive role in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, will remain fully operational.


“Aeroflot, starting from 6 March, will stop admitting on international flights passengers holding return tickets with the return segment to Russia dated after 8 March 2022,” it stated, adding that international flight passengers with one-way tickets will be accepted until March 8.


The move follows a recommendation by Russia’s Federal Air Transport Agency, Rosaviatsiya, for all national airlines to curtail their scheduled international trips, citing “high risks” of planes operated by Russian airline operators being detained or arrested abroad.



The agency advised that national air carriers that lease aircraft to foreign corporations halt international flights beginning March 6 and put international flights on hold beginning March 8, Tass Russian News Agency reported on Saturday.


It also recommended all Russian citizens returning home from abroad use foreign airlines or transit through countries that have not sanctioned Russia, including Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and Serbia.


S7 Airlines, Russia’s second-largest carrier, has likewise halted all international flights in response to Western sanctions on Russia.
The United States has blocked Russian flights from its airspace, following similar moves by the European Union and Canada after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Alaska Airlines has also suspended the “limited interline relationships” with S7 and Aeroflot.


The EU has indicated that it was in discussions with the United States to extend the ban. The EU decision to ban all “Russian-owned, Russian registered, or Russian-controlled aircraft” was announced by European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen on Feb. 27.


Russia has retaliated by banning airlines from 36 countries, including all 27 member states of the European Union and the United Kingdom. London had earlier banned Aeroflot from UK airspace.


Without access to Russia’s airways, experts say carriers will have to divert flights south while also avoiding areas of tension in the Middle East. Recent flights from European and U.S. airlines to Asia have been forced to take major detours.

Wonder if they truly think they are making a difference by doing this?
Don't you know that naked tits can stop war? What are you, some sort of a bigot?
 

Euro Eyes Void Below Parity Versus Swiss Franc on Stagflation Shock​

The euro briefly sank below parity versus the Swiss franc for the first time in seven years on Monday and held at a 22-month low versus the dollar as soaring oil prices stoked fears of a stagflationary shock that could hammer Europe.


The conflict in Ukraine and harsh international sanctions on Moscow have sent Russian assets tumbling while prices of the country’s exports such as precious metals, oil, and gas have soared at a time when the global economy was already grappling with inflationary pressures.


Europe is the most vulnerable as it imports as much as 40 percent of its natural gas consumption from Russia and the single currency has become increasingly correlated with oil prices—the higher oil climbs, the more the euro falls as investors fret about higher inflation and the blow to the economy.


In early London trading on Monday, the euro was down as much as 0.5 percent to $1.0874, within striking distance of a low of $1.0822 hit in Asia trade, its lowest since May 2020.


It is down almost 4 percent since Russia began what it calls a “special military operation” in Ukraine and is not far from testing its 2020 trough of $1.0636.



Oil prices soared again on Monday as the risk of a U.S. and European ban on Russian products and delays in Iranian talks sent prices soaring to the highest levels since 2008.


“This is fuelling demand for the dollar and Swiss franc this morning,” said an FX strategist at a European Bank in London.

“The melt-up in commodity prices ramps up the risk of a stagflationary shock for the euro zone and complicates the policy outlook for the ECB.”


According to Goldman Sachs, a sustained $20 oil rise shock will lower real economic growth in the euro area by 0.6 percent and by 0.3 percent in the United States. But in a more adverse scenario if Russian gas shipments via Ukraine are curtailed, then euro area GDP could fall by as much as 1 percent from gas alone.


The euro also fell to a 15-month low of 124.39 yen and touched its lowest since mid-2016 against the pound at 82.01 pence. Against the Aussie, the euro has lost more than 10 percent over about a month.


Russia’s military will hold fire and open humanitarian corridors in several Ukrainian cities on Monday, the Defence Ministry said, after fighting halted weekend evacuation efforts and civilian casualties from Russia’s invasion mounted.


Sweden and Finland to Further Strengthen Security Cooperation​


Sweden and Finland will further strengthen their security cooperation in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the prime ministers of both countries said on Saturday, but they were non-committal on joining NATO.


“Russia’s war against a sovereign European nation puts the European security order at risk. In this changing security environment, Finland and Sweden will further strengthen our cooperation,” Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin told reporters in Helsinki at a joint news conference with Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson.


Sweden and Finland have strong historic ties and a close military cooperation, including joint drills and information sharing.


The invasion, called a “special military operation” by Russia, has also forced a quick change in attitude towards NATO in both countries, which are currently outside the NATO-alliance.


Polls in recent days showed a majority for joining NATO in both countries for the first time ever. Marin said it was “understandable” that more people in both Sweden and Finland now want to join NATO.



“We are now having this discussion in Finland,” Marin said. “We will have these discussions within parliament, with the president, within the government, and between the parties.”


In Sweden, the governing Social Democrats have long resisted calls from the center-right opposition to join NATO. Andersson said it was natural that the discussion should come up again, but avoided questions on Sweden joining the military alliance.


“The security situation has been altered in a dramatic way,” Andersson said. “I have met the party leaders from the other Swedish parties several times in the last week and we are discussing a number of issues,” she said.


The two countries already have a close cooperation with NATO and are invited to all consultations on the Ukraine crisis. Secretary General Stoltenberg said in January they could join the alliance “very quickly” if they decided to apply for membership.


Finland’s President Sauli Niinisto said on Friday the United States and Nordic countries would “initiate a clear process to step up defense and security cooperation” after a meeting with U.S. President Biden that included a call to Magdalena Andersson.


Puma Suspends Operation of All Its Stores in Russia​


German sportswear maker Puma has decided to suspend operations at all its stores in Russia, it said on Saturday.


Puma, which has 100 stores in Russia, had already stopped deliveries to Russia following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.


US, European Allies Discuss Banning Imports of Russian Oil​


The United States and European allies are exploring banning imports of Russian oil, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Sunday, and the White House coordinated with key Congressional committees moving forward with their own ban.


U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) also said in a Sunday letter that the chamber is “exploring” legislation to ban the import of Russian oil and that Congress intends to enact this week $10 billion in aid for Ukraine in response to Moscow’s military invasion of its neighbor.


Blinken stressed the importance of maintaining steady oil supplies globally.


“We are now in very active discussions with our European partners about banning the import of Russian oil to our countries, while of course, at the same time, maintaining a steady global supply of oil,” Blinken said in an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press” show.


Blinken, who is on a trip across Europe to coordinate with allies the response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, also said he discussed oil imports with President Joe Biden and his cabinet on Saturday.



Japan, which counts Russia as its fifth-biggest supplier of crude oil, is also in discussion with the United States and European countries about possibly banning Russian oil imports, Kyodo News reported on Monday.


Asked about a potential embargo on Russian oil imports at a regular news conference on Monday, Japan’s top government spokesperson Hirokazu Matsuno declined to comment on its communication with the United States.


Oil prices have soared over the past week after the United States and its allies sanctioned Russia over the invasion.


A bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced a bill on Thursday to ban U.S. imports of Russian oil. The bill is getting fast-tracked and could ultimately become the vehicle for the sanctions.


After Russia invaded Ukraine, the White House slapped sanctions on exports of technologies to Russia’s refineries and the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, which has never launched.


So far, it has stopped short of targeting Russia’s oil and gas exports as the Biden administration weighs the impacts on global oil markets and U.S. energy prices.


Asked if the United States has ruled out banning Russian oil imports unilaterally, Blinken said: “I’m not going to rule out taking action one way or another, irrespective of what they do, but everything we’ve done, the approach starts with coordinating with allies and partners,” Blinken said.


He said there were a series of additional measures that the United States was looking at to increase the pressure on Russia, but he did not provide any details on what the new measures would be.


Americans are by far the world’s heaviest consumers of gasoline, thanks to big cars, long driving distances and little public transportation in many areas.


The U.S. national average for a gallon of gasoline hit $4.009 on Sunday, the highest level since July 2008, according to AAA. Consumers are on average paying 40 cents more than a week ago, and 57 cents more than a month ago.


The United States imported more than 20.4 million barrels of crude and refined products a month on average in 2021 from Russia, about 8 percent of U.S. liquid fuel imports, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Russia Preparing to Commit a War Crime by Bombing Odessa, Zelensky Says​


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that Russia is preparing to bomb Odessa, a strategically important port city in southern Ukraine with a population of nearly one million.


“They are preparing to bomb Odessa. Odessa!” said the Ukrainian President of the Black Sea city in a video message on Sunday.


“Russians have always come to Odessa. They have always felt only warmth in Odessa. Only sincerity. And now what? Bombs against Odessa? Artillery against Odessa? Missiles against Odessa?” Zelensky added.


“It will be a war crime. It will be a historical crime,” he stressed while calling on Russian people to make a choice “between life and slavery.”


Russian armed forces made rapid progress when they first invaded neighboring Ukraine 11 days ago, surrounding several Ukrainian cities or facilities in the first week.



Since then, Russian forces have overrun the city of Kherson, a key port on the Black Sea and the Dnieper River, and shelled the port of Mariupol, even as Ukrainians attempted to flee via humanitarian corridors set up for civilians to evacuate.


Multiple other cities have been bombed and shelled, and the United Nations believes that around 1.2 million people have fled Ukraine as the war continues.


However, Russian forces have been met with strong resistance from the Ukrainian military, especially on the outskirts of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv.


Moscow’s military forces have also so far not taken Odessa, a cosmopolitan harbour on Ukraine’s southern coast and the country’s fourth-largest city which is home to both Ukrainian and Russian speakers and Bulgarian and Jewish minorities.


However, local residents and officials are expecting an attack soon as some Russian troops advance west towards Kherson, which is on the road towards Odessa.


“We’re expecting an attack from the sea, and we’re also expecting an attack from the Mikolayev area since they’re already moving there,” Gennadiy Trukhanov, the mayor of the city, told The Times.

Strategically, taking over Odessa would allow Russia to cut Ukraine off from the sea, effectively leaving a country that relies heavily on exports via the sea landlocked, and create a land bridge with Crimea and the Russian-occupied region of Transnistria.


Russian officials have not commented on whether they plan to attack Odessa.


“It has been in the air for days now that the possibility is there—that the Russian forces that have been extending their gains north of Crimea, through Kherson and onwards through the town of Mykolaiv, may well try to double back on Odesa and join up with a naval landing from elements of the Black Sea fleet that have been hovering on the horizon there for several days,” Al Jazeera’s Jonah Hull said.


“That’s been talked about—whether Zelenskyy is referring to specific intelligence or not it’s not clear,” Hull added.


Elsewhere, Russia and Ukraine are set to hold the third round of negotiations on Monday, Ukrainian negotiator David Arakhamia, who is also the parliamentary faction leader of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s party, announced in a Facebook post.


Both countries agreed in the second round of negotiations on Thursday to establish humanitarian corridors which would allow for civilians to safely evacuate Mariupol and Volnovakha.

However, the evacuation of Mariupol was halted after Russian forces allegedly breached the ceasefire.


The Mariupol City Council said Saturday in a statement on Telegram that the evacuation has been postponed and called on residents to seek safety in bomb shelters.


“Due to the fact that the Russian side has not adhered to the ceasefire agreement and continues shelling Mariupol and its surroundings, for security reasons the evacuation of the population is postponed,” the council said.


During his video message on Sunday night, Zelensky called for peace and told the people of Russia, “this is the time when you can still win over the evil.”


“We are Ukrainians. We need peace. We want peace. And for Russian citizens, it’s not only the fight for peace in Ukraine but for your peace and for your freedom. You used to see it. You knew prosperity … If you will be silent now, then only your poverty will speak for you”, Zelensky continued.


Backlash Against Russian-Branded Gas Stations Hits Americans​


Following the invasion of Ukraine, lawmakers in New Jersey’s largest city lashed out at one of the closest symbols of Russia they could find—a pair of Lukoil gas stations.


The Newark City Council voted unanimously Wednesday to ask the city’s business administrator to suspend the service stations’ operating licenses, citing Lukoil’s base in Moscow.


In doing so, however, they may have predominantly been hurting Americans.


The stations are franchises owned by locals, not Russians. They employ mostly New Jersey residents. And the gasoline sold at the stations comes from a local Phillips 66 refinery.


The campaign targeting the gas stations is one example of collateral damage from the backlash against Russia, as government officials and customers race to show their support for Ukraine by boycotting products and companies—or things they perceive to be Russian.



Roger Verma, a New Jersey resident who immigrated from India 45 years ago, has owned the franchise for one of the Lukoil stations in Newark since 2005. He said the decision to yank his license left him baffled and concerned that he could be put out of business, which would affect his 16 employees.


“Let me be clear that I stand with Ukraine and I’m fully in support of Russian sanctions,” Verma said Wednesday in front of Newark’s City Hall. “But I’m baffled and confused how people sitting in these positions without having any of their facts together and without having full knowledge of how things are done can introduce and change laws and change people’s lives just like that.”


In some places, people have been pouring out Smirnoff vodka, not realizing that the beverage is owned by an English company and the bottles consumed in the U.S. are distilled in Illinois.


A phone message couldn’t be left at a listing for Lukoil Americas Corp. in New York.


In a statement posted on its website Thursday, Lukoil’s board of directors expressed “its deepest concerns about the tragic events in Ukraine” and called for “the soonest termination of the armed conflict.”

It wasn’t immediately clear Thursday when the Newark stations’ licenses would be revoked, or if the city administrator might halt the suspension.


Under a typical Lukoil franchise agreement, the company acts as the station’s landlord. The station pays rent, taxes, and utilities to the company and also agrees to buy a certain amount of fuel each month.


Sal Risalvato, executive director of New Jersey Gasoline, Convenience Store and Automotive Association, called the crackdown on the stations “nothing more than political theater.”


Council Member Anibal Ramos, who introduced the resolution, said the license suspension in Newark is meant to be temporary and his office had received calls from employers offering to give jobs to any affected gas station workers.


NY Pension Chief Says McDonald’s, PepsiCo Should Consider Russia Risk​


The chief of New York state’s pension fund said on Thursday that McDonald’s Corp., PepsiCo. and other companies with a large footprint in Russia “need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time.”


Political pressure is building for companies to halt business in Russia because of its invasion of Ukraine. Some big companies have already said they will do so, including sneaker maker Nike and home furnishings firm IKEA.


“Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine and its highly unpredictable foreign policy are a threat to the global economy,” New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, who oversees the state’s public pension fund, said in a statement.



“We’re encouraging the companies we invest in to do a risk analysis and determine what is in the best interests of their company and their shareholders,” he said.


McDonald’s—one of the first western brands to open in Moscow in 1990 as the Soviet Union was crumbling—has 847 locations there, 84 percent of which are company owned.



Pepsi is also notable as one of the few Western products allowed in the Soviet Union. It has two production plants and sells snacks and beverages in the country, according to its most recent annual report for 2021.


The companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both companies have about 4 percent revenue exposure to Russia, according to a J.P. Morgan Report.


Goldman Sachs GQG Fund Cuts Russian Exposure to $222 Million​


Goldman Sachs Asset Management has reduced the Russian exposure in its GQG international equity fund to about $222 million, according to a statement and a spokesperson, down from over $1.7 billion six months ago.


The Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund was 0.99 percent exposed to Russia as of the end of February, Goldman Sachs said in a statement on its website, with holdings in Lukoil, Rosneft, and Gazprom.


The fund is Goldman’s only fund with Russian exposure, according to data from research firm Morningstar on the top 100 open-end and exchange-traded funds worldwide in terms of estimated U.S. dollar exposure to Russian securities.


“Coming into 2022 we saw attractive growth opportunities and valuations in many Russian companies,” the firm said.


“The actions by the Russian government this year began to outweigh the positive fundamentals we were seeing in many companies. We have been reducing our exposure to Russian holdings since early January, and they are now concentrated in the energy sector,” it said.



A spokesperson said the fund had $22.45 billion in assets as of the end of February, with Russian exposure equivalent to $222.3 million.


This is down from exposure of more than $1.7 billion as of September, according to Morningstar data.

Western sanctions on Moscow after Russia invaded Ukraine last week have prompted a wave of investors to announce they were cutting positions in Russia.


Goldman said it has also marked down the value of its Russian assets after the country’s central bank closed the local market to all foreign investors, complicating plans to ditch or evaluate assets.


“Under these circumstances, the Russian securities in the portfolios for which we determine valuations are now being ‘fair valued’ in the absence of true market values,” it said.


Fair value determinations “resulted in significant discounts to the market values that existed prior to the actions of the Central Bank of Russia,” it added.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Chi-com Soldier
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back