- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
You'd have more credibility if you didn't say things like the US fleeing Iraq and dropping it like a sack of shit by 2009, since the highest number of US troops in Iraq in 2009 was 148,500; 2010, 114,300; 2011, 47,305. Deaths 2009, 149. Wounded 2009, 688. Deaths 2010, 50. Wounded 2010, 319. Deaths 2011, 0. Wounded 2011, 0. All numbers from DoD. Does not include PMCs aka mercenaries. There were no serious dissensions in the US over casualties during the first term of Barack Obama. The Obama administration essentially followed a very slightly accelerated Bush administration withdrawal plan. No US soldiers were officially in Iraq from 2012 to 2015. If Russia is in as good a shape in Ukraine the next three years as the US was in Iraq from 2009-2011, Vlad daddy will be very pleased.The problem with most of these maps is that it draws WW2 style "lines" when they're entirely obsoleted forms of measurement. This one is "closer" to reality but I still don't like the vast coloring down by the Crimea. This war is almost certainly going to be dictated by the vast amount of insurgents that plague Russia over the course of months or years and its important to note that Russia doesn't really control every little village and town in the countryside, they just destroyed formal national military units but left a seething population in the rear of their advancing units. Everyone should be very careful when dealing with these maps because they tell a false story. Every major invasion in the 21st century by a national military has been overturned by insurgent forces, the invasion of Iraq in 2003 had the US fleeing by 2009 as casualties were causing serious dissension in the country alongside the economic implosion, Iraq got dropped like a sack of shit. Afghanistan also was overturned in under a week after the US finally capitulated and left. I see no reason why Ukraine wont follow the same format.
View attachment 3053862