Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder how many threads well see before this ends

1646666279632.jpg

Spicy satire
 
The amount of people saying "close the sky over ukraine!11!!!1" in the comments is terrifyingly high. i hope atleast half of these are bots because if there are genuinely this many people calling for nato to step in directly and drag us all into ww3 then i don't know man.
Going back to what i said here, Didn't Z ask yet again for a NFZ during another nato/eu circlejerk very recently? He's been told No over and over but he keeps asking and asking, calling NATO weak sissy bitches (somewhat true) for not interfering directly, but it seems that he has accepted that ukraine joining NATO won't happen anytime soon which is a good first step into realizing that NATO won't risk nuclear war for you.
People forget that Russia's military could be made up of, in it's entirety, 20 bisexual Orangutans that spend all day sniffing paint and jerking each other off and Putin still would be able to end the world on a whim via nuclear war.

Just because Russia's invasion isn't 20,000 Doom Guys rocket jumping around and hitting 360 noscopes while in a full sprint towards Kyiv dosent mean it's a good idea to escalate war with Russia.
Which is why burgers and NATO should stay out of this as much as possible and let holols and vodkas kill eachother.
I know Z must be desperate for direct NATO/burger help, after all his country is being invaded and shit, but trying to drag other countries into your regional war against the country with the biggest nuclear arsenal is a big mistake.
Call me a pussy faggot but NATO denying direct intervention so far is a good thing, pray it stays that way and that a big fuck up doesn't happen anytime soon.
 
The Russians officially state 5,500 military deaths in the First Chechen Insurgency. And Chechnya wasn't like the US invasion of Iraq. It would've been more like the US invasion of Arizona. It's literally part of Russia. They had highways and railroads leading into the region and still suffered those casualties.

US lost around 4500 in Iraq, half a world away, over a much longer timeframe.

Ofc the US used the Iraqi Army as cannon fodder and many more died. But the Russians suffered casualties amongst allied militias in Chechnya too.

Take 4500 x 2.5 at least to account for the contractor deaths which were alot, probably still are alot. Then let's talk about American backed Iraqi army deaths as well.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Pope Julius IV
Old satellite photo that was recently published:
Satellite images from March 3rd. AN2 biplanes, as well as 2 rare aircraft: IL-22PP and IL-20M. These aircraft are deployed at a military airfield in the Bryansk region, just 160km from the Ukrainian border.
1646763125486.png
Not sure about the relevancy of this, but the only reason to put those AN2s there is to be a decoy.
 
People forget that Russia's military could be made up of, in it's entirety, 20 bisexual Orangutans that spend all day sniffing paint and jerking each other off and Putin still would be able to end the world on a whim via nuclear war.

Just because Russia's invasion isn't 20,000 Doom Guys rocket jumping around and hitting 360 noscopes while in a full sprint towards Kyiv dosent mean it's a good idea to escalate war with Russia.
I don't like the argument though that you should accept Russian aggression because you're telling me they're crazy and willing to launch the nukes because they can't have Ukraine.

Now I don't want NATO there as well, but I see this often where especially Russians think they're being coy by threatening to stab you every time you do something to upset them. Imagine how crazy international politics would be if every nuclear nation played the "I'll nuke you if you escalate this" card
 
Seeing a lot of comments along the lines of "Why do people care so much? Don't they know Ukraine is corrupt and does war crimes too?!" and I just want to say from an European perspective, yeah, we know. Everyone whose understanding of geopolitics extends beyond Star Wars and Marvel analogies understands that Russia and Ukraine are both corrupt slavnigger shitholes.

It's just that nobody really gives a fuck if a nearby country launders money for shady oligarchs or elects a kike funnyman who isn't actually a capable leader, just plays one on TV. A nearby country funding separatist rebels and performing aggressive landgrabs is a much bigger cause for concern. The argument that "Russia only wants (eastern) Ukraine, no reason for other countries to worry" is less convincing when it was also claimed they'd stop at Abkhazia or that taking Crimea would be enough. And when the same rhetoric used to justify the invasion (denazification etc) is also regularly levelled against other former Eastern bloc countries - hardly a week goes by without some Russian propaganda outlet running a piece about how Latvia and Estonia are ruled by Nazis or how Poland is to blame for WW2.

Sensible people don't want an escalation to nuclear war, but they do want Russia to get hurt enough (militarily and/or economically) that they won't consider pulling this shit against anyone else in the foreseeable future. Hence the support for Ukraine. I get why Americans would be indifferent (it's not like they're gonna drop VDV into Alaska), but for us Europoors there's more to it than blind Zelensky simping.
 
You wanted total war, now you have it Ukraine.

View attachment 3054465

Turning every civilian into a fighter was a evil plan.
The worst part is that I can't even blame the crew for opening up on that car. There's a real possibility of a couple dudes with RPGs/Javelins hopping out the back and popping your vehicle...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back