Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
I'm almost certain he had originally written it as "suck me off" but decided that "suck my penis" looked better. Russ being Russ, he left the "me" in the sentence while editing it.
"suck me off" seems like a weirdly out-of-date phrase. Then again, our Russell is nothing if not weirdly out-of-date in pretty much all respects.
 
"suck me off" seems like a weirdly out-of-date phrase. Then again, our Russell is nothing if not weirdly out-of-date in pretty much all respects.
I never thought of it as particularly outdated, so I did a search in this thread for "suck him off" to see if anyone else on here had used that phrase.

Lo and behold, there was one single result. Guess who?
Something about him wanting to make Yovanna legally required to visit him and suck him off because "dishabled"?
Cant make this shit up.
 
His level of narcissism does not allow for checking for mistakes.

To cope with his adoption, disability and other disfigurement like stubby fingers or knock knees, he deluded himself as magnificent person, with little disability but otherwise great person in any field; fit, smart, artistic, stud, you name it. He is going through great lengths to maintain this delusion. This is basically his most important motivation. If he won't have delusion, then he has not even zero, but more like -12. Thus.

He cannot check himself, because that would mean he is capable of making mistakes. If he is capable of making mistakes, then he is not perfect. And if he's not perfect, then the delusion is not true. And if the delusion is not true, then he would have to go straight from 80 to -12.
 
He cannot check himself, because that would mean he is capable of making mistakes. If he is capable of making mistakes, then he is not perfect. And if he's not perfect, then the delusion is not true. And if the delusion is not true, then he would have to go straight from 80 to -12.
Right. One of his chief delusions is that his legal arguments are airtight. When he was trying to get the judge to reconsider her dismissal of his suit against Null, he indicated he was astonished that she didn't find his arguments compelling. The idea that maybe she did let him explain and still disagreed with him and gave her reasons why brought him uncomfortably close to having to acknowledge he's not perfect.
 
I'm afraid, or we'll maybe not, this is whole reason why Rusty is so entertaining. I'm afraid Rusty is too deep in his narcissist territory to absorb any information which stands against his grand delusion. He's more likely to feel victimised how judge was too stupid to understand his argument. A lone paragon of Intelligence in vast masses of retardation; not understood, denied his rights. But he is not going to give up! That would mean win of the baddies, and he's a good guy, he cannot give up! Thus the appeal happened.

Jesus, it makes too much sense if you try to be empathetic and look from his point of view. I find it horrible and entertaining at the same time, like a bad trip on LSD. I can't believe he actually operates this way in his everyday life.
 
Right. One of his chief delusions is that his legal arguments are airtight. When he was trying to get the judge to reconsider her dismissal of his suit against Null, he indicated he was astonished that she didn't find his arguments compelling. The idea that maybe she did let him explain and still disagreed with him and gave her reasons why brought him uncomfortably close to having to acknowledge he's not perfect.
Or how in his email exchange with Molly Lens where he was flabbergasted she was "oddly insisting on arbitration." I had a good chuckle at that line. He was so convinced that his threats and "reverse psychology" would work that he found her adherence to the contract that he signed to be "odd."
 
Or how in his email exchange with Molly Lens where he was flabbergasted she was "oddly insisting on arbitration." I had a good chuckle at that line. He was so convinced that his threats and "reverse psychology" would work that he found her adherence to the contract that he signed to be "odd."
Why the fuck does this gimpy retard think they insist on putting those clauses in there in the first place? It's so they can enforce them and bypass litigation, whether frivolous like Russhole's or even meritorious.
 
Or how in his email exchange with Molly Lens where he was flabbergasted she was "oddly insisting on arbitration." I had a good chuckle at that line. He was so convinced that his threats and "reverse psychology" would work that he found her adherence to the contract that he signed to be "odd."
Considering that he insisted the contract said things it didn't actually say, it's not surprising he'd say it didn't say things it clearly did. He also asked the other lawyer to "stop threatening him with arbitration and fees." He views being told the consequences of his actions and being held to an agreement that he signed of his own free will as "threats."

Why the fuck does this gimpy retard think they insist on putting those clauses in there in the first place? It's so they can enforce them and bypass litigation, whether frivolous like Russhole's or even meritorious.
He doesn't think it applies to him. Remember he found a ruling that said the "any and all" clause didn't apply to ADA claims? Nevermind that @Useful_Mistake immediately dug up a more recent ruling that said that clause applies to literally "any and all" claims. He ignores any law or rule that says he can't do what he wants to do.
 
Not sure if this was posted yet, but he made this comment a short while before the account got nuked:

1646774132869.png


in response to

1646774213780.png
 
Don't have time to document and archive but Russ has made some updates to his asafernevada webpage. A second about page that is an abridged version of the first. Listing of the EIN a claim of tax exception status and some ramble about a side PAC:

"Our EIN is 88-1043948 and we are claiming 501(C)(4) tax-exempt status.


We also run a side PAC (political action committee) that specifically seeks to change legislation. Per tax laws, 501(C)(4)s can give less than 50 percent of their donations to PACs to influence legislation. Check out our PAC"

A classic Russ blog merely promising to blog in the future and he has deleted the meet the team page instead of just not linking to it. Open palm begging for help/support and the usual 3rd person to make it more than just him.

Someone autism for me or I might do it later.
 
I never thought of it as particularly outdated, so I did a search in this thread for "suck him off" to see if anyone else on here had used that phrase.

Lo and behold, there was one single result. Guess who?

Cant make this shit up.
That is a Russell style name too. Let’s hope it’s one of those super complex ironies we just learned about and not just Russell shitting up his own thread
 
Don't have time to document and archive but Russ has made some updates to his asafernevada webpage. A second about page that is an abridged version of the first. Listing of the EIN a claim of tax exception status and some ramble about a side PAC:

"Our EIN is 88-1043948 and we are claiming 501(C)(4) tax-exempt status.


We also run a side PAC (political action committee) that specifically seeks to change legislation. Per tax laws, 501(C)(4)s can give less than 50 percent of their donations to PACs to influence legislation. Check out our PAC"

A classic Russ blog merely promising to blog in the future and he has deleted the meet the team page instead of just not linking to it. Open palm begging for help/support and the usual 3rd person to make it more than just him.

Someone autism for me or I might do it later.
Got you covered, mi amigo.
 
What the hell did he think he was doing when he sued Taylor Swift explicitly because she didn't follow his script which included her falling in love with him?
To the ween who just HAD to go and confront Russell on Reddit: Thanks a fucking lot.
Another source of milk lost due to rampant ween autism.
It seems like a lot of people who either aren't Kiwis, or only lurk sporadically think they can shame him into behaving like an adult (or at least an older teenager). His parents have undoubtedly tried that. Hell, pleading guilty to electronic harassment and being on probation for a year and a half only made him change targets, not his behavior. Some rando on Reddit isn't going to make Russ change his behavior. At this point, I don't think anything can. Remember, and this is important for understanding why Russ acts the way he does: He doesn't think he has done, or is doing anything wrong. It's all because everyone hates him because he's disabled. The idea that he brings all this crap down on himself is foreign to him. If he ends up having to cough up costs for Null and/or Freemantle, he will never consider that if he hadn't thrown a fit in the first place, it wouldn't have happened. Nope, it's all our fault.
 
Last edited:
The guy is still publicly simping for instathots after over half a decade-he'll be back sooner or later. He's incapable of keeping himself away.
He thinks each new girl he pesters will definitely be the one who responds to him favorably for sure this time! Of course he'll be back.
 
Back