Not calling anyone retarded.
But Chantal's main platform has sucked lately. She's sucked. It's been the same cycle over and over again and yeah, spicing things up by rocking Chantal's boring existence intrigues me. I'm not going to get upset over the fact she lost her YT channel when it's largely been ass this year already. Hell, I'd wager the more entertaining bits have come from Nader's channel, specifically when the dumb fuck livestreamed the police showing up to his house (Chantal turned off her stream pretty quickly into that episode) or when he went live with her a few weeks ago and she clearly was not expecting it since she had "broken up" with him.
Everything else came via her reacting. That's all her channel has turned into: her reacting to something Nader did/ said.
Even the going to the police arc largely played outside her channel, with her streaming an hour of nothing in her car while her fat ass was in the police station filing her report.
So, from my perspective, nothing really changes except we're not going to see the same repetitive streams over and over that rarely say anything or offer anything interesting.
What we could get is Chantal spiraling even further, which sure won't be broadcast via YT but we'll get glimpses of it from Peetz' channel, maybe even Nader's, her Twitter, OF and Instagram. And hell, had nothing changed, all we'd likely get is the same boring streams of nothing.
So, yeah, I'm sorry I guess because I see this as a good trade at the moment. Let Chantal navigate things without Bibi and her YT channel. It will be interesting to follow - far more interesting than the fourth Starbeeze stream this week.
It is already interesting. Look at how she is flailing about with trying to get OF to work. Of course, it is
Only Fans that isn't working properly, not
Chantal. Somehow, thousands of Only Fans users manage to do their thing daily without a hiccup, but when Chantal tries to use it, the whole system fails and she can't get online no matter how hard she tries. Not that
she is doing anything wrong, Only Fans is.
Also amusing is her constant changing of her rates. Tiers added, tiers removed, $10, $20, $50... She doesn't have a fucking clue what she is doing, and she has managed to find a way to double charge her faithful Beezers. Not only does this make her look stupid, which is always entertaining, but she is pissing off her own fans and ruining their community, which they richly deserve.
Even her denial about the dire straits she is in is funny. She thinks that all of this is just another mistake. YouTube is the one that goofed, not her. She has played by the rules all along, and once YouTube reviews her channel, they will give it back and apologize on top. She is so sure that her channel is coming back that not only is she not raging, she is downright giddy. Switching platforms seems to be triggering the same fat synapses that starting new diets used to. This change in her entire world will make her richer and skinnier.
I'm a bit disheartened at all the infighting in this thread over the past day. Null is convinced that Charlie Coal is to blame for this, and he also is convinced Chantal will get her channel back (if she gets her channel back, then why the rage, Null?) He and the 'farmers who see it this way are irate at Charlie's poo-touching, and they see themselves deprived of lulz. They dismiss the notion that YouTube might be acting on cumulative reports, and they suggest that it is retarded to think that they might be.
Well, call me a retard, but I really see it differently.
We don't know what happened. Let's get that straight. Maybe Charlie was the one who got her banned, but maybe she wasn't. What we
do know is that Charlie was not the only one reporting her. Reports were being made on a daily basis, and the people doing the reporting were boasting about it openly. There were plenty of things equal to or worse than the Omegle incident to report. Frankly, her daily attacks on DeeDee, which were extraordinarily vile, were explicitly against TOS and grounds for removing her channel as well. AdSense is also specific about using drugs on camera, including cannabis (which is
not legal in many states of the US and abroad). It is not a stretch to imagine that Charlie succeeded in getting their attention, but Chantal's fate was sealed by a review of her channel. Null also seemed to scoff at the notion that previous complaints would be saved by YouTube. Why
wouldn't they? Isn't every email a person receives automatically saved in the in box? I'm sure there is a repository for complaints that are submitted directly to YouTube (I am not referring to tweets at YouTube), where the thousands or tens of thousands of complaints have been accumulating. Were these a factor in YouTube's decision? Maybe not, but
we just don't know.
What we
do know is that YouTube did not fuck around with handing out strikes to her. They just shut her down completely without warning. Those who are upset about this dismiss the Omegle debacle as "nothing". It
isn't nothing, but it does seem that it is unlikely to be enough to yeet a whole channel without explanation. So why did they yeet it? The obvious answer is that they must have looked beyond Omegle. But once again, we don't know. Maybe Omegle
is enough? But presumably, pulling a channel without issuing strikes is an action reserved for the most egregious rule breakers.
So will they give her her channel back? I don't know that either. I assume there would be at least a cursory investigation that would include at least a token look at her channel. What will be the first thing that confronts someone looking at her channel? Hundreds and hundreds of videos of a pot smoking half-naked woman raging and threatening people. Will that be enough to make YouTube realize their error and reinstate our hero? I'm not feeling it...
If it makes certain farmers feel better to blame Charlie for what happened, go ahead and blame her. I don't give a fuck about the gorilla. But the sniping at fellow kiwifarmers in good standing, including accusing them of reporting Chantal, is going too far.
This was indeed inevitable; we've been saying it would happen for years. Monkeys like Charlie are simply part of the environment in which Chantal works. They are the price of doing business. Ultimately, it was not Charlie who put a kid with a boner on YouTube. It was Chantal. Chantal was the one making the decisions, and Chantal should have known better, If she wanted to preserve her channel, then why would she introduce something like Omegle, which is an uncontrollable element that was guaranteed to result in trouble? Chantal has to operate in an environment in which she knows there are haters everywhere, and it is part of her responsibility to be mindful of TOS. Since she routinely sharts on TOS, then why should we be surprised that YouTube has finally said enough?
Maybe you should talk to somebody about this. That whole I'M A VICTIM mentality isn't good for Chinny, and I would suggest it isn't healthy for you, either.
03/12/22
