Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 383 26.0%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 53 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,037 70.4%

  • Total voters
    1,473
That's the thing that really pisses me off: not only do they sexualize childhood, they do it as obviously as possible, as if to rub it into our faces. Even if they don't, and just want to "make a statement", they do it with all of the subtlety of stabbing you in the eye with a fucking salad fork.
Either make seeing red as a story about a girl who turns into a red panda when she gets emotional and keep it as an allegory OR tell a serious informative story about the human biology. You can't have it both ways. The story of menstruation is cringey especially in hindsight, but at least that short took the subject matter as serious as it could while still being a work of Disney animation. It didn't have Minnie mouse as the narrator or use her for the anatomy model.
 
Either make seeing red as a story about a girl who turns into a red panda when she gets emotional and keep it as an allegory OR tell a serious informative story about the human biology. You can't have it both ways. The story of menstruation is cringey especially in hindsight, but at least that short took the subject matter as serious as it could while still being a work of Disney animation. It didn't have Minnie mouse as the narrator or use her for the anatomy model.
It was meant to be shown in health classes. It wasn't going to be shown in public.

I find it odd people are complaining that this film "sexualizes childhood" when the main character is apparently 13 years old... that is, when sexuality first starts entering someone's life and puberty begins.
 
It was meant to be shown in health classes. It wasn't going to be shown in public.

I find it odd people are complaining that this film "sexualizes childhood" when the main character is apparently 13 years old... that is, when sexuality first starts entering someone's life and puberty begins.
It's the paradox of adults creating relatable content for children. Obviously these adults went through all the same things they're portraying on film, but they're making content for others instead of themselves. Some people can't get past that, some can.
 
'.jpg


A National Treasure Series without Nicolas Cage
 
Disney's really pushing Turning Red, like the ESPN crowd would have any kind of interest in watching a movie that's an allegory for periods:
Been hearing it on a rock/alternative station lately. It's really weird, mainly because I honestly doubt kids are actively listening to this particular station even if the parents have it on.

Also just hearing audio from it doesn't convince me this film is memorable. They're just throwing out buzzwords and such, and you can hear it in Mei's voice she's a brat.
 
Last edited:
Hoo boy if you say anything negative about Turning Red, get ready for shit to get ugly fast. Even when it was going to drop in theaters I thought it looked like ass. I'm sorry but when Pixar goes from this:
to looking like a generic commercial that a college student could make in 3 hours then I don't have the highest hopes for the movie.
You're not even wrong about it looking like a commercial. The red panda mascot could be used to sell tampons the same way those red bears are used to sell Charmin. Maybe this film was the result of some scrapped plan for Disney branded women's hygiene products.
 
View attachment 3061965
This is apparently the plot of the show according to wikipedia. It just screams we only made this for ESG scores in mind.
Who on this green earth of ours thought it was a good idea to have a show based on a Nick Cage movie that has nothing to do with Nick Cage what so ever.
They couldn't even get Nick in as like a wise old mentor? That's always been a good way to re-introduce old series without alienating old fans.
 
Concerning Disney's recent backpedaling over Florida's Don't Say Gay bill, Governor DeSantis made a pretty devastating point:
“You have companies, like at Disney, that are going to say and criticize parents’ rights, they’re going to criticize the fact that we don’t want transgenderism in kindergarten, in first-grade classrooms,” he added. “If that’s the hill they’re going to die on, then how do they possibly explain lining their pockets with their relationship from the Communist Party of China? Because that’s what they do, and they make a fortune, and they don’t say a word about the really brutal practices that you see over there at the hands of the CCP.”
Good fucking question, Ron. In fact, the Chinese Communist Party literally has a straight-up No Gays Allowed rule. China forbids depicting effeminate-looking -- "gay" looking -- men anywhere. And yet, Disney hasn't said a fucking word about that. I wonder why....?

Here's the full video of DeSantis telling Bob Chapek to go pound Chinese sand:

From Randy Newman and Peter Gabriel to Billie Eyelash. Fuck me. *sigh*
 
A nigga, a chink, a dreamer and a token white soyboy...of fucking course that's the cast.
You're not even wrong about it looking like a commercial. The red panda mascot could be used to sell tampons the same way those red bears are used to sell Charmin. Maybe this film was the result of some scrapped plan for Disney branded women's hygiene products.

People keep comparing it to ardman and their animation style but frankly all I see is that ambiguously brown chubby guy from the GrubHub commercial.
 
Back