Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

I'm sure Fatrick confronted these fascists.
Screen Shot 2022-03-12 at 8.28.50 AM.png
 
@Caverlock I can't reply, so I'll say this:

I want initially to cut her some slack. As a cosplayer, she may be intending "Lolita" to mean what the Japanese mean; i. e., a giant frilly lacy mess, and she's just drastically misinterpreted the rules of the Japanese Lolita fashion subculture to mean dressing in any way that's overtly childish. But given the general nonce-ish character of her friends at SFWA, my hopes are not strong.

Also
(it turns out "The Devil's Doorbell" is a very Hank Hill-esque way of saying clitoris)
Who in the fresh fuck would call it that?
 
@Caverlock I can't reply, so I'll say this:

I want initially to cut her some slack. As a cosplayer, she may be intending "Lolita" to mean what the Japanese mean; i. e., a giant frilly lacy mess, and she's just drastically misinterpreted the rules of the Japanese Lolita fashion subculture to mean dressing in any way that's overtly childish. But given the general nonce-ish character of her friends at SFWA, my hopes are not strong.

Also

Who in the fresh fuck would call it that?
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I became aware of the Lolita subculture thing while working on the post. It apparently has a big overlap with Steampunk, which is huge at Sci-Fi cons, of course.

The Lolita cosplayers seemed to fall into two categories: those who wore over-the-top ballroom gowns, garters, corsets, heels, a small hat or very large bow, etc.; and those who just really try to look like young children. I felt that the person I was featuring fell neatly into the second category.

COQJPW4WgAAdKkd.jpg <- Not one of these Dragoncon "Lolitas", which is one of the conventions the subject of my post attended (A, L)

I could draw parallels between the Lolita and Furry communities, but I think I'll avoid that.

Also, the naked doll stuff really creeped me out. For example, I don't understand how to make the doll that is clearly a child posed to appear to be flashing on a playground OK--not that you or anyone else was arguing that it was. Additionally, an adult who can spend hours coloring in coloring books strikes me as different from someone who just likes to add some extra buckles and ribbons and pastel coloring to their Steampunk attire.

If anyone feels I was unfair to Sarah Hans, please let me know. I don't want to be like Patrick "I just know Nazis when I see them, child" Tomlinson.
 
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I became aware of the Lolita subculture thing while working on the post. It apparently has a big overlap with Steampunk, which is huge at Sci-Fi cons, of course.

The Lolita cosplayers seemed to fall into two categories: those who wore over-the-top ballroom gowns, garters, corsets, heels, a small hat or very large bow, etc.; and those who just really try to look like young children. I felt that the person I was featuring fell neatly into the second category.

View attachment 3066125 <- Not one of these Dragoncon "Lolitas", which is one of the conventions the subject of my post attended (A, L)

I could draw parallels between the Lolita and Furry communities, but I think I'll avoid that.

Also, the naked doll stuff really creeped me out. For example, I don't understand how to make the doll that is clearly a child posed to appear to be flashing on a playground OK--not that you or anyone else was arguing that it was. Additionally, an adult who can spend hours coloring in coloring books strikes me as different from someone who just likes to add some extra buckles and ribbons and pastel coloring to their Steampunk attire.

If anyone feels I was unfair to Sarah Hans, please let me know. I don't want to be like Patrick "I just know Nazis when I see them, child" Tomlinson.
No fuck her. Even if she's not a pedophile shes still a retard who wears costumes. And she's ugly and fat.
 
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I became aware of the Lolita subculture thing while working on the post. It apparently has a big overlap with Steampunk, which is huge at Sci-Fi cons, of course.

The Lolita cosplayers seemed to fall into two categories: those who wore over-the-top ballroom gowns, garters, corsets, heels, a small hat or very large bow, etc.; and those who just really try to look like young children. I felt that the person I was featuring fell neatly into the second category.

View attachment 3066125 <- Not one of these Dragoncon "Lolitas", which is one of the conventions the subject of my post attended (A, L)

I could draw parallels between the Lolita and Furry communities, but I think I'll avoid that.

Also, the naked doll stuff really creeped me out. For example, I don't understand how to make the doll that is clearly a child posed to appear to be flashing on a playground OK--not that you or anyone else was arguing that it was. Additionally, an adult who can spend hours coloring in coloring books strikes me as different from someone who just likes to add some extra buckles and ribbons and pastel coloring to their Steampunk attire.

If anyone feels I was unfair to Sarah Hans, please let me know. I don't want to be like Patrick "I just know Nazis when I see them, child" Tomlinson.
I don't know what to make of Sarah Hans. I genuinely try not to think people are pedos, and certain elements of Lolita fashion can be completely innocent. But wanting to dress like a child, naked child-like doll photography, and her association with known pedos all runs together into a very unsettling picture to me. Maybe she isn't a pedo in the classic sense, but I can see her definitely down for ageplay. Which, honestly, could be why the SFWA freaks keep her around.
 
I don't know what to make of Sarah Hans. I genuinely try not to think people are pedos, and certain elements of Lolita fashion can be completely innocent. But wanting to dress like a child, naked child-like doll photography, and her association with known pedos all runs together into a very unsettling picture to me. Maybe she isn't a pedo in the classic sense, but I can see her definitely down for ageplay. Which, honestly, could be why the SFWA freaks keep her around.
it seems like a hobby for people who were abused as children.
 
My favourite thing about Rick's texts is the gay little copypasta he puts in every reply. I assume this is either something he's been told by his lawyer or he read somewhere that it's meant to incriminate people texting you if you make clear you don't wish to be contacted, but the best part is his inflated ego cannot allow a slight go unanswered so he still antagonizes the stalkers, making his dumbass disclaimer moot.

People throw around the NPC label willy-nilly, but it fits Fatrick better than anyone else I've ever come across. At least when he's in "fight" mode, he can't do anything except spit out the same 4-6 catchphrases. Wrong as always, stalker. You are mentally ill, stalker.

There are text conversations (this is not a conversation, stalker) on ONAforums that get 50+ replies from Fatrick, and every single one ends in ", stalker."
 
People throw around the NPC label willy-nilly, but it fits Fatrick better than anyone else I've ever come across. At least when he's in "fight" mode, he can't do anything except spit out the same 4-6 catchphrases. Wrong as always, stalker. You are mentally ill, stalker.

There are text conversations (this is not a conversation, stalker) on ONAforums that get 50+ replies from Fatrick, and every single one ends in ", stalker."
him getting cucked and DRUMPF ORANGEMAN getting elected were the two planes that annihilated the twin towers of his sanity, it seems. He was almost assuredly a bone-deep faggot dweeb before that, though.
 
If anyone feels I was unfair to Sarah Hans, please let me know. I don't want to be like Patrick "I just know Nazis when I see them, child" Tomlinson.
She dresses in a childlike way and makes reference to Lolita. Humbert Humbert wasn't playing checkers with her literary inspiration. If she chooses to send those signals that hard, she can only thank herself if people draw the obvious conclusions.
 
@Caverlock I can't reply, so I'll say this:

I want initially to cut her some slack. As a cosplayer, she may be intending "Lolita" to mean what the Japanese mean; i. e., a giant frilly lacy mess, and she's just drastically misinterpreted the rules of the Japanese Lolita fashion subculture to mean dressing in any way that's overtly childish. But given the general nonce-ish character of her friends at SFWA, my hopes are not strong.

Also

Who in the fresh fuck would call it that?
I wouldn't go out of my way to cut slack for this person when there's no real reason to think they meant it in the niche cosplay sense. Yes, the "gothic lolitas" of cosplay fame (the most kiwi-compatible are probably the /cgl/ board on 4chan circa 2014 and whatever examples we have on BP) are generally adult females, not children.

I don't think she'd be referring to that type because they are absurdly elitist and would be constantly sperging about outfits. The top of that field of spergs make their own costumes, or design them and pay top dollar to have other people do the sewing.

Any reason to think this person is using "lolita" in a non-perverted way? I'm just assuming pervert now because the only non-perverted reason that suggests itself doesn't make sense. Also she doesn't really look like Marion Zimmer Bradley but has the same smug energy. Therefore pedophile.
 
I wouldn't go out of my way to cut slack for this person when there's no real reason to think they meant it in the niche cosplay sense. Yes, the "gothic lolitas" of cosplay fame (the most kiwi-compatible are probably the /cgl/ board on 4chan circa 2014 and whatever examples we have on BP) are generally adult females, not children.

I don't think she'd be referring to that type because they are absurdly elitist and would be constantly sperging about outfits. The top of that field of spergs make their own costumes, or design them and pay top dollar to have other people do the sewing.

Any reason to think this person is using "lolita" in a non-perverted way? I'm just assuming pervert now because the only non-perverted reason that suggests itself doesn't make sense. Also she doesn't really look like Marion Zimmer Bradley but has the same smug energy. Therefore pedophile.
I think there's an very easy way to triage these people. The ones doing it for a love of the fashion and not for cummies very rarely have to special order the xl version of the outfit
 
It's one of those old sayings about masturbation, I don't really know the origin, but goes along the lines of, "if you ring the devil's doorbell, don't expect god to answer" or some dumb shit like that.
That's stupid. I expected that there was some sort of entendre there about the woman "coming" to the door when you rang it, but this is worse. And invites so many questions. So if she gets married, and her husband rings her devil's doorbell, does the devil still answer? Can you ding-dong-ditch the devil's doorbell? It will also make the sort of gross perverts who come onto her on social media sound like they have Down's syndrome ("I want to lick the devil's doorbell, yum!") but that might actually be intentional, I don't know.
 
Back