- Joined
- Jun 10, 2021
People said Poots was not stupid enough to actually invade Ukraine.
I think I saw Lindsay Graham or some other dumb US politician today was saying Poots wouldn't launch nukes even if NATO got involved.
Is the term WWIII limited to just a war with Nuke being tossed around?
Or if the "important" countries get in a war with each other and they hold off nuking each other, does that count?
People often associate World War III with a nuclear conflict precisely because it inevitably involves nuclear powers battling each other (there is a reason why there aren't many examples of direct confrontation between nuclear powers), and because World War II, as we all know, ended with the first recorded usage of nuclear weapons in history. World War II like escalations in conflicts, on this day and age, are bound to end in a nuclear exchange precisely because of the unpredictability of said occasions. Thus, the conclusion of a nuclear exchange being a direct consequence of a new World War isn't at all far fetched!
There are examples of this happening even before this war started. Fitbit data was used to pinpoint the locations of classified military bases some years ago, google made the news for "doxxing" an SAS facility with maps, social media is a powerful and necessary tool for information warfare but the collaterals are wildly unpredictable and can be very damaging. It takes a single retard taking a selfie to blow the cover of a whole squad, as you said!Smart phones are a plague on this war. The US knew the invasion was started a day before it kicked off because Google Maps saw the traffic jams building up on the main highways into Ukraine.
I hope western militaries are taking notes. Don't let the grunts take their phones to a combat theater. They can leave that shit at the barracks.
Not that I am aware. Do note that while China is clearly on the side of Russia on this conflict, they aren't too invested in it precisely because the notion of breakaway provinces being recognized as independent states isn't acceptable to a country with claims to whole regions that could realistically desire to be independent from it, not to mention Hong Kong and Taiwan. They also own loads of farmland in Ukraine, and it's worth jack shit if your land is being occupied by some armed militias backed up by an ally of convenience!Is there any actual evidence of a request for Chinese support by Russia, or is this just Western lies made to make Vlad look like Xi's bitch?
It's probably inevitable anyway, but I'm just asking.