War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
Seems like a basic truism that the guy’s intelligence apparatus sucked. Putin looks like he believed he would be wrapped up in a day and that turned out false.

Though there are also all the people in the west that agreed 100% with Putin’s assessment. Seemed like many wanted to treat it as ridiculous to imagine people of Ukraine wanting to fight because they figured both governments involved were awful or took the more ridiculous stance that the presence of a gay pride parade would make Ukrainians long to live under a dictatorship. Then you also get those vaguely detached from reality and thinking those identifying as ethnic Russians would flock to Russia’s side after their town gets bombed by Russians.

It’s like they’re so desperate to stick to the talking point of NATO being bad they ignore everything going on in the actual region.

Well Russian Logistics has long been known to suck. In terms of their logistics support units they can manage about 40 miles or so from railheads, and the idea was it would've been quick and easy because everything "on paper" pointed to it. The Russian bear was a big scary thing that had helped keep Assad going, taken out Checnya, stolen Crimea.

The problem is it relies very very heavily on using railways to keep going, so this is where most of the Russian movement axis make sense as its all within rail networks where available.

Ontop of that, Ukraines main move to an all professional body also included changing how their logistical supplies worked from a "push" style "Marshal Pantsov says it's day 7 so this is what you require for day 7" (which is how the russians work) to to a pull style "Colonel Wankov says we used 17 MLAWS, 3000 rounds today and need some chow."

Which changes how logistics work, it operates in real time and ensures the units actually doing fighting (and not bogged down in mud or confused by the lack of road signs) get shit they need while those largely sat waiting get less.

Russians meanwhile are stuck still getting shit handed to them according to a timetable.
 

Fighters with Ukraine’s foreign legion are being asked to sign indefinite contracts. Some have refused​

Jake Priday wanted to do his bit. His Ukrainian adventure lasted nine hours​


On February 26th Volodymyr Zelenksy, Ukraine’s president, went on television and asked foreign volunteers to take up arms in his country’s defence. Jake Priday, a 25-year-old British teacher from Cardiff in Wales, responded to the call. Priday had spent six years in the British army, doing tours of duty with the Royal Engineers in Estonia, Kenya and, most recently, Iraqi Kurdistan, where he helped train local militias in 2017. After he dislocated his knee the following year, he left the armed forces.

Back home, he began teaching skills he’d learned as a soldier – making tourniquets and treating wounds – at a vocational school in Cardiff. Most of his students were young men in their late teens, who “had dropped out of university and were looking for some way to improve their lives”.

Priday is 6’3” and powerfully built with green eyes and a crew-cut. Zelensky’s plea caught his attention: here was a chance to instruct people who now needed his first-aid skills more than ever. He had been following the Russian troop manoeuvres on the Ukrainian border for months. “Whenever you see me on my phone, I’m not on social media,” he said. “I’m scrolling through the news. My partner hates it. I’m always asking her, ‘Have you seen this? Have you seen this?’” Priday didn’t think that Putin’s build-up of troops was a bluff. “It didn’t make sense if it was all a ploy,” he said. “It’s too expensive to keep that much equipment there for so long.” So when Russia finally invaded Ukraine on February 24th, Priday was already mentally prepared for his next move.

A few days later Priday informed his school that he was taking three weeks off and told his fiancée he was heading to Ukraine: “She was sad, but she understood what it was that I needed to do.” Social-media posts suggested that anyone interested in helping the war effort should contact the Ukrainian embassy in their home country. His goal, Priday told diplomats in London, was to give Ukrainians basic medical training, focusing his efforts on “as many women, children and disabled people as possible”. “I have no interest in being a hero or dying,” he told the embassy staff. “My heart goes out to the people. And I want to help.” On March 2nd he left for Krakow in Poland on a one-way ticket.

“I have no interest in being a hero or dying”

The Ukrainian embassy told him to contact a volunteer in Poland called Staz, who said Priday should go to the Cicada Hotel in a Polish border village called Korczowa. “No one is ever going to help everyone,” Priday remembers thinking as he travelled to Ukraine. “But if you can do a little bit, even just for a little bit of time, you need to find it in you to try.” In the end, his foray into Ukraine lasted just nine hours.

At approximately 1am on March 3rd, Priday and 15 other volunteers crammed into a white van with civilian licence plates, bound for western Ukraine. A yellow van followed with another 15. A Bulgarian in a black hoodie, who’d drunk a number of Tyskie beers while waiting at the Cicada, sat next to Priday for the hour-long drive. He worked as a nightclub bouncer in London and, moments after he entered the van, confessed to being a neo-Nazi. “My plan is to kill as many Russians as I can,” he explained on repeat.

The two vans were waved through each of the six checkpoints they passed. The volunteers were dropped off at a Ukrainian army base, a collection of yellow buildings with red tiled roofs, just before 3am. They were led inside one of the buildings to a room with no heating and 25 beds without sheets. The Ukrainians checked everyone’s passports and turned away one prospective volunteer, a Russian who worked in Dublin. He was told, according to Priday, that there was “no way” he could sign up.

Priday was woken around 8am by a Ukrainian soldier banging a drum. In a canteen the new arrivals were served a breakfast of noodles and a “weird-tasting juice that smelled like gasoline”. Priday expected staff to assess the skills of the foreigners and attempt to slot them into suitable roles – many volunteers had no military experience. He thought he might be sent to a refugee camp to help the wounded and teach basic first aid.

Instead, the co-ordinators explained that volunteers were expected to fight on the frontline. “You were told that you would go where you are most needed,” Priday said. They would get three to five days’ training. Staff informed them that the first two days would be devoted to rudimentary map-reading and medical skills; on the third day weapons would be handed out and volunteers would practise firing them on a range; then all of them – regardless of their prior experience – would be dispatched to the front. A Belarusian anarchist who had been through the training confirmed the abbreviated nature of it. He said he was told that new recruits were destined for Kyiv.

The foreign legion does now appear to be adapting. Online application forms for new recruits ask for candidates with “military/combat/medical experience”. 1843 magazine has heard reports that a new commander has been appointed.

Veterans are now being winnowed out from those who have never seen combat – the latter now receive three weeks of training. A spokesman for Ukraine’s ministry of defence said that “we are focused on trained people.

Untrained people are not going to be sent to the front”.

Priday was surprised by the naivety of those eager to fight. Some volunteers likened the Ukrainian struggle to that of the Kurds in Iraq against Islamic State, but he knew how the Russians were a different kind of enemy. “This is nothing like fighting terrorists,” Priday tried to explain to other recruits. “You’re fighting a real country, with a real army, with a real navy, with special forces and heavy weaponry and superb tactical capabilities. And it’s all being conducted by a crazy man.” As he said to his fellow volunteers, no one seemed to have thought through what would happen if a foreigner like Priday – a nato veteran – were to be captured by the Russians.

“Prisoners like me would be a gold mine for Russian propaganda,” Priday said.

“You’re fighting a real country, with a real army and heavy weaponry – all conducted by a crazy man”

The most troubling turn of events came just after breakfast. The volunteers lined up and were told that it was time to sign a contract: this stipulated that their pay would be 7,000 hryvnia a month ($230 at the time) and that they would have to remain in the Ukrainian foreign legion for the duration of the war. The contract put them under the same obligations as all Ukrainian men: under martial law, declared by Zelensky on February 24th, no man aged between 18 and 60 is allowed to leave the country. “If you’ve got any commitments at home, you’re going to lose them,” Priday told me.

People might lose their jobs or even their houses, if they fall behind on rent or mortgage payments: “7,000 hyrvnia a month is not sustainable”.

Two other sources confirmed to 1843 magazine that the contract binds volunteers to serve for an indefinite length of time. (By way of comparison, the French Foreign Legion requires people to sign up for five years in the first instance.) None of the volunteers 1843 magazine spoke to had been told about the terms of contract before they made the crossing into Ukraine. A source in the Ukrainian ministry of defence also told 1843 magazine that the contract was for an unlimited period. He said that, in practice, those who no longer wished to fight could apply for a discharge and were unlikely to be refused. Between 20 and 30 volunteers have already been allowed to leave after signing on. The ministry of defence spokesman denied that the contract requires volunteers to sign on indefinitely but refused to share a copy.

The terms of the contract are clearly giving some people pause. A number of would-be volunteers in Lviv in western Ukraine, interviewed by 1843 magazine, said they would like to help the war effort but are wary of signing the document. They are now looking for other ways to offer assistance.

Priday implored the other volunteers not to sign. “I was trying to explain to them what martial law really means – and that it’s up to Ukraine to decide when it ends. It can be extended and extended. But no one at the base was explaining this to the volunteers. They just kept reiterating that you were getting paid for your services.”

“To me it’s deceiving,” Priday said. “They’re selling you a dream – You can help the Ukrainian people! – but then they’re throwing you into the worst place possible in a war zone.” Priday refused to sign and said he was immediately asked to leave the barracks. He was still able to convince nearly 20 aspiring volunteers not to sign the contract, he claims.

One foreigner who did sign was a 21-year old from Britain with no military experience. He told Priday he’d been working dead-end jobs for years and his frustration had mounted and mounted. He flew to Poland without telling his housemates or his parents: no one in Britain knew that he had gone. Priday felt like the man was signing his “death warrant”. (The man has subsequently returned from Ukraine.)

Less than ten hours after he’d entered Ukraine, Priday left the camp and hitchhiked back to the border. The last thing he saw in the barracks was a group of young men in the bathroom lining up to shave: members of the foreign legion are prohibited from having beards.

Volunteers are still flocking to fight. A blazing red neon sign slung across the roof of the Cicada Hotel announces that it is open 24 hours a day. The gravel car park has become a staging ground for chancers, mercenaries, volunteers, drifters, missionaries, legionnaires, spies and swindlers who, at any hour of the day, are looking for some form of transport – buses, vans, cars – to whisk them across the border. Eighteen-wheelers are parked next to Volkswagens with diplomatic plates and Red Cross vehicles loaded with medical supplies. A green van, a former food truck that still bears the words “DELICIOUS FOOD” in faded Cyrillic characters, has been renovated to become a troop carrier. A sign reading “FOREIGN LEGION” is taped to the windshield. Volunteers sleep inside cars, engines running to keep the occupants warm.

Priday felt like the man was signing his “death warrant”

The interior of the Cicada is a cross between an Austro-Hungarian hunting lodge and a Wild West saloon. Half-a-dozen Slavic languages echo beneath its slanted wood-beam ceiling. Army backpacks line a wall; body armour, helmets and sleeping bags crowd the hallway from the bar to the dining area, where men chain-drink instant coffee and beer, and cut into pork schnitzels.

They huddle over their phones, examining maps and news stories.
On any given night you can meet French foreign legionnaires, Baltic ex-servicemen and American gun-nuts raised on “Rambo” and “Top Gun” hankering for a shot at their old Cold War foe. A bulked-up former pilot from Louisiana who did four tours in Afghanistan he sold his pick-up truck to fund his trip to Ukraine. “I’m just here to shoot,” he said with a grin. There are Balkan fighters in cargo pants; German hipsters-turned-gonzo humanitarians; Ukrainian military attachés with black pistols holstered into their jeans;

Mormons from Utah; and a middle-aged Norwegian woman determined to ease the burden on Ukrainian mothers and take up a Kalashnikov in the spirit of solidarity.

A Lithuanian volunteer seasoned in anti-tank warfare wears a sweatshirt that reads, in blue-and-yellow letters “Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй” (“Russian Warship, Go Fuck Yourself”), the response of the Ukrainian soldiers stationed on Snake Island in the Black Sea when a Russian naval vessel ordered them, hours into the invasion, to lay down their arms. The Lithuanian’s friends had given him the sweatshirt as a going-away present. He took out his phone and scrolled to a photo of a tattoo of a crusader on horseback that he recently had emblazoned across his chest. “I worry that if Putin conquers Ukraine, he will turn to Lithuania next,” he told me. “So I’m here fighting for my own country as much as I am for Ukraine.”


"Ukraine’s foreign legion volunteers sign indefinite contracts fo $250 a month. Co-ordinators explained that volunteers would fight on the frontline after 3 to 5 days’ training."

 
The guys of American Thinker are on a roll with a batch of Ukraine related articles.

March 14, 2022

Alas, the Best Outcome in Ukraine Now May be a Relatively Quick Russian Victory​

By Selwyn Duke

It’s hard finding an American, anywhere, who believes Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a good thing. I’m no exception. War is ugly, and innocent people suffer as the pseudo-elites play their geopolitical chess games driven by power-lust, pocketbook and politics. This also isn’t about rooting for the “good guys.” For Vladimir Putin cannot be counted among them, and, for that matter, neither can ex-actor and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy or our globalist “leaders.” Rather, this concerns something else.
When I was on some medication a while back and wanted to take Benadryl as well, for a more frivolous reason, I hesitated because I couldn’t determine how the drugs would interact. I didn’t take the Benadryl; as someone close to me put it, “You don’t want to risk dying over something stupid.”
The same point could be made here as our leaders, who can’t even figure out what boys and girls are, and who tiptoe around WWIII in the backyard of the nation with the world’s largest nuclear weapons stockpile:
Do we really want to risk dying in an atomic holocaust over something stupid?
This isn’t emotion-driven fear-mongering. Trends forecaster BCA Research is predicting a 10 percent chance of a civilization-ending nuclear war within the next year — and I fear the probability may be greater still.


March 14, 2022

The Myth about NATO Expansion​

By Michael Curtis

Perhaps the most notable achievement of the war criminal Vladimir Putin is his gift for disinformation and deception, the creation of an alternative reality. His shameful mastery is illustrated by his justification not simply of his aggression against the independent country of Ukraine, but of the brutal attack on the hospital and maternity ward in Mariupol by the allegation that neo-Nazis, with Nazi flag and photos of Hitler, were hiding in the medical facilities of the city which in fact had been without water, electricity, and heat for a week. Putin informs us that Russia is bringing justice by a variety of actions: by attacking the care home for disabled, near Kharkiv, and destroying a kindergarten in Dnipro in central Ukraine, destroying 48 schools, and apartment buildings. The gifted propagandist Yevgeny Prigozhinm , close to Putin, has released a film Blazing Sun which depicts Russian mercenaries entering Ukraine in order to prevent Ukrainian authorities for committing genocide against its own people.
Harry Potter lovers will be surprised they are unaware that U.S. government is training birds infected with or carrying bacteriological weapons to fly from Ukraine to Russia.
The world is still searching to explain the “root causes” of the unprovoked aggression by Putin against a neighboring country. His actions are reminiscent of the tragedy in 1932-33 when the mania of Joseph Stalin forced famine, the Holodomor, which caused the death of four million Ukrainians who were forced to eat grass, tree bark, flowers, rats, dogs, and even cildren. Ostensibly, Putin claims his policy is to prevent expansion of NATO, which has been unjustly expanded, and the desire of Ukraine to be a member of NATO. The brutal attack ironically stems from the fact that Ukraine wanted protection from a Russian attack.


March 14, 2022

Ukraine's Truth​

By Thomas Rose

Krakovets, Lyviv Oblast Ukraine: As Russia’s invasion of Ukraine now targets military bases and supply lines here in the far west of Ukraine just miles from one of the busiest Polish border crossing, the letter Z has morphed from a proud symbol of Russian arms symbol into of the mark of Russian terror. What did the nearly two million women and children passing through this corridor ever do to have their homes, hospitals, and factories destroyed by Russian artillery?
Ukraine’s guilt is manifold. She is guilty of not surrendering; guilty of defending herself against impossible odds; guilty of standing up to the tyrant of a mighty and aggressive neighbor. She’s guilty of celebrating her national identity and independence and worst of all, she’s guilty of not succumbing to the ever-growing terror from the east nor the neglect from an uncertain and terrified west, led by the United States.
Ukraine officially now puts the number of its dead war fighters at nearly 1500, but as in all wars, the heaviest price is paid not by those who bear arms, but those who cannot fight back. Those who can’t find refuge even in the hospitals and apartment blocks Russian heavy guns now target.
Ukraine’s armed forces are now joined by a tragically growing army of inconsolable mothers and orphaned children. Recently vibrant urban landscapes are rendered lifeless by Russian armor. Tanks are parked where cars should be. Churches are without spires. The longer it takes Russia to occupy Ukraine the more it is turning this country into ever-growing heaps of uninhabitable rubble. The more valiant the Ukrainian defense stifles Putin’s plans, the more his war becomes a war of vengeance that Russia has by no means yet lost.
What must go through the minds of Russian soldiers as they are given their orders to fire upon civilian neighborhoods. Do they think it to right the wrongs against a Russia more sinned against that sinning? Do they think of themselves are actual victims of real western aggression? One can only wonder what it is they see themselves fighting for as they traduce the fields villages and cities of Ukraine. Not to mention whether they think it worth dying for
Such is not the case among those they are fighting against. If they didn’t before, Ukrainians certainly now know what they are fighting for. Like the citizens of Russian-occupied Maritipol, who by the thousands surround Russian tanks outside city hall chanting “bring back our men.”

How long before some pro-Zelinsky supporters in the West will have a surprising Pikachu face when they found out then Zelinsky isn't a saint and he can be a bigger SOB than Putin? :thinking:
 
One thing is to assert that Putin doesn't come into public, the other is to assert he is about to be shot. This feels like when the Pentagon agent went to the news and claimed he had undeniable proof that Putin was about to die from a lethal anal disease. His proof? Putin wasn't smilling, therefore anus about to kill him.

I do agree with your loyalty point, although it's far to early to start celebrating a potential coup as the media is doing


2 weeks ago (if you don't count his alleged fake appearance a week ago), as far as I know. But given the censorship the media employs, it may be that we haven't heard any of his new apperances.
I'll think we should wait and see what happens there.
I have heard some people comment that China has a hard time understanding why governments around the world can't just will legislation into power on a whim like they do whenever they negotiate and I think Russia maybe having the same issue, once you've been a dictatorship where what the man says, goes, it's probably really hard to comprehend even the concept of lowly plebs rebelling, much less having a say in the process.

Idk maybe FSB agent in a drunken stupor gave Putin their analysis of Belarus and said "Ukrainians are 95% on our side, OMON is currently pacifying the remaining 5%" and even then their intelligence was based on some Belarusian government polling agency.

Russia and China show us what the danger of locking oneself in a censored, feel-good, bubble ends with. When your leadership ends up only reading the one newspaper that's written by their own fucking propaganda department their view of reality becomes warped and disconnected from reality and eventually such idiots always end up embarrassing themselves to hell and back because of that disconnect and then it's "YOU'RE ALL FIRED FOR LYING TO ME ABOUT EVERYTHING" and the quiet response is "we'd be fired for telling the truth a lot sooner".

Edit: Oh and let's not be fooled that the west is not going down that same retarded road, just look at certain american cities and how it's borderline illegal to mention the problems they're having, hell, a lot of problems the west has are about as discussable as the Ukraine Invasion is in Russia because god damn think of everyone who this information will potentially offend, we see this, we can take this, multiply by 10 and apply that to what Russian government in it's info bubble knows about the world.
This is something the U.S government is currently going through with the current administration they are legit using propaganda outlets as their media advisors and are clearly following what ever their propaganda tells them.
Dammit Russia are missing the ukranians who actully deserve a bullet in the fucking head.
 
Azov burning rusians





and now it's ON

1647264164484.png


when you go for a walk around Kyiv and then suddenly ...


 
Last edited:
@Useful_Mistake can't quote you, but interesting article. I have a suspicion that the Foreign Legion will be used as a stopgap measure to fill the rank as the Ukrainian volunteers and recruits finished their training, this is why now they're preferring those with prior military experience. That article, however, now makes me think about the condition for the mercenaries on the other sides. The Chechen, the Syrians, the Wagners, and most likely others. We knew of stories from the Ukrainian, but none so far from the Russian side
 




Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky will deliver a virtual address to Congress on Wednesday as the western ally comes under intense shelling from Russia, Democratic leadership in the US Congress said Monday.


“We look forward to the privilege of welcoming President Zelensky’s address to the House and Senate and to convey our support to the people of Ukraine as they bravely defend democracy,” House leader Nancy Pelosi and her Senate counterpart Chuck Schumer said in a joint letter to lawmakers.


The announcement came with both sides launching a fresh round of talks, more than two weeks after Russia’s President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion, amid deadly air strikes in the capital Kyiv and an eastern pro-Moscow separatist region.


Ukraine said it would demand “peace, an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of Russian troops” during the talks.


Pelosi and Schumer said in the letter Zelensky’s virtual address would begin at 9:00 am (1300 GMT).


“The Congress remains unwavering in our commitment to supporting Ukraine as they face Putin’s cruel and diabolical aggression, and to passing legislation to cripple and isolate the Russian economy as well as deliver humanitarian, security and economic assistance to Ukraine,” they added.


"JUST IN - Ukraine says to demand 'immediate' ceasefire, Russian withdrawal at Monday talks"

India considers buying discounted Russian oil, commodities, officials say​


India is considering taking up a Russian offer to buy its crude oil and other commodities at discounted prices with payment via a rupee-rouble transaction, two Indian officials said, amid tough Western sanctions on Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.

India, which imports 80% of its oil needs, usually buys about 2% to 3% of its supplies from Russia. But with oil prices up 40% so far this year, the government is looking at increasing this if it can help reduce its rising energy bill.


"Russia is offering oil and other commodities at a heavy discount. We will be happy to take that. We have some issues like tanker, insurance cover and oil blends to be resolved. Once we have that we will take the discount offer," one of the Indian government officials said.

Some international traders have been avoiding Russian oil to avoid becoming entangled in sanctions, but the Indian official said sanctions did not prevent India importing the fuel.


Work was ongoing to set up a rupee-rouble trade mechanism to be used to pay for oil and other goods, the official said.

The officials, who both declined to be identified, did not say how much oil was on offer or what the discount was.

The finance ministry did not immediately reply to an email seeking comments.

Russia has urged what it describes as friendly nations to maintain trade and investment ties. India has longstanding defence ties with Russia and abstained from a vote at the United Nations condemning the invasion, although New Delhi has called for an end to the violence.


Russia's Surgutneftegaz (SNGS.MM) allowed Chinese buyers to receive oil without providing letters of credit (LC) payment guarantees in order to bypass sanctions, sources told Reuters. read more

The Indian government, which could see its import bill rise by $50 billion in the fiscal year starting in April, is also looking for cheaper raw materials from Russia and Belarus for fertiliser, as the cost of its subsidy programme has rocketed.

The government, which has already doubled its subsidy bill for the fiscal year to the end of March 31, allocated a further 149 billion Indian rupees ($1.94 billion) on Monday.

The government expects the fertiliser subsidy bill to rise by at least 200 billion to 300 billion rupees in the next financial year, from the current estimate of 1.05 trillion rupees, the two officials said.

"If we can get cheaper fertiliser from Russia then we will take that. It would help in easing some fiscal concerns," one official said.

($1 = 76.6100 Indian rupees)

 
Elon Musk challenges Putin to a duel

In a bizarre turn of events, US tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to have challenged Russian president Vladimir Putin to a one-on-one fight, suggesting that the winner decide the fate of Ukraine.
Ukrainian politicians so far have welcomed the offer, which may have been made tongue-in-cheek. Kyiv's mayor Vitali Klitschko, himself a former boxer, replied with three strong arm emojis.
The Russian president is yet to respond. Musk has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine throughout the invasion.
Earlier this month one of the companies owned by the California-based tech entrepreneur, Starlink, supplied Ukraine with a number of satellite dishes intended to protect internet access in the country.

 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Un-Clit

Beijing says US spreading ‘disinformation’ over China’s Ukraine role​


Beijing on Monday accused Washington of spreading “disinformation” over China’s role in the Ukraine war, ahead of talks between the two countries’ envoys in Rome.


Without directly addressing US media reports of a Russian request for help from Beijing, foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said: “The US has been spreading disinformation targeting China on the Ukraine issue, with malicious intentions.”


"BREAKING: Germany planning to buy up to 'thirty five' US F-35 fighter jets"

Instagram no longer accessible in Russia: AFP, regulator​


Instagram was inaccessible in Russia on Monday after Moscow accused its parent company Meta of allowing calls for violence against Russians, including the military, on its platforms.


The move comes after Facebook and Twitter were blocked in early March as part of sweeping efforts by Moscow to control information available to Russians about its military operation in Ukraine.


Instagram appeared Monday on a list of “restricted” online resources on a list published by Russia’s media regulator Roskomnadzor.


Instagram’s app was not refreshing without a VPN, AFP journalists said.


Facebook and Instagram are widely used in Russia, the latter being the most popular social media platform among young Russians.


For many small Russian businesses, Instagram was a key platform for advertising, processing sales and communicating with clients.

Fourth round of Ukraine-Russia talks on "technical pause" until Tuesday, Ukrainian negotiator says​


Ukrainian negotiator, Mykhailo Podoliak, said in an update on Twitter that a "technical pause" has been taken in the Ukraine-Russia talks until Tuesday.

"For additional work in the working subgroups and clarification of individual definitions. Negotiations continue,” Podoliak said.

Earlier today, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described them as “difficult talks.”

Podoliak said the fourth session was being held virtually, not in person, with the Ukrainian negotiating team in Kyiv.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Elim Garak

Taiwan Says ASUS Will Withdraw Business From Russia Amid Calls From Ukraine​


Taiwan-based electronics company ASUS will pull out business from Russia in consideration of its reputation, Taiwan’s economy minister said on Monday, following a letter from a Ukrainian minister urging the company to cut ties with Moscow.


Ukraine’s deputy prime minister Mykhailo Fedorov issued a letter to ASUS chairman Jonney Shih on March 10 urging the company to “end any relationship and stop doing business in the Russian Federation until the Russian aggression in Ukraine is fully stopped.”


“We appeal to you to stop relationships with Russia-based clients and partners, including supplying hardware and electronics, providing technical support and services by your company and its affiliates to the Russian Federation,” Fedorov said in a letter posted on his Twitter account.


ASUS did not release a statement following Fedorov’s letter, nor did it respond to a request for comment.


Speaking on the sidelines of a parliament session, Taiwan’s economy minister Wang Mei-hua reaffirmed the country’s support for democracies and that Taiwan had taken measures against Russia, though she could not comment on specific corporate actions.



Wang said that ASUS will provide “overall consideration to its reputation” and will perform “relevant business and personnel evacuation as soon as possible,” based on her “initial understanding” of the company’s situation.


ASUS does not provide a breakdown of revenue by country. For the third quarter of last year, it reported Europe accounted for only a third of its revenue.


The company does have a fully-owned Russian sales unit, though it has similar units all over the world, and a product support unit in Ukraine, according to its latest quarterly report.


Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sparked concerns that China may be emboldened and decide to invade Taiwan, a de facto independent country that the communist regime sees as a part of its territory.

Taiwan said it condemned Russia’s attack on Ukraine and pledged to join sanctions against Moscow. Premier Su Tseng-chang said on March 1 that Taiwan will work with Western countries in their ban of selected Russian banks from the SWIFT international payment system.


Currently, there is not much trade between Taiwan and Russia. According to data from Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan exported $1.3 billion worth of goods to Russia in 2021, while importing $5 billion of Russian products. Meanwhile, Taiwan’s trade with Russia accounts for only 0.76 percent of the island’s total trade.


Yen Su-chiu, deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers’ Association, said that Taiwanese technology firms may face debt and cash flow issues due to the sanctions, even though Russia only makes up 1 percent of Taiwan’s electronic exports.


Yen said this is because most of these technology corporations have facilities in countries that have imposed sanctions against Russia, local newspaper Focus Taiwan reported on Sunday.


Frank Fang and Reuters contributed to this report.

 
China got Russia to trade via its payment processors, now India does the same:

India to Finalize Alternative Payment System for Trading With Sanction-Hit Russia​


India is finalizing an alternative payment system that will allow it to continue trading with Russia, which has been subjected to a barrage of Western sanctions after its invasion of Ukraine, a local newspaper reported on Sunday.


The Indian government is in the midst of finalizing a bank to set up an alternative payment system, which will allow Russia to deposit rubles while India deposits rupees, an official familiar with the matter told Hindustan Times.


The official noted that talks are on with representatives of the Reserve Bank of India, the State Bank of India, and Kolkata-based UCO Bank with regards to the payment mechanism.


India used the same mechanism to import Iranian oil after the United States imposed sanctions against Iran in 2012 for its nuclear weapons program. At that time, UCO Bank was appointed and anchored a “Vostro account” from an Iranian bank.


The government has also established a top inter-ministerial panel, led by economic affairs secretary Ajay Seth, to analyze the impact of the Western sanctions against Russia on India’s economy.



The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that India would prioritize imports of edible oil and fertilizers because a shortage of any of these goods could lead to food inflation and affect the country’s agriculture sector.


Discussions with banks concluded that India has a better chance of negotiating the rates of its share of Russian oil, given Russia’s dwindling oil market as a result of Western sanctions, the official said.


India has called for an end to violence in Ukraine but refrained from outright condemnation of Russia, with which it has long-standing political and security ties.


A top Pentagon official expressed understanding of India’s decision to abstain from voting on U.N. resolutions condemning Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, saying that the United States acknowledged India’s “complicated history and relationship with Russia,” the Times of India reported.


Ely Ratner, assistant secretary of defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs, said during a Congressional hearing on March 10 that India is “diversifying their arms purchases away from Russia” and is “moving in the right direction.”

“That’s going to take some time, but they are clearly committed to doing that, including increasing the indigenous, including increasing the indigenization of their own defense industry,” Ratner said. “That’s something we should support.”


U.S. lawmaker Ro Khanna pointed out that the United States would be a greater ally to India because the country supported India during its 1962 conflict with China.


“I think it’s obvious that the U.S. would stand against Chinese aggression on the Line of Actual Control far more than Russia or Putin would, and that we really need to press India to not be as dependent on Russian defense and to be willing to condemn Putin’s aggression in Ukraine, just like we would condemn Chinese aggression beyond the Line of Actual Control,” Khanna said.


Russia’s exports to India stood at $6.9 billion in 2021, mainly mineral oils, fertilizers, and rough diamonds, while India exported $3.33 billion worth of goods to Russia in 2021, mainly pharmaceutical products, tea, and coffee.


Reuters contributed to this report.

Australian Fuel Prices Skyrocket to 8-year High in February and Showing No Sign of Slowing​


The Russian invasion of Ukraine, on top of the refusal of OPEC nations to increase crude oil production, pushed February prices for Australian petrol prices in the five largest capital cities to an eight-year high.


The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) latest quarterly petrol report found that the daily average petrol prices in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth was 182.4 cents per litre (US$5 a gallon) in late February.


This is the highest inflation-adjusted level since 2014, at a time of strong international demand, conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, and a lower Australian exchange rate.


In the first half of March, prices have accelerated towards 220 cents a litre, surpassing the previous record, with no signs of slowing.


In June 2008, during the Global Financial Crisis, daily average prices reached an equivalent to 213 cents per litre (US$5.87 a gallon) in today’s dollars.



“The world was already experiencing high crude oil prices late last year due to the continuing actions of the OPEC and Russia cartel, and the enduring Northern Hemisphere energy crisis,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said. “The shocking events in Ukraine have forced crude oil prices even higher, as Russia is a major supplier of oil.”


Australian retail petrol prices are largely determined by international refined petrol prices and the Australian-U.S. dollar exchange rate.


“Crude oil prices have been climbing sharply since late-2020, and prices at the bowser here have followed,” Sims said.

In the 12 months between the December quarter 2020 and 2021, average retail petrol prices increased by 41.4 cents per litre or about 34 percent.


Retail petrol prices consist of three factors: Mogas 95, the regional benchmark price of refined petrol, excise and GST taxes, and other costs and margins.


Mogas 95 and taxes accounted for 86 percent of the average price of petrol in the December quarter of 2021.


“It is tempting to point the finger at petrol retailers when prices are very high, but our data shows that late last year 86 cents of every dollar spent by consumers at the bowser was outside of the retailers’ control,” Sims said.


The federal government has faced calls to consider measures in the upcoming federal budget, to be revealed at the end of March, including cutting excise tax—currently at 44 cents per litre.


South Australian Premier Steven Marshall wrote to the federal government on Sunday, urging for a reduction in excise tax.

Marshall has also committed to making real-time petrol pricing permanent, allowing motorists to find the cheapest fuel at any given time.


However, Liberal MP Tim Wilson said tax adjustments would not make any radical price changes.


“Obviously, international conflicts have a direct flow through to the price of petrol at the bowser,” Wilson told Sky News Australia. “And that’s why we’re so mindful of it. And any tax adjustment—if it were to happen—would not radically change the impact at the bowser.”


Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the answer to the calls would be revealed in the budget but noted that an excise cut would not affect the fluctuations currently occurring.


“What are driving fuel prices are things well beyond the shores of Australia,” Morrison told Nine Network on Sunday.

Australia Unveils Sanctions on 33 Russian Oligarchs Including Chelsea Owner Abramovich​


The Australian government has announced fresh sanctions on 33 Russian “oligarchs” including notable billionaire and Chelsea football club owner Roman Abramovich.


The latest tranche of penalties will cover the heads of Russian state-owned enterprises and the armed forces and follows recent sanctions—numbering around 460—from the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada, and New Zealand.


Swept up in the Australian sanctions are Gazprom CEO Alexey Miller, Rossiya Chairman Dmitri Lebedev, Rostec Chair Sergey Chemezov, Transneft CEO Nikolay Tokarev, Vnesheconombank Chairman Igor Shuvalov, Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Kirill Dimitriev, and Abramovich.


“The sanctions announced today reinforce Australia’s commitment to sanction those people who have amassed vast personal wealth and are of economic and strategic significance to Russia, including as a result of their connections to Russian President Vladimir Putin,” Foreign Minister Marise Payne said in a statement on March 14.

“We will continue to coordinate closely with our partners to impose a high cost on Russia for its actions,” she added. “The Australian government reiterates our strongest support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and for the people of Ukraine.”



Sanctions include asset freezes, travel bans, and restrictions on financial transactions.


Abramovich was disqualified from running the English Premier League team Chelsea after he was sanctioned by UK authorities. The billionaire has, however, vowed to sell the club and direct the proceeds towards aiding the Ukrainian people.


Authorities have also been involved in highly publicised seizures of luxury villas, yachts, and private planes.


Emeritus legal professor Gabriel Moens has raised concerns over the lack of transparency from democratic governments in identifying targets for sanction.


“Simply being an acquaintance of Vladimir Putin is neither a satisfactory nor a sufficient reason for depriving them of their property …” he wrote in The Epoch Times. “This is because the act of seizure implies that they are guilty by association, even if they have not done anything to facilitate, or to support, the Kremlin’s catastrophic decision to invade Ukraine.”


“The reality is that there are oligarchs who oppose the invasion and are prepared to use their resources to help the victims of Putin’s war of aggression.”


Meanwhile, U.S. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan has revealed the Biden administration has issued a stern warning to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on any assistance to Moscow.


“We are communicating directly, privately to Beijing, that there will absolutely be consequences for large-scale sanctions, evasion efforts or support to Russia to backfill them,” he told CNN.


The warning comes after Russian missiles struck a Ukrainian base just 25 kilometres from NATO-member Poland, killing around 35 people and injuring another 134.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky again called on NATO to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine, warning that a lack of action could result in Russian missiles hitting NATO territory.


“If you do not close our sky, it is only a matter of time before Russian missiles fall on your territory, on NATO territory, on the homes of NATO citizens,” Zelensky said in a video address.


In response to the invasion, a 2015 video of U.S. political scientist John Joseph Mearsheimer has been circulating online in which he criticises successive American foreign policy experts and presidents for misreading the Ukraine-Russia relationship and oversimplifying the situation by blaming Putin without considering Russia’s strategic interests.


“NATO expansion was driven by 21st century men and women. They believe balance of power politics is dead, that’s what happened here. (But) Putin is a 19th century man, he does view the world in terms of balance of power politics,” Mearsheimer said, in reference to Russian concerns that a westernised and militarised Ukraine would pose a threat.


“We thought we could drive right up to his doorstep, and it wouldn’t matter,” he added. “We should create a neutral Ukraine, which is a buffer state between NATO and Russia.”

Australia To Develop Offshore Oil, Gas Amid War-Induced Energy Crisis​


Australia will soon begin approving offshore oil and gas exploration projects in a move that could help alleviate the global energy crisis stemming from the Russia-Ukraine conflict.


The decision from governments and corporations to cut off imports of Russian oil has led to a spike in fuel prices worldwide—including Australia, where the price at the pump is set to exceed $2 per litre (US$5.50 per gallon).


Minister for Resources and Water Keith Pitt criticised the Russian regime and said ongoing exploration would help provide reliable and affordable energy to Australia and other parts of the world.


“Ukraine is providing a frightening example of the dangers of relying on despots and autocrats for your energy supplies,” Pitt said.


“The Australian Government is working with like-minded countries on how we can be part of the solution for Europe’s energy crisis, and that includes ensuring the development of energy resources.”

The Australian government will now be assessing bids placed on exploration zones released as part of the 2021 Offshore Petroleum Exploration Acreage Release.


The release opened up 21 areas across 80,000 square kilometres (30,000 square miles) with potential for offshore oil and gas drilling, with locations in the coastal waters north of Western Australia and between Victoria and Tasmania.

“The Government regularly offers acreage release opportunities to industry, and it is great to see this healthy level of interest in investing in exploration and bringing on new oil and gas projects for both domestic gas and for exports to our trading partners,” Pitt said.

In Australia, rising petrol prices have sparked fears that the increasing cost of living will carry through into higher inflation.


Peter Khoury, the spokesman for Australian motor vehicle and housing insurance giant NRMA, predicted that the cost of basic goods at shops and supermarkets will also see a hike with transport delivery trucks now paying twice as much for diesel compared with April of 2020.


“Diesel is the fuel that our economy runs on. Farming, agriculture and mining, transport, small businesses that run fleets,” he told the ABC.


“This is coast to coast, and we have never seen anything like it in history. Your family will feel it at the bowser, in the supermarket aisles and everywhere else.”


Calls have been made for the federal government to help the strain on all Australians by reducing or even putting the 44 cents per litre ($1.20 per gallon) fuel tax on pause altogether.

 
I'm sorry, what's your point exactly? My point was that the whole "RUSSIA IS COLLAPSING, PUTIN IS LITERALLY ABOUT TO BE SHOT" seems a bit too fed to me. My other point was that the British thought the same about the German Reich, and thought it would collapse a month or so into the war. The Reich was fairly stable, and as we know lasted until 1945. The point is, they predicted a fall, which didn't happen. Seems like they might be blowing their load a bit soon here. Unless the feds are behind the coup, in which case they'll just place someone worse
The difference between the two is that Russia is beginning to clamp down on free speech and putting high-ranking people in jail.......when they're just beating down on a small ex-Soviet Republic. This is like what if Hitler started freaking out before his forces took Poland. Everything from the Russian side indicated this would be a quick fight, instead, they're getting bogged down for weeks with no end in sight. Also, another difference between Russia and the German Reich? Adolf was open to realism in his first few years of the war. Hitler didn't purge the generals until near the end, whereas Putin practically purged anyone who didn't sing his praises. It was only by the end in 1945, did he lament that he didn't purge the generals like Stalin did. Meanwhile, Putin surrounded himself with yes-men Soviet-style, and the result is what we saw now: with him being lied to until the very end, because anyone with the balls to tell him that he was about to commit political and military suicide was gone.

Though there are also all the people in the west that agreed 100% with Putin’s assessment. Seemed like many wanted to treat it as ridiculous to imagine people of Ukraine wanting to fight because they figured both governments involved were awful or took the more ridiculous stance that the presence of a gay pride parade would make Ukrainians long to live under a dictatorship. Then you also get those vaguely detached from reality and thinking those identifying as ethnic Russians would flock to Russia’s side after their town gets bombed by Russians.

It’s like they’re so desperate to stick to the talking point of NATO being bad they ignore everything going on in the actual region.
Exactly. So many people in the west simp for a man who made such colossal errors because "THE WEST IS RUN BY GLOBOHOMO!" Never mind that, as I pointed out before, there's plenty of sexual abuse in Russia's army full of conscripts, so Russia is far worse in that regard than the West ever was.

Well Russian Logistics has long been known to suck. In terms of their logistics support units they can manage about 40 miles or so from railheads, and the idea was it would've been quick and easy because everything "on paper" pointed to it. The Russian bear was a big scary thing that had helped keep Assad going, taken out Checnya, stolen Crimea.
So basically, they're still at the same stage they were in WW1? Logistics is still their weakness.
 
Last edited:

World Shares Mixed, Oil Down $5.50 per Barrel​


Shares rose in Europe after a mixed session in Asia on Monday, where Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index sank 5 percent after the neighboring city of Shenzhen was ordered into a shutdown to combat China’s worst COVID-19 outbreak in two years.


Benchmarks rose in Frankfurt, Paris, and Tokyo and U.S. futures were higher. Oil prices retreated against the backdrop of uncertainty from the war in Ukraine.


Germany’s DAX advanced 2.8 percent to 14,003.93, while the CAC 40 in Paris picked up 1.7 percent to 6,367.58. Britain’s FTSE 100 gained 0.3 percent to 7,178.48.


The future for the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1 percent, auguring a positive start for the week’s trading. The S&P 500 future was 0.7 percent higher.


The spreading virus outbreaks in China are compounding worries over supply chain disruptions both from the pandemic and from the war.



A vital manufacturing and technology hub of 17.5 million people, Shenzhen is home to some of China’s most prominent companies, including telecom equipment maker Huawei Technologies Ltd., electric car brand BYD Auto, Ping An Insurance Co., and Tencent Holding, operator of the WeChat message service.


Foxconn, supplier to Apple and other electronics brands, said it had suspended factory lines in Shenzhen due to the shutdown. In a notice to Taiwan’s stock exchange, its listed company Hon Hai Precision Industry, the world’s largest contract manufacturing company, said it did not expect the suspension to have a major impact on its business.


Hon Hai shares lost 1 percent on Monday.


The Hang Seng index dipped 5.4 percent but regained some lost ground to close 5 percent lower at 19,531.66. The exchange’s tech index dropped 11 percent.


The Shanghai Composite index slipped 2.6 percent to 3,223.53. The A-share index in Shenzhen’s smaller market lost 2.9 percent.


Infection numbers in mainland China are low compared with other countries and with Hong Kong, which reported more than 32,000 new cases Sunday. But Beijing’s “zero tolerance” strategy has led to lockdowns of entire cities to find and isolate every infected person.


In other Asian markets, Tokyo’s Nikkei 225 index rose 0.6 percent to 25,307.85 and the S&P/ASX 200 in Australia gained 1.2 percent to 7,149.40. South Korea’s Kospi lost 0.6 percent to 2,645.65.


The Ukraine crisis and central bank efforts to fight inflation remain the focus for most markets.


Russia’s military forces were keeping up their campaign to capture Ukraine’s capital as residents of other besieged cities held out hope that renewed diplomatic talks might open the way for more civilians to evacuate or emergency supplies to reach them.


A fourth round of talks began on Monday between Ukrainian and Russian officials.


On Friday, the S&P 500 fell 1.3 percent, and the Dow industrials lost 0.7 percent. The Nasdaq composite index gave up 2.2 percent and the Russell 2000 index of smaller companies slipped 1.6 percent.


World markets have been rocked by dramatic reversals as investors struggle to guess how Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will affect prices of oil, wheat, and other commodities produced in the region.


That’s raising the risk the U.S. economy may struggle under a toxic combination of persistently high inflation and stagnating growth. The Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates at its meeting this week as it and other central banks act to stamp out the highest inflation in generations, while trying to avoid causing a recession by raising rates too high or too quickly.

U.S. stocks are about 10 percent below peaks hit earlier this year, while crude oil prices are more than 40 percent higher for 2022.


U.S. benchmark crude oil lost $6.51 to $102.82 per barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It surged $3.31 per barrel on Friday to $109.33 per barrel.


Brent crude oil, the standard for international pricing, declined $5.40 to $107.27 per barrel.


The U.S. dollar rose to 118.02 Japanese yen from 117.35 yen. The euro strengthened to $1.0952 from $1.0926.

European Shares Rise on Ukraine Hopes; Volkswagen Surges on Strong Results​


European stocks rose on Monday as investors pinned their hopes on diplomatic efforts by Ukraine and Russia to end weeks-long conflict, while shares in Volkswagen surged after the German carmaker doubled its operating profit.


The pan-European STOXX 600 index gained 1.0 percent, extending gains from Friday when Russian President Vladimir Putin signaled a positive shift in talks with Ukraine.


Russia and Ukraine gave their most upbeat assessments following weekend negotiations, even as Russia attacked a base near the Polish border and fighting raged elsewhere.


“No sign yet of hostilities in Ukraine easing, but risk assets are beginning to behave as if most of the negativity is now priced in,” said Ian Williams, economics & strategy research analyst at Peel Hunt.


Auto stocks climbed 4.1 percent to lead gains among sectors. Volkswagen AG surged 6.6 percent as higher prices and a more favorable product mix boosted its operating profit.



However, China-exposed miners, which have outperformed recently, fell 1.8 percent, as surging COVID-19 infections in the world’s top metals consumer fanned worries over economic growth prospects.


Shares of luxury brands such as LVMH and Richemont, which depend on China for a large part of their sales, also declined.


Investors waited for policy decisions from the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bank of England later this week, with both the central banks expected to raise interest rates.


Banks gained 2.8 percent, extending a rebound from one-year lows hit last week as investors ramped up expectations of rate hikes to combat soaring inflation.

Hopes of progress in peace talks sent oil prices lower. Oil has surged this month after Western sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine raised concerns about supply disruptions.


French power utility EDF slipped 1.5 percent after it warned on its 2022 profit outlook, saying that wholesale energy price caps and lower nuclear output problems are likely to impact the group’s capability to achieve financial targets.


Dutch tech investor Prosus, which owns a stake in China’s Tencent, tumbled 10.6 percent, reflecting worries over regulatory concerns.


Telecom Italia climbed 8.0 percent after it said it would start formal talks with KKR to assess the U.S. fund’s potential 10.8 billion euro ($11.8 billion) offer for Italy’s biggest phone group.


Russia’s Claims It Killed up to 180 Foreign Mercenaries in Yavoriv Strike Are ‘Pure Propaganda’: Ukraine Officials​


Ukrainian officials have called Russia’s claims it has killed up to 180 foreign mercenaries during a strike on Yavoriv military base “pure Russian propaganda.”


The country’s Defense Ministry spokesperson Markiyan Lubkivsky told CNN that the claims are simply not true and that no foreigners have yet been confirmed among the dead at the training area, which is around 12 miles away from the Polish border and roughly 25 miles from Lviv, located in western Ukraine.


“This is not the truth. Pure Russian propaganda,” Lubkivsky said.


Lubkivsky’s comments come after Russia’s Defense Ministry on March 13 said that up to 180 “foreign mercenaries” and a large consignment of foreign weapons were destroyed in the attack at the Yavoriv International Center for Peacekeeping and Security.


Russian Ministry of Defense spokesperson Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said in a briefing that high-precision long-range weapons were used to strike the Ukrainian armed forces training centers at Yavoriv, as well as a separate facility in the village of Starichi.



“At these facilities, the Kyiv regime deployed a point for the training and combat coordination of foreign mercenaries before being sent to the areas of hostilities against Russian military personnel, as well as a storage base for weapons and military equipment coming from foreign countries,” Konashenkov said, according to the Moscow-based RIA news agency.


“As a result of the strike, up to 180 foreign mercenaries and a large consignment of foreign weapons were destroyed. The destruction of foreign mercenaries who arrived on the territory of Ukraine will continue.”


The defense ministry added that Moscow would continue its attacks against foreign mercenaries.


The Lviv regional administration said in a statement on Sunday that at least 35 people were killed in the attack after around 30 missiles were fired from warplanes over the Black and Azov seas and hit the military base.


Another 134 people were hospitalized in the incident, Lviv Governor Maksym Kozytsky said in a Facebook statement.


Ukraine said foreign military instructors have previously worked at the Yavoriv military base. However, a NATO official told Reuters that there were no personnel from the alliance there.


Konashenkov’s comments come after Moscow warned on Saturday that it may target NATO countries’ supplies to Ukraine if they continue to supply weapons to the country.


“We warned the United States that the orchestrated pumping of weapons from a number of countries is not just a dangerous move, it is a move that turns these convoys into legitimate targets,” Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told Russian state-run media on Saturday.

He added that Moscow had warned “about the consequences of the thoughtless transfer to Ukraine of weapons like man-portable air defense systems, anti-tank missile systems, and so on.”


Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly called on Western nations to deliver more weapons to his country, specifically for Russian-made planes, so that it can defend itself amid the Russian attack.


Zelensky has also repeatedly called on the West to implement a no-fly zone over Ukraine.


However, Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that he would view any country that declares a no-fly zone over Ukraine as a participant in the “armed conflict.”


Meanwhile, U.S. President Joe Biden has vowed to defend “every inch of NATO territory,” calling an attack against one member of the alliance “an attack against all.”


Power Supply Resumed at Chernobyl After Nuclear Plant Was Seized by Russian Forces: Officials​


Ukraine says it has resumed the power supply to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant after it was seized by Russian forces in February, energy officials in Kyiv said Sunday.


A broken power line at the site was reportedly restored at 18:38 CET by the repair personnel of Ukrenergo, Ukraine’s transmission system operator, meaning external electricity supplies to the plant can now be resumed.


Ukraine’s Energy Minister German Galushchenko said in a statement that specialists from the national power grid had been able to successfully restore the connection.


“Today, thanks to the incredible efforts of (Ukrainian energy) specialists, our nuclear power engineers and electricians managed to return the power supply to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, which was seized by the Russian occupiers,” Galushchenko said.


“Our Ukrainian energy engineers, by risking their own health and lives, were able to avert the risk of a possible nuclear catastrophe that threatened the whole of Europe,” he added.



The power supply to Chernobyl is used to keep running pumps that keep thousands of spent nuclear fuel cool, thus preventing radiation leaks.


Russian forces captured Chernobyl, which is located along the Ukraine–Belarus border and about 60 miles north of Kyiv, just days after invading Ukraine on Feb. 24.


Ukrainian officials told the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that power had been cut off from the plant on Wednesday and it had to use emergency generators.


Officials said that there was enough diesel fuel to run the on-site generators for 48 hours, while the IAEA said there had been “no critical impact” to safety after officials, including Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, warned about a potential radiation leak overnight.


A nuclear accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986 killed hundreds and spread a radioactive cloud west across Europe.

The Ukrainian government warned that, just like in the previous Soviet disaster, the wind could transfer a radioactive cloud across Ukraine, Russia, and other parts of Europe.


On March 10, Ukraine officials lost all communications with the power plant, the country’s regulatory authority informed IAEA, meaning that they could not provide IAEA with updated information about the site.


Ongoing fighting around the nuclear power plant has made it impossible to carry out repairs, the government said.


However, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, told state-run outlets on March 9 that the site was operating as normal and that both Russian and Ukrainian specialists were jointly controlling the situation.


Zakharova also said that the Ukrainian government’s allegations regarding a potential radiation threat were false.

“The actions of the Russian military in this dangerous situation were motivated by the necessity to prevent a nuclear provocation from Ukrainian nationalists, who seem to have nothing to lose. As a matter of fact, they have been trained to do it. That is why Russian troops are taking Ukraine’s nuclear facilities under control,” Zakharova said.

IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Sunday that the team of Ukrainian specialists had repaired one of two lines that had been damaged at the plant, meaning they would now be able to deliver all required off-site power to the plant.


However, Grossi expressed concerns over the future safety of the plant and has proposed a “framework” that would enable IAEA to provide technical assistance to ensure the safe operation of the plant.


Grossi said he has discussed the proposal with the Ukrainian and Russian Foreign Ministers Dmytro Kuleba and Sergei Lavrov, last week.


“This is a positive development as the Chornobyl NPP has had to rely on emergency diesel generators for several days now,” Grossi said. “However, I remain gravely concerned about safety and security at Chornobyl and Ukraine’s other nuclear facilities.”

Ukraine’s Farmers Stalled, Fueling Fears of Global Food Shortages​


The Russian invasion of Ukraine threatens millions of tiny spring-time sprouts that should emerge from stalks of dormant winter wheat in the coming weeks. If the farmers can’t feed those crops soon, far fewer of the so-called tillers will spout, jeopardizing a national wheat harvest on which millions in the developing world depend.


The wheat was planted last autumn, which, after a brief growing period, fell dormant for the winter. Before the grain returns to life, however, farmers typically spread fertilizer that encourages the tillers to grow off the main stalks. Each stalk can have three or four tillers, increasing the yield per wheat stalk exponentially.


But Ukrainian farmers – who produced a record grain crop last year – say they now are short of fertilizer, as well as pesticides and herbicides. And even if they had enough of those materials, they can’t get enough fuel to power their equipment, they add.


Elena Neroba, a Kyiv-based business development manager at grain brokerage Maxigrain, said Ukraine’s winter wheat yields could fall by 15 percent compared to recent years if fertilizers aren’t applied now. Some farmers warn the situation could be much worse.


Some Ukrainian farmers told Reuters their wheat yields could be cut in half, and perhaps by more, which has implications far beyond Ukraine. Countries such as Lebanon, Egypt, Yemen, and others have come to rely on Ukrainian wheat in recent years. The war has already caused wheat prices to skyrocket—rising by 50 percent in the last month.



The Ukrainian farming crisis comes as food prices around the world already have been spiking for months amid global supply chain problems attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. World food prices hit a record high in February, and have risen over 24 percent in a year, the U.N. food agency said last week. Agriculture ministers from the world’s seven largest advanced economies were due Friday to discuss in a virtual meeting the impact of Russia’s invasion on global food security and how best to stabilize food markets.


International food and feed prices could rise by up to 20 percent as a result of the conflict in Ukraine, triggering a jump in global malnourishment, the United Nations food agency said on Friday.

Ukraine and Russia are major wheat exporters, together accounting for about a third of world exports- almost all of which passes through the Black Sea.


Svein Tore Holsether, president of Norway-based Yara International, the world’s largest maker of nitrogen-based fertilizers, said he is worried that tens of millions of people will suffer food shortages because of the farming crisis in Ukraine. “For me, it’s not whether we are moving into a global food crisis,” he said. “It’s how large the crisis will be.”


Ukrainian officials say they are still hopeful the country will have a relatively successful year. Much of that hope rests with farmers in the west of the country, which, so far, remains distant from the shooting.


But officials are taking measures to protect domestic supplies to ensure Ukraine’s population gets fed – posing another possible hit to export shipments. Agriculture Minister Roman Leshchenko said on Tuesday the country was banning the export of various staples, including wheat. Leshchenko has acknowledged the threat to Ukraine’s food supply and that the government was doing what it can to help farmers.


“We understand that food for the entire state depends on what will be in the fields,” he said in televised remarks Monday.


Moscow says it is conducting a special military operation in Ukraine to demilitarize and capture dangerous nationalists. It has denied deliberately targeting civilians and civil infrastructure, despite documented attacks on hospitals, apartment buildings and railroads.


Grain exports are a cornerstone of Ukraine’s economy.


In the coming weeks, farmers should also start planting other crops, such as corn and sunflowers, but they are struggling to get the seeds they need, said Dykun Andriy, chairman of the Ukrainian Agricultural Council, which represents about 1,000 farmers cultivating five million hectares.


Andriy warned that the fuel is the critical problem now. Unless farmers can get diesel to run their equipment, spring farmwork will be impossible and this year’s harvests doomed. “Farmers are desperate,” he said. “There is a big risk that we don’t have enough food to feed our people.”


Maxigrain’s Neroba said farmers are facing fuel shortages because military needs take priority.

Ukrainian farmer Oleksandr Chumak said little work is happening in his fields, some 200 km north of the Black Sea port of Odessa. He farms 3,000 hectares (about 7,500 acres) where he grows wheat, corn, sunflowers and rapeseed. Even if he had enough fuel to get his equipment into the fields, he said he had insufficient fertilizer for all of his crops and no herbicides.


“Usually we have maybe six to seven tons (of wheat) per hectare. This year, I think that if we get three tons per hectare, it will be very good,” Chumak said. He added he remains hopeful that Ukrainian farmers will find a way to grow enough food to feed their countrymen, but he does not expect much will be exported.


In northern Ukraine, he said friends of his have been reduced to skimming fuel from a ditch that was filled with diesel after a Russian attack on a train spilled fuel from several tankers. Other friends, in the occupied areas near Kherson, are scavenging diesel from ambushed and abandoned Russian tanker convoys, Chumak said.


Currently, he spends much of his time preparing for a Russian assault. “I live in Odessa. Every day I see rockets fly over my house.”


Val Sigaev, a grain broker at R.J. O’Brien in Kyiv, who evacuated last week, said it is unclear how much of the usual spring farming — planting and fertilizing — would be possible. High prices for natural gas – a major input for fertilizer – sent fertilizer prices up, so some farmers postponed purchases.


“Some people think we could plant as much as half of the crop,” Sigaev said. “Others say that only the West will see plantings and what is produced will be strictly for Ukrainian needs.”


The situation is especially dire in the southern port city of Kherson, the first Ukrainian city Russia captured after invading the country on Feb. 24. Spring-like weather adds to farmers’ urgency, if they don’t tend to their fields now this year’s harvest will be a bust.


Andrii Pastushenko is the general manager of a 1,500-hectare farm just west of the city, near the mouth of the Dnipro River. Last autumn, they sowed about 1,000 hectares of wheat, barley and rapeseed. His farm workers need to get into those fields now, but can’t, he says, and they’ve lost access to fuel. “We’re completely cut off from the civilized world and the rest of Ukraine.”


Additionally, many of Pastushenko’s 80 workers cannot come to work at the farm because they live a few miles to the north, across the front line. The manager’s problems are compounded because the region is drier than other agricultural areas of the country and his fields need to be irrigated. And that too requires fuel.


Unlike many, Pastushenko has a 50-metric ton nitrogen-based fertilizer stockpile. With the fighting all around him, however, he’s not sure that’s such a good thing: Fertilizer is highly explosive. “If something drops from a helicopter, it could blow the whole place,” he said.


He said he fears the harvest will be poor. Last year, his wheat and barley fields yielded about five metric tons per hectare. If he doesn’t spray insecticide – which he says he can’t get – and spread fertilizer, he doubts he’ll get a third of that amount.


“I’ve no idea whether we’ll be able to harvest something,” he said. “Something will come off the ground, but it won’t be enough to feed our cattle and pay our staff.”


About 150 km west of Pastushenko’s farm is the Black Sea port of Odessa, which remains under Ukrainian control. In peacetime, much of Ukrainian agricultural exports find their way onto ships at the port, Ukraine’s busiest. Today, no ships are leaving and the city is besieged by Russian forces.


Much of Ukraine’s harvest was due to be exported to North Africa, the Middle East, and the Levant. According to the United Nations’ World Food Program (WFP), Ukraine supplies Lebanon with more than half of its imported wheat, Tunisia imports 42 percent, and Yemen nearly a quarter. Ukraine has grown to become WFP’s largest supplier of food.


For some countries, rising prices could hammer governments as well as consumers because of state food subsidies.

Egypt, which has become increasingly dependent on Ukrainian and Russian wheat over the past decade, heavily subsidizes bread for its population. As the price of wheat rises, so will pressure on the government to raise bread prices, said Sikandra Kurdi, a Dubai-based research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute.


The country’s food subsidy program currently costs the government about $5.5 billion annually. Currently, nearly two-thirds of the population can buy five loaves of round bread daily for 50 cents a month.


Other developing countries with similar subsidies will also struggle with rising wheat prices. In 2019, protests over bread price increases in Sudan contributed to the overthrow of the head of state, Omar al-Bashir.


For countries that provide large subsidies, rising food prices will mean that either governments take on more debt or consumers will pay higher prices, Kurdi said.

The difference between the two is that Russia is beginning to clamp down on free speech and putting high-ranking people in jail.......when they're just beating down on a small ex-Soviet Republic. This is like what if Hitler started freaking out before his forces took Poland. Everything from the Russian side indicated this would be a quick fight, instead, they're getting bogged down for weeks with no end in sight. Also, another difference between Russia and the German Reich? He was open to realism in his first few years of the war. Hitler didn't purge the generals until near the end, whereas Putin practically purged anyone who didn't sing his praises. It was only by the end in 1945, did he lament that he didn't purge the generals like Stalin did. Meanwhile, Putin surrounded himself with yes-men Soviet-style, and the result is what we saw now: with him being lied to until the very end, because anyone with the balls to tell him that he was about to commit political and military suicide was gone.
I did not say that Russia was like the Reich. They are hardly comparable. What I did say was that the West prediction of Putin about to die (from anal diseases or a coup) was the exact same thing they used against the Reich with about as flimsly of reasonings. There are more examples like this, but admitedly the Reich is first to come to mind. I only meant my post as a way to urge caution. They have been saying Putin's gonna die for ages now (since 2013 as far as I can tell), and always on flimsy reasonings that have not come true.

I'm sorry if I caused confusion.
 
@Useful_Mistake

It's hard not to believe the stories. Especially when you look at Putin's background and what kind of person he was. An ex-KGB guy is exactly the kind of person who would fire anyone who says something that sounds like "dissident speak", and he has also fired people for "rocking the boat" before. Why did those people try to rock the boat? Maybe it has to do with Russia's inherent weaknesses, and these people tried to solve that. Which explains everything happening now; why Putin is investigating "who put the conscripts on the border". He's slowly realizing that he's being lied to, but he's being lied to because anyone with the balls to tell him the truth is either fired, or they left, a long time ago:
The Soviets started filling their ranks with prisoners during the Cold War and it turned the usual hazing you see in militaries into actual institutionalized buck breaking of their own conscripts when you started to supplant Soviet conscript culture with prison gay culture, and the Soviet collapse turned it into hell on earth in the 90s. Putin made some token gestures to reform the army in the late 2000s but then kicked out the guy making reforms because he was rocking too many boats so I doubt it got much better under the surface and this will just make it even worse.

So yes, it is easy to see the stories about Putin's mishaps to be credible, especially since now, he's acting like a paranoid maniac.
 
It's hard not to believe the stories.
I'll disagree. I don't think "he has anal disease because he no more do smile" is a good theoretical argument, much less an accurate prediction (especially considering all similar predictions US intellegence and MI6 made had turned out to be incorrect)

Re:The coup, like I pointed out when I talked about this with @дядя Боря , it's entirely possible that a coup might take place. Certainly there is reason to believe Putin's higher echelon might be unhappy and may be not as loyal as Putin would like. But what US media right now presents is a pre-written FBI (I pressume, since those kinds of things do happen) propaganda piece about how the big bad is just sooooo close to falling, and it's totally not just speculation by creditless feds. I suppose we'll see.
Remember kids, the boy who cried wolf is a story about lying and being wrong enough times people no longer believe your word, but in the end, the wolf does eventually come.
That is true, I suppose. Even a broken clock is right some times, huh?
 
I'll disagree. I don't think "he has anal disease because he no more do smile" is a good theoretical argument, much less an accurate prediction (especially considering all similar predictions US intellegence and MI6 made had turned out to be incorrect)

Re:The coup, like I pointed out when I talked about this with @дядя Боря , it's entirely possible that a coup might take place. Certainly there is reason to believe Putin's higher echelon might be unhappy and may be not as loyal as Putin would like. But what US media right now presents is a pre-written FBI (I pressume, since those kinds of things do happen) propaganda piece about how the big bad is just sooooo close to falling, and it's totally not just speculation by creditless feds. I suppose we'll see.
The Feds actually have a spy network that's far better than the one the Russians have. So I can actually take them at their word when it comes to that, 9 times out of 10. Not to mention that you don't need Feds or spy networks to come to such conclusions; most of Russia's hierarchy are oligarchs who are obviously NOT happy with what's going on with this war, since they're losing money by the bucketload and their economy is tanking. That's more than enough to motivate some people to start a coup. Coups have come from less, after all.

My reaction to the Feds saying that Putin might get overthrown is to say "no shit" since the signs for that are everywhere.
 
Last edited:

This also isn’t about rooting for the “good guys.” For Vladimir Putin cannot be counted among them, and, for that matter, neither can ex-actor and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy or our globalist “leaders.” Rather, this concerns something else.
One of the claims of Zelensky being evil or at least "not the good guy" has been that prosecutors in the country wanted to jail the former leader that supposedly was helping finance Russian backed separatist fighters by buying coal from those separatist fighters. Personally I can understand being against people funding enemy fighters, which makes it hard for me to see what the big problem is.

So I'm curious what the arguments are for saying Ukraine can't be considered the good guys here or even why opinions on Zelensky are relevant to the conversation. Like Ukrainians don't seem like they're fighting on behalf of Zelensky so much as for their own country, leading to some confusion where forces didn't appear to even be listening to Zelensky.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back