I love these tweets. I love the obvious, blatant hypocrisy hidden within them. If you asked Anthony or any other trans activist whether he thinks it should be legal for parents who are "abusing" (read: saving) their children by refusing to allow them to "transition" to leave the state to avoid investigation and their child possibly being removed from their care so they can "transition," they would absolutely say it shouldn't be.
Hell, if you asked any liberal whether it should be legal for parents suspected of abusing their children to flee the state to avoid investigation and/or prosecution, the answer would - rightly!! - be a resounding
hell no.
They're framing the problem wrong. If they want to argue that pediatric transition isn't child abuse, they're free to argue that - they're wrong, but god knows that won't stop them. But this isn't an argument they can win, because the state isn't stopping these parents from leaving the state solely based on pediatric transition in and of itself, it's
because the state defines pediatric transition as abuse and therefore the parents are being treated like any other parents suspected of abusing their children by being barred from leaving the state to avoid investigation and prosecution. They just look like braindead hypocrites trying to fight from that side of the issue.
Braindead hypocrites who don't care about the actually abused kids who would be harmed if the state took their word on it and stopped barring parents under investigation for child abuse from fleeing the state. But what else is new? Trans activists and not giving a shit about the welfare of children is a timeless combination.
Also, informative fashion tweet, he looks like he has giant clown shoes in every post because he’s a womens 11.5 shoe size:
View attachment 3066797
"I have enough money to pay out of pocket for a surgeon to cut my dick off and shove it into my abdomen but buy me clothes, peons!" What a good look.
And y'all are right, that maxi dress is the best looking thing he's ever put on - because it covers most of his body with a nice print that distracts from his face.
That black and gold dress looks like he spent $5 on Wish. So cheap looking. Even if that dress was made out high quality material, that isn't the type of dress you wear as a casual daytime outfit. That looks like a cocktail dress. The kind of dress where your hair and makeup should be on point and flawless.
And as usual, he pairs the absolute worst shoes. I feel like even the average autistic male kiwi farmer would look at that dress and know that those shoes don't match.
He's wearing that tacky necklace again. Idk why I find that so pathetic and funny at the same time.
I feel like the black and gold dress could look cute on an actual woman, but on Tony it only emphasizes his masculine body structure - the narrow hips, broad chest, etc. and generally looks tacky and terrible. The way it pulls and the line detailing are supposed to emphasize a narrow waist, wide hips and breasts - all traits Tony
doesn't have. It'd look great on a curvy gal, but on a man it just looks sad and weird.
god I love how much this subject puckers his amhole.
fashion icon
