@Allanon
What we know is that this creeper has been crushing on this kid since he was 15, that he was actively being sexual and flirting with him as a teenager while he was already in his 20s, that all this abruptly stopped and changed course only after the kid started making moves on a girl. We know that he was actively being flirty and sexual towards several other underage kids and minors. This isn't in dispute, we've seen the logs. We know a hell of a lot, all of which paints Daman in a very bad light.
They are the prologue to a lawsuit. A necessary formality to show the court that the person being sued was given opportunity to cease whatever it is the plaintiff wanted ceased, and its a warning to the potential defendant that a lawsuit is in the offing. It means a hell of a lot on its own. Lawyers don't draw those up and send them for free, and should never be taken lightly.
Which would have been unethical or morally suspect at best, completely illegal at worse depending on when the relationship started.
Okay motherfucker, you try making that argument in court and see how far it gets you. At that point Trayce was certainly under the age of consent and even older teens would have considered Daman a creeper for doing it.
Does that somehow make anything Daman did okay to you? Age of consent doesn't matter in this case because Trayce never tried to bring criminal charges. It doesn't change the fact that Daman was actively creeping on a teenager as a grown ass man.