Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
Their ROE are not like America's. It will depend how hard they want to go. Maybe wave enough Azov fags in front of them, like bullfighters wave a red blanket in front of a bull, and they might get better results. After all, America blew its entire load with every possible sanction on earth in the first round, so why not?
Can you name me one occasion where a country was invaded and the sitting government replaced that did not require a prolonged military occupation afterwards? Any ROE. Make it piles of skulls in an extensive terror campaign if you want to. Can you name one?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spicey McHaggis
Eat
Oh look, it's the Patriot Act, but for the United States President and the rest of The Planet.

I totally want Ms. President Wakanda of Earth to have these powers.

c) IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS. –

(1) In General.-- Subsection (a) of section 1263 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Subtitle F of the title XII of Public Law 114-328; 22 U.S.C. 2656 note) is amended to read as follows:

(a) IN GENERAL. – The President may impose the sanctions described in subsection

(b) with respect to any foreign person that the President determines, based on credible information–

“(1) is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

“(2) is a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in–

“(A) corruption, including–

“(i) the misappropriation of state sets;

“(ii) the expropriation of private assets for personal gain;

“(iii) corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources; or

(iv) bribery; or

“(B) the transfer of facilitation of the transfer of proceeds of corruption;


(3) is or has been a leader or official of–

(A) an entity, including a government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in paragraph (1) or (2) during the tenure of the leader or official; or

“(B) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section as the result of activities during the tenure of the leader or official;

“(4) has materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of–

“(A) an activity described in paragraph (1) or (2) that is conducted by a foreign person;

“(B) a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this section; or

“(C) an entity, including a government entity that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, an activity described in paragraph (1) or (2) conducted by a foreign person; or

“(5) is owned or controlled by, or has acted or been purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, a person whose property and interest in property are blocked pursuant to this section.”.


(2) CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION.-- Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking “violations of human rights” and inserting “corruption and human rights abuses.”
Look like we will own nothing and be happy.
 
Can you name me one occasion where a country was invaded and the sitting government replaced that did not require a prolonged military occupation afterwards? Any ROE. Make it piles of skulls in an extensive terror campaign if you want to. Can you name one?
I'm not saying it wouldn't require occupation, just that it's acceptable to Russia. The Chinese seem to be doing fine in Tibet, for example. Macau is fine. Hong Kong flares up occasionally but I don't see anyone demanding China get out (except for protesters).
 
I'm not saying it wouldn't require occupation, just that it's acceptable to Russia. The Chinese seem to be doing fine in Tibet, for example. Macau is fine. Hong Kong flares up occasionally but I don't see anyone demanding China get out (except for protesters).
Well that's because most of the Western elite castrated their own countries economically, and handed the bleeding, trembling testicles to the Chinese with a grin. The Chinese can get away with more shit because they have the sliced off testes of the West. Russia doesn't.
 
I'm not saying it wouldn't require occupation, just that it's acceptable to Russia. The Chinese seem to be doing fine in Tibet, for example. Macau is fine. Hong Kong flares up occasionally but I don't see anyone demanding China get out (except for protesters).
Tibet, Macau, and Hong Kong aren't really applicable to what's happening to Ukraine. The Chinks didn't shell the hell out of cities when they annexed those regions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UVB-76
where civvies were taking shelter
Ah, yes, the old Not Wearing A Uniform = Civilians gambit, so beloved of the Vietcong and other scum.
Remember the polish politician wanting to send a mostly peaceful peacekeeping mission to ukraine?
View attachment 3077780
Why is everyone using euphemisms lately? call a war a special operation, call nato intervention a peacekeeping mission. :tomgirl:
Because we live in a world of lies.
 
Source? Evidence?
Every time I see this sort of response I think:
proof.png
And then the follow up:
proof.jpg
I hope this information has been valuable to you.
 
Tibet, Macau, and Hong Kong aren't really applicable to what's happening to Ukraine. The Chinks didn't shell the hell out of cities when they annexed those regions.
I never state they were, just that an long term occupation is acceptable to some, and used China as an example. And the annexation of Tibet wasn't bloodless, eg, the Battle of Chamdo.
 
I hate burgers so much. From their fucking fat faced chinstrap beards to the constant drama sperging for attention. Some people have voiced doubts this guy was ever even in Ukraine because when he was supposedly at base he was spending all day sperging out on reddit.
Look at their dull eyes and you can immediately tell what kind of morons you're dealing with.
Stop putting American cock in your mouth it’s embarrassing
 
I'm not saying it wouldn't require occupation, just that it's acceptable to Russia. The Chinese seem to be doing fine in Tibet, for example. Macau is fine. Hong Kong flares up occasionally but I don't see anyone demanding China get out (except for protesters).
Who does it though? I pointed out that they basically had to permanently garrison Chechnya with the 58th Combined Arms Army to settle it down. It's going to take a lot more than that to secure the Ukraine. It is 44 million people versus 2 million. That is how big the occupation problem is here. Their entire invasion force is I think 8 Armies. Roughly 75% of their entire active Ground Forces. I think they got 2 Armies and change elsewhere.

They are going to need all of it. All 280,000 of them. To hold it.
 
Well if the Russians start having ammo shortages you'll know why
View attachment 3085463
>Religion of Peace
>Infantry Attack: -15%
>Planning: -1
You can take the man out of his shithole Muslim border country to fight your bloodland wars....but you can't take the Muslim out of the man.

That lady and kid were raped before they propaganda walked them out of the basement. It's actually kind of genius sending these morons into combat....they fight hard but ISIS retarded, get killed, so do Ukrainians: profit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back