Okay, but the Kievan Rus wasn't the start of Ukraine, it was the start of Russia. The lands now known as Ukraine weren't conceptualized as its own nation until at earliest the 1800's, and that's being generous. Kiev existed under the rule of countless states before being lumped together with the rest of 'Ukraine', almost all of whom had some political and cultural justification for ruling it, especially those powers native to eastern Europe.
'Kyiv didn't exist until recently' is accurate in that the modern conception of Ukraine as a succinct nation state with a clear identity and presence is new, throughout nearly the entirety of the existence of Kiev it would have been know not by what some local would have called it, but by what its name according to its ruling power would have been. French and English statesmen wouldn't have thought of 'Ukraine' during the Crimean War as anything other than a region within Russia, similarly they would not have thought of Ukrainian or Ukrainian versions of city names as anything other than subgroups of Russian linguistics.
As retarded as that sheboon usually is, Candace Owens is actually right so far as it matters that 'Kyiv' has only existed since the end of the Cold War. Man, she's so smart, no wonder Saint Tarrant was inspired by her.
View attachment 3092556