I see you don't get it... Which shouldn't shock me by the fact you're a low IQ, uneducated simpleton with debilitating autism who gets his information from Fox News. Let me explain it to you further, although since you're a Republican who loves his conspiracies and claims to know more than doctors about a virus and vaccine because he watches Tucker Carlson, this is probably an exercise in futility.
1. Around 1% of doctors back then, if not less, said cigs were good for you.
2. You are using this to say that all doctors and scientists said cigs were good for you
3. Around 1% of doctors claim the vaccine is super duper dangerous
4. You are trusting that 1% of doctors this time.
So if this was 1960, which is what you puritanical Republicans want to bring us back to, you would be saying cigarettes are good for us because 1% of doctors say so.
Now, you could do what a normal, well-adjusted, not retarded person would do and think, "gee, 99% of the world's experts on this subject say this. maybe I should trust that." However, because you're a good little conspiracy believe Republican who gets his medical information from Tucker Carlson, you go, "I know more than doctors on the subject they study for a living because Tucker Carlson said so".
Again, you claim this vaccine is super duper dangerous. Show me these dead bodies or you are admitting that you're just another uneducated simpleton conspiracy retard on Kiwi Farms. You have the next post to show these dead bodies or you are admitting defeat. Oh, and random conspiracy blogs without direct sources showing the bodies don't count, so tweets from PatriotTrumpLover1488 don't count unless they show direct sources
If it weren't for feeling that you have a limited speech bank I'd almost be impressed you managed to pile up this many retarded fallacies in under 5 minutes. Where to begin?
1. Your political sperging is irrelevant entirely to this. Tucker Carlson had nothing to do with tobacco lobbies corrupting medical research for years. Stop throwing up so many red herrings and address the debate at hand, you slobbering retard.
2. No, I didn't say "all" doctors did so. I was however responding to your very vague post earlier where you attempted using generalized language which did make it seem like you were making the case of "all" scientists. I specifically stated there were many doctors, and several large research committees doling out funds. Stop trying to take your autistic stupidity as if it's coming from my words.
3. It's been happening since 1960 as well you idiot.
4. It's exceptionally hilarious to me that you of all people are even attempting to take the "it was just one percent of doctors, man!" stance. You, HHH, the fear driven fool who has lived in fear and impotent rage for the last two years over the coof, you who are currently in a thread screeching endlessly about the dangers of muh misinformation etc, are willing to overlook the impact that even "one percent" of physicians making such claims could sway public health in a negative direction?
Even pretending you were right about it being 1% of doctors (you aren't, but let's pretend) - that would still be more than the prominent doctors that are openly speaking out against vaccines in the public sphere today. And unlike the vax skeptics, the tobacco shill doctors were mainstream enough to get shown in public and could talk without being shut down by twitter or YouTube.
So you are trying to shrug off the potential effects that "1% of doctors" could have when they're arguing that smoking, an addictive and self-reinforcing vice behavior, is benign and harmless?
5. More hallucinatory sperging I see. Are you even sure you're replying to the correct person, or are you just so desperately seething and sneeding that you're still making shit up? I'm not even discussing the ineffective coof jab and haven't been in this thread for quite a while, it's unnecessary since Covid is over now.