Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

If you took all the time you currently spend obsessing over Nick on a message board and used that time to make pro-white content, you would probably already be in the ethnostate.
This would actually be a meaningful critique if it didnt come from someone slavishly devoted to the guy who excommunicated someone from "his" movement for suggesting they actually do real life organizing instead of just streaming online. Unfortunately for you, you match that description, and so anything you ever have to say about others "not doing anything" is total horseshit.
 
Well you are just retarded for not seeing it. Why do you think so many normie men are afraid of being called racist, or afraid of saying anything a man would say pre-1950. It’s because a woman might call him gay or tiny-dicked and vow to deprive him of sex. You have autism. Your rebuttal is retarded. We don’t live in a gynocracy? Majority of nu-males don’t placate every whim of modern women? Hollywood movies don’t set the tone of what’s cool and what’s not for normies?
I don't know could it prehaps be the same people who don't want you to think or live lives where you could organize your community. Could it be the same people who just want you to live in a pod and just eat the bugs?
Women follow strength, they desire to conform and thats what they always do. If Nazism were the dominate system they would be the most vocal about it.
Groypers can not refute PPP's arguments because PPP's arguments are completely incoherent.

PPP will at various times claim that AF are bad optics and yet at other times, PPP will claim that optics don't matter.
PPP will at various times claim that Nick is working for the feds and at other times claim that Nick is going to be taken down by the feds.
PPP will at various times claim that Nick is ruining his life and should quit and yet at other times, PPP will claim that he is actually trying to give AF advice in hopes of making them better.

I don't see how PPP is working from any coherent moral or philosophical framework. He just throws a bunch of spaghetti at the wall, whatever random criticism and accusations that come to his head, regardless of whether any of them contradictory or mutually exclusive. I mean, which of PPP's arguments were you wanting to be rebutted because they can't ALL be correct?

And yes, "You are fat" is a perfectly legitimate counterargument. Id say an obese homeless friendless unemployed loser who has been disowned by his parents who spends his days obsessing over e-celebs rather than improving himself has some seriously misplaced priorities.
PPP flipflops on a lot of things but his critism of AF has always been the same at the core.
Its wrong for Nick Fuentes to corrupt children for his own financal gain. Cause lets face it thats what he does he takes children and leads them off a potential path of success so they stay donating for a couple of years.
 
PPP flipflops on a lot of things
All e-celebs who "critique" things or do reaction videis/streams have this gay habit of criticizing something from every possible angle for maximum content, even if it's contradictory to do so. They will make every possible joke they can think of because their audience will always laugh. They will always mock whatever they can, even if it doesn't deserve mockery. Franssen and Beardson do this more than anyone.
 
All e-celebs who "critique" things or do reaction videis/streams have this gay habit of criticizing something from every possible angle for maximum content, even if it's contradictory to do so. They will make every possible joke they can think of because their audience will always laugh. They will always mock whatever they can, even if it doesn't deserve mockery. Franssen and Beardson do this more than anyone.
The difference between Beardson and PPP is that Beardson will call you a short, clout chasing hobgoblin without a hint of self-awareness but PPP will focus on insults and criticism that's actually applicable to his target.
 
This would actually be a meaningful critique if it didnt come from someone slavishly devoted to the guy who excommunicated someone from "his" movement for suggesting they actually do real life organizing instead of just streaming online. Unfortunately for you, you match that description, and so anything you ever have to say about others "not doing anything" is total horseshit.
Oh, if you only knew...

PPP flipflops on a lot of things but his critism of AF has always been the same at the core.
Its wrong for Nick Fuentes to corrupt children for his own financal gain. Cause lets face it thats what he does he takes children and leads them off a potential path of success so they stay donating for a couple of years.
WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN???? Nasty Nick is swindling those kiddies out of their paper route money. They are cracking open their little piggy banks with a hammer, scooping up handfuls of nickels and dimes, and then taking them to the store to buy pre-paid credit cards so they can spend it on superchats. They are going around begging all their neighbors to let them mow their lawns for $20 so they can send it to Nick.

*Waves fist in the air* DAMN YOU, NICK! DAMN YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!

OK, so you've identified a problem. Now let's talk solutions. What can Nick do to make sure that ONLY adults watch his show and that ONLY adults superchat him?
 
Not even a funny reply, gaypers confirmed humorless homosexuals.
"Unfunny" and "humorless" are not synonyms. They mean two different things.

1647879119333.png
 
Well you are just retarded for not seeing it. Why do you think so many normie men are afraid of being called racist, or afraid of saying anything a man would say pre-1950. It’s because a woman might call him gay or tiny-dicked and vow to deprive him of sex. You have autism. Your rebuttal is retarded. We don’t live in a gynocracy? Majority of nu-males don’t placate every whim of modern women? Hollywood movies don’t set the tone of what’s cool and what’s not for normies?

You asked what’s the political utility of referring to yourself as ‘incel’, I gave you it. Put simply, it’s to say you don’t give a shit about sex so women have no power over you. If you guys are just going to seethe anyway, stop framing your rhetorical questions as sincere.
If you get bullied in public by women because your afraid of actually saying anything in response you really are fucking buck broken my nigga.
Its wrong for Nick Fuentes to corrupt children for his own financal gain. Cause lets face it thats what he does he takes children and leads them off a potential path of success so they stay donating for a couple of years.
Nick Fuentes is a homosexual who has to prey on children to warp them into his broken worldview and self destructive lifestyle. That's why Milo likes him, he sees himself.
Oh, if you only knew...


WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN???? Nasty Nick is swindling those kiddies out of their paper route money. They are cracking open their little piggy banks with a hammer, scooping up handfuls of nickels and dimes, and then taking them to the store to buy pre-paid credit cards so they can spend it on superchats. They are going around begging all their neighbors to let them mow their lawns for $20 so they can send it to Nick.

*Waves fist in the air* DAMN YOU, NICK! DAMN YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!

OK, so you've identified a problem. Now let's talk solutions. What can Nick do to make sure that ONLY adults watch his show and that ONLY adults superchat him?
he can stop making it for starters. but id verification is possible, its not a good idea but neither is being a groyper. he can put up a landing page saying 18+, he could say at any point that it's not a kids platform but that'd kike his shekels so its out of the question.
 
If you get bullied in public by women because your afraid of actually saying anything in response you really are fucking buck broken my nigga.

Nick Fuentes is a homosexual who has to prey on children to warp them into his broken worldview and self destructive lifestyle. That's why Milo likes him, he sees himself.

he can stop making it for starters. but id verification is possible, its not a good idea but neither is being a groyper. he can put up a landing page saying 18+, he could say at any point that it's not a kids platform but that'd kike his shekels so its out of the question.
Name one other outlet in the Dissident Right with a "+18" warning on their website. Does The Daily Stormer? Does TRS? TRS had their own pedophilia scandal back 2016 with Ghoul and they STILL don't have any such warning. What about when Nick was on Youtube? How was he supposed to stop "children" from watching his streams back then?

If Nick was purely driven by a lust for shekels, why doesn't he paywall anything?
 
If Nick was purely driven by a lust for shekels, why doesn't he paywall anything?
Because it's been proven time and time again that free content bolstered by trust fund babies whaling on superchats is a far more viable and profitable business model than paywalling content in the world of streaming?
 
Because it's been proven time and time again that free content bolstered by trust fund babies whaling on superchats is a far more viable and profitable business model than paywalling content in the world of streaming?

OK, so are they children or are they trust fund kids? Because by definition, a trust fund kid is an adult. You don't get access to your trust fund until you turn 18.
 
Name one other outlet in the Dissident Right with a "+18" warning on their website. Does The Daily Stormer? Does TRS? TRS had their own pedophilia scandal back 2016 with Ghoul and they STILL don't have any such warning. What about when Nick was on Youtube? How was he supposed to stop "children" from watching his streams back then?

If Nick was purely driven by a lust for shekels, why doesn't he paywall anything?
I'm sorry, I forgot two wrongs make a who cares right? If Nick wants to be taken seriously he should in no way shape or form do anything to distinguish himself from andrew anglin, someone who can at least on occasion make me laugh. BLM is a bunch of retarded nonwhites but both are nonwhite political grift movements what has nick done to address this issue? See I can do that too. If your going to try and use logical fallacies to deflect for nick maybe at least be at kike iq not nigger iq. He could have age restricted his videos when on Youtube, now I know what your going to say "that would limit his growth and outreach" and my preempting response to that is yes, yes it would. Nicks business model is from frequent small transactions which you can far more easily bring than larger paywalled bursts. He's the micro-transaction of political predator.
 
OK, so are they children or are they trust fund kids? Because by definition, a trust fund kid is an adult. You don't get access to your trust fund until you turn 18.
because underage trust fund kids never have an allowance or a credit card....

OH NO NICK BROS TWITTER BANNED HIM AGAIN!!!!
rekt.JPG
 
I'm sorry, I forgot two wrongs make a who cares right? If Nick wants to be taken seriously he should in no way shape or form do anything to distinguish himself from andrew anglin, someone who can at least on occasion make me laugh. BLM is a bunch of retarded nonwhites but both are nonwhite political grift movements what has nick done to address this issue? See I can do that too. If your going to try and use logical fallacies to deflect for nick maybe at least be at kike iq not nigger iq. He could have age restricted his videos when on Youtube, now I know what your going to say "that would limit his growth and outreach" and my preempting response to that is yes, yes it would. Nicks business model is from frequent small transactions which you can far more easily bring than larger paywalled bursts. He's the micro-transaction of political predator.
First of all, you don't know what a logical fallacy is.

Second of all, you don't know what a predator is. He gives people the OPTION to VOLUNTARILY send him money in exchange for reading a comment on the air. What is predatory about that? Is he not giving people what they pay for? Are there any hidden fees that he doesn't tell people about? By sending him money, are you unknowingly being locked into a contract that requires you to keep sending money? Where does the predator part come in?
 
Now's a good time to put out a reminder that Nick is still under investigation by the Jan 6 committee and their demands haven't changed. Nick is required to hand over all documentation in relation to America First, and before any groypers try to hit back with it being a movement and not an organization, I will remind you that America First has plenty of organizations and programs under its belt like the America First Foundation, America First Students and most importantly the internship program. Nick is trying to hold out but how long do you think he'll last? You're fooling yourself if Nick will choose being held in contempt over handing every scrap of info he can to save his own skin.
Screenshot_20220119-191338_Twitter.jpg1634723426491 (1).jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First of all, you don't know what a logical fallacy is.

Second of all, you don't know what a predator is. He gives people the OPTION to VOLUNTARILY send him money in exchange for reading a comment on the air. What is predatory about that? Is he not giving people what they pay for? Are there any hidden fees that he doesn't tell people about? By sending him money, are you unknowingly being locked into a contract that requires you to keep sending money? Where does the predator part come in?
Nick is absolutely predatory. He "ironically" says all the shit kids from pol want to hear and begs for shekels while he does it. He doesn't believe in any of it but says edgy shit to grift money out of impressionable teenagers all while telling them they shouldnt start a family and should instead play fortnite. You're a faggot for defending that.
 
First of all, you don't know what a logical fallacy is.

Second of all, you don't know what a predator is. He gives people the OPTION to VOLUNTARILY send him money in exchange for reading a comment on the air. What is predatory about that? Is he not giving people what they pay for? Are there any hidden fees that he doesn't tell people about? By sending him money, are you unknowingly being locked into a contract that requires you to keep sending money? Where does the predator part come in?
he is a grifter who knows there is no hope for the west. he knows elections are fake. he knows there is no political solution. he lists his speakers as mystery speakers so they dont back out when they are made aware of who nick is and what he represent. all while pretending the speakers know who he is & they showed up to the even because his movement has grown. in reality they would show up to any event who paid them. he uses speakers showing up to an event to con his followers into thinking his movement has grown. in reality they had no idea who nick was. he claims to be a catholic while being a closeted homosexual. he is a LIAR who continues to lie so his fans keep giving him money & he never has to get a real job. the end.
 
because underage trust fund kids never have an allowance or a credit card....

You don't have to be a trust fund kid to have an allowance.

In common parlance, the term "trust fund kid" has certain specific connotations. The stereotypical trust fund kid is an adult for whom working is optional so live frivolously, making bad art or starting a communist podcast from their Brooklyn apartment. People call them trust fund KIDS because despite being adults, they live their lives in a sort of suspended adolescence. Chapo Trap House are trust fund kids. Socialism Done Left is a trust fund kid.

You're not a trust fund kid until you are an adult. Until then, you're just a kid with rich parents.

he is a grifter who knows there is no hope for the west. he knows elections are fake. he knows there is no political solution. he lists his speakers as mystery speakers so they dont back out when they are made aware of who nick is and what he represent. all while pretending the speakers know who he is & they showed up to the even because his movement has grown. in reality they would show up to any event who paid them. he uses speakers showing up to an event to con his followers into thinking his movement has grown. in reality they had no idea who nick was. he claims to be a catholic while being a closeted homosexual. he is a LIAR who continues to lie so his fans keep giving him money & he never has to get a real job. the end.
That was a devastating answer to a question that I didn't ask. I sure am glad I didn't ask that question or else I would be feeling very silly right now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oh its chili fries, I knew it was chili but I thought the whole time it was plate of straight chili.
Is it? I thought it was a burrito or something under that mess, but the white of whatever it is does blend in so much that it just looks like the chili at first glance.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: trickyzerg23
Back