War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
I think he probably is, but not because he's in Poland or whatever (haven't seen any evidence to suggest it) but more for security reasons.

Didn't something like this also allegedly happen to Trump? IIRC media had once accused him of greenscreening one of his speeches.


I think the issues here are different, that I am not sure can be explained by compression. I am not an expert, though, so I may just not know
Yeah there was the theory Trump used it for a twitter video on the White House lawn.

2022-03-21.png
I think it's pretty clearly a green screen. The sharpness of the outline and the lighting. Also it's a very long way to bring a sick president to shoot something when you have the Rose Gardenl. https://t.co/bBZyb2m0Fs

— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) October 8, 2020
2022-03-21 (1).png
There was also a Forbes article where the general gist is the guy believed in the conspiracy theory and doesn't care if he might be wrong because "hey what's the harm?".

Twitter Users Say President Trump Used A Green Screen For This White House Video. You Be The Judge​


I don’t usually agree with conspiracy theories, since most of them are a bit odd. However, I’m firmly on the bandwagon for this one, despite what all of the experts say.

Yesterday, President Trump released a video that shows him on the South Lawn of the White House. At first glance, and also at a second or third glance, the video does seem like he is a weatherman in front of a blurred image. You be the judge:
[They included the now deleted Trump tweet](You can also read through the comments about the green screen.)

Now, before I share my opinions, know this: The experts all say he is really on the lawn. And I mean every single one of them. This one, this one, and this one.

They make some valid points. They have some merit. Twitter uses low-grade compression on videos that make things look a bit unrealistic. There is some weirdness in how the leaves on the trees seem to stop and repeat. (By the way, leaves actually do that in real life. It’s called a wind gust.) The coloring seems legit.

Other experts dived into the deep tech with both feet. The audio is consistent with what you’d expect in that location (which is technically the South Lawn). The arc of the sun on that day matches with what you’d see in that location when it was recorded. And then there’s this: Why bother faking this video when President Trump really is at the White House recovering from COVID-19?
The Washington Post even asked an expert from USC about the green screen conspiracy theory, which is fresh off the chopping block as of yesterday. (Next up: Bigfoot hanging out with the Loch Ness Monster.) The experts make a good case for how the video just appears to be faked and has a weatherman vibe.

Well, maybe.
One of the interesting things about any conspiracy theory is that nothing in life is 100% verifiable. We don’t have any hard evidence that aliens didn’t arrive at Area 51. We don’t know for sure that the American government didn’t fake the lunar landing. We also didn’t have someone record a second video of President Trump on the South Lawn. In the absence of hard evidence, we have to sort out the truth.
So, my theory: I agree with the Twitter users on this one. To me, it looks like someone recorded the South Lawn video and then moments later had President Trump placed in front of a green screen with that exact same video playing in the background, but maybe closer to the Oval Office. An elaborate, forgettable hoax.
Here’s why I think that’s the case: It doesn’t matter. Some of the topics we like to dissect and parse out on social media are trivial, but they are a good distraction from the colossal seriousness of life right now.
I want to believe the green screen conspiracy, so I do believe it. Well, sort of. There’s no harm in that. In the end, it doesn’t matter and won’t impact anything about politics, social media, my positions, or even my view of Twitter’s compression algorithms.
It’s just a video.
With other conspiracy theories? They can cause serious harm. They can ruin lives, actually. When we believe or don’t believe things without consulting the experts and then disregard the facts we can encourage total chaos.
I’m not 100% serious about believing the South Lawn video. It does look fake. Maybe it isn't fake. The point is that most of us won’t remember it after today.


The problem is when you go into looking at these videos with the mindset that the guy behind it must be a lying liar wanting to feed you lies then you can get so skeptical that the digital compression fucks with your head. Personally I find the theory that Zelensky used a green screen nonsensical because if he did flee to another country, then the US/NATO powers would probably be working more closely with him on videos like this and would have better production values. For the theory to be true, you'd have to believe the US was not willing to pour that much money into the propaganda production, but still be fine spending hundreds of millions on other random shit to send to Ukraine.
 
There was also a Forbes article where the general gist is the guy believed in the conspiracy theory and doesn't care if he might be wrong because "hey what's the harm?".
WashingtonPost, out of all newsoutlets, pointed out that it was unlikely to be faked, which I find interesting
Video experts say that’s unlikely. Instead, the odd elements people are pointing out — the focus of the grass, the background that looks like it’s on a loop, the shadows — are more likely a result of standard compression that gets applied to videos when they are posted on Twitter.


Personally I find the theory that Zelensky used a green screen nonsensical because if he did flee to another country, then the US/NATO powers would probably be working more closely with him on videos like this and would have better production values. For the theory to be true, you'd have to believe the US was not willing to pour that much money into the propaganda production, but still be fine spending hundreds of millions on other random shit to send to Ukraine.

What if he is using a greenscreen but is also in Ukraine? He could be using the greenscreen for security.

The problem is when you go into looking at these videos with the mindset that the guy behind it must be a lying liar wanting to feed you lies then you can get so skeptical that the digital compression fucks with your head.
I guess I can see that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
But Zelensky actually offered Putin an out. He offered Putin two things: Ukraine doesn't join NATO, and the eastern breakaway states go do their own thing. That's mighty generous. If it were me, I'd never agree to those things, but Putin could have taken that deal, gone back home, and declared victory,

With the state of russian propaganda, telling people with straight face that geese are trained to kill all slavs, but only russians, he doesn't need any out. He can march all his troops out today, declare all out victory complete with voluntary/mandatory celebrations paying 300-500 rubles each and a bowl of free kasha. Photoshop nazi uniforms on dead kiddos, Azov flags on bombed out high rises and say "mission accomplished" Unfortunately, none of this is sarcasm, this is real, "russia never invaded ukraine".

Either this is propaganda bullshit or the press just ruined a coup. Either way, GG dipshits.

Putin arguably has at least 5 identifiable body doubles. There was $20 mil on his head like 5 years ago by reportedly ny some disgruntled oligharchs after 2014 sanctions. I think that he is no stranger to assassination plots, no head of mafia crime family is that complacent. Add recent cleaning in power structures, hopefully this gives people ideas that no one is safe.

I think that the real reason for these leaks is to continue to increase paranoia and uncertainty in rank and file. MVD and KGB warred among themselves, especially in later Soviet Union period. It would not be out of character to consider that same type of internal strife going on now. If anyone remembers how Gorbachev went for vacation and when he got back to Moscow, he was no longer at the top.


Despite freezing russian state assets and gold reserves in the west, and declarations that russia will service it's foreign debt with rubles instead, they did manage to fulfill their coupon obligations a week ago, and west allowed it, so there is no default for russian foreign debt ... yet. Which means that Russia and West have legit hopes to normalize relations in the future somehow. We are not going WWIII anytime soon.
 
WashingtonPost, out of all newsoutlets, pointed out that it was unlikely to be faked, which I find interesting





What if he is using a greenscreen but is also in Ukraine? He could be using the greenscreen for security.


I guess I can see that
Him using a green screen within Ukraine is a possibility, but I don't think you can really tell from the video if that's the case.

If you've never watched this video then I'd suggest trying it out (go fullscreen and honestly try) before reading the spoiler.

The gorilla test has always been memorable to me as it was the most ridiculous of a series of experiments on "selective attention". A lot of people would never notice the guy in the gorilla costume appearing right in front of them because they weren't primed to pay attention to it. There were similar experiments such as with test subjects entering a building to get directions from someone at a counter who then crouched down as though to get something, then having someone else pop up. Many people never noticed it was two different people at the counter, because the fact is we're all selective about what we pay attention to.

There are problems that pop up in videos all the time, but we don't notice them because we're not looking for them. With the Zelensky video we have a horde of skeptics trying to decipher any bits of information coming out of Ukraine to help back their pre-determined conclusion that Zelensky is fake and gay. Which is especially funny to me given we also had theories just within the past week that Putin was doing the same thing with a deepfake, one version being a proven deepfake where he's declaring the end of the war. Makes me wonder if Putin and his people are pulling a "NO U" and accusing Ukraine of the same thing Russia was just accused of to help deflate the accusations against Putin's possible deepfakes.
 

Meta asks Russian court to dismiss proceedings in 'extremism' case, Russian news agencies report​


Meta Platforms Inc (FB.O) on Monday asked a Russian court to dismiss proceedings in a case brought by state prosecutors demanding that the U.S. tech giant be labelled an "extremist organisation", Russian news agencies reported.
The TASS news agency reported from the courtroom that Meta had asked for more time to prepare its position and had also questioned the court's authority to implement a ban on its activities.

Representatives for Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Russian court rejects Meta attempt to dismiss 'extremism' case -reports​


A Moscow court on Monday rejected an attempt by Facebook owner Meta Platforms (FB.O) to have extremism charges against it dismissed, Russian news agencies reported, in a case that could force the U.S. tech giant out of the Russian market.
The TASS news agency earlier reported that Meta had asked for more time to prepare its legal position and had questioned the court's authority to ban its activities at the request of state prosecutors.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The company's lawyer, Victoria Shagina, said in court that Meta was not carrying out extremist activities and stood against Russophobia, Interfax reported.
Russia has already banned Facebook for restricting access to Russian media while Instagram was blocked after Meta said it would allow social media users in Ukraine to post messages urging violence against Russian President Vladimir Putin and troops Moscow sent into Ukraine on Feb. 24. read more

Russia calls the conflict in Ukraine a "special military operation" to disarm Ukraine and protect it from "Nazis".
Meta has since narrowed its guidance to prohibit calls for the death of a head of state and said its guidance should never be interpreted as condoning violence against Russians in general. read more
But the perceived threat to Russian citizens angered the authorities.
Russian prosecutors want to label Meta an "extremist organisation", a designation once reserved for groups such as the Taliban and Islamic State but later given to the Jehovah's Witnesses and jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation.

TASS cited the prosecutors as saying they were not seeking to curtail WhatsApp's activity on Russian territory, but that Meta being deemed extremist would ban the company from doing business in Russia.
It was not immediately clear how the WhatsApp messaging service would be able to continue operating in the event of an "extremist" designation.
Communications regulator Roskomnadzor, the body responsible for blocking Facebook and Instagram, said it favoured a ban on Meta's activities, TASS reported.
An FSB security service representative echoed that view in court, TASS reported.

 
Him using a green screen within Ukraine is a possibility, but I don't think you can really tell from the video if that's the case.

If you've never watched this video then I'd suggest trying it out (go fullscreen and honestly try) before reading the spoiler.

The gorilla test has always been memorable to me as it was the most ridiculous of a series of experiments on "selective attention". A lot of people would never notice the guy in the gorilla costume appearing right in front of them because they weren't primed to pay attention to it. There were similar experiments such as with test subjects entering a building to get directions from someone at a counter who then crouched down as though to get something, then having someone else pop up. Many people never noticed it was two different people at the counter, because the fact is we're all selective about what we pay attention to.

There are problems that pop up in videos all the time, but we don't notice them because we're not looking for them. With the Zelensky video we have a horde of skeptics trying to decipher any bits of information coming out of Ukraine to help back their pre-determined conclusion that Zelensky is fake and gay. Which is especially funny to me given we also had theories just within the past week that Putin was doing the same thing with a deepfake, one version being a proven deepfake where he's declaring the end of the war. Makes me wonder if Putin and his people are pulling a "NO U" and accusing Ukraine of the same thing Russia was just accused of to help deflate the accusations against Putin's possible deepfakes.
Who the hell wouldn't have noticed the big fucking gorilla in the middle of the screen?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Elim Garak and SBG
About half of those that tried the video didn't notice it. Results from the experiments were pretty insane like that, since it showed how little we really pay attention to what's going on around us.
That's...I don't know how I feel about that. Shocked, definitely, perhaps a bit disappointed
 
That's...I don't know how I feel about that. Shocked, definitely, perhaps a bit disappointed
Shouldn't be that disappointed, it's basically what happens with magic tricks. A magician drawing your attention to one place while he does something in another, it's why magician's practice their patter like random stories or lines, they're trying to draw your attention away from what all is going on around you and onto what they want you to pay attention to. There's even a phenomena where magicians using their fake thumbs often don't need to worry about it being the wrong skin color, because people often pay little attention to it.
 
Russia is blocking Azerbaijan news sources:


just a recent increase, in turn Azeris are not blocking any russian media sites. AZ tone is pretty salty, I won't be surprised if more flames come out of that region soon.

Azeris are closely allied to Turkey and in the recent weeks getting close in supporting Ukraine. Also Azeris have very decent oil and gas supply that they try to get to the EU market, but EU hasn't really bit on, going instead with Qatar for gas. Also Azeri-Turkey are against Armenians (who also staged meetings of support for Russian invasion this past weekend) - Russian alliance.
 

Russia tells U.S. envoy ties close to rupture after Biden's comments​


Russia's foreign ministry said on Monday it had summoned U.S. Ambassador John Sullivan to tell him that remarks by President Joe Biden about Russian President Vladimir Putin had pushed bilateral ties to the brink of collapse.
President Biden said last week that Putin was a "war criminal" for sending tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine.

"Such statements from the American president, unworthy of a statesman of such high rank, put Russian-American relations on the verge of rupture," the ministry said in a statement.

The Kremlin earlier described the comments as "personal insults" against Putin.
The ministry also told Sullivan that hostile actions against Russia would receive a "decisive and firm response".
Russia sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24 in what it called a special operation to degrade its southern neighbour’s military capabilities and root out people it called dangerous nationalists.

Ukrainian forces have mounted stiff resistance against Russian forces and the West has imposed sweeping sanctions on Moscow in an effort to force it to withdraw.


Fertiliser prices hit record on Russia supply concerns​


Fertiliser prices are breaking new records as supplies from Russia, the leading exporter, has dwindled, adding further to fears over food security.

Russia’s export ban this month — including key crop nutrients containing nitrogen, potash and phosphates — has sent prices soaring, while farmers were already facing high fertiliser costs because of sanctions on Belarus, a leading potash producer and export restrictions by China.

In Europe, soaring natural gas prices, the main ingredient for nitrogen crop nutrients, have meant that producers including Yara have reduced their output.

The fertiliser index from CRU, a consultancy, has risen 30 per cent since the start of the year, and is now higher than the levels reached during the food and energy crisis when prices jumped in 2008.

Higher fertiliser prices mean costs of production globally will increase, affecting the quality of crops. “Yields could be lower if farmers choose or are forced to reduce fertiliser applications, potentially impacting global production,” warned AHDB, a UK farmers’ advisory organisation.

Ukraine accuses Russia of illegally deporting children from Mariupol​


Kyiv on Monday accused Moscow of illegally deporting Ukrainian children to Russia, amid reports that troops in Mariupol were directing civilians to evacuate to the Russian-controlled breakaway eastern regions of Donbas.

“According to the information received, on March 19, the Russian occupation forces illegally deported 2,389 children to the territory of the Russian Federation who were in the temporarily occupied districts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions,” said Ukraine’s foreign ministry in a statement.

“The forcible transfer of civilians to the territory of the aggressor state, including children, shows signs of abduction. Such actions are a gross violation of international law, in particular international humanitarian law,” Ukraine’s foreign ministry added.

The ministry said that “by destroying homes and killing parents, Russia is depriving Ukrainian children of parental care and putting their lives in further danger in Russia.”

The ministry continued: “We call on the international community to respond immediately to the illegal removal of children, to increase pressure on Russia to force it to end the barbaric war against the Ukrainian people.”

Russian news agency Interfax reported on Monday that 450 people, including 100 children, had been evacuated from Mariupol, citing a statement from the territorial defence headquarters of the Donetsk People’s Republic.
The Ukrainian and Russian claims could not be independently verified.

Vitol calls on regulators to maintain ‘integrity of financial markets’ after Ukraine invasion​


The world’s biggest independent oil trader has called on regulators to maintain the “integrity” of the financial markets that underpin the global trading of commodities.

In its annual results statement on Monday, Vitol said policymakers needed to consider “market integrity and liquidity” on futures exchanges, which are used by the industry to manage price risk.

“Last year the gas and power markets experienced unprecedented levels of volatility, testing the resilience of markets and their participants,” the privately owned company said in its statement. “This period highlights the need for regulators to consider market integrity and liquidity during times of severe stress.”

The comments from Vitol speak to the concern felt by the commodity trading industry, which has faced huge demands for cash to cover hedging positions.

This month, Europe’s largest energy traders asked governments and central banks to provide “emergency” assistance to avert a potential cash crunch as sharp price moves triggered by the Ukraine crisis strained markets.

Exchanges play a vital role in global commodity markets by providing trading houses with futures contracts to manage risk. Without these instruments, most traders would not be able to move physical commodities.

That makes margin requirements — or demands for more cash — and clearing limits on commodity futures critical to global flows of oil and gas.

Demands for extra cash to cover short positions soared this month as commodity prices jumped following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, forcing some traders to unwind positions.

Ukraine says at least 115 children killed in Russian invasion​


Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has claimed the lives of more than 100 children, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday.
In a statement, Ukraine’s general prosecutor’s office said that “115 children died in the armed aggression by the Russian Federation on Ukraine”.

“The number of injured children has increased to 148,” the statement added.

Suggesting that the actual figures may be higher because of difficulties in confirming details in a war zone, the prosecutor’s office said the largest number of confirmed victims was 58 in Kyiv, the capital city where Russian forces last week targeted residential and public areas with shelling and rockets.

The eastern city of Kharkiv has recorded 38 child deaths, which has been under fire in recent weeks. Donetsk has seen 29 child deaths and Chernihiv 31.

Ukrainian authorities also warned of casualties from the bombing of an art school in Mariupol, “where about 400 Mariupol residents, women, children and the elderly, were hiding. The building was destroyed, people were under its rubble, but there is no information about the victims,” the statement said.

“The bombings and shelling have so far damaged 530 educational institutions, 72 of which have been completely destroyed — most in Donetsk, Kharkiv, Mykolayiv, Sumy, Kyiv, Kherson, Chernihiv and the Kyiv region. In addition, more than 40 children’s facilities were destroyed and damaged, including medical facilities, art schools, sports facilities, and libraries,” the statement added.

Russian and Ukrainian military claims cannot be independently verified.

Russian rouble bonds fall in price as trading resumes​


Russia’s rouble-denominated bonds dropped on Monday as trading resumed for the first time since the invasion of Ukraine, in the first tentative steps towards reopening Moscow’s financial markets.

Yields on the benchmark 10-year bond, which rise as prices fall, climbed as high as 19.7 per cent in pre-market trading before settling back to 13.5 per cent, roughly 1.4 percentage points higher than the last trading day on February 24, according to Refinitiv data.

One investor said brokers were quoting higher yields of more than 15 per cent shortly after the market reopened, with large gaps between bid and offer prices. It is unlikely that the restart to trading will allow foreigners to buy and sell Russia’s local currency government bonds, given the difficulty in settling transactions, the investor said.

Securities depositories Euroclear and Clearstream stopped accepting payments in roubles in early March, in effect trapping foreign investors in the local debt market, where they held bonds worth $41bn at the start of the year.
The Russian central bank announced the resumption of trading on Friday, and said it would purchase rouble bonds “in order to neutralise excessive volatility and provide balanced liquidity”.

Zelensky urges Germany to back Ukraine’s EU bid and freeze business with Russia​


Ukraine’s president has urged Germany to do more to help stop Russia’s invasion and approve Kyiv’s bid to be accepted as a member of the EU.

In a video to citizens of Germany — a country that has opposed Kyiv joining Nato and has expressed reservations over its EU bid — Zelensky said: “All of our values are all of your values . . . we are a part of Europe. And you see our desire to be in Europe, which we are fighting for on the battlefield.”

Germans could back Ukraine “by expressing your own thoughts and words through pressure on [your] politicians to that Ukraine can once and for all become a part of the EU”, he added.

Speaking weeks after Ukraine on February 28 formally submitted an application to join the EU, Zelensky said: “Nobody has the right to destroy a people and tear apart Europe.”

He also urged Germans to pressure their politicians into cutting all economic relations with Russia.
He said: “We warned your politicians that this is dangerous when Moscow decides what natural gas you get and at what price. We said sanctions were needed to prevent this war. Please don’t sponsor the war machine of this country, Russia. The occupier should not get a single euro.

“Close all of your ports to them. Don’t supply them with goods. Refuse Russian energy resources. Pressure Russia to leave Ukraine. I believe and know that peace is possible but you need to act for us to get peace,” he said.

Egypt devalues pound after Ukraine war hits economy​


Egypt devalued its currency and raised interest rates on Monday as the central bank moved to contain the impact of the war in Ukraine on the country’s economy.

The Central Bank of Egypt raised interest rates 100 basis points, increasing the deposit rate to 9.25 per cent and the lending rate to 10.25 per cent. It also devalued its currency 10.67 per cent, causing the pound to sink against the dollar. After the decision, the US currency was worth E£17.42 compared with E£15.66 earlier on Monday.

The country’s economy has been hit by rising commodity and energy prices because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Egypt is the world’s largest wheat importer and maintains a subsidised bread programme that feeds 70mn people. The country also relies on imports for its oil needs.

Analysts had expected the rate increase, but the timing came as a surprise because the bank’s monetary committee was due to meet on March 24.

The central bank said it was “keen on safeguarding the achieved macroeconomic stability”, and it stressed the importance of the role of the currency’s exchange rate as a shock absorber.

“Rising international commodity prices resulting from further supply chain disruptions in addition to increased risk-off sentiment have added to domestic inflationary pressures as well as external imbalances,” said the bank after an “exceptional meeting”.

Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the IMF, warned earlier this month the countries that rely on food and oil imports would feel the impact of the war severely.

European shares muted after strongest weekly advance since 2020​


European equities were muted on Monday, following their best week since 2020, as a rally driven by prospects of peace in Ukraine stalled and the benchmark oil price rose above $110 a barrel.

The regional Stoxx 600 share index, which last week wiped out all its losses incurred since Russia invaded its neighbour in February, added 0.1 per cent, Germany’s Xetra Dax traded flat, while London’s FTSE 100 added 0.5 per cent.
Brent crude rose 3.9 per cent to $112.2 a barrel, topping $110 for the first time in more than a week, due to renewed anxieties about global supply shortages.

The moves came as fierce fighting engulfed the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol overnight, even after Turkey, which is mediating peace talks between Russia and Kyiv, claimed the two countries were converging on key aspects of an agreement.

Futures trading implied Wall Street’s S&P 500 share index, which also closed out its best week since November 2020 on Friday, would fall 0.1 per cent in early New York dealings.

In Asia, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng lost 0.9 per cent with steeper drops for Chinese tech and property stocks. The fall followed a Chinese market rally last week after Beijing said it would introduce “favourable” measures to support the economy and financial markets.

Russia says missile strike hit ‘foreign mercenary’ training centre​


Russia’s defence ministry said that its cruise missiles had struck a military training centre for “foreign mercenaries” and Ukrainian troops in the Rivne area of northwestern Ukraine.

The attack in Rivne took place overnight, the ministry said on Monday, and targeted the Nova Liubomirka training range.
Russia last week struck a military base near the Polish border that had been used in the past by western instructors in an attack widely read as a warning to the Nato alliance.

The head of Rivne region Vitaliy Koval confirmed that two missile strikes had hit military training areas, but did not disclose the number of victims.

The defence ministry on Monday also accused Ukraine of staging an explosion at a chemicals plant in the northeastern city of Sumy, after an ammonia leak was reported in the early hours during fierce fighting there.
The Sumy regional governor Dmytro Zhyvytskyy said that a leak had been reported at the Sumykhimprom chemicals plant at 4.30am, endangering a 5km radius around the area.

Zhyvytskyy later reported that by 7.50am, the leak had been eliminated and there was no threat to the city’s population.
Sumy, located north of Kharkiv and 30km from the Russian border, has been the site of intense battles.
Russia’s defence ministry said the plant had been mined and the leak was caused intentionally by the Ukraine side.
Russian and Ukrainian military claims cannot be independently verified.


Do not expect the war in Ukraine to end quickly​

Peace talks or turmoil in Russia could halt the conflict, but the likeliest outcome is many more months of fighting

“Tell me how this ends?” is one of those things that people say in films — and sometimes also in real life. It is the crucial question about the war in Ukraine — but one that is sometimes obscured by the sheer drama and horror of day-to-day events.

Just before the outbreak of the war, most military experts expected a swift Russian military victory. That turned out to be wrong — and there will be more surprises in store. So all predictions have to be made with humility.

That said, there are three Ukraine scenarios which currently seem most likely. The first — which is both the most tragic and the most probable — is that this war continues for many months. The second possibility — put it at maybe 30 per cent — is that there is a peace settlement. The third scenario — which is perhaps 10 per cent — is that there is some sort of political upheaval in Russia, involving the overthrow of President Vladimir Putin and a new approach to Ukraine.

The long, grinding war scenario assumes that neither Russia nor Ukraine is now capable of achieving total victory and that neither is prepared to concede defeat. Putin is fighting to save his political life and the Ukrainians are fighting to save their country.

After almost a month of conflict, Russia has failed to take control of any of Ukraine’s major cities and has suffered heavy losses of men and equipment. The Russians may be about to conquer the strategic port of Mariupol — but only by destroying it in the process.

The increasing brutality of Russian tactics, which is on full display in Mariupol, is a guide to the future. As they get more desperate, the Russians may become even more vicious. There are ominous indications that the Kremlin is considering the use of chemical weapons already used in Syria.

But Kyiv has roughly six times the population of Mariupol. Surrounding Ukraine’s capital, bombarding it into submission and then successfully taking control of it looks beyond the capabilities of the Russian military. Even capturing Odesa, which would allow Russia to effectively control Ukraine’s coastline, could take months and involve the destruction of the port city that serves as the headquarters of the Ukrainian naval forces.

As well as causing terrible casualties, a prolonged war would steadily increase the risk of escalation. The pressure on western leaders to intervene would increase as atrocities get worse. The US and European governments are likely to continue resisting that pressure. But stepped-up military assistance to Ukraine may blur the line between intervention and non-intervention — raising the risk of a direct clash between Russia and the west.

The appalling losses for both sides, now and in the future, should increase the prospects for a negotiated peace. The Russians and Ukrainians have been talking almost from the beginning of the conflict. The Ukrainians seem to have accepted that they will not join Nato and will instead be a neutral state. That was one of Russia’s major demands and might allow Putin to claim some sort of victory.

There are other big issues that remain unresolved. The status of Russian-occupied Crimea and of Donetsk and Luhansk, which Russia now recognises as independent states, is not agreed. A peace settlement might have to involve some kind of creative compromise that accepts the current status quo, without setting it in stone.
Even if these issues were agreed, other very difficult issues would remain. Ukraine — understandably — now wants some kind of international security guarantees.

But if that looked like Nato membership by another name, it might not be accepted by Russia or, indeed, by Nato governments themselves. Russia may demand the lifting of western sanctions as a condition to withdraw its troops. But the US and EU will be reluctant to end Russia’s pariah status, as long as Putin remains in power.
The current assumption in Washington is that the Russians are probably not negotiating in good faith. Even the announcement of a ceasefire is likely to be treated sceptically — since Russia may just use it as an opportunity to regroup militarily.

But if Putin is indeed still committed to war, he may be making another catastrophic error. The pressure on the Russian economy and military is only going to increase in the coming months. Some military analysts believe the army may soon run short of ammunition and troops. There are shortages in the shops and prices are rising.

Displays of public dissent continue in Russia, despite the risk to protesters. Putin himself has taken to issuing angry denunciations of traitors and fifth columnists. Some senior figures within the intelligence services have reportedly been put under house arrest.

On the other hand, translating all this confusion and panic into an effective palace coup against Putin is a very tall order. The Russian leader is very careful about his security — so careful that he does not seem willing to allow even close aides near him.

Dissenting voices were purged from the Kremlin a long time ago. There will be disagreement and distress throughout the Russian system — but co-ordinating that into an effective plot to remove Putin may not be possible.
So those are the three options: a prolonged war; a peace settlement; or a coup in Russia. Expect the first, work for the second and hope for the third.


Introduction: Oil prices rise as EU mulls Russian ban, Saudi refinery hit​


At the start of the new week, oil prices have risen, with Brent crude above $110 a barrel, as European Union nations consider joining the United States in a Russian oil embargo. Adding to market jitters, Houthi rebels attacked a Saudi Aramco refinery over the weekend, temporarily disrupting production.


Brent crude is up more than $3 at $111.03 a barrel while US light crude is trading at $107.88 a barrel.


Prices moved higher ahead of a series of summits this week between EU governments and US president Joe Biden, where the Europeans will consider whether to impose an oil embargo on Russia.


The Moscow stock exchange has been shuttered for three weeks following the imposition of western sanctions on Russia, but is resuming limited trading today, in federal loan bonds.


European stock markets closed higher for the second week in a row last week despite there being little prospect of a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.


Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets UK, said:


Volatility levels have slipped back quite considerably from the levels we saw in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, with stock markets on both sides of the Atlantic posting their best week since 2020.

There appears to be a growing disconnect between what markets are doing and what is happening on the ground in Ukraine and the increasingly brutal measures that Russian forces are taking in trying to wear down resistance to their occupation, including the use of hypersonic missiles.

While markets appear to be focussing on the fact that peace talks are taking place, there is also little evidence that they are actually leading anywhere, given the distance between the two sides in respect of what they will accept, with Ukrainian President Zelensky saying at the weekend that Ukraine wouldn’t give up Lugansk or Donetsk in the east of the country.

Joe Biden’s ambassador to the United Nations warned on Sunday there was little immediate hope of a negotiated end to the war in Ukraine.


European markets look set to start the week lower, after a mixed Asian session where Japan’s Nikkei closed 0.65% higher, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng lost 1.1% and the Shanghai market was little changed.

 
Screenshot_20220321-152124__01.jpg
Screenshot_20220321-151431__01.jpg
Some recent US Intelligence updates about the state of the Russian Air Force.

First, they have noted that alongside approximately 75% of their high readiness BTG ground forces, the Russians also aligned approximately 60% of their total air assets for the invasion. (I presume this is of their total number of assets which are serviceable, not the 1,500).

Second, of those aligned for the invasion they still have over 60%.

Now obviously, there is speculation involved here but, presumably over 60% probably also means less than 70%. So we could be looking at air forces forces aligned to the invasion having lost somewhere in the region of 30-40% of their capacity.

Note, this would mean that Russia in the space of a month and with minimal success has lost around 20-25% of its Air Force.

What will matter going forward:
1) Can Ukrainian Air Defenses maintain their effectiveness, recent videos would suggest they are at the moment - however, there have been some noticeable losses of valuable S300s (seemingly early in the conflict).

I would suggest that it is likely that they will be able to for some time at least, especially with the West scrambling to get more systems in to their armament.

2) Can Russia rotate their other air assets in. This is a big question mark. Russia is a big country with large borders and huge air space - will they really backfill with units used for air policing of their border?

Plus, what about the training of these other units - presumably you would use your most experienced bomber pilots in Ukraine, do they have the time and capacity for conversion training (russian pilots have very low flying hours visa vi western counterparts, so unlikely others will be current).

3) In the face of Western sanctions, can Russia replace these losses at pace. This I highly doubt.

So in effect, if Ukraine can maintain their current air defense posture the air campaign might be over in a month or two. I doubt the Russians could operate at 30% capacity, if their pilots could even pull themselves into the cockpit at that point. I'd rather fly to a European airport and beg for asylum.

What does that mean for Russia's fighting abilities going forward? Nothing good. There is a reason why Western Forces are so reliant on air power, it's probably the most potent conventional force on any battlefield.

I do find it funny that Russia this is being done using primarily Russian made air defense systems which they were 100% aware of the capabilities of. Yet they have underestimated their own fucking hardware? How monumentally stupid are the Russian military planners? Shit, just play some fucking autistic mil sims and you would know what they were capable of...
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3093563
View attachment 3093564
Some recent US Intelligence updates about the state of the Russian Air Force.

First, they have noted that alongside approximately 75% of their high readiness BTG ground forces, the Russians also aligned approximately 60% of their total air assets for the invasion. (I presume this is of their total number of assets which are serviceable, not the 1,500).

Second, of those aligned for the invasion they still have over 60%.

Now obviously, there is speculation involved here but, presumably over 60% probably also means less than 70%. So we could be looking at air forces forces aligned to the invasion having lost somewhere in the region of 30-40% of their capacity.

Note, this would mean that Russia in the space of a month and with minimal success has lost around 20-25% of its Air Force.

What will matter going forward:
1) Can Ukrainian Air Defenses maintain their effectiveness, recent videos would suggest they are at the moment - however, there have been some noticeable losses of valuable S300s (seemingly early in the conflict).

I would suggest that it is likely that they will be able to for some time at least, especially with the West scrambling to get more systems in to their armament.

2) Can Russia rotate their other air assets in. This is a big question mark. Russia is a big country with large borders and huge air space - will they really backfill with units used for air policing of their border?

Plus, what about the training of these other units - presumably you would use your most experienced bomber pilots in Ukraine, do they have the time and capacity for conversion training (russian pilots have very low flying hours visa vi western counterparts, so unlikely others will be current).

3) In the face of Western sanctions, can Russia replace these losses at pace. This I highly doubt.

So in effect, if Ukraine can maintain their current air defense posture the air campaign might be over in a month or two. I doubt the Russians could operate at 30% capacity, if their pilots could even pull themselves into the cockpit at that point. I'd rather fly to a European airport and beg for asylum.
Wasn't there a report as well that the Hypersonic Missiles Russia used (if they did) were launched from Crimean Airspace? It might be they're scared the plane itself would be shot down before launching the ordnance
 
Wasn't there a report as well that the Hypersonic Missiles Russia used (if they did) were launched from Crimean Airspace? It might be they're scared the plane itself would be shot down before launching the ordnance
I think it was mentioned in the same Twitter thread that the US Intel agency is not able to confirm if a hypersonic was used - but that they would be surprised if it was due to the range (I.E. where this was launched from was close enough for another type of munition) and the target not exactly being of high priority.

That being said, with regards to stand off munitions that is exactly what they are designed for. To avoid enemy aircraft and air defence systems - yet they are using plenty of air launched cruise missiles being launched from TU-95s. Their fighters, CAS etc are as those Tweets suggest either not entering Ukrainian Air Space or are only doing so in a very limited capacity to avoid being shot down.

However, they are also running low on precision guided munitions. Which forces them to fly in low to be effective - although even that is in doubt due to poor comms, Forward Tactical Controller jobs for Artillery/Airstrikes is a difficult business - or they end up doing what those attack helicopters are doing and launching upwards which is inaccurate but means they can shoot at a greater distance even if all they achieve is damaging civilian buildings.

My take away is that Russian Suppression of Enemy Air Defences is shit, and that they have failed to achieve in a month what the US and it's allies did in a matter of days in 1991 against Saddam's Iraq, which had a far more potent air defence system than Ukraine currently has. Saddam Hussein's Iraq had effectively the same Soviet Systems that Ukraine has today, but with more of them. Russia has paid the price for this failure, and strangely did not sit back and consider what capabilities the West had developed to counter their kit when they sought to invade an adversary that had their kit from the 1980s and 90s.

Personally though, I would suggest that Ground Based Air Defences if used correctly are a powerful force multiplier, and perhaps Western militaries should seek to develop more tactical or non-strategic means of carrying out this task. Sure, Patriot is good but each system is worth like $1bn, when clearly a TOR is able to do the business too.
 
Last edited:
1) Can Ukrainian Air Defenses maintain their effectiveness, recent videos would suggest they are at the moment - however, there have been some noticeable losses of valuable S300s (seemingly early in the conflict).

I would suggest that it is likely that they will be able to for some time at least, especially with the West scrambling to get more systems in to their armament.
I saw an interesting article about this a while ago. they argued that isntead of playing hot potato trying to get old MiGs and shit to Ukraine it would be much more effective to get them proper SAMs instead. They did a pretty indepth breakdown of the various systems that are out there and unsurprisingly there's quite a few. Even if the US won't immediately commit to replacing them on a like for like basis, they could probably free some up by offereing to deploy one of their own Patriots as short term cover. For instance Bulgaria has a few systems the ukrainians could use, and as a NATO ally in the vicinity of a warzone deploying defensive assests should be an easy sell.
2) Can Russia rotate their other air assets in. This is a big question mark. Russia is a big country with large borders and huge air space - will they really backfill with units used for air policing of their border?

Plus, what about the training of these other units - presumably you would use your most experienced bomber pilots in Ukraine, do they have the time and capacity for conversion training (russian pilots have very low flying hours visa vi western counterparts, so unlikely others will be current).
It's not just the state of the pilots, but the state of the aircraft. It's entirely likely the planes on the quieter borders who were never expecting to do anything are probably in shitty shape. As for the pilot hours thing:
has some interesting info. Russians at ~100 hours vs the ~200 for Western pilots is insane


3) In the face of Western sanctions, can Russia replace these losses at pace. This I highly doubt.
I mean they've not been able to afford to build shit since before the war, with sanctions it's gonna be all but impossible. I've posted about it previously but looking at some of the production numbers for their hardwars is comical. The Su-57 was originally scheduled for serial production in 2012, it actually began in December 2020 at a pathetic 2 planes per year, one of which already fucking crashed.


I do find it funny that Russia this is being done using primarily Russian made air defense systems which they were 100% aware of the capabilities of. Yet they have underestimated their own fucking hardware? How monumentally stupid are the Russian military planners? Shit, just play some fucking autistic mil sims and you would know what they were capable of...
Not just Russian hardware, but old hardware. I mean according to the Russians shit like the S-400 and the Pantsir were supposed to be an enormous leap forward over their older shit, yet the Ukrainian air force is still flying and they're getting their shit pushed in by Turkish build frankenstein drones.

Sure, Patriot is good but each system is worth like $1bn, when clearly a TOR is able to do the business too.
But won't somebody please think of the shareholders. I find it kinda funny that the US has an easy option for a much cheaper system since Raytheon already helped build the David's Sling for Israel, they even offered it as a potential for a cheaper Patriot option (cheaper on a per missile basis at least), and despite interest the Army has done fucking nothing.
The problem is generals and politicos have a fucking hardon for multi-role capability, which comes with the price tag. Hence adding more expensive patriot missiles for ballistic missile defence, or why they're insisting on shit like trying to make the SM-6 a jack of all trades instead of keeping it an AA missile and then carrying proper dedicated AShM/Land Attack options.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back