Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

First of all, you don't know what a logical fallacy is.

Second of all, you don't know what a predator is. He gives people the OPTION to VOLUNTARILY send him money in exchange for reading a comment on the air. What is predatory about that? Is he not giving people what they pay for? Are there any hidden fees that he doesn't tell people about? By sending him money, are you unknowingly being locked into a contract that requires you to keep sending money? Where does the predator part come in?
ignoring the first part of you the retarded "no you don't know" lying about being under federal investigation in connection to a RICO case such as patrick casey said he was and denied and still asking for donations the hidden cost of being jammed up on the terror list or any of the other outcomes yet to fully be shown (federal cases move slowly don't deny the risks are there just because the hammer has yet to drop) that will have life ruination effects on the people just getting to start theirs seems pretty predatory doesn't it? It'd be like when your rabbi told you don't worry everything will be fine before he molested you not letting you know he had the clap and herpes Hershel.
 
ignoring the first part of you the retarded "no you don't know" lying about being under federal investigation in connection to a RICO case such as patrick casey said he was and denied and still asking for donations the hidden cost of being jammed up on the terror list or any of the other outcomes yet to fully be shown (federal cases move slowly don't deny the risks are there just because the hammer has yet to drop) that will have life ruination effects on the people just getting to start theirs seems pretty predatory doesn't it?
So when the federal indictments come out, what will the charges be? What crimes can these superchatters expect to be brought up on?
 
So when the federal indictments come out, what will the charges be? What crimes can these superchatters be expected to be brought up on?
potentially up to funding terrorism, co ordinated harassment campaigns, and if they decide to be really spiteful which seems to be the growing trend perjury for anything they get wrong if questioned on top of any criminal findings found in the course of the investigation. Really lucky they all aren't being migrated to services Nick runs through Milo and admitted and proven federal informant who keeps vaults of information on people. go ahead and say that's hyperbolic, you probably would have said the same about nick being investigated by the feds with his accounts frozen and being called for a congressional hearing right? pilpul level 4 next or you gonna go with smug derisive mockery not answering any points next? how about you give the reasons to think there is no real risk and nick has everything well in hand.
 
OK, so are they children or are they trust fund kids? Because by definition, a trust fund kid is an adult. You don't get access to your trust fund until you turn 18.
I literally never said, or made the claim that his paypigs/biggest donators are children.
 
potentially up to funding terrorism,

That's not how the law works. If it did, your employer would be considered an accessory to whatever crime you commit. The law requires that the prosecution prove mens rea (ie that you knew you were commit when you committed it). So not only would it require a terrorist event to occur which Nick would have no motive to do, especially if, as you say, he is purely motivated by greed (there's no money in blowing things up), you would have also to prove that the superchatter were aware that's what they were doing.

co ordinated harassment campaigns
Not illegal.

if they decide to be really spiteful which seems to be the growing trend perjury for anything they get wrong if questioned on top of any criminal findings found in the course of the investigation.
Perjury is specifically lying under oath in a court of law. You might be referring lying to a federal investigator. Both can be resolved by invoking your 5th amendment rights, By law, refusing to talk to police can not be used as grounds for suspicion (ex "He won't talk to us! That means he must being doing something bad!")

Really lucky they all aren't being migrated to services Nick runs through Milo and admitted and proven federal informant who keeps vaults of information on people. go ahead and say that's hyperbolic,
Nick did one interview with Milo two years ago and people come up with these fantastic theories about how Milo is Nick's second-in-command or better yet, that he is the secret string-pulling power behind the throne. I find these theories unpersuasive.

how about you give the reasons to think there is no real risk and nick has everything well in hand.
Nick may in fact be brought down by the feds. I mean, they are feds. But that's in the lap of the gods and I'll cross that bridge when I get to it. That said, the idea that Nick is going to be bring thousands of casual groyper fans down with him is absurd.

The feds know who all the Nazis are. If you ever commented on an Alt Right Youtube video, the feds know you are a Nazi. You need a Google to comment on Youtube and Google works with the feds. This notion that "Oh, once the feds find out that you are a groyper, you're gonna b in big trouble, mister."
 
So when the federal indictments come out, what will the charges be? What crimes can these superchatters expect to be brought up on?
In case you missed it, one of Nick's largest (literally) and most pathetic paypigs (IP2 Zoomer/Braxton Bell) was just visited by the FBI. Your guess is as good as mine, but I'm sure they have some ideas.
 
In case you missed it, one of Nick's largest (literally) and most pathetic paypigs (IP2 Zoomer/Braxton Bell) was just visited by the FBI. Your guess is as good as mine, but I'm sure they have some ideas.
Someone in AF admitting that feds are in the movement is just ironic bro, do you not trust Nick? Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
 
In case you missed it, one of Nick's largest (literally) and most pathetic paypigs (IP2 Zoomer/Braxton Bell) was just visited by the FBI. Your guess is as good as mine, but I'm sure they have some ideas.
It wouldn't surprise me. I don't doubt that the feds would like to take Nick down. But then, this is a testament to Nick's effectiveness. If he was as irrelevant and discrediting to the opposition as the people on this page claim, he wouldn't wouldn't be worth the effort. They never went after Richard Spencer because Richard Spencer sucked at his job.

Given that, it would make sense for the feds to approach people who might have an axe to grind with Nick.

Of course, this is all assuming that IP2 Zoomer is not lying. It is possible that he said that to get back in with the good graces of the broader groyper community. "I had the chance to betray Nick to the feds and chose not to! That proves I'm still loyal!"
 
PPP makes me immediately lose my appetite.
maybe that’s not a bad thing

also this art is blasphemous, there is only one dear leader and that’s @Null
45172657-1D8A-4185-8AF9-3D7BE1DB2B7B.jpeg
 
Now's a good time to put out a reminder that Nick is still under investigation by the Jan 6 comittee and their demands haven't changed. Nick is required to hand over all documentation in relation to America First,
1647886567934.png


Someone in AF admitting that feds are in the movement is just ironic bro, do you not trust Nick? Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
Feds are in every movement, genius. They're feds. That's what they do.
 
That's not how the law works. If it did, your employer would be considered an accessory to whatever crime you commit. The law requires that the prosecution prove mens rea (ie that you knew you were commit when you committed it). So not only would it require a terrorist event to occur which Nick would have no motive to do, especially if, as you say, he is purely motivated by greed (there's no money in blowing things up), you would have also to prove that the superchatter were aware that's what they were doing.


Not illegal.


Perjury is specifically lying under oath in a court of law. You might be referring lying to a federal investigator. Both can be resolved by invoking your 5th amendment rights, By law, refusing to talk to police can not be used as grounds for suspicion (ex "He won't talk to us! That means he must being doing something bad!")


Nick did one interview with Milo two years ago and people come up with these fantastic theories about how Milo is Nick's second-in-command or better yet, that he is the secret string-pulling power behind the throne. I find these theories unpersuasive.


Nick may in fact be brought down by the feds. I mean, they are feds. But that's in the lap of the gods and I'll cross that bridge when I get to it. That said, the idea that Nick is going to be bring thousands of casual groyper fans down with him is absurd.

The feds know who all the Nazis are. If you ever commented on an Alt Right Youtube video, the feds know you are a Nazi. You need a Google to comment on Youtube and Google works with the feds. This notion that "Oh, once the feds find out that you are a groyper, you're gonna b in big trouble, mister."
The terror event would be the 1/6 event you dip shit. if you want me to site specific claims just ask, don't ramble off pilpuling to try and drift of the point like spic nick and destiny. Milos on cozy, helped get the site's set up and by nicks own words is an integral part of what he does. theres degrees to things, comment ((())) is not the same as posting a christ church memeafesto and they pay different levels of attention to you accordingly. oh and i know what the 5th does, did you know you have to open with that because if they ask how was your day what'd you eat for breakfast and they find out that bagel was a mcmuffin that counts all the same. it's retarded but feds gonna fed.
 
It wouldn't surprise me. I don't doubt that the feds would like to take Nick down. But then, this is a testament to Nick's effectiveness. If he was as irrelevant and discrediting to the opposition as the people on this page claim, he wouldn't wouldn't be worth the effort. They never went after Richard Spencer because Richard Spencer sucked at his job.
Nick was in the area during Charlottesville, 6th of January and anti-vax rallies. Anyone participating in every notorious right wing anti-regime rally of the past 5 years would be investigated.
 
The terror event would be the 1/6 event you dip shit.

So you are telling me that you believe that Nick's superchatters are going to be sent to prison for J6. They sent superchats to Nick who was later present at J6 when a riot broke out and this makes those superchatters criminally liable. Am I to understand that this is your position?

Well, it's good to know that the Lionel Hutz School of Law is still producing graduates

Nick was in the area during Charlottesville, 6th of January and anti-vax rallies. Anyone participating in every notorious right wing anti-regime rally of the past 5 years would be investigated.
That would be tens if not hundreds of thousands of people. Throw in Stop the Steal and it's probably over a million. If that's true, I'm amazed that the feds have time to do anything else.
 
That would be tens if not hundreds of thousands of people. Throw in Stop the Steal and it's probably over a million. If that's true, I'm amazed that the feds have time to do anything else.
AC0C1339-D71B-4745-95AB-EDD14C881F65.jpeg
Stop spamming the thread and learn how to use the quote feature. I know you kiss the toes of a dirty gremlin hobbit and a Twink Mexican Catboy but you could do it properly instead of shitting up the thread with textual diarrhea retard
 
That's not how the law works. If it did, your employer would be considered an accessory to whatever crime you commit. The law requires that the prosecution prove mens rea (ie that you knew you were commit when you committed it). So not only would it require a terrorist event to occur which Nick would have no motive to do, especially if, as you say, he is purely motivated by greed (there's no money in blowing things up), you would have also to prove that the superchatter were aware that's what they were doing.


Not illegal.
Sorry just noticed this harassment is an actionable issue it's that what most claim is harassment doesn't rise to the definition, it may even meet the level of menacing which if done as part of a group for political reason terroristic threats.
So you are telling me that you believe that Nick's superchatters are going to be sent to prison for J6. They sent superchats to Nick who was later present at J6 when a riot broke out and this makes those superchatters criminally liable. Am I to understand that this is your position?

Well, it's good to know that the Lionel Hutz School of Law is still producing graduates
Jailed no, but marked down for life sure. I could probably claim yes and just do what you do and drill down into the inconsequential to try and distance myself from points I can't deal with but I'm not Jewish.
Milo's homobriety is not helping with the "urges" so he's raging and lashing out. Fun.
Oh god, he's gotta be at full blown diva levels of bitchy right now then
 
Last edited:
Back