Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

I swear, that petition is the worst bit of writing Fat has ever done! Good grief, this is scribbled on the back of a napkin for your mommy quality writing, not I'm going to hand this in to the judge for a legal proceeding where there are actual standards applied.

He's not writing to his audience. This isn't twitter where he can vague-post a list of potentially awful things for a bunch of likes. This is a court of law. They care about specifics.

-False police reports: case number, what were the reports about? How does this result in Fat being threatened and needing a restraining order?
-Impersonations: are we talking a free speech issue, or is someone trying to get loans in Fat's name? Is this even a criminal thing? Is this something that has in any way damaged Fat? The judge doesn't know.
-Harassment through the mail, threatening voicemails, emails: what did any of those say? Also, that's awful writing. Were only the voicemails threatening? Was only the mail harassment? Fat doesn't know how to structure a list, this is embarrassing. He should have written it: "There have been harassing messages, including threats sent through physical and electronic mail and left on voicemail."
-This group of people have been caught repeatedly on the cameras on our house vandalizing my property. Dates, times, what was the nature of the vandalization? Again, the court cares about specifics, you need to provide them. Also, given that those are criminal actions, the police reports for each of those occasions should be included.
-They harass the local businesses I frequent: How? When? Which ones? Without knowing what Fat considers harassment, the court cannot decide whether this piece of information is useful. Of course, if Fat writes, "They leave 5-star reviews with messages mocking me for the pub where I eat my Thanksgiving dinner," the judge isn't going to think that's a matter he should be bothered dealing with.
-They have threatened to etc. etc... Okay, this is starting to get relevant. But again, specifics are needed. What does Fat consider a threat? "Black Bulls fart in your wife's vagina" isn't going convince the judge that anybody is planning on raping Nikki.

Of course, the bigger problem with that paragraph is that it's about a bunch of unidentified people. It may be relevant as context for why Fat is afraid of Andrew, but he has to draw a connecting line between those acts and Andrew in order for the judge to be able to use any of the information from paragraph one in considering whether to use those claims in deciding to issue an order against Andrew. How does Fat draw that connecting line? "Andrew is the first of them who identified themselves." That's it. He doesn't say that Andrew posts regularly on the OnA forums, he doesn't say that Andrew claimed to be part of the group of harassers. He doesn't say anything to prove his claim. This guy is inept. He makes Russell Greer look like a competent lawyer.

The rest of the second paragraph is just pure garbage writing. He tells the court that Andrew went to the bar to harass him, and then he starts over and tells the same story a second time, without ever clarifying that the two accounts are of the same event. With only this report, the judge couldn't be certain how many times Andrew went to Hooligans. Fat also tells the story wholly out of order. Chronologically, it goes:

-Andrew texts Fat, sending him a copy of his drivers license, threatening to kick his ass
-Fat leaves the bar
-Andrew drives to the bar
-Andrew uses his debit card and identifes himself to people at the bar.
-A police report is made several days later
-Additional texts from Andrew.

What we get is this:

-Andrew identified himself.
-Andrew drove to the bar Fat frequents.
-Andrew had sent harassing messages
-Fat was at home.
-Andrew drove to the bar Fat frequents.
-He told several of Fat's fellow customers that he was there to fight Fat.
-Police were called to make a report several days later
-Andrew sent a text of his license
-Andrew used his debit card at the bar.

This garbage is from a professional writer, people. Fat can't even manage two paragraphs. What a fat loser.
This actual tough guy is afraid of a guy who announces himself and threatens to fight him. Lol.

He does have a punchable face, though
 
One of my favorite thing about lolcows like Pat, is the fact that they simply cannot be normal for even 5 minutes. You could easily find tons of courtroom footage of even the most horrible criminals being perfectly polite to the judge and having some understanding about how the process works.

But Pat? He interrupts the judge, is so smug he doesn't bring any real evidence, and he just has to give an indignant response regarding his artisan pepperoni business. He will continue acting against his own interests in his quest to get back at his "stalkers" until he has nothing left. It's a beautiful thing.
 
One of my favorite thing about lolcows like Pat, is the fact that they simply cannot be normal for even 5 minutes. You could easily find tons of courtroom footage of even the most horrible criminals being perfectly polite to the judge and having some understanding about how the process works.

But Pat? He interrupts the judge, is so smug he doesn't bring any real evidence, and he just has to give an indignant response regarding his artisan pepperoni business. He will continue acting against his own interests in his quest to get back at his "stalkers" until he has nothing left. It's a beautiful thing.
That's often because their attorney has beaten it into their head to keep quiet during anything happening in court no matter what. Now, in Fat's case his attorney was....

edit: Actually, I just remembered in Fat's earlier case (where he did have attorneys) he raised his hand and tried to talk to the judge too.
 
That's often because their attorney has beaten it into their head to keep quiet during anything happening in court no matter what. Now, in Fat's case his attorney was....

edit: Actually, I just remembered in Fat's earlier case (where he did have attorneys) he raised his hand and tried to talk to the judge too.
Even people without a lawyer’s advice usually know that when you take a personal dispute to court it’s important to behave like you’re the sane and reasonable one. Fatrick is just as dumb as a rock.
 
I swear, that petition is the worst bit of writing Fat has ever done! Good grief, this is scribbled on the back of a napkin for your mommy quality writing, not I'm going to hand this in to the judge for a legal proceeding where there are actual standards applied.

He's not writing to his audience. This isn't twitter where he can vague-post a list of potentially awful things for a bunch of likes. This is a court of law. They care about specifics.

-False police reports: case number, what were the reports about? How does this result in Fat being threatened and needing a restraining order?
-Impersonations: are we talking a free speech issue, or is someone trying to get loans in Fat's name? Is this even a criminal thing? Is this something that has in any way damaged Fat? The judge doesn't know.
-Harassment through the mail, threatening voicemails, emails: what did any of those say? Also, that's awful writing. Were only the voicemails threatening? Was only the mail harassment? Fat doesn't know how to structure a list, this is embarrassing. He should have written it: "There have been harassing messages, including threats sent through physical and electronic mail and left on voicemail."
-This group of people have been caught repeatedly on the cameras on our house vandalizing my property. Dates, times, what was the nature of the vandalization? Again, the court cares about specifics, you need to provide them. Also, given that those are criminal actions, the police reports for each of those occasions should be included.
-They harass the local businesses I frequent: How? When? Which ones? Without knowing what Fat considers harassment, the court cannot decide whether this piece of information is useful. Of course, if Fat writes, "They leave 5-star reviews with messages mocking me for the pub where I eat my Thanksgiving dinner," the judge isn't going to think that's a matter he should be bothered dealing with.
-They have threatened to etc. etc... Okay, this is starting to get relevant. But again, specifics are needed. What does Fat consider a threat? "Black Bulls fart in your wife's vagina" isn't going convince the judge that anybody is planning on raping Nikki.

Of course, the bigger problem with that paragraph is that it's about a bunch of unidentified people. It may be relevant as context for why Fat is afraid of Andrew, but he has to draw a connecting line between those acts and Andrew in order for the judge to be able to use any of the information from paragraph one in considering whether to use those claims in deciding to issue an order against Andrew. How does Fat draw that connecting line? "Andrew is the first of them who identified themselves." That's it. He doesn't say that Andrew posts regularly on the OnA forums, he doesn't say that Andrew claimed to be part of the group of harassers. He doesn't say anything to prove his claim. This guy is inept. He makes Russell Greer look like a competent lawyer.

The rest of the second paragraph is just pure garbage writing. He tells the court that Andrew went to the bar to harass him, and then he starts over and tells the same story a second time, without ever clarifying that the two accounts are of the same event. With only this report, the judge couldn't be certain how many times Andrew went to Hooligans. Fat also tells the story wholly out of order. Chronologically, it goes:

-Andrew texts Fat, sending him a copy of his drivers license, threatening to kick his ass
-Fat leaves the bar
-Andrew drives to the bar
-Andrew uses his debit card and identifes himself to people at the bar.
-A police report is made several days later
-Additional texts from Andrew.

What we get is this:

-Andrew identified himself.
-Andrew drove to the bar Fat frequents.
-Andrew had sent harassing messages
-Fat was at home.
-Andrew drove to the bar Fat frequents.
-He told several of Fat's fellow customers that he was there to fight Fat.
-Police were called to make a report several days later
-Andrew sent a text of his license
-Andrew used his debit card at the bar.

This garbage is from a professional writer, people. Fat can't even manage two paragraphs. What a fat loser.
It's funny cause this is how shitty writers - especially shitty journalists - like to tell a story.
He knows he has no data, no records, no proof. So he starts by bunching all the vague nonsense together in the hopes that sounds scary when explained in sequence, and then implies that this man is an agent of all of that. He just thought that the judge would be emotionally invested at that point and accept that Andrew is an avatar of a sick conspiracy. This couples with his belief that Andrew was just so emboldened he slipped up by sending Pat his info, when in reality nobody took him or this or anything he does seriously.
What's most amusing that by the judge rejecting this strategy, he is also rejecting that this sick conspiracy matters or even exists. He took this to a proper court of law, and the law said "shut up, fatty."
 
Milwaukee's like 80% Dem voting wise, a "social justice" lawyer who gets appointed to the court system is probably practically guaranteed.
He's registered unaffiliated but that's pretty standard for anyone on the bench. It's not uncommon for them not to vote at all, depending on their outlook. Some judicial canons could be interpreted strictly as absolutely prohibiting any political activity, and while it generally doesn't prohibit simply voting, some prefer to avoid it for ethical reasons of their own.

That said he has a career path, including a high position in an organization to provide bilingual legal services, so it is pretty likely there are social leanings there.

If a judge routinely makes obvious political decisions contrary to the law they will rapidly become unpopular and a chief judge who does that might find himself replaced. The state supreme court, which more closely reflects the population of the state, can also veto the chief judge's choices.

He didn't throw the case out because Fatrick is a white male and a "Republican," he threw it out because Fatrick completely failed to present even a ghost of a cause of action. Lolcows are fairly amazing for being completely ignorant of what a cause of action is, and absolutely impenetrable to any explanation, and that it doesn't mean my fee-fees are hurt and I'm angy.
Well he's at it again today with the exact same arrogant shtick that worked so well last time, I can't wait to see what happens nexxxt.
For a "writer" I've rarely seen anyone with such dire paucity of language. It's like he's one of those shitty irc bots that had like a dozen phrases it'd endlessly repeat.
What a fat baby Pat is. He also wrongly claimed that Andrew was African-American which is odd because Pat had Andrew's drivers license at this point. I'm sure piggy thought that Andrew wouldn't show and he might get a racist judge that would immediately rule in his favor.
As with most SJWs, he is an utterly racist shit who would play the race card against a guy and falsely claim he was black in an attempt to take advantage of his white privilege.
This couples with his belief that Andrew was just so emboldened he slipped up by sending Pat his info, when in reality nobody took him or this or anything he does seriously.
What's most amusing that by the judge rejecting this strategy, he is also rejecting that this sick conspiracy matters or even exists. He took this to a proper court of law, and the law said "shut up, fatty."
Well he kind of did slip up in the sense he ended up involved in completely unnecessary litigation from a nutcase. Unlike Fatty, though, he at least seems to have learned from the mistake. He did give us a lot of entertainment for free for us, though. Unfortunately he's somewhat limited his own avenues for fun in the future.
 
Last edited:
The fact that Patrick was yelling in open court, talking over the judge, had to be told multiple times to stop talking and the bailiff saw fit to escort the other guy out is all very telling. Patrick isn't simple a salty chump, he's genuinely mentally unwell to the point where he'll actively endanger himself. It's almost not funny.

Almost. It's still pretty funny :P
Let me preface that I have no sympathy for this fat faggot. But to him, because he has no self awareness at all, this is the most inexplicable and unfair situation he could possibly find himself in. He's just a well respected author who is being tortured by at most 3 people with thousands of sock puppet accounts, one of whom is standing beside him in court! He demands justice! Why doesn't the judge understand??

Reality is a bitch though. Pat is a fat demented faggot, a failed author, an historically cucked idiot and absentee father who is helplessly addicted to social media and who deserves quite literally everything that has come his way. The judge got a taste and dismissed his tro. God does Patrick ever fucking deserve it lol. I bet he gets a good ol' pegging from the missus after he wasted another $150 of her money.
 
You're right, it is stupid and gay. Worst of all, it is effortposting. Everyone knows Pat will react the exact same way regardless of what you send him, it's highly unlikely he even reads most of it. So if you're gonna just plug in a new thing it better not be a bunch of speculative fiction that just sucks to read.
His replies may be generic, but I suspect Fatrick reads every word of every post, shidding and farding the whole time.
 
The author of this book is the same guy who just tried to get a restraining order by betting on the judge being a racist:

0873CFEF-691E-418C-BA1E-0D46010A3AE0.jpeg
 
One of my favorite thing about lolcows like Pat, is the fact that they simply cannot be normal for even 5 minutes. You could easily find tons of courtroom footage of even the most horrible criminals being perfectly polite to the judge and having some understanding about how the process works.
A judge once told me that in criminal court, you see bad people on their best behavior, but in civil court, it's often good people on their worst behavior. People who realize their literal lives are on the line tend to be polite to the person in a position to make a decision about it. People in a retarded feud have no particular reason not to act like total dicks and probably have been for years anyway.
 
A wise man would accept that he has been bested and get off twitter for a while..
Losing is impossible for some people so they just rewrite events in their head and declare themselves winners. Standard lolcow procedure.

If Patrick was normal or even mildly self aware he wouldn't have a thread, forum, and IRL bullshit but here we are. Too stupid to live, too stubborn to die.
 
This thread always turns to shit when it gets featured. Fatrick is a fat faggot but he's rivalled in faggotry by a lot of the user base here.
Any thread that gets featured goes to shit for a bit. When I was reading thru the thread there is a noticable difference in quality of the posts before the thread got featured vs after.
 
A wise man would accept that he has been bested and get off twitter for a while.. Why does Fatrick have this need to respond to everything with his " blah blah, child" template?
I keep saying this, but he doesn't even need to accept that he lost. He just needs to smarten up about using Twitter and change his phone number. You know, like a high-functioning retard probably would have by now.

Speaking of high-functioning retards behaving better than this: do you see bobo getting into years long slapfights with the rascals? Christ, even both Cumia brothers figured it out eventually
 
Back