- Joined
- Dec 15, 2015
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, I was looking more into the diy hrt stuff, and check this shit out:
View attachment 3085460
This person needs to be kept away from children and shot.
And then:
View attachment 3085464
ITS SORE BECAUSE YOU HAVE FUCKING GYNO AND KEEP PLAYING WITH YOUR BITCHTITS YOU DEGENERATE REDDITOR!
Is that the Autism that Dave Rubin mired in?About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.
Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
I don't think any of the kinds of people you mentioned have the right to force children into any of those lives. But WTF do I know.About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.
Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
Yeah that child is gonna be raped or groomed into degeneracy by their two dads and I would prefer to be a ward of the state in that situation. In fact I would prefer to be born to my mother instead of literally stolen by two homos because they want to normalize their deviation from god's light. I get the rational logical arguments and shit but I just don't trust em. Simple as. Also yes, two crackheads shouldn't be breeding either. A lot of people shouldn't, including people who have horrific genetic diseases that are likely to be passed down to curse their child. And black men who just don't use protection and leave their baby momma to raise a future nigger who will contribute to the 13/50 stat because they have no father figure to discipline them and be a good male role model. But that's just my opinion. Children can give meaning to otherwise barren lives, and sometimes they can correct a wayward course, but 1) we don't need more people and 2) some are clearly not fit to be parents.About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.
Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
Personally I feel like a child raised by two women is better off because at least one of them is (usually) the child's actual mother. Though a daughter instead of a son in that situation would be better off since a son would be lacking a close male role model and someone who knows what it's like to grow up as a young boy.About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.
Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
official and objective parenting tier list:Personally I feel like a child raised by two women is better off because at least one of them is (usually) the child's actual mother. Though a daughter instead of a son in that situation would be better off since a son would be lacking a close male role model and someone who knows what it's like to grow up as a young boy.
at the very bottom Ralph and panstu/faith.official and objective parenting tier list:
god tier: intact family with father and mother
[power gap]
C tier: single father
D tier: single mother
E tier: lesbian couple
[massive power gap]
absolute trashcan tier: gay couple, any kind of polyamorous arrangement, anything involving non-binary people or trannies of any kind
this is indisputable fact and only smelly people disagree