"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

@Null, as a fellow fan or the bygone days of Springer and Maury and Judge Judy, back when the spectacle of humanity was mostly limited to trash tv and what you'd see in real life, I have a suggestion. I would enjoy a Jerry Springer-style Final Thought's before the outro song for each episode. Please, pander to my nostalgia.
 
With the LowTax mom talk, Maury guests thing, the dumb bitch with four kids doing commentary on Chantel, and the Dave Rubin shit made the stream pretty close to "Mad at bad parents."

But tbh fair that kind of is at the heart of every stream in a way or two but still just something I noticed.
 
Speaking of DIY HRT, one of the older sites was hosted on MIT. The site has gone through changes from its DIY estrogen, though. There used to be a video of a white troon showing how to make estrogen from grocery bags. The site is run by a crazy asian woman who is more artist than scientist. It almost reads like a schizophrenic's website.
 
So, I was looking more into the diy hrt stuff, and check this shit out:
View attachment 3085460
This person needs to be kept away from children and shot.
And then:
View attachment 3085464
ITS SORE BECAUSE YOU HAVE FUCKING GYNO AND KEEP PLAYING WITH YOUR BITCHTITS YOU DEGENERATE REDDITOR!

So when I searched yt for "Peter breastfeeding" the third fucking result was the Ben Shapiro vid of the crazy seahorse dad.
Fuck YouTube jfc
 
I knew there was a reason I enjoyed kiwi farms. Growing up i would always watch maury and springer with my mom and absolutely loved it. Just trashy people bringing their garbage onto a stage for everyone to point and laugh at. I always felt that KF was like an internet extension of the premise and I'm glad Null sort of confirmed that for me.
 
About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.

Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
 
About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.

Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
Is that the Autism that Dave Rubin mired in?

He is getting some thot to shit out a kid for him? FUCKING LOL, I don't listen to him anymore cause I don't have time but Dave is more stable than most of the Fat Welfare Queens that pump out 5 or 6 kids to different daddies.
 
About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.

Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
I don't think any of the kinds of people you mentioned have the right to force children into any of those lives. But WTF do I know.
 
About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.

Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
Yeah that child is gonna be raped or groomed into degeneracy by their two dads and I would prefer to be a ward of the state in that situation. In fact I would prefer to be born to my mother instead of literally stolen by two homos because they want to normalize their deviation from god's light. I get the rational logical arguments and shit but I just don't trust em. Simple as. Also yes, two crackheads shouldn't be breeding either. A lot of people shouldn't, including people who have horrific genetic diseases that are likely to be passed down to curse their child. And black men who just don't use protection and leave their baby momma to raise a future nigger who will contribute to the 13/50 stat because they have no father figure to discipline them and be a good male role model. But that's just my opinion. Children can give meaning to otherwise barren lives, and sometimes they can correct a wayward course, but 1) we don't need more people and 2) some are clearly not fit to be parents.
 
About Dave Rubin, I agree with conservative thinking about needing both genders to form a stable partnership, because having an established female presence is obviously more likely to result in a more balanced upbringing, but I didn't understand the consent issue he brought up - that the child can't consent to the circumstances of their birth. But, surely this applies to all children? If two heterosexual crackheads living in some welfare tip chose to have a child, they've consented and made the joint decision to bring that child into a pretty shit life. If two Africans have a child, they've brought their child into one of the most lethal, barren places on Earth to spend their one existence. No child can consent to their birth - there have been at least a few lawsuits against parents by people arguing that they did not have a right to their birth. So Dave Rubin and husband using surrogate mothers to birth children that are half theirs is undeniably ersatz, but they're born to solvent people living in the first world who are trying to fulfill their reproductive role in society and take on that burden.

Like I get it, it weirds people out, but a child could do a lot worse than be born to two poofs.
Personally I feel like a child raised by two women is better off because at least one of them is (usually) the child's actual mother. Though a daughter instead of a son in that situation would be better off since a son would be lacking a close male role model and someone who knows what it's like to grow up as a young boy.
 
Personally I feel like a child raised by two women is better off because at least one of them is (usually) the child's actual mother. Though a daughter instead of a son in that situation would be better off since a son would be lacking a close male role model and someone who knows what it's like to grow up as a young boy.
official and objective parenting tier list:

god tier: intact family with father and mother
[power gap]
C tier: single father
D tier: single mother
E tier: lesbian couple
[massive power gap]
absolute trashcan tier: gay couple, any kind of polyamorous arrangement, anything involving non-binary people or trannies of any kind

this is indisputable fact and only smelly people disagree
 
official and objective parenting tier list:

god tier: intact family with father and mother
[power gap]
C tier: single father
D tier: single mother
E tier: lesbian couple
[massive power gap]
absolute trashcan tier: gay couple, any kind of polyamorous arrangement, anything involving non-binary people or trannies of any kind

this is indisputable fact and only smelly people disagree
at the very bottom Ralph and panstu/faith.
 
Back