Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Also, how weird do you have to be to have 0 friends?
You have to make an effort to be off-putting and offensive, not merely weird, for you to unlock this achievement. I met one such person in college. For her weirdness she still managed to keep at least 2 friends (me and another Christian dude), eventually she lost me because she actively tried to look for my weakness, to stick barbs through my extremely thick skin. I didn't try to find out how she did with the other guy.

No matter what palette Matt Wilkins uses, he'll still look like a black man.
 
Too bad you have no friends to care.

But look at it this way, your bullies were being your friend...you just didn’t respond to the corrections with which they gifted you. It was still a kindness, though you were too far gone to be saved.

If at any point you were genuinely okay with people using different pronouns for you, then it wasn't an issue for you to begin with in the first place and this new restriction is just a way of exerting control.

Yet another shining example of how queer doesn't mean anything anymore. He's attracted to the opposite sex but doesn't feel "straight". What? :\
Pretty sure this guy is saying he loves alllll women meaning transwomen. He just hasn’t gotten the memo that he’s supposed to pretend that makes him nothing other than 100% heterosexual, instead of accurately identifying as some form of faggot since he fucks dudes.
 
Telling women how they should vote to own the conservatives.

FOkQ6JzXEAAksy6.jpg
 
Last edited:
>Trying to dunk on Putin by being openly discriminating towards white Americans
All while living in a country that was actively bombing 7 countries at the same without a declaration of war about 6 years ago. Pretty sure most of the people getting killed were darker than me.

Why are these black supremacist idiots trying to save the wanna be aryans in Ukraine when their chosen leaders absolutely demolish countries over the pettiest, non-war starting shit?
 
Its funny when you think about it.

Sjws are the way they are because the adults let them stay kids when they grow up:

Kids are born evil, so its about to the parents to snip the evil, and cultivate the good.

Most of the self-hating whites I've seen and have had to deal with are Jews, the ones who hate the european white race they we're born from. The same jews who are peddling Social Justice while boasting how normal they are and literally say they can do no wrong. The same "Adults" who say they raise kids, teach kids, yet hate the kids they teach calling them lazy when the same "adults" scream after getting 1 extra document to do for work. If work means talking the whole day, looking at Tiktok on your phone, and backbiting you for doing simple like typing on a keyboard, or turning pages for a big dossier on a person. The same self-hating white jews, or self-hating whites, who act like they're still in High school: getting boyfriends in their 30's, treating their sons like dogs, and treating their dogs like their kids.

You know what's evil and malicious about these people are: they're not the young kids who blindly parrot an ideology because its the latest cool thing to do like eating a tidepod. They're not the keyboard warriors you see on Reddit who don't have lives to spend except on Reddit trying to ruin people lives instead. These self-hating white jews are literally mothers and teachers who have families who love them, plans for the weekends, hobbies to occupy them, Jobs they go to. In short they have lives they live in. And yet they have enough time to beat down people because they literally say and do things they don't like. Things as simple as saying their full names, turning pages, typing on your keyboard, clicking on your mouse "too loudly" . A man tells you what you did wrong. But these people "feel" they're being threatened, that you should have guessed what you we're doing wrong without them telling you. So they talk behind your back to customers, representatives from other companies, other office buildings, close your chance to advance and grow while preventing you from advancing and growing. Oh and these "people" also consider you these "people". Otherkins, subspecies, a different kind of species like how the Nazi's called the Jews "these people".

Let me say again, these malicious jews, these "sane" SJWs, their in your government, in your doctor offices, in your financial institution. And they literally want to see punch down into the ground, and keep you in the ground. Whether your born white, or simply clicking on your mouse or typing a humble post about these people.
 
Last edited:
UPDATE on this shitshow of a story...
Remember our friends Philip Pullman and Kate Clanchy from last week? (post 1, post 2, post 3) TL;DR they are two British authors who got torn to pieces by Book Twitter for an allegedly racist memoir and the words it used to describe victimised brown people - the latter for writing it and the former for defending the latter.

Specifically the part where...
The Society of Authors (or which Pullman is the serving president) put out a statement last week to distance themselves from Pullman's tweets. And if I were a betting man, I'd say they were already trying to show him the door.

Well I hate to say I told you so, but I goddamn told you so. Yesterday Philip Pullman resigned from his post as the president of the Society of Authors, citing disagreements like the aforementioned.

Sir Philip Pullman resigns as Society of Authors president after book row
[...]
In his resignation letter, which has just been published, he said: "Recent events have made it apparent that when a difference of opinion arises, there is no easy way to resolve it within the constitution or the established practices of the Society.

"When it became clear that statements of mine were being regarded as if they represented the views of the Society as a whole (although they did nothing of the sort, and weren't intended to), and that I was being pressed by people both in and out of the Society to retract them and apologise, I realised that I would not be free to express my personal opinions as long as I remained President.

"That being the case, with great regret and after long consideration I chose to stand down."

The society's chief executive Nicola Solomon said: "We were very sorry when Philip told us in February that he intended to resign, and regret that his personal views have come under so much scrutiny because of his presidency of the SoA.

Social media has changed the way we all communicate, organisations as well as individuals.
"We are in the process of reviewing the constitution to reflect the times in which we live, including the roles of the management committee, chair and president."
(link, archive)

From the way he makes it sound, the Society were the ones who pressed him to make that simpering apology tweet (not the BBC, as I previously suspected).

Still not happy with anyone involved in this story, but I'm somewhat glad (if) Phil eventually chose to leave these assholes on his own terms. Or at least, that's how it's being reported.

But the consequences were much, much worse for the author who this scandal was originally about.

As a reminder, Clanchy was "given the chance to do some re-writing" of her Orwell Award (and no, the irony is not lost on me) winning memoir last August.

By autumn however, the re-written edition had failed to materialise. And in January, we learned that the publisher (for context, Picador and Pan Macmillan are the same company) had dropped the book entirely and all other books by her.

Picador had announced it was working with Clanchy on a revised version of the book. However, a joint statement by Pan Macmillan and Clanchy today (20th January) said this would no longer be published and the two parties were going their separate ways.

It said in a statement: “By mutual agreement, Pan Macmillan and Kate Clanchy have decided to part company.

“Pan Macmillan will not publish new titles nor any updated editions from Kate Clanchy, and will revert the rights and cease distribution of Some Kids I Taught and What They Taught Me and her other works.
(link, archive – bypasses paywall)

This, they claimed, was mutual, and:
“Pan Macmillan wishes Kate Clanchy all the best for the future.”

Like hell they do.

Another aspect of the story that had escaped me until now was how Philip Gwyn Jones (another Philip) spoke in her defence last November. This one worked for the company that published the book, and regretted not standing up for her sooner. He was quoted several times in a Telegraph article where he made a lot of very based points about identity politics in publishing (link, archive - bypasses paywall).

Among the things Gwyn Jones said were that sensitivity readers should not limit the author or the editor's creative control, that he fears sensitivity readers becoming a routine part of the publishing process, saying that the criticism of Clanchy lacked nuance, the logical conclusion of identity politics would be a world where"We’d end up only reading books written by ourselves", and that younger employees in publishing should be guided away from this kind of mindset. All of this from the same article. Seriously, the more I read from this man, the more I end up liking him.

Kate Clanchy also wrote a piece on cancel culture for Prospect magazine (link, archive). (The other two contributing authors were Richard Dawkins and some awful woke university prof who got cancelled by the right.) All three pieces were obnoxiously verbose, but one of its most salient quotes came from Clanchy, who said: "The culture wars are only just getting going in British publishing."

Naturally, the publishing company publicly distanced themselves from their rogue employee's comments and those made by the author (link, archive). This was about a month and a half before they announced they would no longer be publishing her book. Way to prove her wrong, eh?

As for Kate Clanchy, her "widely criticised" memoir got taken up by Swift Press in February (archive), under a newly created brand that aims to publish "original books that challenge groupthink" (archive).

Meanwhile, the Society Of Authors chairwoman joined the Twitter backlash against her (archive), and The Bookseller's entire coverage of the scandal keeps bringing up this pissy open letter that got penned back in August in support of three crybullies who were "targeted, harassed and gaslighted online" after insulting the author on Twitter (archive). The letter was signed by over 1000 people in the publishing industry, and ends with the words "Publishing must do better." (archive)

Well, Kiwis, what do you think? Can publishing do better?
 
Last edited:
Back