Keffals / Clara Sorrenti / Lucas John Roberts / Queen Clara the Fart Dominatrix / SorrentiThott - Twitter / Twitch slacktivist. Obsessed with being famous. Operator of the Catboy Ranch. Canadian T-Girl porn star and independent Fart Fetish / Findom Dominatrix. Personally sponsored sending Chinese HRT from Brazil to children without parental consent.

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

did you not read his previous posts? dude fucked a friend while the mom was awake

Keffals can say whatever he wants online. He could say he was a pussy destroyer and ladies wept upon learning he was cutting off his cock. Doesn't mean it happened.

 

[Jaimas]

You know what's infinitely fascinating?

When a troon does proceed to go whole hog and kill themselves - assuming they actually do, and not, y'know, fake it in a way so obvious that it's blatantly apparent they're still alive, as was the case for ya boi Byuu, the usual suspects always trip over themselves to blame us, even - and indeed, especially - if we had nothing to do with it. At first, I thought this was just "I need an excuse to hate my enemies more, grrr" material, but after what I saw from Elizabeth Waite and Chloe Sagal, I've come a completely different conclusion.

It's because they actually love it when one of their own fucking dies. It's ghoulish, but it's 100% true. There was no one who blamed the Farms harder for Sagal's death than the people who actively led to it. Everyone fucking hated Byuu, until he allegedly killed himself and then suddenly they all decided, apropos of nothing, that it was the Farms' doing. Trans Lifeline ignored Elizabeth Waite's calls for fucking days, but the second she killed herself, welp, time for TLL to fundraise off her death and blame the Farms for it even when her family is telling them to stop.

 

[Menachem Sneedson]

Keffals can say whatever he wants online. He could say he was a pussy destroyer and ladies wept upon learning he was cutting off his cock. Doesn't mean it happened.

I meant what Otm Shank claimed in his original post, can't quote so I'll just paste
" He engaged in group sex with other greasy trannies after connecting with a local LGBT support group. Most offensively he had casual sex with a former mutual friend of ours (another greasy nerd) while his parents slept in the next room. His mother was a notoriously light sleeper and the walls were paper-thin. Luke seemed to delight in telling me that everyone was uncomfortable in the morning except for him. Apparently him and the friend never even discussed anything before or after. Everyone just pretended it was a normal sleepover. Luke had a very hairy back and butt. The thought of that slimy dork penetrating Luke's hairy ass makes me wretch to this day."

 

[Null]

an argument to strip the site of 230 protections actually sounds slightly, slightly feasible. Bring in a lawyer who teaches at Harvard law

No it fucking does not.

Section 230 isn’t the problem, Payment Networks are – Mad at the Internet

madattheinternet.com

Where the Sidewalk Ends: The Death of the Internet – Mad at the Internet

madattheinternet.com

>Tranny lawyer (retard) says that Section 230 protects the site from stalking / harassment / cyberbullying / whatever charges.
Wrong. Section 230 is like 3 paragraphs long so fucking read it. This stupid fag didn't read the law he claims to be an expert in.

47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material

www.law.cornell.edu

47 U.S. Code § 230(c)(2) is titled CIVIL LIABILITY. There is nothing in Section 230 about CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Harassment and stalking is a crime. So if the site was facilitating this, if I was facilitating this, I already have no expectation of immunity from this statute because it offers none whatsoever. (e)(1) explicitly states "No effect on criminal law.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement of ... any other Federal criminal statute."

What Section 230 does is protect websites (like mine, like Twitter, like Facebook) from direct civil liability from both what is said on the platform and what is removed from the platform. If someone defames you on Twitter, you must sue THEM and not Twitter. This is critical to the continued existence of open platforms. If Facebook was personally liable for every post on Facebook, you can bet your sweet ass that the amount of shit getting deleted from Facebook would be astronomical. Only the safest, least offensive things imaginable could survive with that sort of liability.

On deleting, the 'sword' to the 'sword and shield' of Section 230 is the ability to delete things without liability. If someone makes money from being on Facebook and they are banned, they cannot sue Facebook for the resulting damages (i.e. loss of sales revenue from no advertising).

What I can do is personally commit civil offenses. If I said something defamatory and I was sued, then I still am liable for what I say. That's it.

There is no qualifying factors for this. If it is an 'interactive computer service', it is protected.

 

[Cincinnatus]

No it fucking does not.

How plausible do you think the various allegations (the embezzeling, the grooming and the beastiality) being thrown at Lucas are?

 

[Null]

How plausible do you think the various allegations (the embezzeling, the grooming and the beastiality) being thrown at Lucas are?

I mean if you cut off your dick but are a sexual deviant you have to find a way to get off somehow.

 

[Hal]

I mean if you cut off your dick but are a sexual deviant you have to find a way to get off somehow.

I guess by ratioing people on twitter apparently

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I'm hoping you're right. DDOS is one thing, the site's gotten through that. But an argument to strip the site of 230 protections actually sounds slightly, slightly feasible. Bring in a lawyer who teaches at Harvard law and you lend your argument a bunch of legitimacy (because obviously this lawyer couldn't possibly be braindead if they teach at Harvard!).

He still might be too stupid, too lazy, or too spooked in a few months. But if he isn't any of these, I can picture a very real pathway for his success. I think that a competent person could.

If a year passes, and this troon stays nothing but a subpar streamer with a small following and cringe tweets, I'll be thrilled to be the retard who was wrong. But his plan has yet to backfire, his audience has yet to abandon him, and we have yet to see anything in his dox that would destroy his reputation. Based on what he's done with his "ratio" attempts, I know he's trying to drum up support from other left-wing internet personalities. I can imagine the world where he succeeds.

Maybe I'm just a pessimistic doomer though. Hopeful for many more years of milk from this one, either way. 100 pages in 2 days is a good start.

Null just covered this very very well but I'd like to point out that this is a Canadian. They can certainly try to sue Null in the United States but an attempt to redefine the law of another country to make Null liable under the terms which Section 230 blatantly protects him is an incredibly foolish endeavor.

So I would recommend that keffals set up the GoFundMe and crowd source the number of idiot troon (and other) lawyers who will be eager to donate and sign up for it.

 

[3322]

How plausible do you think the various allegations (the embezzeling, the grooming and the beastiality) being thrown at Lucas are?

You saw what happened with Vic Lasagna and how hard it is to win a "defamation" case. Especially as a public person. He would not only have to PROOF that the things said about him are false (good luck with that), but he would also have to proof that the person acted "with actual malice" meaning they either KNEW the statements were false, or acted with "reckless disregard for weather they were true or false". All we have been doing here is discuss things that Keffals or his associates have put out there THEMSELVES.

Imagine if every gossip rag like TLC had to deal with constant lawsuits because they print some inflammatory article about some celebrity. If you are a public figure you open yourself up to criticism from the public.

Also yeah like the above poster says Keffals is in Canada and the posters on here are from all over the world. Good luck trying to sue some Kiwifarmer from Slovenia or Turkey for speculating about your "Catboy Ranch" discord.

 

[McSchlomo]

I mean all he needs is money. Most lawyers, I suspect, would like cases like this. Their client is an idiot with money and so easy to manipulate and screw over, and they don't need to win to earn easy cash.

 

[Autist in a Barrel]

A true master of ratios. Must've gotten at least 30:1 on Daisy.

 

[Cincinnatus]

You saw what happened with Vic Lasagna and how hard it is to win a "defamation" case. Especially as a public person. He would not only have to PROOF that the things said about him are false (good luck with that), but he would also have to proof that the person acted "with actual malice" meaning they either KNEW the statements were false, or acted with "reckless disregard for weather they were true or false". All we have been doing here is discuss things that Keffals or his associates have put out there THEMSELVES.

Imagine if every gossip rag like TLC had to deal with constant lawsuits because they print some inflammatory article about some celebrity. If you are a public figure you open yourself up to criticism from the public.

Also yeah like the above poster says Keffals is in Canada and the posters on here are from all over the world. Good luck trying to sue some Kiwifarmer from Slovenia or Turkey for speculating about your "Catboy Ranch" discord.

I'm not talking about lawsuits, I just mean how likely is it Lucas really stole money, groomed kids, tried to fuck a dog etc...

 

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

You know what's infinitely fascinating?

When a troon does proceed to go whole hog and kill themselves - assuming they actually do, and not, y'know, fake it in a way so obvious that it's blatantly apparent they're still alive, as was the case for ya boi Byuu, the usual suspects always trip over themselves to blame us, even - and indeed, especially - if we had nothing to do with it. At first, I thought this was just "I need an excuse to hate my enemies more, grrr" material, but after what I saw from Elizabeth Waite and Chloe Sagal, I've come a completely different conclusion.

It's because they actually love it when one of their own fucking dies. It's ghoulish, but it's 100% true. There was no one who blamed the Farms harder for Sagal's death than the people who actively led to it. Everyone fucking hated Byuu, until he allegedly killed himself and then suddenly they all decided, apropos of nothing, that it was the Farms' doing. Trans Lifeline ignored Elizabeth Waite's calls for fucking days, but the second she killed herself, welp, time for TLL to fundraise off her death and blame the Farms for it even when her family is telling them to stop.

Good insight.
This was a common theme in the pro-ana communities back in the day. When Eugenia Cooney croaks, what's left of those forums will be celebrating. Even recovered ana chans will probably reset their passwords and drop in to pay their respects. They will blame society's expectations for girls to be thin and forget that they have entire communities dedicated to eating disorders. It's a mass shifting of responsibility. The movies and TV have many people only thinking in terms of victim and perpetrator. In reality there are often victim-perpetrators who do something bad and have the same bad thing done to themselves. They all get together and encourage each other to drink the Kool Aid. Same shit with drugs. Most drug addicts have dealt drugs. I saw it in the bodybuilding community of the 2000s-mid 2010s. One guy gets steroids and starts gaining, then shows everyone else how to do cycles. Guides are written. Gurus are identified. Safe and unsafe Chinese suppliers are listed. Sympathetic doctors cataloged. When someone's dick stops working, or they get an embolism, or they get sick from using bootleg gear, they're provided with half measures and life goes on. With troons, when someone gets a badly botched surgery, finds out their crotch stinks and won't stop stinking, continues to bald despite hormones or castration, or gets dumped by their initially supportive partner, nobody cares.

Shitty behavior spreads and self propagates, especially in weak communities. When it comes time for someone to pay the piper, their friends are ready to say it wasn't their fault, and when they face their own consequences it won't be their fault either. Meanwhile we and other skeptics are scapegoated for the crime of being right.

Spoiler: Legal sperging

Also Keffals if you are reading this, I cordially invite you to sue me. I am a Harvard educated constitutional lawyer and will welcome the legal challenge. I am Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States. You know where to find me. My number is (420)109-1350, ext 41. Or you can contact me at http://www.Whitehouse.com, or my cockmail account, ObamaRama@nigge.rs
Sincerely, Barry Obongo Barack Hussein Obama.

 

[3322]

I'm not talking about lawsuits, I just mean how likely is it Lucas really stole money, groomed kids, tried to fuck a dog etc...

I doubt he tried to fuck a dog, is there any evidence other than some guy who claims he knew him? Grooming kids seems to be the most credible allegation seeing the collar and shit, but unless a kid actually comes forward and implicates him specifically it's just bad optics and won't really damage his reputation much.

 

[Menachem Sneedson]

@Null this is a good opportunity to ask, does that friend seem legit from thebshit he sent?

 

[King Nigger The 3rd]

Is there anywhere where we can do more digging about his child grooming behavior? The evidence is pretty convincing (to me anyways) but I want to see if we can find something more concrete. Maybe something that would even make his supporters doubt him. Something he’s be forced to address. I’m a retard so any help would be appreciated.

 

[AltisticRight]

I'll be 100% honest. I am partially on the fence regarding the "previous friend's" exposé. While he brought plausible information and quite a lot of funny, unconventional detail. It was fun read, but it was way too fun. This troon is basically a zoosadist, he is a disgusting rat living in perpetual filth, a creepy weirdo that even friends of him secretly mock him. He wears the skin of women he meets. He is the quintessential troon lolcow, way too perfect. Oh, the person also used the word troon. I've only heard it once in real life and asked if he had an association with a fruit farm website. He said "I'm not on Kiwifarms" -- sure bro (I never mentioned KF).
The person's explanation was decent, but also convenient.

Anyhow, it was a fun ride. Even if it was fake or exaggerated, it made me laugh and made work less bearable. It's believable, the far left furry to disgusting troon slippery... hatchet wound, played out too many times. Kudos for the kino.

 

[Null]

He said "I'm not on Kiwifarms"

check his pockets for silver coins

 

[SiccDicc]

>"Internet updoots on a site that has no visible downvote option on a site used by only 22% of Americans (and 15% of Canadians) are a totally accurate representation of the ideas of the world's population as a whole"
This is what being terminally online does to a man.

No wonder this idiot lost his election. He doesn't understand that internet updoot farming don't translate to the real world.

It's worse than that. It's 3% of the US population that actually uses Twitter. 22% just have accounts.

 

[Bajilionaire]

He might also dislike the 'Roberts' name as it has masculine air to it. He really is that crazy. When I last talked to Lucas he was actually going by the name 'Kaylie Roberts' making 'Clara Sorrenti' his third pseudonym, not his second. Well... that is unless you count T-girl Skye. Yuck.

It looks like he went from Lucas Roberts --> Kaylie Roberts --> Kaylie Sorrenti --> Clara Sorrenti. Jesus fuck just pick one.


link