So I get the whole backlash of victim blaming but you have to remove emotions and look at the facts. For example:
Minor smokes tobacco. Dealer goes to a minor and offers him weed. Peers around him say not to do it, but minor does it anyways. Minor and Dealer both get caught. Minor gets charged with possession and use of controlled substances.
Do you think the Minor should be charged for his actions? Otherwise, the defense of coercion would be used more often and people would get away with evil shit. The Nazi's did this too claiming peer pressure and coercion made them do the terrible acts. You think they should be able to walk free from the Nuremberg trials? Spoiler, the defense failed and they were convicted. That's why the law is written the way it is because yes. We all were stupid horny teens, but we still can make choices between right and wrong. To the point were in some instances minors can be tried as adults. Being an idiot doesn't excuse you for crimes otherwise we'd have more retards walking around freely doing crimes and not being punished.
Now in an optimistic world full of rainbows and sunshine it would be nice to say that Green was being solely groomed and pups is an evil pedofork. Except, I've given two examples of minors using sexting as a means for manipulation and clout. Bluespike was around 13 during the Julie Saga. He had explicit sexually roleplay with Chris. You're telling me the trolling group coerced a 13 year old to do sexual roleplay? They kicked him out when he forced Chris to shove a medallion up his ass because he's gone too far. I don't know how much they knew about the sexual roleplay, but Bluespike had thoroughly thought out this idea and had clear intentions, acted on it, and had emotional responses to his actions.
Again, Stories was about 16 during the Spoctor-Stories-Pentagrin drama. Spoctor, at the time was 17 who turned 18. Meaning he was sending a minor nudes and sexual content. However, Spoctor isn't in jail and he isn't cancelled. In fact it was the minor, Stories, who was cancelled and kicked off of social media. Stories had thoroughly thought out the idea and had clear intentions, acted on it, and had emotional responses to her actions.
Now this is why I think Green is actually not being groomed, but complacent. I've seen outed groomers in the art community often enough. I've gotten a rough understanding of a lot of the reactions, planning, and investigations. I'll say it again, yes Green is horny. It's really easy to use that against Green. Imagine a drug addict claiming a dealer coerced him into buying. Another issue I have, though I'm not well caught up, is that the groomed have a really strong knee jerk reaction when they realize what's happening. It's really emotional and from my understanding. Green kept going; pups brought up that it felt wrong and Green went "okay, so anyways". Not to mention there are a lot of people calling out and telling both Green and pups not to do this. Seriously why tf would you keep this up Green when you have the whole world telling you that it's bad. Both he and pups are getting backlash, but it took quite awhile for him to turn around and now he's going to call her out. Where have I seen this before? Surely doesn't remind me of someone else in the art community. . .
I'm going to reiterate once again. A lot is speculation. I'm not saying Green is complacent, but he sure damn is sus. I'd like to believe pups groomed him and that Green didn't enjoy it and wasn't complacent. However, lady justice is blind. He can still face consequences, however if proven that he was groomed and coerced it would be mitigated and might not serve jail time or be on record. That's of course if it even gets that far which it probably will never. Since public callouts 99.99% end in nothing unless they actual touched the child all that will happen is pups gets cancelled and hopefully stays that way. It's probably better for her to be off the internet too for the time being.