US USDOT Announces New Vehicle Fuel Economy Standards for Model Year 2024-2026 - As if this worked out about 10 years ago...


The U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration today announced new, landmark fuel economy standards which follow President Biden’s executive order to drive American leadership forward on clean cars. The new standards will make vehicle miles per gallon more efficient, save consumers money at the pump, and reduce transportation emissions.

The new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards require an industry-wide fleet average of approximately 49 mpg for passenger cars and light trucks in model year 2026, the strongest cost savings and fuel efficiency standards to date. The new standards will increase fuel efficiency 8% annually for model years 2024-2025 and 10% annually for model year 2026. They will also increase the estimated fleetwide average by nearly 10 miles per gallon for model year 2026, relative to model year 2021.

Strong fuel economy standards strengthen U.S. energy independence and help reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Since CAFE was signed into law in 1975, the standards have reduced American oil consumption by 25%, or approximately 5 million barrels a day since then.

The new CAFE standards for model year 2024-26 will reduce fuel use by more than 200 billion gallons through 2050, as compared to continuing under the old standards.

Increasing vehicle efficiency and reducing fuel use will save American families and consumers money at the pump. Americans purchasing new vehicles in 2026 will get 33% more miles per gallon as compared to 2021 vehicles. This means new car drivers in 2026 will only have to fill up their tanks three times as compared to every four times that new car drivers today do for the same trips.

“Today's rule means that American families will be able to drive further before they have to fill up, saving hundreds of dollars per year,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “These improvements will also make our country less vulnerable to global shifts in the price of
oil, and protect communities by reducing carbon emissions by 2.5 billion metric tons.”

The new standards will also reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. These reductions will improve public health and provide environmental justice for communities who live near freeways and other heavily trafficked roadways, which are disproportionately low-income communities of color.

“NHTSA is helping American families by making life more affordable – and the air cleaner for their children. These vehicles will be better for the environment, safer than ever, and cost less to fuel over their lifetimes. We are proud to fulfill President Biden’s mission to move us to a more sustainable future, one that strengthens American energy independence and helps put more money in American families’ pockets,” said Dr. Steven Cliff, NHTSA’s Deputy Administrator.

This announcement of new standards comes as the automobile industry is retooling production for future models in response to rapidly growing market demand for cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Nearly all auto manufacturers have announced new electric vehicle models.

More robust fuel economy standards will encourage the industry to continue improving the fuel economy of cars powered by internal combustion engines as the transportation sector transitions to electrification.

Today’s final fuel economy standards follow President Biden’s Executive Order 13990, which directed NHTSA to review the 2020 “The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks” final rule. These CAFE standards also support the Biden-Harris Administration’s priorities to cut costs for American families, improve public health, combat climate change, and create and sustain good-paying jobs with a free and fair choice to join a union.

For the final Corporate Average Fuel Economy rule, please click here. For more on today’s announcement, please visit www.NHTSA.gov/CAFE.

I remembered about 10 years ago, a president who's first name starts with B, and last name ends with A, did something similar to this. And what we got is stuff like Cash for Clunkers, VW's Dieselgate, Ford's PowerShift (which should have been named PowerShit) Dual-Clutch Transmission, and Nissan's XTronic 2.0 CVT (which was actually an upgrade in terms of them grenading themselves). Will it work out better this time?
 
Last edited:
Fun fact some economists did a study a few years back and determined that every additional mpg resulted in extra deaths due to easiest thing to do to increase mpg is to make them lighter study in the edit


Dont forget these laws, restrictions and standards are made by people that actively hate you and want you dead.
 
They want to destroy every vestige of freedom you have. One is a car that can operate without "their" permission. A car that can be refueled anywhere. A car that can be repaired by a layman. It's the reason they're also out to ban gas/diesel generators, and power tools.

I hate the antichrist.
 
Man, I'm so glad the Ryan Congress focused on undoing the damage the Obama administration did instead of trying to frame Trump for treason and cut taxes for corporations, or else this horrifying April Fool's post would be real.

The ultimate target is 57 mpg IIRC, and the only way to hit it is to electrify a substantial portion of the vehicle fleet. CAFE is one of those un-repealable laws because it's got so many lobbyists latched onto it. If Congress were to actually do something, huge portions of the auto industry dedicated to regulatory compliance would get shut down, whole lines of expensive R&D that exist solely to comply with regs would suddenly be worthless, and established car companies would be more vulnerable to small competitors.
 
i keep trying to tell you people: if we have less people on the road, you wont have to worry too much about the climate change stuff. all we need is better infrastructure for stuff like bikes, electric high speed trains, and trolleybuses for the poor people so they dont have to go out and buy used gas cars, therefore lessening traffic congestion on the roads and lowering co2 emissions in the air, but no one wants to listen to me
 
electric high speed trains

And we're seeing first-hand how well it's working out in Hawai'i, and it's not even of the fast variety. The expected completion date on Oahu's rail is now in the 2030s or something like that, the costs continue to balloon like the US's inflation rate, and the last news about it is that the route may end short, in Kaka'ako, instead of the original end location of Ala Moana Center. And it's still going to be hell to somehow build the rail line through Downtown Honolulu to begin with.

The whole rail mess in Hawai'i is even worse, considering that California somehow saw the light, and axed their high-speed rail project, before the building even started.
 
Last edited:
i keep trying to tell you people: if we have less people on the road, you wont have to worry too much about the climate change stuff. all we need is better infrastructure for stuff like bikes, electric high speed trains, and trolleybuses for the poor people so they dont have to go out and buy used gas cars, therefore lessening traffic congestion on the roads and lowering co2 emissions in the air, but no one wants to listen to me
Yeah, but then it gets worse for avoiding the Knockout Game.
 
And we're seeing first-hand how well it's working out in Hawai'i, and it's not even of the fast variety. The expected completion date on Oahu's rail is now in the 2030s or something like that, the costs continue to balloon like the US's inflation rate, and the last news about it is that the route may end short, in Kaka'ako, instead of the original end location of Ala Moana Center. And it's still going to be hell to somehow build the rail line through Downtown Honolulu to begin with.

The whole rail mess in Hawai'i is even worse, considering that California somehow saw the light, and axed their high-speed rail project, before the building even started.
I guess some bureaucrats in California saw these videos from Reason about high speed rail.
 
I guess some bureaucrats in California saw these videos from Reason about high speed rail.
The train game in America is arguably shit. It costs more to take Amtrak cross country than getting molested by a TSA agent and flying. What's needed are more east-west lines and rails that specifically aren't owned by the freight carriers. Amtrak trains yield to freight trains because Union Pacific owns the rails. Trip times could be reduced significantly if the passenger train didn't need to wait an hour or two in siding while the 5 mile long freight train lumbers past unimpeded.

I wouldn't mind cheaper cross country travel that doesn't involve a sweaty TSA wagecuck groping my penis. I don't care if it's slower, I just want to get to my destination relaxed and unfondled.
 
Bicycles are the true expression of freedom in transport. Basically free, easy to maintain and can still be enjoyed whilst drunk.

Bicycles literally changed the world for the better. Until the invention of the bicycle, the average two people getting married in the UK lived less than 1 mile apart. After the bicycle was popularized, that number rose to 30 miles. Imagine all the kissing cousins it must have prevented over the years.
 
i keep trying to tell you people: if we have less people on the road, you wont have to worry too much about the climate change stuff. all we need is better infrastructure for stuff like bikes, electric high speed trains, and trolleybuses for the poor people so they dont have to go out and buy used gas cars, therefore lessening traffic congestion on the roads and lowering co2 emissions in the air, but no one wants to listen to me
It's not that I don't listen, I actually agree, the problem (for my area at least) is that the state bureaucracy doesn't want solutions, they want never-ending projects they can syphon money off of indefinitely. I remember back in the mid 1990's about them proposing a high-speed rail from Los Angeles to Las Vegas; a fine idea mind you because the I-15 corridor between those two places is one of the most dangerous stretches of road in the country due to the number of people traversing between the two points every weekend. High-speed rail would offer a way for people to make the trip, while cutting down on emissions (if they really care about that shit), and traffic accidents; but it got suck in what most people call development Hell. Now they're latching onto Elon Musk's Hyperloop between Los Angeles and San Francisco, but guess what, I called it when it first got announced, not gonna happen. Keep in mind this is the same state that welcomes illegals by the boatload and won't think for a moment that maybe that's part of the problem when it comes to illegals drunk-driving and crashing, let along putting more cars on the road. And despite all its other problems, you know what city does pretty well with public transportation; San Francisco. They have the trolleys, the MUNI system, and the BART, on top of people driving.

If we could remove the bureaucracy to actually get shit done, you'd probably get more people to listen.
 
It's not that I don't listen, I actually agree, the problem (for my area at least) is that the state bureaucracy doesn't want solutions, they want never-ending projects they can syphon money off of indefinitely. I remember back in the mid 1990's about them proposing a high-speed rail from Los Angeles to Las Vegas; a fine idea mind you because the I-15 corridor between those two places is one of the most dangerous stretches of road in the country due to the number of people traversing between the two points every weekend. High-speed rail would offer a way for people to make the trip, while cutting down on emissions (if they really care about that shit), and traffic accidents; but it got suck in what most people call development Hell. Now they're latching onto Elon Musk's Hyperloop between Los Angeles and San Francisco, but guess what, I called it when it first got announced, not gonna happen. Keep in mind this is the same state that welcomes illegals by the boatload and won't think for a moment that maybe that's part of the problem when it comes to illegals drunk-driving and crashing, let along putting more cars on the road. And despite all its other problems, you know what city does pretty well with public transportation; San Francisco. They have the trolleys, the MUNI system, and the BART, on top of people driving.

If we could remove the bureaucracy to actually get shit done, you'd probably get more people to listen.
Rails won't work in the US because the country is too large, especially in the western half. This is something eurocentric assholes and coastal cucks fail to comprehend.
 
I'm a car guy, and three letter agencies have been putting all kinds of crazy restrictions on cars since the 70's. The initial response was to turn a 350 ci 350 hp engine into a low compression 350 ci 150 hp boat anchor with all kinds of complicated vacuum operated prone to failure smog reduction shit for example, but as the times have changed so have the technologies. Now we have 2.5L four banger Kias making 300hp. There have been ebbs and flows and the new technology hasn't always been that reliable at first, but as we go we are actually getting more horsepower and fuel economy out of the gas we burn. EV really is the future though. I'm not an environmentalist and I know that they run on coal and natural gas, but the performance is already there and battery technology is advancing faster than I ever thought it would.

Edit: I just remembered this video
It touches on fleet averages which is what all emission laws to date rely on. I won't time stamp that part just because it is an informative video that you should watch if you are interested in cars.
Older batteries like Nickel batteries have been developed further by companies like Toyota and such. It's not only new battieres, old batteries are also getting more advanced.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cup Noodle
Back