US USDOT Announces New Vehicle Fuel Economy Standards for Model Year 2024-2026 - As if this worked out about 10 years ago...


The U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration today announced new, landmark fuel economy standards which follow President Biden’s executive order to drive American leadership forward on clean cars. The new standards will make vehicle miles per gallon more efficient, save consumers money at the pump, and reduce transportation emissions.

The new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards require an industry-wide fleet average of approximately 49 mpg for passenger cars and light trucks in model year 2026, the strongest cost savings and fuel efficiency standards to date. The new standards will increase fuel efficiency 8% annually for model years 2024-2025 and 10% annually for model year 2026. They will also increase the estimated fleetwide average by nearly 10 miles per gallon for model year 2026, relative to model year 2021.

Strong fuel economy standards strengthen U.S. energy independence and help reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Since CAFE was signed into law in 1975, the standards have reduced American oil consumption by 25%, or approximately 5 million barrels a day since then.

The new CAFE standards for model year 2024-26 will reduce fuel use by more than 200 billion gallons through 2050, as compared to continuing under the old standards.

Increasing vehicle efficiency and reducing fuel use will save American families and consumers money at the pump. Americans purchasing new vehicles in 2026 will get 33% more miles per gallon as compared to 2021 vehicles. This means new car drivers in 2026 will only have to fill up their tanks three times as compared to every four times that new car drivers today do for the same trips.

“Today's rule means that American families will be able to drive further before they have to fill up, saving hundreds of dollars per year,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “These improvements will also make our country less vulnerable to global shifts in the price of
oil, and protect communities by reducing carbon emissions by 2.5 billion metric tons.”

The new standards will also reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. These reductions will improve public health and provide environmental justice for communities who live near freeways and other heavily trafficked roadways, which are disproportionately low-income communities of color.

“NHTSA is helping American families by making life more affordable – and the air cleaner for their children. These vehicles will be better for the environment, safer than ever, and cost less to fuel over their lifetimes. We are proud to fulfill President Biden’s mission to move us to a more sustainable future, one that strengthens American energy independence and helps put more money in American families’ pockets,” said Dr. Steven Cliff, NHTSA’s Deputy Administrator.

This announcement of new standards comes as the automobile industry is retooling production for future models in response to rapidly growing market demand for cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Nearly all auto manufacturers have announced new electric vehicle models.

More robust fuel economy standards will encourage the industry to continue improving the fuel economy of cars powered by internal combustion engines as the transportation sector transitions to electrification.

Today’s final fuel economy standards follow President Biden’s Executive Order 13990, which directed NHTSA to review the 2020 “The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks” final rule. These CAFE standards also support the Biden-Harris Administration’s priorities to cut costs for American families, improve public health, combat climate change, and create and sustain good-paying jobs with a free and fair choice to join a union.

For the final Corporate Average Fuel Economy rule, please click here. For more on today’s announcement, please visit www.NHTSA.gov/CAFE.

I remembered about 10 years ago, a president who's first name starts with B, and last name ends with A, did something similar to this. And what we got is stuff like Cash for Clunkers, VW's Dieselgate, Ford's PowerShift (which should have been named PowerShit) Dual-Clutch Transmission, and Nissan's XTronic 2.0 CVT (which was actually an upgrade in terms of them grenading themselves). Will it work out better this time?
 
Last edited:
There's no reason larger metro areas can't have electric rail systems. Lots of places used to in the 1920s. You might not be able to connect all the US by rail but anything to ease traffic congestion would be great. Plus, with how expensive cars are getting they're well on their way to being another debt trap. The refusal to allow cheap motor transport alternatives because "muh safety" and instead mandating retarded featurecreep like cameras is a big reason cars are becoming cuck cages
 
  • Like
Reactions: Green Man
There's no reason larger metro areas can't have electric rail systems. Lots of places used to in the 1920s. You might not be able to connect all the US by rail but anything to ease traffic congestion would be great. Plus, with how expensive cars are getting they're well on their way to being another debt trap. The refusal to allow cheap motor transport alternatives because "muh safety" and instead mandating retarded featurecreep like cameras is a big reason cars are becoming cuck cages
America is built around the car and remaking the country for trains in even those larger cities will not happen without incredible pains. We can't even maintain what we already have for god's sake, what makes you think that kind of overhaul would ever happen?
 
Rails won't work in the US because the country is too large, especially in the western half. This is something eurocentric assholes and coastal cucks fail to comprehend.
It can work, but you need different lines for different needs. There are commercial short-line railways who mainly exist to do things like move material/resources from Point A to Point B; where one of the larger lines can move it about. When it comes to great distances; High-Speed or MAGLEV would be a worthwhile investment, it'd just require a lot of resources and work since you'd have to get through the Rocky Mountains as going over them doesn't jive with high-speed. Rail is optimal for moving freight, and can be optimal for moving people, it just needs to be planned and designed well; but that's a whole other topic because many areas have already been built up and new infrastructure would require a lot of taking of land and shit like that.
 
what makes you think that kind of overhaul would ever happen?
The same kind of unbridled optimism and techno fetishism that brought America out of the 1800s and into the atomic age.

America built the future once already. 48d2b9ee-5bb7-4080-99f1-3857ce30e9e5.png
 
The same kind of unbridled optimism and techno fetishism that brought America out of the 1800s and into the atomic age.

America built the future once already.View attachment 3140527
That takes boundless optimism to encourage it, pioneers to envision it, and a passionate workforce to enable it. Which of those are prevalent today?
 
Rails won't work in the US because the country is too large, especially in the western half. This is something eurocentric assholes and coastal cucks fail to comprehend.
How did rail somehow work way back in the 1800s enough to establish rail nation wide? And how does it still work for land freight when trucks exist? I get it, developing new passenger rail this late to support modern designs like bullet trains is expensive as fuck but it would likely end up being cheaper than everyone having to drive everywhere. For long distance it would be a god send.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat and Audit
I don't live in CA, my governor is just a sleezy banker (by both profession and marriage) who really wants to be Newsome. Even if I were in Montana it wouldn't matter, CA is the reason my car has rush developed, highly restrictive pre-cats from 20 years ago. If a state with big enough market share demands it, the companies will comply and then the Feds will enshrine it... and this slow MPG creep is federal and is nothing new, it's just being ratcheted again to make it look like Joe Biden is doing something about the gas crisis he created, while he gets returns on his Chinese lithium holdings.

I see the writing on the wall dude, that's my whole internal autistic shtick and it's not just this, it's everything, our whole society. It's cars, it's 2A, it's sex, it's work, it's what you can drink, what you can smoke, what you can watch, read and say... That's why I'm here after all on this bumfuck corner of the old internet besieged by litigeous troons and pedophiles and DDOS bots. I feel like a modern day Cassandra struggling with what I understand at a fundamental level, I can't pretend it will all be okay, it wont.
Tfw you realize you're living in the Demolition Man society, only somehow gayer.
 
Last edited:
The Biden administration makes Obama's past terms look conservative. It's like every new liberal president is like every new DBZ villain, only instead of powers it's policies that are a lot more extreme than the last.
Just wait. This isn't even his final regulation! Tune in next week on Biden Ball Z.
How did rail somehow work way back in the 1800s enough to establish rail nation wide? And how does it still work for land freight when trucks exist? I get it, developing new passenger rail this late to support modern designs like bullet trains is expensive as fuck but it would likely end up being cheaper than everyone having to drive everywhere. For long distance it would be a god send.
Passenger rail only worked because there were no alternatives. Its a five or six hour plane flight non-stop from coast to coast in the USA. Good luck getting close to that even with maglev trains.
 
the other problem of electric cars people are forgetting is that we literally don't have the power for them. california already has rolling blackouts as will most of the pacific time zone in a few years. beyond that and the range of these vehicles being sus especially in bad weather and people are fucked all around in a switch to electric. which sounds like a criticism you've heard a bunch; but its even older than you think. people were literally saying this in the 1890s, electric cars were the first cars, but got fucked once ford came in with the model T because A. you could get gas in way more places than electricity B.diesel runs on almost anything, C. you weren't completely fucked if a blackout happened. thats why in the 1910s a majority of cars were that model.
 
So why isnt hybrid cars more of a thing again? Did everyone forget that existed?
 
The train game in America is arguably shit. It costs more to take Amtrak cross country than getting molested by a TSA agent and flying. What's needed are more east-west lines and rails that specifically aren't owned by the freight carriers. Amtrak trains yield to freight trains because Union Pacific owns the rails. Trip times could be reduced significantly if the passenger train didn't need to wait an hour or two in siding while the 5 mile long freight train lumbers past unimpeded.

I wouldn't mind cheaper cross country travel that doesn't involve a sweaty TSA wagecuck groping my penis. I don't care if it's slower, I just want to get to my destination relaxed and unfondled.

Freight is a more economical use of rail than passenger cars. The USA has just as much rail traffic as Europe, except the balance is tipped much more heavily toward freight since passenger rail isn't as heavily subsidized there as it is here (it's subsidized here, but places like Spain go a lot further to keep passenger rail limping along for whatever reason) When you let people choose, they take the plane over the train nearly every time. And if we start talking about high speed rail, we're talking about modes of transport that still aren't as fast or flexible as airplanes, but now consume enormous amounts of resources.

There's no reason larger metro areas can't have electric rail systems. Lots of places used to in the 1920s. You might not be able to connect all the US by rail but anything to ease traffic congestion would be great. Plus, with how expensive cars are getting they're well on their way to being another debt trap. The refusal to allow cheap motor transport alternatives because "muh safety" and instead mandating retarded featurecreep like cameras is a big reason cars are becoming cuck cages

Without too much PL, I've lived in a city like that. But that was in a country that didn't have America's fetish for letting homeless schizos piss and shit everywhere or trucking in surly barbarians by the million to shore up the local Democratic Party's power.
 
Last edited:
Without too much PL, I've lived in a city like that. But that was in a country that didn't have America's fetish for letting homeless schizos piss and shit everywhere or trucking in surly barbarians by the million to shore up the local Democratic Party's power.

I spent a few months in some europoor countries and I still remember how nice functioning public transit was. But yeah, they had some no bullshit security instead of letting derelicts shid and piss all over the bus. Where I live the city just gave up on enforcement and basically tacitly encourages the homeless to camp out at bus stops.

North America won't see functioning public transit in our lifetimes.
 
I spent a few months in some europoor countries and I still remember how nice functioning public transit was. But yeah, they had some no bullshit security instead of letting derelicts shid and piss all over the bus. Where I live the city just gave up on enforcement and basically tacitly encourages the homeless to camp out at bus stops.

North America won't see functioning public transit in our lifetimes.
And yet the elites keep pushing it.
 
The push is always some half hearted grift in the form of a private/public partnership and it's less about functional transit and more about how much tax many can be pilfered.
 
I spent a few months in some europoor countries and I still remember how nice functioning public transit was. But yeah, they had some no bullshit security instead of letting derelicts shid and piss all over the bus. Where I live the city just gave up on enforcement and basically tacitly encourages the homeless to camp out at bus stops.

North America won't see functioning public transit in our lifetimes.

The basic problem here is it's a cycle. We let vagrants and savages trash our cities until we've had enough, then we call in a no-nonsense, authoritarian type to sweep the filth off the streets, and then after 20 years or so of that, we get all sad and guilty about how vagrants and savages don't get to enjoy clean boulevards, farmers' markets, and open-air dining, and demand those cruel, nasty police stop being so mean to all those suffering Oliver Twist characters that we've so unjustly corralled into a tiny, filthy sliver of the city.

It just makes no sense, knowing how the cycle works, to start building infrastructure during the clean cycle that you know will be used as a toilet and robbery hotspot later on.
 
Last edited:
I actually looked this up in an official Fuel Economy guide and it said that a 2021 model Honda Civic has a City MPG of 32 and a Highway MPG of 42 with an overall Average of 36, How the fuck can Honda expect to increase their average MPG by 13 in 4 fucking years
A. At all
B. without making a Honda Civic cost the same as a BMW
They can't.

The goal is a de facto ban on ICE cars. Even if the Republicans oppose this, they will say that the Republicans are pro big oil, anti environment, etc.
 
Back