War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
I would've so deported them to Russia.
I really don't get the national pride of people who left their country because it was shit (and anyone who lives abroad did exactly that because it's way better wherever they are except home) you're in the USA, Germany, UK, France, whatever either learn to blend the fuck in or fuck off.

I always cringe when I see citizens of whatever stage protests in front of random embassies while they themselves are abroad, waving the flags of countries you couldn't drag them back to, like there's some weird, desperate need to stand out but they don't have the balls to dye their hair pink so they go for the lowest effort one "Look at me, I've been here for a decade and I'm still a FOReIGnEr!"

Really anyone who comes to a country, works there, lives there but fails to learn the language and culture and then has the fucking gall to wave the flag of their shithole with this weird pride in it while showing nothing but contempt for the hosts should be deported no questions asked, no packing your bags, just direct one way trip to the nearest plane connection.
 
The USSR collapsed over 30 years ago. I gave you a 40 year window to account for the tail end of the commie era. So yes, would you like to compare how many wars have been started by the two in that time frame or not? Remember this in reference to who is most dangerous to have on your borders in recent history...



It's not a benefit to my people.



Oh you're one of those people who doesn't believe the CIA is ever involved in conspiracies? Fascinating worldview.



You know it will be. Ukraine wants to get rebuilt with US dollars thy better start grooming their kids to be trannies or you can't have US taxpayer money.



Let's try it this way and get your thoughts:

"You retards claim in the same breath that Ukrainians did really throw out Yanukovych on their own accord, that it wasn't all orchestrated by some outside force, but the so-called Crimean referendum was totally illegitimate, and so is the separatist movement in Donbas."

Thoughts?



Do you think the US would let Mexico join up with some defensive pact that allowed China to put military technology and bases near their border? Why do we all understand perfectly that the US would never let that happen, but then not see another country have similar concerns?



Yes exactly, NATO is a drain on my country which is why I want Europe to handle their own shit and wish my country would stay the fuck out of it. Meanwhile my tax dollars are going to be going to rebuilding Ukraine and making sure they're properly respecting faggotry of all sorts. So my government has been instigated this shit and funding it enough to keep it going long enough for maximum destruction so that there are nice sweet contracts in place for reconstruction, again - paid for by middle class taxpayers in the US.

Fuck off Russian simp. You don't give a shit about your own country or NATO this is a 100 because you are a Russian cock-holster who is fully for the rape of Children so fuck off with this shit about "me taxes!!!, me traanies, my globohomo" it is all bullshit.

Shot dogs. Killed women. Girls under 10 with torn vaginas. Irpin, Bucha, Dmitrievka.
This is what you support.
 
But Trump as a useful idiot was mostly in the realm of disrupting the sleeping giant Russia can’t afford to piss off directly, and one Trump was whining about and saying he planned on withdrawing from and not committing to: NATO.
I’m not sure how telling NATO members to do more (or just anything at all) as members was a huge problem. Germans in the past laughed at Trump for even daring to suggest taking a harsh stance against Russia.

Also I feel like it’s worth mentioning with North Korea that we at one point had soldiers right off their coast in boats ready to invade. Trump got the situation deescalated from there, probably because he was fine showing military force to get people to back down unlike those politicians that such actions feel that itself is escalating.
 
Really anyone who comes to a country, works there, lives there but fails to learn the language and culture and then has the fucking gall to wave the flag of their shithole with this weird pride in it while showing nothing but contempt for the hosts should be deported no questions asked, no packing your bags, just direct one way trip to the nearest plane connection.

1649016456482.png


I’m not sure how telling NATO members to do more (or just anything at all) as members was a huge problem. Germans in the past laughed at Trump for even daring to suggest taking a harsh stance against Russia.

I am not sure how much of it are actual citizens.

On high level, Russia has bought a bunch of politicians and high profile stars like Depardieu (he renounces his support but NOT the wineyards in Crimea that Putin gave him) and Segal (ok, may be not A)

On lower level, as it looks from the Ukrainian invasion, you had absolutely massive network of sympathizers who may not have been 100% paid trolls, but had some part time encouragement. This is 100% inline with Soviet KGB model of CIs that literally comprised 6% of the population (in Poland, since the archives were seized and exact number known), but basically they have a really good grasp on how to work with massively large networks of citizenry in a low key, very plausibly deniable way (i.e. it's ties to KGB)

I came to know if a few people on another forum with such interesting ties. They always seemed to be the russiabro trolls who organized their comrades and seem to have some special connections to the motherland despite being fairly average citizens in burger land.

There was also Butina ... who was all over the American right wing and 2a (while same liberties aren't afforded to ordinary Russian citizens). Once FBI deported her ass, she became a very prominent deputy aside of shitting all over the US. FBI also didn't elaborate on her being a "foreign agent" either, so many questions remain.

In Netherlands, when Ukraine tried to join EU, some voting campaigns on accepting them, there was apparently Ukrainian lobby group that lobbied AGAINST Ukraine joining and all members were found out to be Russian citizens.

I think that Russia, and FSB gang has really mastered hybrid warfare (or 5gen warfare) much better than anyone and better than NATO thinks they do.
 
I continue to wonder why the west doesn't use that as a counter to Russian threats. Forfeiting all their western held shit and handing it to Ukraine and as reparations for all the western stuff they nationalized in there recently.

If they ever get it back it'll just be used to build the army right back and attack something else.

The reason is Ukrainians are still a slavic people so get up to normal Slav shit. Poland would also start getting nervous if the new big digger nick was right next door. You also don't want Russia getting too nervous, especially against a slav, because that's how wars start.
 
Never a good idea to basically steal someone's money. Right now everything's locked up nicely and fine and it's spooked enough of the markets and others because these sanctions made the euro and dollar suspect enough China, India and Russia moved to their own payment schemes far quicker than planned.

They'd been mooting them as far back as 2016 or so, but got very little progress because everyone still beleived in the rock solid power of the dollar. Which got shattered.

Plus the few billions seized will hardly undo much of the ruin wrought.
The ICJ already ruled that the Russian invasion of Ukraine is unjustified. Once they issue a judgement, that will give the EU, US, Japan, etc. a legal basis to enforce the judgement and compensate Ukraine from the seized funds.

Let's be real, once the ECB, the Fed, and Bank of Japan froze the RF's central Bank assets, countries were going to diversify away from those holdings to some extent anyway. Seizing it, but with the ICJ ruling as justification, won't make it any worse IMO
 
Because the Ukraine invasion decision was more recent. Putin likely planned something like the current fiasco for a long time, it’s just that COVID-19, his oil production spat with Saudi Arabia and other factors delayed things. I have no doubt he would have tried a similar thing if Trump won a second term. But Trump as a useful idiot was mostly in the realm of disrupting the sleeping giant Russia can’t afford to piss off directly, and one Trump was whining about and saying he planned on withdrawing from and not committing to: NATO.

Trump as a useful idiot drove some serious cracks into the NATO structure by waffling on Article 5 and in general acting like an ass to about every European nation. He was no puppet as I said before. But he was acting in ways very beneficial to Putin, flirting with lifting sanctions, and so on. Do I think he was under Russian control? God no. Do I think that he thought Putin was someone he could work with? Yes. And Putin happily exploited that. I would bet you he might have tried something with the Baltics instead in a year or two of a second term of Trump, especially if he tried to pull out of NATO.

What Trump told our worthless dependents in Europe was "You are literally funneling billions of dollars to Russia, the greatest regional threat. Please don't. You were completely moribund in 2014 because Putin knew it was winter and he could threaten natural gas supply and none of you would survive re-election. Try to get energy sources that aren't Russia, and maybe put a fraction of the money you are handing Russia to build your forces to attempt to pose something like a credible deterent".

Everyone knew this was true. Everyone knew Euro forces were hoplessly cucked and under equiped, especially if Russia went wildin'.
And again, this wasn't just theory, this was showing in 2014, before Trump. A lot of german weapon and ammo shipments have been stopped because they were worthless due to improper storage.

I don't think he would have tried anything with Trump for one simple reason: Trump was crazy, and he had term limits. Trump said he'd bomb Moscow if they fucked with Ukraine. Putin probably figured he was bluffing, Trump was almost certainly bluffing, but why take the risk? Wait more years to build your forces and then attack then they get in another limp-wrister like Obama.

There is also the fact that the State Department, in a move of fucking self-assured self-fucking, spiked Trump's pullout of Afghanistan, because they couldn't stand to let Trump have any diplomatic victories. And due to the reneg you had Afghanistan fall in weeks instead of years. The loss of Afghanistan can't be over stated in this current situation but I'll try to TL;DR
Basically when you had Bagram as potential rehydratable airfield and lots of US military planes coming and going from Kabul, Russia would have to worry that the US could use Bagram as a stage for B-1s to launch a punitive strike on Eastern Russia - maybe fuck up some rail yards or trains moving equipment bound for Ukraine. This means you need to deploy Anti-air through out your country. This also means that the air defenses in Western Russia would be such that you could use a B-2 or even just conventional Fighter Bombers to do some shit, even a symbolic strike on something near moscow, with minimal risk. With no Afghanistan, and Winnie the Xi letting Putin run wild, Russia has reallocated all their air defense to western Russia. There is no ability to hit Eastern Russia and the air defense is too dense in Western Russia for a surgical strike, you're only getting through if you do a full court press.

You have drunk the Orange Man bad koolaid, but my nigga, it is maybe time to stop chugging and start cutting back.
Trump being a lummox and saying the soft part loud doesn't mean he was wrong.
 
Last edited:
What Trump told our worthless dependents in Europe was "You are literally funneling billions of dollars to Russia, the greatest regional threat. Please don't. You were completely moribund in 2014 because Putin knew he could threaten natural gas supply and none of you would survive re-election. Try to get sources that aren't Russia, and maybe put a fraction of the money you are handing Russia to build your forces to attempt to pose something like a credible deterent".

Everyone knew this was true. Everyone knew Euro forces were hoplessly cucked and under equiped, especially if Russia went wildin'.
And again, this wasn't just theory, this was showing in 2014, before Trump. A lot of german weapon and ammo shipments have been stopped because they were worthless due to improper storage.

I don't think he would have tried anything with Trump for one simple reason: Trump was crazy, and he had term limits. Trump said he'd bomb Moscow if they fucked with Ukraine. Putin probably figured he was bluffing, Trump was almost certainly bluffing, but why take the risk? Wait more years to build your forces and then attack then they get in another limp-wrister like Obama.

There is also the fact that the State Department, in a move of fucking self-assured self-fucking, spiked Trump's pullout of Afghanistan, and you had Afghanistan fall in weeks. The loss of Afghanistan can't be over stated in this current situation but I'll try to TL;DR
Basically when you had Bagram as potential rehydratable airfield and lots of US military planes coming and going from Kabul, Russia would have to worry that the US could use Bagram as a stage for B-1s to launch a punitive strike on Eastern Russia. This means you need to deploy Anti-air through out your country. This also means that the air defenses in Western Russia would be such that you could use a B-2 or even just conventional Fighter Bombers to do some shit, even a symbolic strike on something near moscow, with minimal risk. With no Afghanistan, and Winnie the Xi letting Putin run wild, Russia has reallocated all their air defense to western Russia. There is no ability to hit Eastern Russia and the air defense is too dense in Western Russia for a surgical strike, you're only getting through if you do a full court press.

You have drunk the Orange Man bad koolaid, but my nigga, it is maybe time to stop chugging and start cutting back.
Trump being a lummox and saying the soft part loud doesn't mean he was wrong.
I think you're probably right.
Regarding Trump, his motto was "America First", which meant mainly focusing on internal affairs, namely building strong economy and securing energy independence for US.
He would employ tard-wrangling toward dictators simply so they don't become an issue to US, and for the same reason he wanted to withdraw from foreign conflicts when possible.

Putin became an issue way before him, let's be honest here. And Europe continued doing business with him, knowing full well about human rights violations in Russia and the trajectory it was on, they just didn't give a fuck.
If they did, they would be securing energy independence as well. But retards like Germany are still hellbent on phasing out nuclear energy. How does that make any fucking sense?
 
I don't think he would have tried anything with Trump for one simple reason: Trump was crazy, and he had term limits. Trump said he'd bomb Moscow if they fucked with Ukraine. Putin probably figured he was bluffing, Trump was almost certainly bluffing, but why take the risk? Wait more years to build your forces and then attack then they get in another limp-wrister like Obama.

Trump could be accused of anything, but one thing for sure, he had balls, yuge ones. This is gopnick kryptonite, just like I've been saying all along.

I think you're probably right.
Regarding Trump, his motto was "America First", which meant mainly focusing on internal affairs, namely building strong economy and securing energy independence for US.
He would employ tard-wrangling toward dictators simply so they don't become an issue to US, and for the same reason he wanted to withdraw from foreign conflicts when possible.

Putin became an issue way before him, let's be honest here. And Europe continued doing business with him, knowing full well about human rights violations in Russia and the trajectory it was on, they just didn't give a fuck.
If they did, they would be securing energy independence as well. But retards like Germany are still hellbent on phasing out nuclear energy. How does that make any fucking sense?

A lot of this shitshow will affect US, the world, either way, Ukraine win or loose. Too much power in one person's hands and growing. It is bound to precipitate into something bad, if not Ukraine, then something else.
 
I think you're probably right.
Regarding Trump, his motto was "America First", which meant mainly focusing on internal affairs, namely building strong economy and securing energy independence for US.
He would employ tard-wrangling toward dictators simply so they don't become an issue to US, and for the same reason he wanted to withdraw from foreign conflicts when possible.

Putin became an issue way before him, let's be honest here. And Europe continued doing business with him, knowing full well about human rights violations in Russia and the trajectory it was on, they just didn't give a fuck.
If they did, they would be securing energy independence as well. But retards like Germany are still hellbent on phasing out nuclear energy. How does that make any fucking sense?

Oh, I am not saying Trump was any sort of great statesman. He was entertaining, he made the libs mad, and he was effective because he spoke truths that everyone knew but were told to pretend were false. Trump was America First mainly because being America First got him popularity. Trump was effective because he was completely different than US politicians and he spoke in a way the dictators understood and respected. Even calling Kim Jong Un fat was the sort of playground insults they understand. Its not slick weaselly diplomats saying honeyed words, you don't like a guy you call him a faggot to his face.
But again, this sort of low cunning only works when people aren't expecting it. Trump's bluster and bluffs are very easily out maneuvered, but you need to be ready for it.
tl;dr: Trump's successes weren't about his skill, it was about his opposite's lack there of.

This is why Trump was initially praising Putin. Its not that Putin invading Ukraine was right, it was the Putin was pulling open the curtain on how worthless the UN & EU is. Putin invaded because he knew he could (he'd done it 8 years prior) and all signs showed that he'd be able to get away with it again.
Russia is literally invading Ukraine, committing war crimes, killing civilians, and now that things have not gone to plan just scorched earthing anything of value. The consequence of this is, once things settle down, is hat Putin and like 4 generals now have to take extra steps when want to take a Vacation in Europe.Its completely toothless.
Only now is Germany thinking about sourcing new natural gas. Only now is Finland FINALLY onlining their new 3rd gen nuke plant. Economic sanctions don't work.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20220403-215725__01.jpg

Noting the confirmed Russian losses via Oryx Spion Kop, the original strength of Russia's invasion, and the fact that even this - allegedly - elite formation was approximately starting out about 25% below it's established strength.

This is normal, established strengths are almost never achievable.

Point is, this would mean that the Russians are already on their arses in terms of lost fighting power.
 
Oh, I am not saying Trump was any sort of great world leader. He was entertaining, he made the libs mad, and he was effective because he spoke truths that everyone knew but were told to pretend were false. Trump was America First mainly because being America First got him popularity. Trump was effective because he was completely different than US politicians and he spoke in a way the dictators understood and respected. Even calling Kim Jong Un fat was the sort of playground insults they understand. Its not slick weaselly diplomats saying honeyed words, you don't like a guy you call him a faggot to his face.
But again, this sort of low cunning only works when people aren't expecting it. Trump's bluster and bluffs are very easily out maneuvered, but you need to be ready for it.
tl;dr: Trump's successes weren't about his skill, it was about his opposite's lack there of.

This is why Trump was initially praising Putin. Its not that Putin invading Ukraine was right, it was the Putin was pulling open the curtain on how worthless the UN & EU is. Putin invaded because he knew he could (he'd done it 8 years prior) and all signs showed that he'd be able to get away with it again.
Russia is literally invading Ukraine, committing war crimes, killing civilians, and now that things have not gone to plan just scorched earthing anything of value. The consequence of this is, once things settle down, is hat Putin and like 4 generals now have to take extra steps when want to take a Vacation in Europe.Its completely toothless.
Only now is Germany thinking about sourcing new natural gas. Only now is Finland FINALLY onlining their new 3rd gen nuke plant. Economic sanctions don't work.
I trust intelligence reports where Russians found Trump unpredictable plausible, so it likely wasn't that simple. Fun fact, Russian TV had at least as many caricatures of him as SNL, if not more - he wasn't seen as a friend.

Sanctions do work, it disrupted supply chains with no immediate replacements for a lot of it. Some things would take a while to really show effect, like the fact that Russia can't produce new planes even for civilian purposes, or maintain the ones they seized from international companies following sanctions. Eventually Russians just won't be flying anymore. Or, rather there will be a lot of plane crashes, then they'll stop flying.

Either way, I hope to move out of here as soon as possible. Most people with something to offer already have, but I don't possess any sort of special skills to make me particularly valuable, so it's challenging. Never even been abroad.
I don't want to share space with these people any longer.
 
I think you're probably right.
Regarding Trump, his motto was "America First", which meant mainly focusing on internal affairs, namely building strong economy and securing energy independence for US.
He would employ tard-wrangling toward dictators simply so they don't become an issue to US, and for the same reason he wanted to withdraw from foreign conflicts when possible.

Putin became an issue way before him, let's be honest here. And Europe continued doing business with him, knowing full well about human rights violations in Russia and the trajectory it was on, they just didn't give a fuck.
If they did, they would be securing energy independence as well. But retards like Germany are still hellbent on phasing out nuclear energy. How does that make any fucking sense?

Apparently environmentalists in Germany have a lot of power and managed to convince the government to abandon nuclear energy and suck Russia's cock for natural gas.

It's funny because Trump did warn the Germans during a speech he delivered at the UN that they were too dependent on Russian energy and the German envoys laughed at him, now the German government is having to scramble to find a new energy source and Trump was again proven correct but anyone that had more than 1 braincell could see how badly relying on the Russians for energy security was for European nations.



Dude points out something that bothered me as well. Russians aren't retreating from Kiev, they're fleeing. Otherwise they wouldn't be leaving so much equipment behind.

I would guess that these orders also came in very late and very suddenly, as it was said that Russia wanted to move troops away from Kiev during one of the newest rounds of peace talks in Turkey. I'm not overly surprised though to see how badly the Russians have bungled the retreat though considering how badly they bundled the invasion like with all their "elite" VDV that got cut down at Hostomel with no air support; just another display of Putin's tactical genius.
 

Medvedev urged to be able to distinguish the faces of traitors to the Motherland

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, commented on the current topic of patriotism in his Telegram account. In his view, this notion has more to do with how a person acts than with their mindset.
Medvedev titled his publication "On an extremely difficult subject". In so doing, he summed up one of his main messages in the following sentence: "Patriotism is not a way of thinking, it is a way of acting."
Another of the publication's ideas concerns the opposite of patriotism - betrayal. On this, Dmitry Medvedev, noting that patriots can have "very different faces", wrote the following:
"The traitor always has one face - the face of a traitor. The main thing is to distinguish this face in time".

SIEG HEIL!
 
Either way, I hope to move out of here as soon as possible. Most people with something to offer already have, but I don't possess any sort of special skills to make me particularly valuable, so it's challenging. Never even been abroad.
Well, thanks to our big guy it's now practically impossible. Even if you have an invitation to study, for example.

Medvedev urged to be able to distinguish the faces of traitors to the Motherland
Then he should look into the mirror first.
 

Medvedev urged to be able to distinguish the faces of traitors to the Motherland

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, commented on the current topic of patriotism in his Telegram account. In his view, this notion has more to do with how a person acts than with their mindset.
Medvedev titled his publication "On an extremely difficult subject". In so doing, he summed up one of his main messages in the following sentence: "Patriotism is not a way of thinking, it is a way of acting."
Another of the publication's ideas concerns the opposite of patriotism - betrayal. On this, Dmitry Medvedev, noting that patriots can have "very different faces", wrote the following:
"The traitor always has one face - the face of a traitor. The main thing is to distinguish this face in time".

SIEG HEIL!
This is just fucking insane, but not surprising.
They mean people like me, of course. I was a patriot, while I still thought that it was possible to change Russia. Just not the kind of patriot they want, they couldn't care less for my vision of a better Russia where all this avaricious immoral inhuman scum is out of the picture, Russia that is free and prosperous.
No, they want obedient cattle that would be happy to die for the state.

People like this why I want to believe that hell is real. Because there would certainly be a special place for them. They don't deserve to die peacefully, but they likely will. One can only hope there's a judgement afterward, one they wouldn't be able to bribe their way out of.
 

Reports about another attack on Belgorod:



It looks like Russia will suffer from this "strage" type of attacks.
As someone said earlier, this one sounds a bit too made up because there's just no detail. But at the same time, the reason why I believe the previous one was real is because Kyiv is signanling they can, and would, do similar attacks

Medvedev urged to be able to distinguish the faces of traitors to the Motherland

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, commented on the current topic of patriotism in his Telegram account. In his view, this notion has more to do with how a person acts than with their mindset.
Medvedev titled his publication "On an extremely difficult subject". In so doing, he summed up one of his main messages in the following sentence: "Patriotism is not a way of thinking, it is a way of acting."
Another of the publication's ideas concerns the opposite of patriotism - betrayal. On this, Dmitry Medvedev, noting that patriots can have "very different faces", wrote the following:
"The traitor always has one face - the face of a traitor. The main thing is to distinguish this face in time".

SIEG HEIL!
This is bordering schizo shit now. Definitely sounds like someone that is winning for sure...

By the way, I just want to remind you people that the atrocities we have found mostly centered on just a single town, Bucha. What about the atrocities the Russian might did in places like Kharkiv? Chernihiv? Sumy? Or (may God help us all), Mariupol? We might be seeing the worst atrocities in European soil ever since the Balkan broke apart
 
One can only hope there's a judgement afterward, one they wouldn't be able to bribe their way out of.
There is. There's wrath for people who oppress the weak and malign the virtuous. Just because the daddy's littlest nigger has mansions and power will not deter him from the only true justice in this world and he will get his due.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back