World Economic Forum Megathread (The Great Reset)

Yeah, but it's obvious it's not that new world order, he's talking about a new way in handling the situations going on with how Russia is acting. Like just because he uses the words doesn't mean he mean "that" new world order.

You'd think you idiots would know the turn of phrase aside from the damn book.
There's a good argument the New World Order has already existed for over 30 years--it's the modern United States, unchallenged by any other power and free to institute whatever global policies it so chooses to without the concern of strengthening a mortal enemy. To the elite who run us, this means that they're free to openly despise us and actively work against our interests through undermining the very country that gave them power. That is what CIA boss turned president Dubya H. Bush meant when he used the term New World Order. Every president since him (including of course Neocon Don) has thus been one of the leaders of the New World Order, or at the very least its public face.
 
100% the elections are going to be cancelled. I would also expect the Dems to use "Muh Russian spies" as a cudgel to start locking up any political enemies.
I've seen speculation that the "comprehensive cyberattack" might occur sometime during the summer because it would be more devastating; no more clean water available and no way of keeping fresh food from going bad. The chaos that would ensue from that would be the perfect excuse to establish a permanent martial law.

They need to really drive the narrative for a while and loudly talk about it over and over to really get it into people's skulls that when it happens it will be the Russians' fault and not just another false flag; they need a cyberattack equivalent of 9/11 to pull out a Patriot Act equivalent for the internet, in which only those with digital IDs will be allowed to use a very restricted and monitored version of the internet.
 
Last edited:
He knows. All of the American elites know full well about it and they want it to happen to finally usher in their new global digital ID and currency system after the collapse of the dollar. Biden actually said, verbatim, "the New World Order" in that same speech he gave. He means, of course, one in which the US is no longer a superpower, Europe becomes an economic backwater, the Sino-Russian alliance becomes the other pole to the world and the citizens of the West find themselves under encroaching homo-authoritarianism. I'm sure it's already been mentioned previously in the thread but, another name for the Great Reset is the United Nations' "Agenda 2030" (formerly "Agenda 21") also known as Sustainable Development Goals. Biden, Putin, Zelensky, Xi; it doesn't matter. They all support it and are all playing different roles so these goals come to fruition. It's all kayfabe; in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Zelensky is playing the "face" and Putin is playing the "heel."

The World Economic Forum conducted the "Cyber Polygon" simulation directly with the help of the Russian government. Shortly before the war in Ukraine started and they removed Putin from their website (which is all for show, no doubt) the World Economic Forum also removed it's page on "Cyber Polygon" entirely. Someone doesn't leave such a club by being scrubbed from its website. They leave it with a bayonet in their ass. Putin is not fighting globalism or the New World Order despite what a lot of people want to believe. None of what's happening with the fuel / energy / or climate bullshit already happening to the West is organic. The end result is exactly what Schwab, Kissinger, and those above them want.

Russia and China are both in on the Great Reset as this statement from the Kremlin's official English website says:

Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the International Relations Entering a New Era and the Global Sustainable Development

Some lovely keywords:
>"multipolarity"
>"economic globalization"
>"the advent of information society"
>"cultural diversity"
>"transformation of the global governance, architecture, and world order"

Also, this video was posted in November of 2020 but was later unlisted on YouTube and I was only able to find it again now:

This is probably the hardest I have laughed in weeks.
 
Yeah that's the point. I forget who said this but there's a quote that goes something like "when people stop believing in God they'll believe in anything." Traditional religion, aka Catholicism, is by far the least destructive thing people can believe in. I am a devout Catholic and truly believe in the Faith but frankly I get why some atheists claim that religion was invented as a tool to keep people in line. It probably was invented to do that with Judaism and down the line Christianity being the only organic religions. The point is, there needs to be some sort of a uniting ethos that imposes stringent moral standards upon people. We don't have that. Instead we have an ethos that ruthlessly persecutes heterodoxy and the statement of basic truths.
It's hard to prove this point to anyone. I follow along the same lines in your opinion about religion, faith, and its value in society, but I am formerly a staunch atheist who once only believed in Science and Logic™ but I have come to value the importance of faith in creating a moral hierarchy and system we can all abide by.

With that being said, I am relatively ignorant about the application of faith while being relatively well-informed about the dogmas of Western faiths in particular. We know that Christianity has broken off into schisms time and time again with differentiating results. It has led to having groups with adjacent beliefs fighting each other over nuanced details of the teachings and faith in even the recent past. We know religion tends to splinter into smaller sects of the same faith.

How do we reconcile this when trying to apply a blanket religious morality to Western society? How do you reconcile your Catholic faith and its dogmas with the often times opposing or conflicting dogmas of adjacent faiths? How do we ensure only one form of morality is applied and that it isn't perverted into something entirely else?

I'm asking in good faith. I want to understand more and these are questions I do not have the answers to.
 
World Government Summit talking about establishing a Central Bank Digital Currency for a collection of countries to mutually track all transactions, at this timestamped they're questioned about the potential of a 1984 scenario.
 
World Government Summit talking about establishing a Central Bank Digital Currency for a collection of countries to mutually track all transactions, at this timestamped they're questioned about the potential of a 1984 scenario.
And people call me crazy, the end is near repent... and I'm going to have to get Baptized at some point, I think at best I'm only half saved.
 
And people call me crazy, the end is near repent... and I'm going to have to get Baptized at some point, I think at best I'm only half saved.
God I want to tell everyone who I am with to ditch the idea of virtual currency but everytime I do they respond that "physical items can also be stolen" or "its convenient". Bitch don't you realize that convenience always has a cost?
Fuck this pandemic and fuck this globalization.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Dude Vaccines
It's hard to prove this point to anyone. I follow along the same lines in your opinion about religion, faith, and its value in society, but I am formerly a staunch atheist who once only believed in Science and Logic™ but I have come to value the importance of faith in creating a moral hierarchy and system we can all abide by.

With that being said, I am relatively ignorant about the application of faith while being relatively well-informed about the dogmas of Western faiths in particular. We know that Christianity has broken off into schisms time and time again with differentiating results. It has led to having groups with adjacent beliefs fighting each other over nuanced details of the teachings and faith in even the recent past. We know religion tends to splinter into smaller sects of the same faith.

How do we reconcile this when trying to apply a blanket religious morality to Western society? How do you reconcile your Catholic faith and its dogmas with the often times opposing or conflicting dogmas of adjacent faiths? How do we ensure only one form of morality is applied and that it isn't perverted into something entirely else?

I'm asking in good faith. I want to understand more and these are questions I do not have the answers to.
At this point, the idea of an "interventionist God" (i.e. an outside being considered supernatural and divine and able to influence events and individuals/groups in a way which adheres to a predetermined plan) needs to be taken into consideration - not just in the micro-scale of adhering to one overarching set of doctrines or traditions, but on a macro-scale of fulfilling a larger, coherent plan that takes into account the actions of individuals and groups of varying size and cohesion - a plan that could very easily scale into the thousands, millions, or even billions of years in the making, if we assume this being exists outside of normal time and space as we currently understand it.
 
On the other hand, recently the "anti-vaxxers" (meaning those who refused to get a Covid vaccine) and currently the "Russians" are being presented as objective evil in the media narratives. Extreme reactions against evil actions are very well permitted by society's current language.
It's all been engineered so that if there's no Magic Sky Daddy™️ or other such backward superstitions (unless you're a Muslim!) then you're doing the Logical and Rational™️ thing by following the experts. Don't look at the actual substance of peoples' behavior, that's not very wholesome!
 
The NWO has brainwashed all the weak NPCs to troon out, and now plans to create a famine and perpetual stress wars so that the weakest of the lot, said troons, would all die out first in horrible pain.
Pure genius.
 
This article might be not directly linked to the Great Reset but it might be worth to share.

If you are from the United States, a Russian, China New World Order should worry you. The brutality of these regimes can be seen in their support of authoritarian regimes such as Myanmar and Iran.

A Russian/China-led world order could see a possible drastic value of the U.S. dollar. In a previous article, I wrote about China’s push to buy oil from Saudi Arabia using the Chinese Yuan. Last week Russia was pushing for countries to pay for its oil using the Russian Ruble.

Countries have generally held the U.S. dollar to buy oil. This gives the dollar strength because those countries need to hold huge amounts of the dollar to make their purchases. If this changes, it will spell a big shakeup for the United States’ financial strength.

Russia and China are “more determined” than ever to strengthen ties and end the United States’ monopoly on financial markets.

On March 30th, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met in Anhui, China, to strengthen their bilateral ties and increase cooperation.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: GoingGrink
Back