The Tenacious Unicorn Ranch / @TenaciousRanch / Steampunk Penny / Penellope Logue / Phillip Matthew Logue - Don't cry because it ended, laugh because it's still getting worse.

Who are the top three strongest characters in the Kevin Gibes Inflated Universe (KGIU) canon?

  • Gash Coyote

    Votes: 102 4.5%
  • Rioley

    Votes: 277 12.3%
  • Penis

    Votes: 408 18.1%
  • Loathsome Dung Eater Jen

    Votes: 291 12.9%
  • Boner

    Votes: 294 13.0%
  • Kevin Gibes

    Votes: 671 29.7%
  • The Elusive Earl

    Votes: 701 31.0%
  • Landon Hiscock

    Votes: 262 11.6%
  • The Korps LARP Brigade

    Votes: 200 8.9%
  • Kiwifarms Militia

    Votes: 1,122 49.7%
  • Kindness

    Votes: 650 28.8%
  • Trans Cucumber The Child Abandoner

    Votes: 306 13.6%

  • Total voters
    2,258
Hah! You are right, all the examples they give are just straight up terms used by people critical of tranny thinking or changes in society that they’re causing. It’s not coded, subtle, nor a dog-whistle.

Most people *do* avoid using those descriptive terms though, precisely because you’ll get witch-hunted, put on lists or probably banned from Twitter for mid-gendering if you’re that blatant about it. So there are actually subtle cues to look for. The absence of she/her in a bio, talking about womens’ rights or safety whilst pointedly never ever mentioning transes is a pretty good sign. And this tranny just doesn’t get it.

This sounds like a dog whistle origin story.

Edit: never mind I'm retarded because that was your point. How they think stuff like saying "natal female" is a dog whistle when it's obviously straight-up exclusionary and already discouraged language, is just wow.

Unlike trannies, some of us try to be very precise by using words to mean what they are supposed to mean. This has made a lot of people very angry, and been widely regarded as a bad move.
 
Last edited:
Crossposting myself for TUR only farmers but Sky killed one of their dogs

A dog's sense of smell is sixteen times more sensitive than a humans.
That dog was surrounded by trannies, many with inverted dicks lined with pieces of colon. The trannies, not known for their hygiene at the best of times, were in a low-water area outdoors doing (incompetent) labor. They were also doing weird tranny involving ass play and not bathing or doing bedclothes laundry regularly. This says nothing of the field serf trannies living in RVs with only a solar shower collected rainwater heated by the sun in a suspended garbage bag.
And that's just the human smells. 200 alpa crammed into an area that shouldn't hold more than 1/10th the number, with moldering hay, as well as waterfowl forced to use a single child's pond for both drinking, bathing, and shitting.
IMAGINE THE SMELL then imagine it sixteen times more.

What I'm saying is that we can be glad that poor dog's suffering is over.
 
This sounds like a dog whistle origin story.

Edit: never mind I'm retarded because that was your point. How they think stuff like saying "natal female" is a dog whistle when it's obviously straight-up exclusionary and already discouraged language, is just wow.

Unlike trannies, some of us try to be very precise by using words to mean what they are supposed to mean. This has made a lot of people very angry, and been widely regarded as a bad move.

You’re assuming they do think that. The boomer wine aunt who wrote the original tweet might actually believe it, because she is a useful idiot, but most AGP troons don’t. They want to make it taboo for people to say stuff like “natal females” not because they genuinely believe it’s a TERF dogwhistle, but because they want to remove any boundaries between themselves and real women, including linguistic ones.

They want to make women unable to describe themselves without being pounced on as bigots. They want handmaidens to have trouble even thinking about themselves as a truly separate category, and to correct their own heretical thoughts. That means removing any terms women might use to distinguish themselves from AGPs.

Usually quoting George Orwell is cringe, but his Newspeak essay goes into this tactic very well.

"But the special function of certain Newspeak words, of which oldthink was one, was not so much to express meanings as to destroy them. These words, necessarily few in number, had had their meanings extended until they contained within themselves whole batteries of words which, as they were sufficiently covered by a single comprehensive term, could now be scrapped and forgotten. The greatest difficulty facing the compilers of the Newspeak Dictionary was not to invent new words, but, having invented them, to make sure what they meant: to make sure, that is to say, what ranges of words they cancelled by their existence."​
Go look at the whole essay and see how neatly it all matches up when you slot in words like "woman" and "mother" and "biological sex."

The paragraph I quoted above, for example, lays out the technique currently being used with the word "woman." "Woman" has had its meaning extended to include males, and now TRAs are trying to push the eradication of words that people have come up with to distinguish the different categories covered by this new definition (female, natal woman, biological female, etc).

(Of course, this only applies to their enemies: AGPs themselves are allowed to distinguish transwomen and cis women. It's just actual women who aren't allowed to distinguish on their own terms.)
 
Most people *do* avoid using those descriptive terms though, precisely because you’ll get witch-hunted, put on lists or probably banned from Twitter for mid-gendering if you’re that blatant about it. So there are actually subtle cues to look for. The absence of she/her in a bio, talking about womens’ rights or safety whilst pointedly never ever mentioning transes is a pretty good sign. And this tranny just doesn’t get it
I heard poor socialization from the internet and autism can hamper a person's ability to pick up social cues. True Crypto TERFS:
  • Mention only sex based things
  • never say anything when someone comes out aside from the occassional "congrats" and
  • avoid gendered language around or about trans people
  • ignore conversations about gender as well as comments and tweets
  • offer advice to you that suggest mental health treatment in general
  • when asked about trans things they give empty platitudes and stock answers, appearing dumb and uneducated so yes, you do know more fair trans person, educate my unenlightened mind
  • like and follow visible terfs on separate accounts
  • are misgendering you and your movement IRL where you can't control them and their mom and other lady friends laugh at you and agree with them, where you can't control them :epik:
Basically, crypto TERFs are hard to spot because they're great at blending in and know when and where to speak and where and when not to speak. Turns out female socialization helps, but you don't have to have it to do the very simple things listed above.


Edit: Let's also talk about what counts as a TERF. People making any statement that does not align with current pop trans ideology fall into two categories, here's a handy breakdown:

Has a Penis and is not trans: Republican, Transphobe, Homophobe, Bigot

Has a Vagina and is not trans: TERF

That's it. The radical feminist are probably pissed that people married to men and church ladies are "TERFs" now. A woman can be telling all the other womenfolk to get back in the kitchen but still be called a radfem. It's a gendered insult, which is wild coming from the group who wants gender destroyed.
 
Last edited:
The dry wall contracting work was "for a good friend" or similar, their first $5k totally helping the injuns was given to "someone very special" who was local(ish). I wonder if they are being paid $4k to hang that dry wall for an injun friend but it was totally charity you guys...

Edit so as to not double post, the local weather service has warning for winds and fire. Not sure just how local to the tranch these are but leaving those tubmle weeds because they look pretty might be coming round to bite.

SmartSelect_20220407-161549_Brave.jpg
SmartSelect_20220407-161441_Brave.jpg
SmartSelect_20220407-161452_Brave.jpg
 
Last edited:
The dry wall contracting work was "for a good friend" or similar, their first $5k totally helping the injuns was given to "someone very special" who was local(ish). I wonder if they are being paid $4k to hang that dry wall for an injun friend but it was totally charity you guys...
Good theory. I almost feel like that’s too honest though!
 
Good theory. I almost feel like that’s too honest though!
I'm not sure how this works in USA - but aren't these GoFundMe dollars considered income for tax purposes? Even at 15%, the total amount that they'd be taking home on a $5,000 grift is like $3,600 (it would be taxed twice, first to the donee, then to the Tranch for the drywall work). I'm sure they aren't actually reporting the income and paying the taxes, but the hole they are digging could be massive no?
 
I'm not sure how this works in USA - but aren't these GoFundMe dollars considered income for tax purposes? Even at 15%, the total amount that they'd be taking home on a $5,000 grift is like $3,600 (it would be taxed twice, first to the donee, then to the Tranch for the drywall work). I'm sure they aren't actually reporting the income and paying the taxes, but the hole they are digging could be massive no?
They are a registered charity so maybe not.
My theory about the Indian grift was that they simply gave the friend $1k to take some pictures with them and keep quiet about the rest.
The drywall work is highly likely to be for a white settler type like themselves, and probably entirely off the books, in cash.
I know you or I would get buried by The Taxman/IRS for pulling anything remotely like that, but I’m fairly sure the Tranch will somehow wriggle out of it.
 
I'm not sure how this works in USA - but aren't these GoFundMe dollars considered income for tax purposes? Even at 15%, the total amount that they'd be taking home on a $5,000 grift is like $3,600 (it would be taxed twice, first to the donee, then to the Tranch for the drywall work). I'm sure they aren't actually reporting the income and paying the taxes, but the hole they are digging could be massive no?
I don't think the odds of them getting raked over the coals are high - but if they were, they'd probably get screwed by any such activity. The thing about registering as a charitable non-profit organization is that there are a lot of rules around how that money moves. A lot of talk has already been had around them probably mixing non-organizaton funds with org funds and generating an accounting nightmare, but there's also extra scrutiny about how the money is moved and donated and run. Donating money to someone so they can pay for your services would throw a lot of red flags, especially when those services are outside of what your charitable organization was founded on. If I remember right, they're some sort of non profit sanctuary. And here they are instead soliciting donations for other communities, and then those communities are paying those donations back for construction services. That reeks of fraud from the outside view.

Somewhere, the mere act of writing this statement gave an auditor an erection and he can't figure out why, but he knows he must fuck someone over now.
 
Somewhere, the mere act of writing this statement gave an auditor an erection and he can't figure out why, but he knows he must fuck someone over now.
Rolling up on the ranch looking for tax documents has to be the biggest boner-killer ever.

Probably any receipts have long since been turned into insulation for the alpaca rape shed.
 
Rolling up on the ranch looking for tax documents has to be the biggest boner-killer ever.

Probably any receipts have long since been turned into insulation for the alpaca rape shed.
Yeah, because a lack of receipts always defeats the IRS. They have no idea what to do about that shit.
 
Rolling up on the ranch looking for tax documents has to be the biggest boner-killer ever.

Probably any receipts have long since been turned into insulation for the alpaca rape shed.
I'm pretty sure they'd sprout a second dick at this point. "We have records from your banking institutions of large volumes of money moving back and forth between multiple accounts associated with your organization, and from external accounts that receive and then immediately return large sums of money from you. And you don't have any receipts to show why these moves happened? No formal transaction documents, accounting logs, etc? So you're saying you cannot prove they were legitimate transactions?"

That's the rub about the taxman - when he comes around asking questions, you are indeed obligated to prove your innocence, not for him to prove your guilt. If you got suspicious transactions in a business organization you can't back up, you are fucked. This isn't like personal taxes where allowance and leeway has to be given for myraid luxuries purchases, weird online transactions, cash transactions, etc. A business has no excuse for even a hundred dollars cash to move around without a receipt, especially when you don't engage in physical commerce.
 
I don't care if the Diphallic Dude rolls up there with an economy-sized box of magnums, a Viagra scrip, and a whole team of experienced Buck-Breaking tax lawyers, the tranch is where erections go to die.

Nothing grows on that land, not even wood.
That, I believe. When the tax man comes for them, he'll only come in one sense.
 
The dry wall contracting work was "for a good friend" or similar, their first $5k totally helping the injuns was given to "someone very special" who was local(ish). I wonder if they are being paid $4k to hang that dry wall for an injun friend but it was totally charity you guys...

Edit so as to not double post, the local weather service has warning for winds and fire. Not sure just how local to the tranch these are but leaving those tubmle weeds because they look pretty might be coming round to bite.

View attachment 3154274
View attachment 3154272
View attachment 3154273

I dunno if a giant alpaca barbeque would be a better way to go than slowing starving to death or dying due to lack of proper medical care or what.

Kevin would probably also die attempting to save his precious plastic collection from a raging inferno.
 
Back