Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
its.....its a fucking locomotive with a giant piston dildo on it nigga....

You really think its possible that this is something they would have built in antebellum dixie?

Like you think that a bunch of good old boys would leap on one of these things and take it offroading through the swamp to chase down a runaway buck and lance him through the fucking anus with its piston-dick like a fucking medieval lancer?
Stranger things have happened, steam powered machines did exist to some degree. The dude probably jerks off to the thought of a bunch of hillbillies taking turns playing out that scene from Deliverance on him. Probably still outrage bait though.
 
Yeah, they totally and legitimately meant to lose billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood. It was just a ruse! All those paratroopers getting flown into meat grinders was just to fool them into thinking they were winning. The helicopters getting shot out of the skies was just to provide them with visual entertainment.
If you're gonna argue with the cartoons in your head you should at least go to a park or something and get some fresh air while you're at it.
 
I remember you saying the Russians have no Tochkas, but then saying they did have them during an exercise in Februrary. I doubt they just got rid of them all. And if it was the Ukrainians why would they say it was an Iskander when they were the ones that supposedly launched it and would know it was a Tochka?

No, the training Tochkas were Belarusian, not Russian, they took Iskanders.
According to official data, Russia has no Tochkas, but now there is unconfirmed data that they exist, so I do not know for sure.

Why did they say it was Iskanders? To blame the Russian troops, everything that went beyond the scope of the accusation no longer matters. Dozens of articles have been published about the barbarism of Russians, and Ukrainians receive financial and military support.

The arrival of Ursula von der Leyen and Josep Borrel could not be the best time for this
 
If you're gonna argue with the cartoons in your head you should at least go to a park or something and get some fresh air while you're at it.
"no guys, russia totally isn't losing men, that's just all lies, all those videos LIES. We were never going to take kiev despite sending tens of thousands of troops to charge at it" 1649451378056.png

1649451404903.png
If only you knew how bad things really are
 
Yeah, they totally and legitimately meant to lose billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood. It was just a ruse! All those paratroopers getting flown into meat grinders was just to fool them into thinking they were winning. The helicopters getting shot out of the skies was just to provide them with visual entertainment.
Fuck it, going autistic and spelling out what likely went down.
1.) Russia believes it's own hype, and or underestimates Ukraine's willingness to fight, deploys only 200,000 troops against the second largest country in Europe with around a 400k strong army if you include reserves, with a total population of around 41 million.
2.) Russia has early success thanks to strategic surprise, Ukraine not being mobilized (this is the big one), and foreign military aid and intelligence sharing not arriving yet
3.) Russia advance stalls after strategic surprise runs out, Ukraine manages to mobilize and deploy it's troops, and countless ATGMs and MANPADs making their way to the front, with real time intelligence from AWACS and satellites from the West.
4.) Month in, casualties mounting, material support from the West only growing, and their fronts becoming dangerously thin thanks to only starting with 200k troops to do a full blown invasion on the second largest country in Europe, Russia is left with a choice. Either A. Keep going after the Northern regions and hope for a breakthrough and encirclement, but risk the undermanned lines to lead to a potential disaster if Ukraine manages a counterattack, or B. Retreat and reorganize Northern forces to deploy to the South, where much more success is being achieved but at the cost of significantly reducing war goals.
5.) Russia choses option B, to save face for the home front and try to play off the "Special Military Operation" going to plan, they say this was always a part of their plan and this is in no way a tactical retreat to reorganize forces to redeploy them to the only front that was having significant success.
 
Yeah, they totally and legitimately meant to lose billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood. It was just a ruse! All those paratroopers getting flown into meat grinders was just to fool them into thinking they were winning. The helicopters getting shot out of the skies was just to provide them with visual entertainment.
Yeah, they totally lost billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood, on top of murdering 958 billion Ukrainian civilians. Last I checked Snopes hasn't said those are false either. Haha, seethe and cope russkiboos. I'm glad the black transgender Ghost of Kyev is continuing to solo the entire Russian airforce.
 
No, the training Tochkas were Belarusian, not Russian, they took Iskanders.

Why did they say it was Iskanders? To blame the Russian troops, everything that went beyond the scope of the accusation no longer matters. Dozens of articles have been published about the barbarism of Russians, and Ukrainians receive financial and military support.

The arrival of Ursula von der Leyen and Josep Borrel could not be the best time for this
Am I supposed to believe the Russians just don't use the Tochka for some reason? They would have access to them, and we know Russia is running shit partially through Belarus, so what keeps them from using them exactly? Why would they say Iskander? To my knowledge neither of the sides have a tight grip on Kramatork station (though I could be wrong). Russia has pretty regularly been shelling places and Ukrainian shelling seems to be far more rare (at least outside of Donbass). It also doesn't really help the Ukrainians in any way I see to bomb out a railway station being used to evacuate civillians whereas it's entirely possible the missile is a errant round landing somewhere it shouldn't have sent by either side. Why would they correct their statement to something that the people they're trying to frame doesn't have? Might as well say "I'm guilty your honor".

Also I can't actually find anything official from the Ukraine side where they state it was an Iskander like you stated. Entirely possible I am just missing it, but I ain't finding it.
 
Yeah, they totally lost billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood, on top of murdering 958 billion Ukrainian civilians. Last I checked Snopes hasn't said those are false either. Haha, seethe and cope russkiboos. I'm glad the black transgender Ghost of Kyev is continuing to solo the entire Russian airforce.
This is cope, if I ever saw one :story:
 
Yeah, they totally lost billions and billions of dollars worth of tanks, equipment, and blood, on top of murdering 958 billion Ukrainian civilians. Last I checked Snopes hasn't said those are false either. Haha, seethe and cope russkiboos. I'm glad the black transgender Ghost of Kyev is continuing to solo the entire Russian airforce.
The brain of the pro russian kiwis continues to further its decay with each passing day.
Didn't knew you could assess Russia's forces just by looking at a picture, wow
I could assess enough out of you with your's.
 
Someone in the thread posted a photo of this man with an interesting tattoo on his back and said that he was a Russian soldier. Now the news has come out that this Lieutenant Colonel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was captured in Mariupol, which is why the document is shown somewhat differently. I understand that misinformation is everywhere, but can you at least not be so smug?
photo_2022-04-09_02-04-59 (2).jpg
 
Someone in the thread posted a photo of this man with an interesting tattoo on his back and said that he was a Russian soldier. Now the news has come out that this Lieutenant Colonel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was captured in Mariupol, which is why the document is shown somewhat differently. I understand that misinformation is everywhere, but can you at least not be so smug?
View attachment 3158510
Plot twist, he's a Buddhist who really likes eagles
 
Someone in the thread posted a photo of this man with an interesting tattoo on his back and said that he was a Russian soldier. Now the news has come out that this Lieutenant Colonel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was captured in Mariupol, which is why the document is shown somewhat differently. I understand that misinformation is everywhere, but can you at least not be so smug?
View attachment 3158510
You've seen the retardation of the Anarcho Communist, now witness the next step of retardation the anarcho national socialist!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back